Factors Affecting Student Burnout and Academic Achievement in Multiple Enrollment Programs in Taiwan's Technical-Vocational Colleges
Factors Affecting Student Burnout and Academic Achievement in Multiple Enrollment Programs in Taiwan's Technical-Vocational Colleges
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijedudev
Abstract
Instead of the 44-year joint entrance examination held so far in Taiwan, multiple enrollment programs are a more
recent policy of the Ministry of Education to reform the deciencies of the abovementioned examination. However,
the results of multiple enrollment programs in reducing student pressure are not clear. Therefore, the main purpose
of this research is to investigate the impacts of multiple enrollment programs on student burnout and academic
achievement among technicalvocational college students. The result demonstrates that multiple enrollment programs
have a signicant eect on student burnout and academic achievement. Student burnout has a signicant negative
eect on academic achievement.
# 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Technicalvocational education; Multiple enrollment programs; Burnout; Social support; Course load; Self-ecacy;
Fairness; Academic achievement
1. Introduction
There are ve categories of higher education
systems in Taiwan, which include 5-year junior
college, 2-year technicalvocational junior college,
4-year technicalvocational university, 2-year
technicalvocational university/senior college, and
4-year general university. However, the 5-year
junior college and 2-year technicalvocational
junior college do not lead to a bachelors degree.
The 4-year general university, 4-year technical
vocational university, and 2-year technical
vocational university/senior college lead to a
0738-0593/$ - see front matter # 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2003.12.001
284
285
286
287
288
3.4. Self-ecacy
In the past decade or so, researchers have utilized the self-ecacy theory to explain the burnout phenomenon (Schaufeli et al., 1993). Bandura
(1977a) adopted the SCT to explain the concept
of self-ecacy. Bandura (1977b) dened self-ecacy as peoples judgment of their capabilities to
organize and execute courses of action required
to attain designated types of performances. It is
recognized that self-ecacy is a strong predictor
of subsequent task-specic performance, and the
denitions of the construction ultimately refer to
what a person perceives their capabilities to be,
with regard to a specic task. Bandura (1977a)
found that self-ecacy positively correlates with
behavioral changes both vicariously and emotively. Once self-ecacy had been formulated and
established, it was shown to inuence behavioral
patterns as regards the magnitude of eort a performer would exert. Based on the concept of Bandura (1977a), ecacy expectations were
determinants in choosing activities. On the other
hand, self-ecacy is an important determinant
of task motivated behavior and subsequent
performance.
Self-ecacy belief has received increasing attention in educational research, primarily in studies
of academic motivation and self-regulation (Pintrich and Schunk, 1995). In this arena, self-ecacy researchers have focused on three areas. The
rst area has explored the link between ecacy
beliefs and college major and career choices (Lent
and Hackett, 1987). The second area suggests
that ecacy beliefs of teachers are related to their
instructional practices and to various student outcomes (Ashton and Webb, 1986). The third area
has reported that students self-ecacy beliefs are
correlated with their academic performances and
achievements (Multon et al., 1991; Pajares, 1996;
Schunk, 1989, 1991).
Otherwise, Bandura (1977b) has also identied
three major categories of experiences stimulated
by ecacy beliefs: (1) choice behavior: people
engage in tasks in which they feel competent and
condent and avoid those in which they do not;
(2) eort expenditure and persistence: how much
eort people will expend on an activity, how long
they will persevere when confronted with obstacles, and how resilient they will prove in the face
of adverse situationsthe higher the sense of selfecacy, the greater the eort, persistence, and
resilience; and (3) thought patterns and emotional
reactions: ecacy beliefs also inuence the
amount of stress and anxiety individuals experience as they engage in a task and the level of
accomplishment they realize. Self-ecacy has been
shown to inuence both goal level and goal commitment (Locke et al., 1984). In sum, self-ecacy
inuences individual choices, goals, emotional
reactions, eort, coping, and persistence.
Describing the relationship between burnout and
physiological states, some previous researchers
proved the relationships between self-ecacy
and burnout (Cherniss, 1992, 1993; Hallsten,
1993; Hobfoll and Freedy, 1993). They proposed that people with no sense of mastery (i.e.
self-ecacy), who were easily burned out, usually lacked the capacity to adapt. Based on the
theory of self-ecacy and the previous research
cited above, we concluded that the greater the
self-ecacy, the lower the burnout.
Additionally, in the past decades, the concept
of self-ecacy has played a major role in consideration of task performance (Mitchell et al.,
1994). High self-ecacy helps create feelings of
serenity in approaching dicult tasks and activities. Conversely, people with low self-ecacy may
believe that things are tougher than they really
are, a belief that fosters stress, depression, and a
narrow vision of how best to solve a problem.
Patrikakous (1996) study showed that students
with high self-complacency have repeatedly been
associated with academic achievement. Several
previous researchers concluded that self-ecacy
was positively related to academic performance
(Campbell and Hackett, 1986; Mone et al., 1995;
Schoen and Winocur, 1988; Wood and Locke,
1987). Therefore, we concluded that the greater
the self-ecacy, the greater the academic achievement.
3.5. Social support
In COR, social support is one of the important
environmental factors in explaining the burnout
289
290
3.7. Fairness
In COR, workload is an important environmental factor to explain the burnout phenomenon (Jackson et al., 1986). From an individuals
perspective, workload means time and energy
(Maslach and Leiter, 1997). When individuals feel
that their own valued resources are threatened,
their physical and psychological conditions have
some degrees of change. Workload implies that if
a person, within the limited time, faces many
problems and cannot solve them, he/she will feel
role overload (Kahn et al., 1964). Load aects a
persons health and work quality (Kirmeyer and
Dougherty, 1988). Previous research argued that
load has a positive relationship with tobacco
addiction, cholesterol, excessive nervousness, and
heart rate (Cobb and Rose, 1973). Overload not
only aects the health of employees, but also
aects the way of doing tasks and employees
attitudes towards their work. Especially, overload
causes greater job dissatisfaction, poor work
quality, tension, anger, and a sense of failure
(Beehr et al., 1976; OConnell et al., 1976; Sales,
1970). Consequently, this concept was applied to
the students learning environment. When students perceive course overload, they experience
tension, a sense of failure, lower satisfaction, or
even lower academic performance. Hence, in this
study course load is dened thus: when students
in the learning process, because of limited time,
face many course problems cannot solved them,
they feel overload.
Most previous research regarding the inuence
of workload and burnout indicates a positive correlation. Additionally, prior research also found
that course load is the biggest factor of student
stress (Johnson, 1978; Villanova and Bownas,
1984). Hence, we apply this concept in the students learning environment. If students perceived
a heavy course load, they would have a high
burnout rate and low academic achievement.
Thus, we conclude that the higher the course
load, the higher the burnout and the lower the
academic achievement.
291
292
the east of Taiwan: this was done to avoid sampling bias. Completed questionnaires were then
mailed back to a college address. 1034 responses
were useable, giving a response rate of approximately 66%. The useable samples included 525
male students and 509 female students
(n 1034). The number of respondents from 4year vocational-technical universities, 2-year
vocational-technical senior colleges and 2-year
vocational-technical junior colleges are 392, 159,
and 483, respectively. The number of respondents
through recommendation, application, and joint
examination are 294, 255, and 485, respectively.
The numbers of respondents among Management
Information System (MIS), Industrial Engineering and Management (IE), Business Administration (BA), Electronic Engineering (EE),
Mechanical Engineering (ME), Electronic Mechanical (EM), and Leisure Management (LM)
major students are 234, 152, 109, 179, 121, 117,
and 122, respectively.
4.2. Reliability and validity of the measurement
instrument
Scales were required for each of the constructs
in the research model. A review of literature was
undertaken to identify construct denitions and
existing measures. The wordings of previously
developed and validated instruments were modied slightly to t the present research. Each of
the measures used in the study is described below.
Burnout was dened by scores on three dimensions of the MBI called general burnout scale
(Maslash et al., 1991, 1993, 1996), namely the 5item emotional exhaustion subscale, 5-item depersonalization subscale, and 6-item diminished personal accomplishment subscale. Each item,
measured on a 7-point scale, was from 1 (never
experienced) to 7 (experienced daily) for each
subscale. Maslach and Jackson (1981) reported
acceptable internal consistency and validity for
each subscale. For the current sample, the
reliability analysis using Cronbachs coecient
alpha was quite acceptable for overall burnout
(a 0:82), emotional exhaustion (a 0:83),
depersonalization (a 0:85), and diminished personal accomplishment (a 0:74).
293
Table 1
EFA of burnout
Components
% of variance Cumulative
Items
deleted
Emotional
exhaustion
Depersonalization
Diminished
accomplishment
19.796
19.796
None
19.362
15.860
39.158
55.018
None
None
% of variance
Cumulative
Items
deleted
Social support
Fairness
Course load
Self-ecacy
20.375
13.060
11.470
7.284
20.375
33.0
51.189
56.070
6
1
0
1
294
Mean
8.059
0.005
2.743
15.215
2.275
Female: 76.39
Male: 75.03
Female: 57.03
Male: 60.07
p< 0:001.
0.000
295
Table 4
ANOVA for H1a and H1b
Variables
F-value
18.041
4.846
Schee
Means
0.000
Recommend: 74.99
0.008
Apply: 79.06
Exam: 74.76
Recommend: 62.40
Apply: 58.37
Exam: 59.12
p< 0:01.
p< 0:001.
Table 5
Multiple regression for student burnout
Dependent variable
Variables
Main eects
Way of entrance (WE)
Social support (SS)
Fairness (F)
Course load(CL)
Self-ecacy (SE)
Interactions
SE WE
CL WE
F WE
SS WE
SD
Beta
3.825
0.065
0.185
0.214
0.187
0.039
0.117
0.053
0.366
0.101
0.112
0.2330
0.945
8.144
2.005
0.911
0.020
0.345
0.000
0.045
0.405
0.390
0.383
0.132
0.219
0.080
0.371
0.279
0.920
0.583
1.222
0.974
0.358
0.560
0.222
0.330
p< 0:05.
p< 0:001.
Table 6
Multiple regression for academic achievement
Dependent variable
Variables
Academic achievement
(R2 0:110; F 7:553;
P 0:000)
Main eects
Way of entrance (WE)
Social support (SS)
Fairness(F)
Course load(CL)
Self-ecacy (SE)
Interactions
SE WE
CL WE
F WE
SS WE
p< 0:05.
p< 0:01.
SD
Beta
2.155
0.036
0.102
0.119
0.105
0.111
0.008
0.163
0.044
0.102
0.307
0.166
2.832
0.960
1.966
0.759
0.868
0.005
0.337
0.050
0.194
0.214
0.162
0.073
0.217
0.305
0.555
0.672
0.887
1.742
2.065
2.285
0.376
0.082
0.041
0.023
296
Table 7
Multiple regression for H10
Variables
SD
Beta
Constant
Burnout
1.079
0.18
0.070
72.260
2.153
0.000
0.032
type of school entrance does aect student burnout and academic achievement. The results
showed that students who entered by examination
distribution have the highest burnout and lowest
academic achievement, whereas students who
entered by admission application have the lowest
burnout and highest academic achievement. Students who entered by recommendation and
screening have medium burnout and academic
achievement.
Since the traditional entrance examination system has been a hotly debated issue for educators,
the public and parents for the past decade, the
results of this research conrm that the decits of
examination distribution (similar to the traditional joint entrance examination) aect student
burnout and academic achievement. This result
indicates that the transformation of the traditional joint entrance examination into multiple
enrollment programs is a right policy of the Ministry of Education. Students interest is a key
point of concern while choosing the major or
school. Students choosing the major they really
liked or were interested in did reduce burnout
and increase academic performance. Thus, this
result gives the Education Bureau or schools
some directions. In order to reduce student burnout and increase academic achievement, the Education Bureau should be more actively involved
in the designing and modifying the multiple
enrollment programs to replace the traditional
entrance examination. Schools or the Education
Bureau should reduce the quota of examination
distribution students and increase the number of
students applying directly, who show the lowest
student burnout and best academic achievement.
6.2. Direct and moderating eect of multiple
enrollment programs
As presented in Tables 5 and 6, the interaction
of multiple enrollment programs and independent
factors was partially signicant for academic
achievement but not at all for student burnout.
The direct eects of independent variables on student burnout and academic achievement are partial supported. The ndings of this study provide
partial support for COR and SCT regarding stu-
297
support the moderator eect on independent variables and dependent variables. Only fairness and
social support have signicant impact on academic achievement with multiple enrollment programs as a moderator. Others are not supported
for student burnout. This result indicates that it is
not really clear whether factors aect student
burnout and academic achievement under multiple enrollment programs. This nding is not
consistent with arguments to the eect that the
multiple enrollment programs are the gatekeepers
for student burnout and academic achievement.
Further research is necessary to explore other factors to prove this relationship.
6.3. Student burnout and academic achievement
Table 7 reveals that student burnout has a
negative signicant eect on academic achievement. This result provides further validation and
replication of prior research investigating the
relationship of burnout with performance (Bandura, 1986). Previous studies have shown burnout
to be associated with performance (Motowidlo
et al., 1986; McCarthy et al., 1990). The data
from this study support this nding for a sample
of technicalvocational college students. Student
burnout was signicantly negatively related with
academic achievement (t 2:153 , P < 0:05 ).
This nding suggests that as students have higher
burnout they have lower academic achievement
or performance. As a consequence of this nding,
it is obvious that it is necessary to control student
burnout in order to improve student academic
achievement and learning motivation. In order to
improve student academic achievement, controlling student burnout becomes a critical point for
schools. Schools and teachers should carefully
plan and design courses, tests, or even career
planning to reduce student burnout, and therefore increase academic performance.
6.4. Limitations
Although the results provided full or partial
support for the hypotheses, three limitations
should be taken into consideration when interpreting the ndings. It is important to emphasize
that the data from this study were gathered at
298
are indeed relevant to student burnout. Consequently, the data only partially support the moderator eect on academic achievement in this
study. Further research is required to understand
the reasons for this unsupported result and to try
to nd other independent variables in the context
of similar studies.
Although multiple enrollment programs are a
hotly debated topics recently in Taiwan, this new
initiative is still changing. Till now, there has
been a scarcity of research on this issue, discussing the impact of multiple enrollment programs.
More future study is needed to follow up on the
development and results of this new system. This
paper represents only an early attempt to investigate the impact of multiple enrollment programs.
Experimental and longitudinal studies are
required to address this issue in future research
because it is insuciently to rely on a cross-sectional survey to interpret causality problems.
Acknowledgements
7. Conclusion
Overall, the pattern of reported results is partially consistent with those presented in other
published burnout studies. Multiple enrollment
programs did aect student burnout and academic achievement. This result is consistent with the
policy of the Ministry of Education, which has
been actively involved in designing the multiple
enrollment programs to reduce student stress and
to improve learning performance. This result provides some indications or implications for educational bureaus to set up education policies and
teaching strategies to increase student learning
motivation. Especially, the course plan and
design and teaching content arrangement can
match with students intrinsic and extrinsic
properties to reduce student burnout and educational resources waste.
In general, based on these results, environment
and psychological factors are fully or partially
linked to student burnout and academic achievement. Moreover, it is not clear whether these
particular environment and psychological factors
299
300
Motowidlo, S.J., Packard, J.S., Manning, M.R., 1986. Occupational stress: its causes and consequences for job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (4), 618629.
Multon, K.D., Brown, S.D., Lent, R.W., 1991. Relation of
self-ecacy beliefs to academic outcomes: a meta-analytic
investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology 38, 3038.
Normandeau, S., Guay, F., 1998. Preschool behavior and
rst-grade school achievement: the mediational role of cognitive self-control. Journal of Educational Psychology 90,
111121.
Nunnally, J.C., 1978. Psychometric Theory, second ed.
McGraw-Hill, New York.
OConnell, M.J., Cummings, L.L., Huber, G.P., 1976. The
eects of environmental information and decision unit
structure on felt tension. Journal of Applied Psychology
61, 493500.
Pajares, F., 1996. Self-ecacy beliefs in academic settings.
Review of Educational Research 66, 543578.
Patrikakou, E.N., 1996. Investigation the academic achievement of adolescents with learning disabilities: a structural
modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (3),
435450.
Peng, S.S., Lee, R.M., 1993. Home variables, parentchild
activities, and academic achievement: a study of 1988
eighth graders. In: Smit, F., Van Esch, W., Walberg, H.J.
(Eds.), Parental Involvement in Education. Institute of
Applied Social Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,
pp. 211226.
Pines, A., Maslach, C., 1978. Combating sta burn-out in a
child career center: a case study. Child Care Quarterly 9,
516.
Pines, A., Aronson, E., Kafry, 1981. Burnout: From Tedium
to Personal Growth. Free Press, New York.
Pintrich, P.R., Schunk, D.H., 1995. Motivation in Education:
Theory, Research, and Application. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Clis, NJ.
Ramist, L., 1981. College student attrition and retention.
Findings (ETS) 6, 14.
Russell, D.W., Altmaier, E., Velzen, D.V., 1987. Job-related
stress, social support, and burnout among classroom
teachers. Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (2), 269274.
Ryerson, D., Marks, N., 1981. Career burnout in the human
services: strategies for intervention. In: Jones, J.W. (Ed.),
The Burnout Syndrome. London House Press, Park Ridge,
IL, pp. 151164.
Sarason, I.G., 1983. Test Anxiety: Theory, Research, and
Application. Lawence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 349385.
Schaufeli, W.B., Maslach, C., Marek, T., 1993. Professional
Burnout: Recent Development in Theory and Research.
Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC.
Schoen, L.G., Winocur, S., 1988. An Investigation of the selfecacy of male and female academics. Journal of
Vocational Behavior 32, 307320.
Schunk, D.H., 1989. Self-ecacy and academic motivation.
Educational Psychologist 26, 207231.
Schunk, D.H., 1991. Self-ecacy and achievement behaviors.
Educational Psychology Review 1, 173208.
301
Villanova, P., Bownas, D.A., 1984. Dimensions of college student stress. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
ED 262 690.
Vaux, A., Harison, D., 1986. Support network characteristics
associated with support satisfaction and perceived support.
American Journal of Community Psychology 13 (3), 245
268.
Wood, R.E., Locke, E.A., 1987. The relation of self-ecacy
and grade goals to academic performance. Educational
and Psychological Measurement 47, 10131024.