ABB Variable Shunt Reactors For Network Stability Control PDF
ABB Variable Shunt Reactors For Network Stability Control PDF
Variable shunt
reactors for network
stability control
alternative for controlling network voltage stability when the need for
reactive power compensation varies with time or when the grid is undergoing change. VSR benefits include: The voltage steps related to switching of
fixed reactors are avoided; maintaining voltage stability during seasonal or
daily load variations becomes easier; and the operation of the reactors can
be coordinated with static var compensators (SVCs) to maximize dynamic
capacity during failures. For wind park applications, control of fluctuating
reactive power exchange at connection points becomes possible at an
attractive cost. The VSR has become well established and several are in
successful operation in Europe and North America. This article discusses
the design and application of VSRs.
Balance of power
4 1
Core
Core segment
Non-magnetic spacers
Winding
4 2
2 Measured sound power levels of seven shunt reactors against year of manufacture:
factory measurement (first column) and 2007 on-site measurement (second column)
100
95
90
85
80
75
1984
1989
1991
1996
1998
2000
2002
Year of manufacture
Generally, when
there is a slow
load variation,
the VSR works
as an efficient
reactive power
compensator.
VSR design
Footnote
1 Loss capitalization based on expected
energy prices, interest rates, etc., the customer
puts a financial value on each kW of losses.
This is added to the price of the reactor to form
a comparison price which is used for evaluating
tenders.
Balance of power
4 3
4 The feasible range is the area above the curve and the feasible
voltages are 110 kV to 525 kV
Neutral
Phase
terminal
OLTC
0.6
0.5
0.4
525
110
0.3
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
Voltage (kV)
4 4
Claes Bengtsson
ABB Power Transformers
Ludvika, Sweden
[email protected]
References
[1] Petersen A. et al. (2007). Australian experience
with shunt reactors reliability, condition
assessment, end of life and impact on
specifications. Cigr A2/D1 Colloquium
Bruges 2007, paper pp. 341.
[2] Cormack R. (2007). A snapshot into one
utilitys experience with the operation of shunt
reactors. Cigr A2/D1 Colloquium Bruges 2007,
keynote p.3.
[3] Bengtsson C. et al. (2008). Field Performance
and Sound of Shunt Reactors in Service.
Cigr 2008, paper A2-306.
[4] G. Bertagnolli et al. (1998). Design and
application of variable Mvar output shunt
reactors with on load tap-changer.
Operation experience in Africa. CIGRE
Sessions 1998, Paris, France, paper 12308.