Precedent Transaction Analysis

Street Of Walls Investment Banking Technical Training

In this Precedent Transaction Analysis chapter, we will cover five key topics:

Precedent Transaction Analysis Overview

Peer Universe for Precedent Transactions
Calculating a Precedent Transaction Multiple
Price Premium Analysis Overview
Common Mistakes

Precedent Transaction Analysis Overview

What are Precedent Transactions?
Precedent Transaction Analysis, also known as M&A Comps, Comparable Transactions, or Deal
Comps, uses previously completed mergers and acquisitions deals involving similar companies to
value a business.
Precedent Transaction Analysis typically uses the same multiple as Comparable Companies Analysis
(or Comps). In particular, Enterprise Value/Sales, Enterprise Value/EBITDA and Earnings/Earnings
Per Share (EPS) are the most commonly used metrics. However, unlike in Comparable Company
Analysis, the basis for value comparison is the price paid by the purchaser for a business, rather than
the traded market values of the companys securities. These prices can be different because there is a
control premium the value ascribed to being able to control a business rather than simply own a
percentage of the equity in it. Thus, Precedent Transaction Analysis will typically result in valuations
that are higher than standard Comparable Company Analysis.
Additionally, Precedent Transaction Analysis tends to focus on the value of a business as of the time
an acquisition of the business can be completed, rather than today. This is because deals take time
close, whereas current market values for a business can be assessed on any day. Sometimes, deals
can take as long as a year (or more!) to close, so the Precedent Transaction Analysis should reflect
that fact.
For all of these reasons, Precedent Transaction Analysis should be part of the valuation analysis of
any company in which a change of control (such as via an acquisition) is possible.
Below you will find a detailed overview of Precedent Transactions techniques used by investment
bankers and leveraged buyout investors (also known as financial sponsors) to value a company.
Why use Precedent Transactions?
There are many reasons why a Precedent Transaction Analysis should be used as part of a valuation
exercise:

To value a private business that does not have public trading comparables.
To evaluate the market demand for acquiring a company, based on the total dollar volume and
number of recent transactions in a certain industry.
To provide data analytics in assessing M&A activity and consolidation trends.
To identify potential bidders if the company is looking to be acquired or identify potential
sellers if a company is looking to buy a business.
To provide a fairness opinion to a Board of Directors when a company is acquiring or selling
all or part of a business, or is being acquired.

PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

Peer Universe for Precedent Transactions

Searching for Precedent Transactions

Information on Precedent Transactions can typically be found in a number of places:

Previous valuation analyses: A great source for previous transactions is presentation

material that has previously been compiled in a certain industry. This can be a great way to
save time, so be sure to check whether such analyses have recently been conducted at your
bank chances are high that they have.
Public tender documents and merger proxy statements: Fairness opinions disclosed in
public tender documents and merger proxy statements could provide a wealth of information
about other closed transactions.
SDC database: Securities Data Corporation compiles a database of all completed M&A
transactions and can be used to search for relevant transactions.
Capital IQ or FactSet: This database is a widely used internet-access financial database that
has a search future for M&A transactions that can be filtered by many factors including target
company geography, size, etc.
News Internet searches: Try a Google search for industry M&A news.
Equity research: Typically transaction information can be found in initiation reports.

It is important to note that primary sources are always the best source of information regarding M&A
multiples. We suggest using information that is disclosed directly by a company, such as a merger
proxy statement. Documents available via the SEC should be close in quality to primary documents,
because the SEC is where public companies disclose press releases and all major corporate and
financial events. Also valuable are Equity Research reports, if they are cross-verified by company
press releases and proxy statements. By contrast, multiples available from databases such as SDC,
Capital IQ and FactSet may need to be verified.
Selecting the Appropriate Precedent Transactions
The appropriate selection of a relevant peer universe is critical for a Precedent Transaction Analysis,
because it plays a significant role in the valuation of the company, when viewed as a potential M&A
target. For example, a company could sometimes be compared across two different industries due to
the nature of the business (an internet retail company). This will affect which comparable transactions
to use. Similarly, some comparable transactions might need to be ruled out or adjusted because of
specific transaction dynamics. Finding the right Precedent Transaction Peer Universe can therefore be
somewhat subjective.
The best Precedent Transactions to use are those in which the target companies and the company
you are valuing have the most similar business and financial characteristics. These characteristics
include the following:

Same business & industry

Similar business size
Similar sales growth rates and profitability margins
Similar capital structure
Similar reasons for transaction (fire sale, bankruptcy, or strategic motive).
Same geographic location of operations

The best way to get a relevant set of Precedent M&A transactions is to go to one relevant example
transaction and search for the Fairness Opinion filed in a target companys Merger Proxy (filed with the
SEC under Form S-4). That Fairness Opinion should include a robust set of relevant transactions that
are similar to the one disclosed in the S-4 document.
For example, lets assume that we are looking for comparables to a company that conducts its
business in the cloud-computing sector. In 2011, Time Warner Cable acquired NaviSite, a cloud-

computing business, for approximately $230 million. The relevant transaction filing can be found on the
SEC website.
In this document, we can search for the fairness opinion conducted by Raymond James & Associate
using the search text Selected Transaction Analysis. Raymond James states the following:
While none of the companies (other than the Company) that participated in the selected transactions
are directly comparable to the Company, the companies that participated in the selected transactions
are companies with operations that, for the purposes of this analysis, may be considered similar to
certain operations of the Company. Raymond James excluded transactions whose targets may have
offered services similar to certain operations of the Company. Raymond James excluded transactions
whose targets may have offered services similar to those of the Company, but that also derived a
larger part of their revenues from businesses dissimilar to those of the Company.
Just prior to this quote, the Raymond James analysis provides a relevant set of 15 comparable
transactions to help get us started.
Based on the set of transactions listed in the proxy statement, Raymond James concluded that the
Precedent Transactions multiples were as follows:

From the analysis summary, Raymond James demonstrates that the merger consideration for the
NaviSite acquisition is relatively close to the average multiples of the selected transactions, if
measured in terms of Enterprise Value/EBITDA. In terms of Enterprise Value/Revenue, the
consideration is on the low side but the implication is that NaviSite has a low EBITDA margin relative
to the universe of companies used in this analysis.
Calculating a Precedent Transaction Multiple
Lets take a look at a completed precedent transaction and determine the relevant multiples for that
transaction. The key information to be gathered includes the following:

Announcement date
Target and acquirer name
Consideration type (cash or stock)
Equity Value (based on offer share price and diluted shares outstanding)
Enterprise Value (based on equity value plus net debt)
LTM financial results of the target

The example we will use is the acquisition of J.Crew Group for $43.50 per share in cash by TPG
Capital and Leonard Green & Partners. The press release states, The price represents a premium of
29% to J.Crews average closing share price over the last month. From the press release and
supporting SEC filings, we can gather and compute the key information described above.
The first step is to calculate the market value of J.Crew prior to the announcement. There were 63.741
million basic shares outstanding prior to the announcement, according to SEC filings. This document
shows that the company had approximately 7.977 million options outstanding. Therefore, we can
assume the diluted share count equals 63.741 + 7.977 = 71.718 million. For the equity value of
J.Crew, we use the offer price times the dilutive shares outstanding. Therefore, J.Crews implied Equity
Value is [71.718 million x $43.50] = $3,120 million.

Next, we calculate the implied enterprise value, or total consideration, by taking the equity value and
adding total debt balance minus total cash and short-term investments. According to the 10-Q filing,
J.Crew had $340.5 million in cash and $49.2 million in total debt as of July 31, 2010. Thus, J.Crews
implied Enterprise Value is therefore [$3,120 + $49.2 - $340.5] million = $2,828 million.
Finally, we can gather the Last Twelve Months (LTM) financial data from J.Crews SEC filings. A
revenue of these documents shows that J.Crews LTM revenue was $1.711 billion and its LTM EBITDA
was $320.78 million. From this data, we can calculate the following multiples for this Precedent
Transaction:

In addition to the historical acquisition multiples, investment bankers use research reports that were
published prior to the announcement of the deal (this is very important) to get a sense of projected
financial performance estimates. From these, we can compute what forward/estimated acquisition
multiples were used. For example, if J.Crew was expected to have revenue of $2.5 billion in 2011, then
we can assume that the 2011E EV/Revenue multiple for the transaction was 1.1x.
This procedure can be repeated for each relegation transaction in the Peer Universe. Once this is
completed, aggregate statistics for the multiples should be presented (minimum, median, mean and
maximum).
An example analysis would look something like this:

Additional points to note as you are performing a Precedent Transaction Analysis include the following:

Enterprise Value = Equity Value + Total Debt Cash + Minority Interest + Preferred Equity.
Calculate LTM financial performance based on latest filings prior to announcement.
Determine projected financial performance by using a recent research report published prior
to announcement.
Exclude extraordinary one-time items such as restructuring charges. Make sure to footnote
any such exclusion.

Look for convertible securities that may convert upon change of control of the target. These
securities will likely be included in the diluted share count.
Always double-check your work! Cross check research reports, company filings and press
releases.
Price Premium Analysis Overview
Investment bankers calculate the control premium of Precedent M&A Transactions to approximate
the appropriate offer price premium for a target company. Typically, the difference between the share
price one day prior to announcement and the offer price is used. The following is an example of a
Precedent Transaction Analysis that included Price Premium data:

The formula for Premium Paid (as a percentage above market) is:
Where Last Trading Price is generally the closing price of the stock the day before the acquisition
announcement is made.
For example, if Company A last traded at $100 per share upon Wednesdays close, and Company B
announces its intent to acquire Company A for $125 per share on Wednesday evening, Company B is
paying a 25% premium over the market price to gain control of Company A.
In some cases, there are rumors or leaked information regarding potential M&A activity that can
manipulate or impact the trading price of a potential target companys stock price. Therefore,
investment bankers can also perform a price premium analysis relative to the price one week or one
month prior to announcement.
Common Mistakes To Avoid When Using Precedent Transactions
There are a number of common ways that mistakes can be made when performing Precedent
Transaction Analysis. Be sure to review this checklist of pitfalls to avoid before completing the analysis:
Inconsistent announcement date or effective transaction date
Always keep your data points consistent. If you are looking at a set of precedent transactions, be sure
to use the LTM data points when calculating the respective multiples (rather than, for example, using
multiples based upon the prior fiscal year end). Keeping the data points are not consistent in your
analysis will ensure a more consistent valuation. If any data points are not consistent and difficult to
make consistent, make sure to footnote them, and at least consider removing them from the aggregate
statistics for the analysis.
Including extraordinary items

Make sure to exclude any one-time items from the financial results data. These items may include
gains/losses on sales of assets, legal expenses, write-offs or restructuring expenses. Always footnote
any exclusion.
Including minority interests in financial results
Any minority interest expense or income should be excluded from the financial data points used to
calculate multiples if the minority interest is not related to the companys core line of business. Always
footnote any exclusion.
Taking the numbers straight from an online financial database
It is imperative that you conduct your own research on any given transaction. Financial databases
often have inaccurate or imprecise metrics. Try to always use primary sources when possible, as this
should help ensure that the data is accurate and approximately adjusted for extraordinary items.
Failing to calculate the premium over market value
Be sure to calculate the true premium of an offer price in other words, make sure that the market
price prior to the transaction has not been manipulated by market rumors or insider trading. Charting
the stock price over the previous six month prior to announcement of the transaction can give you a
sense of what the historical price was prior to any possible appreciation immediately prior to
announcement caused by information leaks or illicit behavior.