Section 195 and Form 15CB
Section 195 and Form 15CB
CA N. C. Hegde
November 2015
1
Table of content
Particulars
Section 195 of the Income Tax Act
Chargeability to Income-tax
Payments to NR important aspects
Remedies available to the payer
Remedies available to the payee
Taxation of reimbursement overseas to non resident agent
Taxation of commission overseas to non resident agent
Key take aways
Clause by Clause 15 CB
2
Provides for the deduction of tax at source on payments made to Non Residents
195(1)
195(6)
195(2)
195(3)
197
Application by
Payer
Payee
Payee
Purpose
To determine the
appropriate proportion of
sum chargeable
No deduction
of tax
No deduction/
deduction at
lower rate
No appeal
No appeal
Whether appealable?
Appeal u/s 248 denying
A revision petition under liability to deduct tax after
section 264 would lie
payment of tax
against such orders
Under DTAA
Royalty or Fees for
Technical Services
Business Income
Section 9: Income
Deemed to Accrue or Arise
in India
Independent Personal
Services
Other Income
9
the transfer of a capital asset in India* any other which derives its value from assets
in India.
It also includes any share or interest in a company or entity registered or incorporated
outside India which derives its value from assets in India.
Finance Act 2015 & DIT v. Copal Research Ltd., Mauritius
[2014] 49 taxmann.com 125 (Delhi HC )
10
CBDT vide Instruction No 2/2014 instructed that in cases where the assessee does
not withhold taxes under section 195 of the Act, the AO is required to determine the
income component involved in the sum on which the withholding tax liability is to be
computed and the payer would be considered as being in default for non-withholding
of taxes only in relation to such income component.
11
If payment is not chargeable to tax, the provisions of section 195(1) are not attracted:
12
Payers
Any person
Responsible for paying
Payer itself and in case of company, the company including the principle officer
Including an Individual and HUF (whether or not carrying business)
Agent also liable to deduct tax at source from payments to non-resident principal.
Explanation 2 to sub-section (1) of the section 195 clarifies that the obligation to
comply with sub-section (1) and make deduction thereunder applies and shall be
deemed to have always applied and extends and shall be deemed to have always
extended to all persons, resident or non-resident whether or not the non-resident
person has a residence or place of business or business connection in India or any
other presence in any manner whatsoever in India.
13
14
Where seller of Indian property was NRI according to address given in sale deed,
assessee-purchaser ought to have made TDS under section 195 on sale
consideration payable to NRI seller, failing which he was to be treated as assesseein-default under section 201(1).
15
Rakesh Chauhan vs DDIT (International Taxation) [2010] 128 TTJ 116 (CHD.)
Where payment is made by assessee to an individual Resident say (P) in India in
respect of purchase of land which belonged to non-residents but rights therein were
assigned unequivocally to said resident as power-of-attorney holder, such payment
could not be regarded as payment to non-resident so as to require deduction of tax at
source under section 195.
When non-resident himself nominates a particular agent to whom payment should be
made and pursuant to that direction, the assessee pays the sum to the agent so
nominated, the provisions of section 195 of the Act will apply.
16
Key aspects
Verizon Communications Singapore Pte. Ltd. [2013] (361 ITR 575) Madras HC
17
Payments
Payment in kind
Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. v. CIT, (SC) (2010 (6) SCALE 442
The assessee is liable to deduct tax at source under section 195 on the payment made
to the non-resident even though the payment is not made in cash but made in kind
18
Rates
Rates in force
19
Section 2(37) states that rate or rates in force would mean for the purpose of section
195 rates of income tax specified in Finance Act or rates as per the agreement by
Central Government u/s 90 of the Act.
Section 90, an assesse can avail the provisions of section 90 only in case if the
provisions of DTAA are more beneficial to him
Section 90
Section
206AA
In case of non availability of the PAN, tax is to be deducted at higher of the following Rates specified in the Act,
Rates in force
20%
Serum Institute
of India Limited
[2015] (56
taxmann.com 1)
Pune Tribunal
Bangalore
Tribunal in the
case of Infosys
BPO Limited ((IT
(IT) A No.:
1143B/2013))
It is upheld by the supreme court that the provisions made in the DTAAs will prevail over
the general provisions contained in the Act to the extent they are beneficial to the
assessee.
It is held that where tax has been deducted on the strength of the beneficial provisions
of DTAAs, the provisions of section 206AA of the Act cannot be invoked to insist on tax
deduction @ 20%, having regards to the overriding nature of the provisions of section
90(2) of the Act
It is held that there is no scope of deduction of tax at the rate of 20% as per section
206AA (when assesse does not have tax identification number PAN) of the Income-tax
Act, 1961 (the Act) when the benefit DTAA is available to the assesse.
Thus, based on the above decisions, one may take a position that
section 90 shall override section 206AA
21
If payee bears the tax liability i.e. payment is net of tax then for computing TDS, income
should be grossed up
E.g. Amount payable to NR is 100 and TDS rate is 10%; Gross amt. for TDS purpose
would be 111.11 (100*100/90)
Issues
Whether grossing up would be required to be done in case payment is made net of
tax to a foreign company which does not have a PAN in India, considering the
provisions of section 206AA
Income could be grossed up using the applicable rate e.g.10% and tax could be
withheld at 20%
For e.g.. say total amount to be paid net of tax as per agreement be INR 100. Income
increased to INR 111.11 (grossed by 10%). Tax needs to be withheld @ 20% on
111.11= 22.22.
Bosch Ltd. v. ITO (2013) 141 ITD 38/155 TTJ 354 (Bang.)(Trib.)
22
authorities.
maintains prescribed
documents/information
23
24
The permission granted by the AO would be in force for the period as specified
The assessee cannot be treated in default under s. 201 of the Act because it has
applied under s. 195(2) of the IT Act before the AO, prior to remitting the payment
25
Decision under section 195(2) should not be treated as a conclusion in the determination
Dodsal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT [2003] 260 ITR 507 (Bom.)
DCIT vs. Arthur Andersen ITA No. 9125/Mum/1995 dated 29-07-2003 (ITAT, Mumbai)
26
27
The amended provision provides that the information relating to payment of any sum,
whether or not chargeable under the provisions of the Act, shall be furnished in such form
and manner, as may be prescribed.
Rule 37BB provides that any person responsible for paying to a non-resident, not being a
company, or to a foreign company, any sum chargeable to tax under the provisions of the
Act shall furnish information in Form Nos. 15CA and 15CB.
Until Rule 37BB and Form Nos. 15CA and 15CB are amended to give effect to the
amended provision of Section 195(6) or form and manner for furnishing
information is prescribed, a payer is required to furnish only information relating
to payment of sum chargeable to tax under the provisions of the Act.
However, for all foreign remittances, banks have mandate to provide for such information.
Thus, it is prudent to have such documentation in place for all foreign remittances.
28
According to rule 37BB of the income tax rules, following information is to be submitted
Form 15CA Prescribes the information to be furnished by the payer
Applicability
29
30
Address of the
beneficiary
Nationality
Period of residential
status
Whilst the prescribed format of TRC was done away with by the Finance Act, 2013, it did provide that
additional information and documentation shall be furnished separately. Rule 21AB was consequently
amended, which provides that aforesaid information of the foreign assessee is required to be furnished
(10F), and sufficient documentation to substantiate the same shall be maintained.
It is to be noted here that Form 10F is only an ad hoc requirement in order to enable the non-residents to
disclose certain information which is not mentioned in the TRC. In case, if the TRC is inclusive of all the
requisite information, there is no need to furnish the Form 10F.
Presentation on provisions of section 195
32
Specific elements, accounts or items covered by the report or certificate should be clearly
identified and indicated.
The report or certificate should indicate the manner in which its audit was conducted.
If the report or certificate is subject to any limitations, then such limitation should be
clearly mentioned.
References obtained should be included in the report or certificate i.e. any specific
information or explanations on which is relied upon.
If the special purpose statement is based on general purpose financial statements, the
report or certificate should contain a reference to such statements and the said
statements should also form part of annexure.
The issuing authority should clearly indicate in his report or certificate, the extent of
responsibility which he assumes.
Any modification in form of report or certificate from the manner as prescribed by statue
should be clearly indicated.
33
If person responsible considers that the sum payable would not be income, would he be
required to go to the A.O every time or will a CA certificate suffice?
DCIT vs. Rediff.com India Ltd. (ITA No. 3061/Mum/2009)
Chartered Accountant's certificate for TDS on payments to non-residents had no
decisive impact on determination of taxability of payments to non-residents. It is
only prima facie evidence about taxability status and cannot substitute adjudication
of taxability by the AO
ADIT vs. Tata Communications Ltd (ITA No. 3061/Mum/2009)
Where the assessee had duly obtained the Chartered Accountants certification
regarding applicability of tax withholding and based on the certification, made the
remittance for deduction at source. A demand u/s.201(1A) cannot be raised on the
assessee merely because he had not obtained prior approval of the Assessing
Officer u/s.195(2) of the Act.
34
Observe the deadlines for withholding taxes and depositing the same
Suffer disallowance if the tax is not withheld/ partly withheld if revenue believes that it
should have been withheld
35
36
Appeal against the order under section 195 Can be filed before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) under section 248
against the order passed by the Assessing Officer
A revision petition under section 264 would lie against such an order
37
38
Director IT vs. Krup Udhe GmbH. (2010) (38 DTR 251) Bombay
Amount received by assessee towards reimbursement of traveling expenses of its
technicians who were deputed to the establishment of a customer is not chargeable
to tax.
Steffen, Robertson and Kirsten Consulting v. CIT (230 ITR 206) (AAR)
Daily allowance and expenses of technicians part of FTS agreement
39
Reimbursement of Expenses
40
41
Section 9(1)(i) is applicable on the net the profits of a non resident which can
reasonably be attributed to operations carried out in India.
The expression "business connection" nominates a real and intimate relating
between trading activity carried on outside the taxable territories and trading activity
within the territories, the relating between the two contributing to the earning of
income by the nonresident in his trading activity. SC in CIT vs. R. D. Aggarwal & co.
(56 ITR 20)
Any activity carried on in India by Broker, General Commission Agent or any other
agent having Independent Status in the ordinary course of business will not constitute
Business Connection in India. [Explanation 2 to Section 9 (1) (i)]
42
CBDT Circulars
However, the principle still holds good that the payments to non-resident are liable for
tax in Indian only if they satisfy the test of chargeability in India.
43
Facts:
Panalfa Autoelektrik Ltd. India, was engaged in manufacturing business and made an
application to the Assessing Officer (AO) to decide the withholding tax as regards
commission to be remitted to a non-resident company registered in Liechtenstein, for
arranging export sales and realising payments.
In absence of a tax treaty between India and Liechtenstein, the AO decided the taxability
of commission under the ITA and held that the same to be taxable as FTS.
Issue:
Whether the commission payable to the non-resident agent could be Income accruing or
arising, whether directly or indirectly, through or from any business connection in India or
income by way of FTS payable by a person who is a resident
Held:
As there was no allegation or argument from the revenue on the existence of business
connection or as regards any operations being carried on by the non-resident in India, the
High Court concluded that no income can be taxed in India under this provision.
44
As per the agreement between the taxpayer and the non-resident agent, it was clear that the nonresident was acting as an agent for procuring orders and was not rendering managerial advice or
management services.
The non-resident had not undertaken or performed technical services, where special skills or
knowledge relating to a technical filed were required.
The non-resident had acquired skills and expertise in the field of marketing and sale of
automobiles. However, the same was used for own benefit and to secure their
commission.
The non-resident did not act as a consultant, who advised or rendered any counseling
services. The High Court, accordingly, held that services rendered by the non-resident
cannot be said to be in the nature of managerial, technical or consultancy services and
hence, the commission cannot be treated as FTS.
The High Court however added a note of caution that in case of selling agents, taxability
would depend upon the nature of service rendered and, depending on the factual matrix,
the services may fall in the category of consultancy services.
45
47
Sub
Clause
Particulars
Explanation
Name and address of the entity to whom the
payment shall be remitted
Amount
Payable
BSR Code of the bank branch (7 BSR Code of the bank branch
digit)
Proposed date of remittance
The date shall be filled in (dd/mm/yyyy) format
Sub
Clause
Particulars
Explanation
8a
8b
8c
8d
9(i)
9(ii)
which
the
Sub
Clause
9(iii)
Particulars
Explanation
9(iv)
9(v)
9A
9A(a)
9A(b)
9B
Sub
Clause
Particulars
Explanation
Taxable income
9C
9C(a)
9C(b)
9C(c)
9D
9D(a)
Sub
Clause
Particulars
Explanation
9D(b)
9D(c)
9D(d)
10
Amount of TDS
11
Rate of TDS
12
13
be
made
post
Thank You
53