0% found this document useful (0 votes)
112 views4 pages

rm08 RMR

The document describes the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system for classifying rock masses for engineering purposes. The RMR is calculated using five geological parameters (A1-A5) related to rock strength, discontinuity characteristics, and groundwater conditions. An adjustment is made based on discontinuity orientation (B). The total RMR score places the rock mass in one of five classes (I to V), with class I being the best rock. The classes indicate expected tunnel stability and engineering properties of the rock mass. Guidelines are provided for characterizing discontinuities and assessing their impact on tunneling or dam foundations based on orientation.

Uploaded by

Unknown
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
112 views4 pages

rm08 RMR

The document describes the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system for classifying rock masses for engineering purposes. The RMR is calculated using five geological parameters (A1-A5) related to rock strength, discontinuity characteristics, and groundwater conditions. An adjustment is made based on discontinuity orientation (B). The total RMR score places the rock mass in one of five classes (I to V), with class I being the best rock. The classes indicate expected tunnel stability and engineering properties of the rock mass. Guidelines are provided for characterizing discontinuities and assessing their impact on tunneling or dam foundations based on orientation.

Uploaded by

Unknown
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Mining Rock Mass Rating (RMR)

RMR = JA1+JA2+JA3+JA4+JA5+JB
A. Classification Parameters and Their Ratings
Parameter

Range of Values

A1. Strength of Intact Rock Material (MPa)


Point-Load
Strength Index
Uniaxial
Compressive
Strength
Rating JA1

A2. Drill Core


Quality - RQD
Rating JA2

A3. Spacing of
Discontinuities
Rating JA3

A4. Condition of
Discontinuities

Rating JA4

For this low range uniaxial compressive


test is preferred

> 10

4 - 10

2-4

1-2

> 250

100 - 250

50 - 100

25 - 50

5 - 25

1-5

<1

15

12

90% - 100%

75% - 90%

50% - 75%

25% - 50%

< 25%

20

17

13

>2m

0.6 - 2m

200 - 600 mm

60 - 200mm

< 60 mm

20

15

10

Slightly
rough
surfaces
Separation
< 1 mm
Highly
weathered
walls

Slickensided
surfaces or
Gouge < 5
mm thick or
Separation 1
- 5 mm
Continuous

Soft gouge
> 5 mm
thick or
Separation >
5 mm
Continuous

20

10

Very rough
surfaces
Not
continuous
No
separation
Unweathered
wall rock
30

Slightly
rough
surfaces
Separation <
1 mm
Slightly
weathered
walls
25

A5. Groundwater
Inflow per 10
m tunnel
length
(L/min)

None

< 10

10 - 25

25 - 125

> 125

< 0.1

0.1 - 0.2

0.2 - 0.5

> 0.5

General
Conditions

Completely
dry

Damp

Wet

Dripping

Flowing

Rating JA5

15

10

Joint water
pressure/
Major
principal

B. Rating Adjustment for Discontinuity Orientations


Strike and Dip
Orientations

Very
Very
Favorable Fair Unfavorable
Favorable
Unfavorable

Tunnels and
Mines

Rating
Foundations
JB
Slopes

-2

-5

- 10

- 12

-2

-7

- 15

- 25

-5

25

- 50

- 60

C. Rock Mass Classes Determined from Total Ratings


Rating
Class No.

100 - 81

80 - 61

60 - 41

40 - 21

< 21

II

III

IV

Description Very good rock Good rock Fair rock Poor rock Very poor rock

D. Meaning of Rock Classes


Class No.

Average
stand-up
time

20 yr for 15
m span

II

III

1 yr for 10
1 wk for 5 m span
m span

IV

10 h for
2.5 m
span

30 min
for 1 m
span

Cohesion of
rock mass
(kPa)

> 400

300 - 400

200 - 300

100 200

< 100

Friction
angle of rock
mass (deg)

> 45

35 - 45

25 - 35

15 - 25

< 15

E. Guidelines for Classification of Discontinuity Conditions**


Discontinuity
Length
(persistence)
Rating
Separation
(aperture)
Rating
Roughness
Rating
Infilling
(gouge)
Rating
Weathering
Rating

<1m

1-3m

3 - 10 m

10 - 20 m

> 20 m

None

< 0.1 mm

0.1 - 1.0
mm

1 - 5 mm

> 5 mm

Very rough

Rough

Slightly
rough

Smooth

Slickensided

None

Hard
Filling < 5
mm

Hard
Filling > 5
mm

Soft
Filling < 5
mm

Soft Filling
> 5 mm

Unweathered
6

Slightly
Moderately
Highly
Decomposed
weathered weathered weathered
5

F. Effect of Discontinuity Strike and Dip Orientation in


Tunnelling***
Strike perpendicular to tunnel axis

Strike parallel to tunnel axis

Drive with dip Dip 45 - 90

Drive with dip Dip 20 - 45

Dip 45 - 90

Dip 20 - 45

Very favourable

Favourable

Very unfavourable

Fair

Drive against dip - Drive against dip Dip 45 - 90


Dip 20 - 45
Fair

Dip 0 - 20 - Irrespective of strike

Unfavourable

Fair

*(after Bieniawski 1989)


**Some conditions are mutually exclusive. For example if infilling is present,
the roughness of the surface will be overshadowed by the influence of the
gouge. In such cases use A.4 directly.
***Modified after Wickham et al (1972)

Assessment of Joint Orientation Favorability


Upon Stability of Dam Foundations
Dip 0 10

Dip 10 - 30

Dip 30 60

Dip 60 90

Favorable

Very
favorable

Dip Direction

Very
favorable

Upstream

Downstream

Unfavorable

Fair

Note: This table is based on experience and consideration of stress


distribution in foundation rock masses. It assumes both the arch and the
effects of gravity have an effect on a dam structure.
The initial in-situ state of stress is not considered here, as in dam foundations
in-situ stresses are mainly important when considering grouting, drainage
curtains and the excavation sequence of foundations. For this last point, recent
evidence shows that high horizontal stresses may be expected in near-surface
rock masses.

Reproduced from
http://www.edumine.com/Xtoolkit/tables/rmrtables.htm accessed
17.10.06

You might also like