Development Policy As Ill-Structured Problem: Sofija Adžić
Development Policy As Ill-Structured Problem: Sofija Adžić
Development Policy As Ill-Structured Problem: Sofija Adžić
UDC 338.242:330.341
Sofija Adi
Faculty of Economics, University of Novi Sad
Put Moe Pijade 9-11, 24000 Subotica, Yugoslavia
1. INTRODUCTION
A recovery of development, when the national market is narrow and the economy is in
transition, is possible only if there is a transformation and internationalization of the total
economy structure. Transformation and internationalization of the economy should be
founded on individual microeconomic rational basis, in such a way that property of the
company should be connected with the production that satisfies international needs, and
with the appropriate marketing to support such business orientation. Main characteristics
of such global orientation are flexibility fast response system to the environment
impulses and the quantitative economy. Wise and consistent concept and strategy of the
economy restructuring based on this, cannot be formed autonomously and independently
from its current performances and economic and system conditions such as:
44
S. ADI
1. Market restructuring, ownership, organization, human resource, production, technology, etc.) enterprises made in the former economic system in which a great (relatively
speaking) capital is captured and which do not derive any profit,
2. Creation of stable political, legal and economical climate for private entrepreneurs
and investment, and
3. Modification of macro and mezzo organizational structure and division of labour.
Division which should provide braking of the existing rigid organizational structure and
formation of long-term interactions between industrial, agronomic, commercial and noncommercial servicing companies and scientific and research organizations of different sizes
based on net organizations to serve rational export orientation.
This is the only way to restart the accumulation of wealth on a national level tp
finance new development cycle. In spite of all that, it is impossible to avoid high cost of
this transformation - down a number of enterprises, increasing the percentage of open
unemployment, additional fiscal burdening of people, increasing public spending for
social transfers, additional money from foreign factors, etc.
The current economic situation and low control ability of (national) economic system
do not allow (in terms of modern economic system) formalization and realization of the
development policy. That is mostly the result of (objective) difficulties:
Unclear role of state in regulation of economy,
Poor quality of automatic feed-backs and information, due to underdeveloped and
deformed market, and
Intensive changes of the elements and the structure of feedback in the economic
systems that are moving from mainly administrative to mostly market inducements and
limitations.
Negative effects of these factors and subjective elements can be divided in two main
groups:
Low level of knowledge and culture of the creators and proponents of the economic
policies realization, and
The structure of plural interests in which it is impossible to articulate the solutions
for overcoming the conflicts that are exemplary for an open society, mostly because
of the mechanisms of power which still exist because of the inherited old social and
economic system and also because of irregular and institutionally unregulated
balance of power.
Dynamism, diversity and low predictability level of results and expenses related to
activities of the environmental adaptation, imply (as one of the alternatives for
neutralization) use of the planning system based on soft system methodology combined
with multicriterial compromise choice of (conditional) favorable goals and mechanisms
for their realization, which, to some extent, should represent a vision of dynamic
environmental changes.
In the presented observation, the real world is problematic, while process and
methodology are systematic. Such approach is primarily based on certain type of culture
and a principle of participation, or in another words, wide participation of all factors
involved in a problematic situation. This is the area in to be searched for greatest
limitations of operative application of this methodology. In addition to that negative
45
national experience in past related to the system of social consultations and deliberation in
which ideas of culture and participation were incorporated as means for neutralization of
uncertainties and influence of the environment, the directions and dynamics of their
changes in future.
2. DEVELOPMENT POLICY MODELING AS ILL-STRUCTURED PROBLEM
Since main problems in modeling development policy are located in decision-making
domain, so in the philosophy the concept od functional hierarchy of layers in decision
making, has been incorporated. This hierarchy is firmly based on natural principles
because it includes three main aspects of decision-making in the situation of uncertainty:
1. The choice of strategy to be used in the proces of solution.
2. Reducing and eliminating the uncertanty.
3. Search for desired direction of actions under apriori expectable conditions.
As a base for determination of the dissipated group for the contents of development
policy the Checkland's methodology for soft systems was chosen. This methodology,
conceptualised as a seven levels analytic proces and through appropiate learning system,
uses the main mental processes: perception, comparison, proclamation and decision-making,
and thus enables the flexibil problem solving.
Relying on the presented philosophical basis and principles we will present the analysis
of the soft system methodology application as a system approach for determining the
contents of the sector multivariation plan group with Checkland's methodology for soft
systems.
This methodology is a seven-levels analytical process which through the appropriate
system of learning, by using main mental processes: perception, comparison, assertion
and decision making, enable flexible solving of the problem
Necessary information are assembled in the first and the second phase through
adequate research of economic and key social and political elements, and through
appropriate system of learning, and by using the main mental processes: perception,
comparison, assertion and decision making, enable flexible solution of the problem.
In the first and the second stage, non-structured problem situation is discovered - in our
example: how can the state, i. e. its authorized institutions, via measures and instruments of
development, social and educational policy, stimulate the sectors transformation,
restructuring the large enterprises and developing small and middle industrial and service
enterprises.
In those two phases, the collection of information is carried out, trough the relevant
research of key economic and social elements of total economic structures and their
characteristic interactions and conflicting interests as well as the specific of common
economic and social culture and climate. Collected and systematically arranged
knowledge should define a picture within which the followings relevant topics are to be
defined:
1. Problems in the form of a vague assembly: {(Losses) Market sales, (Losses)
Market purchases, (Enormous lagging behind competition) Organizations and
technology, (Enormous surplus) Manpower, (Little and archaic) Managerial knowledge
and entrepreneurs, (High) Costs, (Expensive) A to external finance,}
46
S. ADI
47
48
S. ADI
restriction should allow the planed (meaning sensible, not ad hoc) actions of the makers
of economic, social and educational policy.
Presented methodology is based on the procedure of system observation in finding
what are the best ways to solve the observed problem situations? In which a large number
of actors with their partial observations and truths, and a number of fusibility analysis are
incorporated. Integration of their ways:
{Actors, Aggregates} -> {Goals} -> {Measures and mechanism development
(social and education) policy}
enables through the learning process to conduct more robust and flexible structuring of
the contents for the realization of the development policy.
3. FUZZY APPROACH TO THE INDETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE CONCEPTUALIZATION
OF THE DEVELOPMENT POLICY
In order to illustrate this, an attempt to construct a fuzzy model has been made:
"Standardization system and its role in support of the individual initiatives for the internal
transformation in order to implement the ISO 9000:2000 standards". The general idea is
to structure fuzzy model based on the results from the second and third phase of
Checkland's soft system methodology, and compose fuzzy rules with a group of the
following fuzzy variables described linguistically:
Internal barriers
Business culture:
Technical culture:
Management:
Organization:
Personnel (main orientation):
Knowledge:
Educational system:
Distribution system (main orientation):
Financial resources:
Technical resources:
External barriers:
Infrastructure for standardization:
Public educational system:
Funds for financial support:
Control system:
Support for implementation
Financial aid:
Technical help:
Administrative constraint:
Moral constraint
49
50
S. ADI
REFERENCES
1. Adzic, S., Sedlak, O., System Approach to the Developing Policies as Ill Structured Problem, PC 120
PAMM, Balatonalmady, 1997.
2. Adzic, S., Sedlak, O., The Model of Multicriteria decision making within National Sector Policies, 4th
Balkan Conference on Operational Research, Thessalonica, 1997.
3. Checland, P. B., Science and The Systems movement, Systems Behavior, Edited by Open Systems Group,
Harper and Row Publishers, London, 1980.
4. Checkland, P. B., Soft System Methodology in Action, Wiley, Chichester, 1990.
5. Checland, P. B., Towards a Systems - based methodology for real-world problem solving, Systems
Behavior, Edited by Open Systems Group, Harper and Row Publishers, London,
6. Mesarovic, M. D., Macko, D., Takahara, Y., Theory of Hierarchical, Multilevel Systems, Academic Press,
New York, 1970.