100% found this document useful (1 vote)
344 views8 pages

X-Bar Theory

The document discusses X-bar theory, which proposes that syntactic structures can be represented as binary branching trees. Phrases are headed by lexical categories like nouns and verbs. The head determines the properties of the phrase. Phrases are built up recursively by combining heads with their complements and specifiers. The trees represent hierarchical and precedence relations between constituents. Functional projections like Inflection Phrase and Complementizer Phrase are also discussed. Movement of elements like auxiliaries is explained.

Uploaded by

Marcel Balaur
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
344 views8 pages

X-Bar Theory

The document discusses X-bar theory, which proposes that syntactic structures can be represented as binary branching trees. Phrases are headed by lexical categories like nouns and verbs. The head determines the properties of the phrase. Phrases are built up recursively by combining heads with their complements and specifiers. The trees represent hierarchical and precedence relations between constituents. Functional projections like Inflection Phrase and Complementizer Phrase are also discussed. Movement of elements like auxiliaries is explained.

Uploaded by

Marcel Balaur
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

tefan Oltean, Generative linguistics (X-bar theory)

X-bar theory: Sentences are not merely strings of words; the words that compose the
sentence are grouped into phrases. X-bar theory offers a uniform format for all types of
phrases in the sentence.
The syntactic structure of a phrase is endocentric; a syntactic constituent is built around a
head, which determines the properties of the constituent (constituents headed by a noun is
a noun phrases; they share a number of distributional characteristics)
1. The instructor will analize the problems after class.
VP = will analize the problems after class

NP
The instructor

VP
will analize

NP
the problems

PP
after class

VP

V
will analize

NP
the problems

PP
after class

2. the instructors analysis of the problems


NP

NP
the instructors

N
analysis

PP
of the problems

PP
after class

How are these structures? Are the internal relations of the constituents captured?
VP
3.
V
V

PP
NP

after class

will analyze the problems

In these representations the trees are binary, i.e. syntactic units are built up by combining two
constituents, thus creating a new constituent (cf. MERGE)
A constituent is built around a head (N, V,X) of a lexical category; the head has one projection
and each projection has one head.

tefan Oltean, Generative linguistics (X-bar theory)

4.

NP
N

NP
The instructors N

NP

analysis

of the problems

- hierarchical structures
5.

NP
.

N
6. this book

NP
Det.

this

N
book

7. these students from Paris


NP
det.

these

PP

students

from Paris

8. The students [all drink Martini].

tefan Oltean, Generative linguistics (X-bar theory)

VP

Specifer

all
V

NP

drink

Martini

9.

VP
.

V
10. right after class
PP
right

P
11.

NP

XP
.

The category of the head determines the category of the constituent. The head combines with a
complement to form an intermediate projection X. The complement of a head is a phrase that is
also formed according to the X-bar format. The head determines the number of complements and
the particular form of the complements (e.g., analyze selects an NP, rely a PP, analysis (an NP)
and envious (an AP) select a PP (envious of John, *envious John). A singular NP head selects a
singular agreement of the NP (analysis of the problems takes a singular verb, e.g., is); the
grammatical feature of the head percolates to the projection.

12. The students smoked smoke Marlboro.

tefan Oltean, Generative linguistics (X-bar theory)

Subject

VP

students V

NP

smoked

Marlboro

The sentence is seen as the expansion of the projection of the verb: the lexical or thematic core of
the sentence is the VP. But is it so?
A sentence is more than a mere projection of a verb. It is associated with inflections
expressing time, aspect etc. VP is integrated into the sentence through the functional head
Inflection, which takes the VP as complement.

13.

InflP/IP

- IP is the inflection projection. It is a functional projection.

Infl

Infl

VP

Tense, Agr NP
[past, pl. III]
-ed students

V
V

NP

smoke Marlboro
14.

InflP

NP
Infl
The studentsi
Infl.

VP

Tense, Agr. NPi


_

V
V

NP

smoked Marlboro
Movement has PF motivation; it guarantees that the inflection has lexical support (a
proper host).

tefan Oltean, Generative linguistics (X-bar theory)

The specifier of the IP is the canonical subject position, which is the highest in the structure.
The IP is the complement of C (complementizer), another functional projection.

The Complementizer Phrase


1. I think [that [the students will have a drink after class]].
2. She asks [whether [the students will have a drink after class]].
3. She expects [for [the students to have a drink after class]].
C/CP
C

Spec

IP
?

that
the students will have a drink after class
whether
for
The projection headed by C links the clause (IP) with the context / discourse. It encodes
the illocutionary force of the sentence, the way the speaker presents the information to
the hearer. In statements the inflection / the auxiliary is in I. In questions it moves to C.
4. Will the students have a drink after class?
C/CP
C

Spec

IP
?

C
NP

Will
the students I
ti

VP
have a drink after class

5. Mary watches television after dinner.


*-s Mary watch television after dinner?
Does Mary watch television after dinner?

tefan Oltean, Generative linguistics (X-bar theory)

C/CP
C

Spec

IP
?

C
NP

Doesi
Mary

VP

ti

watch television after dinner?

6. When does Mary watch television?


C/CP
C

Spec

IP
Whenj

C
NP

Doesi
Mary

Specifier-head agreement
7.

NP
Det

this/these
N

ZP

student/students

VP

ti

watch television tj?

tefan Oltean, Generative linguistics (X-bar theory)

8.

IP
I

NP
Mary
I

VP

-s
watch television after class
Structural relations
Dominance: Node A dominates node B iff (if and only if) A is higher in the tree than B
and if a line can be traced from A to B going downwards.
Immediate dominance: When there is no intervening node between the elements.
Precedence: Node A precedes node B iff A is to the left of B and A does not dominate B
or B does not dominate A.
Immediate precedence: if a node A precedes node B and there is no interveing node.
Sisterhood: e.g., in the case of VP: it immediately dominates V and NP, which are
sisters; VP is the mother.

9.

VP

V
watch

NP
television

C-command
10.

Ai

Bi

tefan Oltean, Generative linguistics (X-bar theory)

Government in terms of sisterhood


11.

A
B
A is a governor; A and B are sisters; A is a lexical head the commonest case of
government.
If A is a V, does it govern the NP complement or the NP subject?
Extended definition of government
A governs B if 1) A is a governor; 2) A c-commands B; 3) Nor barrier intervenes
between A and B. Governors are lexical heads (N, V, P, A) and tensed I. Maximal
projections are barriers to government.

You might also like