Brand Exploratory - Colgate
Brand Exploratory - Colgate
Brand Exploratory - Colgate
Management
Professor Kyryl
Lakishyk
4th Trimester
2014/2015
Brand
Exploratory
Project
Contents
Introduction
Through this project our group wishes to study the importance of a brand
and how companies use their brand as a communication tool to set up
Research methods
In this part we will explain the methodology used to collect data for
the research. We obtained data from primary as well as secondary sources.
Limitations
Regarding the focus groups, the main limitation found was the
difference in active participation between contributors. For most of the time
people answered honestly, but at times we realized that some participants
were waiting for other members to present their views first and thus ended
up getting influenced by the others opinion.
Regarding the quantitative research, our main limitation was in the
distribution of the survey. As previous explained, we used our personal
social media platforms for distributing the survey and as a result our
respondents are more concentrated between the 18 and 24 years age
bracket. This is a limitation for our analysis, because our sample is not
equally distributed.
We were also unable to get reliable secondary information related to oral
care brands / consumers in Portugal. We had to be content with research
reports of private marketing firms.
Brand Identity
What does Colgate offer?
Colgate is an oral hygiene brand with a diverse product line including:
toothpastes (fresh breath, prevention of dental plaque and gingivitis,
sensitivity and whitening), toothbrushes, mouthwashes and dental floss. Its
sub-brands include Colgate Total, Colgate Sensitive, Colgate Whitening,
Colgate Fresh Gel toothpaste, Colgate Max Fresh toothpaste, Colgate Plax
mouthwashes, Colgate 360 toothbrushes, Colgate for kids and also
pharmaceutical products for professionals under the sub-brand Colgate
PeriodGard Plus.
some changes on them in the past year, with a redrawn logo and a chevron
ribbon created by The Partners New York office. According to Jason Smith,
the creative director at Fontsmith, this refreshed elements were needed
because Colgate was never really overarching due to the many different
products with different identities offered, thats why they decided to use a
different typeface and the chevron ribbon device to realign that relationship
between products and company, bringing Colgate a bit more to the
forefront. As to the creation of the new elements, Smith states: Making a
consistent brand across all those different regions was a challenge. The
typeface was key to that our inspiration was in trying to find something
that was both humanist and clinical . The red color that Colgate uses is so
ownable. We had to design a typeface that had the same emotive feeling as
that white on red. The typeface of the new logo now has three weights,
with the lighter styles used for cosmetics and beauty and the heavier ones
used for more clinical products (regular use and dentist/medical use).
Colgate
Oral B
Aquafresh
Sensodyne
Core Identity
Associated
colours
Blue
Red,white and
blue
Colgate
Palmolive
Global Brand is
present on
twitter but not
Procter and
Gamble
Global Brand is
present on
twitter but not
GlaxoSmithKlin
e
Global Brand is
present on
twitter but not
GlaxoSmithKline
Logos
Owned by
Twitter
presence
Global Brand is
present on
twitter but not
Facebook
presence
Toothpaste
Toothbrush
(manual)
the Portuguese
subsidiary
the Portuguese
subsidiary
Global brand
present on
Facebook.
Colgate
Portugals page
is also present;
Global Brand is
present on
Facebook but not
the Portuguese
subsidiary;
the Portuguese
subsidiary
Global Brand is
present on
Facebook. The
Portuguese
subsidiary is
also present on
Facebook;
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
We create
products that
provide you with
a more beautiful
and healthier
smile
Brand Positioning
- Leading brand
in the segment
of toothbrushes.
- Get a sense of
professional
cleaning
Toothbrush
(Electric +
Replacement
parts)
Elixirs
Childrens
products
Professional
products
Floss
Claims on
website
the Portuguese
subsidiary
Global Brand is
present on
Facebook but
not the
Portuguese
subsidiary;
Imagery
Heavy use of
images of
general
consumers
(Mothers and
kids,couples,yout
h,babies). All
look happy.
Have images of
Oral B products,
most imagery is
about the Oral B
electric
toothbrush.
Target
audience
General public
that wants
happiness
General public
that is
performance
oriented
The protection
that tastes
good.
Makes use of an
animated
character
Captain
Aquafresh for
advertising
products for
children. Use
images of
general
consumers to
advertise
products for
adults.
Kids as well as
general public
that wants
happiness and
a good tasting
toothpaste.
No
Number one
brand in dental
sensitivity
Images of teeth
and Sensodyne
products. Lot of
scientific
content related
to teeth
sensitivity.
General public
conscious of
tooth sensitivity
and acid erosion
In the following section of the report, the group used the CustomerBased Brand Equity (CBBE) model, created by Kevin Keller, in order to
gather information about the consumers brand knowledge and the principle
dimensions of brand awareness, associations, reactions and loyalty of
Colgate. The basic premise of the model is that the power of a brand resides
in the minds of customers, through what they have learned, felt, seen and
heard about the brand in the past. According to Kevin Kellers model,
building a strong brand comprises four steps: identify - which involves
establishing the proper brand identity, taking into account the breadth and
depth of brand awareness; meaning - which consists of creating the
appropriate brand meaning through unique and favorable associations;
response - by eliciting positive, accessible brand responses; and relationship
- which involves building brand relationships with customers that are
characterized by intense loyalty.
In order to adapt this model to Colgate, the group has analyzed the
building blocks of salience, performance and imagery, judgment and
feelings and resonance of Colgate through the analysis of the results
obtained in the focus groups and in the survey.
RESONA
NCE
Preferred
brand
JUDGEMENT FEELING
S
Respecte Warmth
S
d
brand
Security
PERFORMANC
Freshness
ENCE
Good
Flavour
Clean
SALIEN
IMAGER
YRed
Silver
Elegant
Top spontaneous
notoriety
CE
brand
Salience
The salience of the brand is the memory of a brand and its linkage to
other important memory structures in a consumption occasion. The depth of
brand awareness consists on the ease with which a brand element is
remembered, either aided or unaided, while the breadth of awareness is the
range of purchase or consumption occasions for which it is recalled (which in
turn depends on how the product knowledge and brand are organized in
memory and refers to the different usage and purchase occasions when
consumers think of a brand). Taking into account Neil Barnard and John
Scrivens article Differentiation or salience, if Colgate has more salience
then Aquafresh, it means that it has more people who are aware of it, who
are familiar with the brand, who note and recall its advertisements and who
have and who harbor intentions to use it in the future, among other aspects.
According to the Portuguese distinction Marcas que marcam, by
QSP-Consultoria de Marketing and Dirio Econmico, Colgate comes up as
the top brand in Oral Hygiene among Portuguese consumers.
From the above analysis we conclude that the Portuguese consumers do not
associate visually with the Colgate logo. Although Colgate revamped their
logo last year, it still has to do better to improve it or communicate it better.
However, when asked to recall a brand from memory, a majority of
respondents mentioned Colgate. This means that consumers do not
remember Colgate for its visual appeal but for some other reason.
When we asked respondents how well they knew the following brands
Colgate, Sensodyne, Aquafresh and Oral B (0=Not at all, 100=Very Well),on
it would be a BMW. Both brands are known as good and safe brands in the
car segment, which is consistent with the reasons behind the respondents
choices: the majority of respondents justify their choice by the association of
both brands with quality, value for money, trustworthiness and variety of
products. For Aquafresh, 24.32% of the respondents also think it would be a
Volkswagen, which seems to be consistent with the common associations it
has with Colgate, and another 24,32% of the respondents imagine it as a
Citroen, since for them it is a second choice. In Sensodynes case,
respondents considered it as a more expensive, unique and high quality
brand, since 21.62% told it would be a Porsche and 21,62% said it would be
a Audi, both premium brands. For Oral B, 23.53% of the respondents said it
would be a BMW, 14.71% said it would be an Audi and 14.71% considered it
would be a Volkswagen. In this case, respondents link the color and letters
of Oral Bs logo and name to the color and letters of BMWs logo and name,
since both are blue and use letter B, what is interesting is that
respondents made associations through visual matches. In addition,
respondents associated innovation and recognition of the brand, as reasons
behind their choices.
In conclusion, most people associate Colgate with quality and trust. Its
attributes like fresh good flavor, clean sensation and value for money
have helped build this positive image. People also value the accessibility
and Colgate being the most accessible oral care brand has also contributed
to its loyal image.
72.87
74.31 74.95
70.40
Is a trustworthy brand
76.60
76.41 76.97
70.78
Is a respected brand
81.57
73.15 79.11
71.68
Is an innovative brand
55.85
53.97 56.26
59.35
70
57.4
53.8
Would
recommend
other people
to
64.9
Is a unique brand
47.26
41.54 44.73
36.87
Attachm
ent
Engagem
ent
Brand
Colgate
Aquafre
sh
37
Sensod
yne
32
Oral-B
42.7
If
brand
was
not 28.9
available,
it
would
make a big difference
to use another brand
Would go out of the 24.9
way to use the brand
Average
32.2
29.1
26
19.5
26.2
22.3
19
30.8
26.8
21.1
Important brand
59
46.8
46.6
36.8
Unique brand
47.3
36.9
44.7
41.5
Preferred brand
53.6
42.3
36.9
27.1
Average
53.3
42
42.7
35.1
57.4
64.9
53.8
57.4
64.9
53.8
Would recommend to 70
other people
Average
70
24.8
correlated to the way consumers think and feel about the brand. In terms of
brand awareness, people easily identify the brand and its products, mainly
because they buy them on a regular basis. However, the logo identification
could have been better comparing to the competition.
Concerning the performance and imagery of its products, people associated
Colgate and Aquafresh mainly with freshness and good flavor,
Sensodyne with recommendation by specialists and Oral-B with cleaning
sensation. Curiously enough, every brand was once associated with
recommendations by specialists and quality/efficacy, although Sensodyne is
more times associated with these aspects, followed by Oral-B due to lack of
distinctive associations. Additionally, Colgate is considered to be an
accessible and diverse brand, due to its availability in the market and to its
diversification of products and adaptability to different ages. There is,
however, a small difference in the perceived quality between Colgate and
the two brands at the top for this aspect, Sensodyne and Oral-B. In regard to
its strategy, Colgate has been doing a great work conveying the freshness
and flavor of its toothpastes through its sub-brands and packages (focusing
the flavor more on products for kids). The associations with the brand
clearly evidence a focus on toothpastes, which is a smart move having in
account that it is the most demanded product in the oral care industry.
However people were proven to adhere promptly to promotions, so Colgate
should use this strategy to expand the demand to other highly used
products, such as toothbrushes, dental flosses and elixirs.
Focusing on judgments, Colgate is a trustworthy and respected brand that
people consider to be unique, reason why they would recommend it to other
people. Sensodyne and Oral-B are perceived as good quality and trustworthy
brands, while Aquafresh is the most innovative. However, there is an
inconsistency between the brands core values, which highlight their
compromise to continuously innovate its products, and the consumers
perceptions.
When respondents were asked to assign a feeling to each brand, they
considered Aquafresh to be the funniest due to its innovation, Sensodyne
the most secure due to its quality and Colgate the warmest for its tradition
in their lives. In this case, there is again inconsistency with the brands
strategy, since Colgate consistently evokes happiness in its website, by
showing regular people smiling. This can be explained by the lack of
advertising displaying a feeling of happiness, which can be seized by the
company, leveraging on the fact that people in the focus groups shared
some boredom with commercials displaying doctors recommendations.
Finally, the analysis placed Colgate as the best in terms of resonance, being
consistently better rated than the competition for loyalty, attachment and
engagement to the brand. However, all brands received a low rating, which
can be explained by the fact that this is a low involvement industry.
Although the company has recently redesigned the logo, the only
thing they changed was the typeface. In order to improve the logo
identification and consequently the brand awareness, the group
recommends the company to add a distinctive element. As seen in
the survey, Aquafresh and Sensodyne were identified correctly the
most times through the logo. This might be explained by the fact that
both of them contain a distinctive element on their logo (Aquafresh
contains a colorful toothpaste element and Sensodyne contains
background loops, Images in Appendix?). Moreover, there was some
confusion between Colgate and Oral-Bs logos.
As this is a low involvement category, the company should
experiment punctual promotions of the type Take 2 for the price of
1, mainly in segments with strong competition, since it is the most
requested offer by the consumer. Besides, the company should sell
products in bundles, such as for example:
toothpaste plus dental
floss or toothpaste plus elixir. This way, it would increase the
awareness to other products that people use the most (besides the
toothpaste and the toothbrush) and that are not sufficiently
associated to the brand, while increasing the level of loyalty (by
expanding the dependency on the brand to other products).
According to the information gathered, consumers (mainly older
people), consider quality to be the most important factor when buying
toothpaste. However, Colgate is below Sensodyne and Oral-B in this
aspect. The strategy should be to confer visibility to the sub-brand
PerioGard Plus. Colgate cannot try to be attractive to all segments or
it loses attractiveness inside its current segment. The already existing
PerioGard Plus is ideal to leverage some strengths of Colgate, such as
respect, trust and, in particular, the tradition, to start a campaign
focused on older people. This sub-brand competes directly with
Sensodyne as a premium brand. The package itself transmits more
quality due to the focus on the properties of the product (eg.:
advanced plaque control)Th traditionto compete in the older people
segment, which is a segment where quality is preferred, to compete
directly with sensodyne and oral-B. Also the package of periodgard
transmits more quality due to the focus on the properties of the
toothpaste and different imagery, while reducing the size of the logo
to give more space for PeriodGard to improve as its own brand. It is
better like this to focus on other segments risking changing the
already built perceptions of Colgate as an unique brand. Show picture
comparing both packages. For this brand can charge premium price,
since people in the survey said to not agree to the fact that Colgate is
premium.
Introduce innovative products to place Colgate at the top in an aspect
where it is not as well-rated as the competition. It transmits care for
innovation in its strategy but consumers dont perceive it. In the focus
group, one person recommended the introduction of chewing gums
Do not focus too much on electronic toothbrush. Small mkt. only used daily
by 4%,
Only 54% of people identified the logo of Colgate, which is low compared to
the competition. However they believe they know well the brand (75%), the
most well-known. That was true for recall, but not for brand image.
However, they say Colgate is the best visually appealing.
References
http://beyond-white-smile.blogspot.pt/
http://www.euromonitor.com/oral-care-in-portugal/report
http://www.colgate.pt/app/Colgate/PT/HomePage.cvsp
http://www.sensodyne.pt/
http://www.aquafresh.pt/
http://www.oralb.pt/
Kantar worldpanel report
http://anilact.pt/informar/lista-actualidade/1952-conheca-osresultados-da-4-edicao-do-marktest-reputation-index
http://www.marktest.com/wap/a/n/id~1adf.aspx
http://www.marcasquemarcam.pt/uploads/pdf/483874.pdf
http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/keller-brand-equitymodel.htm
http://www.sba.pdx.edu/faculty/ahutinel/Read/11.pdf
http://mktg.unisvishtov.bg/ivm/resources/CustomerBasedbrandEquityModel.pdf
http://www.researchersworld.com/vol2/PAPER_04.pdf
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1252054?
uid=37193&uid=3738880&uid=368665151&uid=2&uid=3&uid=67&
uid=37191&uid=62&sid=21106878357393
http://mktg.uni-svishtov.bg/ivm/resources/CustomerBasedbrandEquityModel.pdf
http://www.marcasquemarcam.pt/uploads/pdf/483874.pdf
http://www.marktest.com/wap/a/n/id~1adf.aspx
http://www.designweek.co.uk/colgate-rolls-out-new-identity/
Appendix
Focus Groups
Thru this focus group, we intend to understand what consumers think and
feel about the brand Colgate and its competitors Aquafresh and Oral B.
We are conducting this research as part of our brand exploratory project for
our course in Brand Management.
Rules
No right or wrong answers, only differing points of view
You've probably noticed the microphone. We're tape recording the
session because we don't want to miss any of your comments. People often
say very helpful things in these discussions and we can't write fast enough
to get them all down.
We will be on a first name basis tonight, and we won't use any names in
our reports. You can be assured of complete confidentiality.
You don't need to agree with others. Keep in mind that we're just as
interested in negative comments as positive comments, and at times the
negative comments are the most helpful.
My role as moderator will be to guide the discussion
Talk to each other. We've placed name cards on the table in front of you
to help us remember each other's names.
Questions
Let's find out more about each other by going around the table. Tell us your
name, where you live and for how long have you been living in Portugal.
1) Which brands of oral hygiene products are you aware of?
Focus Group
(A)
Focus Group
(B)
2) Do you feel that all oral care brands are the same (as in they are
indifferent to you)?
Focus Group
(A)
All agree that brands are not the same. Regarding Colgate,
females stated that it is more green, associated it to
natural products and considered it a brand recommended
by dentists, while males associated it to whitening
toothpaste. Concerning competitors: most agree that
Focus Group
(B)
The majority agree that brands are almost the same, only
to participants started a discussion about the quality of
Sensodyne comparing to other brands, one saying that
Sensodyne is better than the rest of the brands and other
saying that it is worse.
Focus Group
(B)
Focus Group
(A)
Focus Group
(B)
4) Is there any brand of oral care products / toothpaste that you totally
dislike?
Focus Group
(A)
Focus Group
(B)
5) What are the main attributes that a toothpaste should have for you?
Focus Group
(A)
Focus Group
(B)
Focus Group
(B)
Focus Group
(A)
Focus Group
(B)
8) If Colgate was a car brand, which brand would it be? What about
Aquafresh? What about Oral-b?
Focus Group
(A)
Focus Group
(B)
Focus Group
(A)
Focus Group
(B)
10)
Do you think Colgate offers all of your preferred features in what it
comes to oral care? If not, what do you think the brand could to improve?
Focus Group
(A)
Focus Group
(B)
11)
If the brand Colgate disappeared, how would you feel towards that?
o If it disappeared, I would just buy another one;
Would you miss anything the brand offers?
o The flavor;
o The freshness;
If you used it regularly before, would it be easy to change to
another brand?
o Yes, although I would miss the flavor;
12)
If you were the Marketing Director of Colgate, which areas of the
brand would you focus on when advertising to the public?
o
o
o
Recommendation by dentists;
Something different, dentists is overly used;
Advertising with common people.
13)
Think about the following brands, what images come to mind when
you think of them?
- Oral-B: a blue package, Oral-B in white letters;
- Aquafresh: different colours, whitening chewing gums;
Colgate: Red and silver package, recommendation by
dentists commercial;
- Sensodyne: recommendation by dentists, white color.
Think about the following brands, what feelings come to mind when you
think of them?
- Oral B: nothing;
- Aquafresh: fun;
- Colgate: warmth;
- Sensodyne: safe.
Does everyone in your family use the same brand of toothpaste? If not,
why?
Yes/No/Yes/Yes/No/No/No
If you visited a super market, and you found the 4 toothpastes
(Aquafresh, Oral-B, Colgate and Sensodyne), of the same size and same
price. Which would you pick up and why?
o Oral B cleans well
o Colgate good brand;
o Sensodyne quality.