Some Complications of Extractions
Some Complications of Extractions
Some Complications of Extractions
GEOFFREY L. HOWE
,;
Co
0
OCZ
-~
CZ
- 0 &YSO
cn~~ :
.CO
o,~C 0
Cq
t
EC) .
Ca
"0
~.
C)
s
O
C)~~~~~C
-.
,~~~~~o
~
C)
C
-t
C
_
'0Ct
04
C0
rs ti oCO
C14
CO
a
C-)
OD
K \
C)
C,)
O Q
ON4N )I
cd
C)
0.
\C
CO~~~~~~~~C
COCxY
-:Eots
U,
N C,;
^
(A
Nt
1oo
l'
0
Cq
0
0
C4ON~
CO
00~
_
N-
_
0
C
C4CS tE o 00a,
0dn
C0,
Us, ,o
0\
0o
a00o
O1
oo-1
mo SMco
tr
0C ,)
0
P
CQ
C4
~
~
~c
CAi
>0
0o0o
00
"0
0COCO
U)
:3C
COCA
r
CO
CCZ
OC
o o v oo0 o o
rO OO
moooCo
Zooo
CO
CA
0
CC
,OeC,
Or.
C
n
CO
Cl~~
~~
cO
lc
(ON
~~
C)
.=
t
_
CO
oZ _
N
C
ON\s,
"0
ON
10
C-4
ON
CO
CO
CZ
bo
0
~1.
ON.
(ON
C-"
C-4
0
0
C)
310
=C)l
Fig I
311
*!k~ ~ ~.^;h
GEOFFREY L. HOWE
Impairment of labial sensation may complicate the extraction of mandibular third molars due to nerve damage arising in one of two ways:
nerve may be crushed or torn during the dislocation of the
tooth from its socket if the canal and its contents are either grooving
or perforating the roots of the third molar.
(a) The
312
..
~~
~~
~~ ~~ ~~
~~
~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.
s: _ I X B~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ......... ..
..
.......
..........:M.
GEOFFREY L. HOWE
becomes vertical the apex descends and may damage the canal and its
contents. The chance of damage can be decreased in these cases by
sectioning the tooth with either a bur or an osteotome, thus altering the
" line of withdrawal " of the root or roots so that they are moved away
from the canal.
If possible, " perforated " teeth should be widely exposed by the removal
of buccal bone and then sectioned at the level of the neurovascular bundle.
The root fragments are then removed, leaving the canal contents intact.
If this procedure is not practicable the neurovascular bundle should be
divided with a sharp scalpel and the severed ends placed in apposition after
the tooth has been removed. A cleanly cut nerve regenerates more
quickly than a crushed and avulsed one (Ward, 1955).
Johnson (1956)
175
Connors (1959)
10
(with local
anaesthetic agents)
919 ml.
Average loss
223 ml.
700 ml.
Average loss
316 ml.
elevation of the tooth or root from its socket whilst a blow with an osteotome which is intended to split the tooth may sometimes displace it into
315
GEOFFREY L. HOWE
Fig. 6. Partially erupted mandi-bular premolar with root grooved by the inferior
dental nerve.
delivered with elevators. The soft tissues are re-apposed with loosely
tied sutures.
Antral involvement during tooth extraction
The roots of all the maxillary cheek teeth may be in close relationship
to the antrum. In some instances as much as one half of their roots may
form part of the wall of the air sinus and be separated from its cavity by
the antral lining alone. During the extraction of such a tooth an oroantral fistula may be created and either the whole tooth or a root be displaced into the antrum. Whilst the basic cause of both these complications is the presence of a large air sinus, fewer roots would be pushed into
antra if the following simple rules were observed:
(a) Forceps should never be applied to a maxillary cheek tooth unless
sufficient of its length is exposed, both palatally and buccally, to
allow the blades to be applied under direct vision.
(b) The apical one-third of the palatal root of a maxillary molar should
be left in situ if it is fractured during forceps extraction unless there
is a positive indication for its removal. Successfula" transalveolar
316
(b)
(a)
vI(
A11
(C)
IMd.
(d)
can then be applied in such a manner that the root is moved away
from the antrum.
(d) The operator should never atteinpt to deliver fractured maxillary
roots by passing an elevator or Coupland's chisel up the socket.
(e) If a patient presents with a history of previous antral involvement
or an isolated maxillary molar the removal of the tooth should be
undertaken only after a pre-extraction radiograph has been carefully studied. A history of antral involvement complicating
previous extractions probably indicates the presence of a large air
sinus and a thin antral floor. The alveolus supporting an isolated
maxillary molar is often weakened by an extension of the antral
cavity into it.
317
GEOFFREY L. HOWE
..I
(a)
(b)
\N
a...~~~~~~~~~~~LI<.
()a
(c)
*~~~~~~~~~~1 '
Fig. 8. Repair of
318
mucoperiosteal flap.
Oro-antral fistula
Despite every care being exercised, oro-antral fistulae will sometimes
be created during the extraction of teeth from patients with large antra.
If promptly diagnosed and correctly treated they usually heal uneventfully.
If the operator suspects that the antrum has been opened he should
attempt to confirm his suspicions by the " nose blowing " test in which the
patient attempts to blow through his occluded nares with his mouth open.
In the presence of an oro-antral fistula, air will be heard to pass through
the fistula, and will displace a wisp of cotton wool held over the socket
whilst any blood present in the socket will be seen to bubble.
..4~*
*".
..
(a)
(b)
[Fig. 9. Repair of an oro-antral fistula with
(c)
palatal mucoperiosteal flap.
The factors which cause an oro-antral fistula to persist are the size of the
bony defect and infection of the maxillary antrum, and treatment must be
planned with these factors in mind. The fistula heals by organization of a
blood clot, and the surgeon should aim to provide support for this blood
clot and to prevent infection of the air sinus. The patient must not be
allowed to rinse the mouth until the fistula is repaired or the antrum will be
contaminated with oral flora, some of which may become pathogenic in
their new environment and cause infection. An attempt is then made to
cover the defect with a muco-periosteal flap, the actual technique employed
being governed by the surgical experience of the operator and the facilities
and operating time at his disposal when the complication occurs. The
319
GEOFFREY L. HOWE
(a)
(b)
(d)
(c)
Fig.
10.
(e)
The treatment of a fractured maxillary tuberosity.
321
GEOFFREY L. HOWE
required.
(d) The results are no better. Following removal of the tuberosity
new bone is rapidly laid down in the area and provides a firm base
for the denture (Fig. 10e).
If a pre-extraction radiograph reveals the presence of a large antrum,
an attempt to prevent fracture of the tuberosity should be made by dissecting the tooth from its attachments and sectioning it if necessary.
Should either antral involvement or tuberosity fracture complicate the
322
S. R. UMRIGAR, F.F.A.R.C.S.
323