Skunk Works of Samsung
Skunk Works of Samsung
or Intrapreneurship
Submitted to: Dr. Noor Muhammad
Salman Yousaf
Misbah Abbas
Shaheer Ahmad
Talha Khalil Sherani
Table of Contents
Company 1:......................................................................................................................................2
SAMSUNG......................................................................................................................................2
Skunk works of Samsung:...........................................................................................................2
Organizational structure:..............................................................................................................2
Encouragement of Intrapreneurship Environment:.....................................................................3
Corporate Entrepreneurship Process (Developing the Model):...................................................4
Learning Process (Know How and Know Why Concepts):........................................................5
Company 2:......................................................................................................................................6
GOOGLE.........................................................................................................................................6
Google X......................................................................................................................................6
Skunk Works At Google:.............................................................................................................6
Organizational Structure of Google:............................................................................................6
Learning Process:.........................................................................................................................7
Encouragement of Intrapreneurship Environment:.....................................................................7
Corporate Entrepreneurship Process: (Model)............................................................................8
1.
Company 1:
SAMSUNG
Page | 1
Organizational structure:
Throughout 2012, Samsung Electronics continued to advance its practice of sustainable
management through responsible corporate governance. In addition to compliance with national
and international law, Samsung also employs a set of ethical standards and values that guide its
decision making processes and work procedures. Through a corporate governance structure that
centers on board of director engagement, the company works to ensure transparent, responsible
business management across all operations. Each policy and decision enacted by the board of
directors seeks to maximize corporate value and enhance shareholder rights and interests.
Specifically, the Samsung board of directors is responsible for the execution of all matters as
mandated by the Korean Commerce Act and the Samsung Electronics Articles of Incorporation,
including those delegated by the companys general shareholders meetings. The board also
makes important decisions on the companys management policies and oversees executive work
performance.
In 2012, Samsung Electronics launched an exhaustive program of organizational reform that
proactively addresses the changing global IT landscape. As a top priority of the organizational
reform, Samsung refined management structures in each business area to optimize capabilities
Page | 2
throughout the entire company. Samsungs new organizational structure reflects the companys
refocused emphasis on three key business sectors: Consumer Electronics (CE), IT & Mobile
Communications (IM), and Device Solutions (DS). These reforms will help Samsung improve
upon its history of operational excellence, allowing for increased growth opportunities and
continued industry-leading innovation.
Samsung Electronics believes that its efficacy and success relies on its ability to create new
business, products, and technology. As a result, the company places a heavy emphasis on future
investments and patents. Samsung also believes in the power of constructive failures,
recognizing that challenges often serve as a catalyst for strategic problem solving and innovation
within the global marketplace. The company regards every challenge regardless of size as an
opportunity for knowledge building and growth. Through constant problem solving and creative
technological innovations, Samsung Electronics is committed to creating a more sustainable
future for the entire global community.
Page | 3
of the CSV model in order to drive value creation both within its business and among its
stakeholders.
in-depth discussions about the companys social responsibility policies and ways of improving
them. The company also held a CSR Sharing Concert event that convened volunteers and
beneficiaries to both share past CSR accomplishments and discuss potential improvements in
future CSR direction and program content.
Samsung Electronics began doing business in Korea in 1969. Forty-three years later, Samsung
has expanded into 200 countries. Samsung attributes much of its success to its global network of
employees, whose creativity and innovation are engines for growth. The diversity of perspective
and expertise present at each of Samsungs nine regional headquarters ensures independent
strategic development and solutions that can be applied both locally and around the world
Leading the Global Market with Cutting-edge Technology & Quality Products Samsung
Electronics sold more than 406 million mobile phones in 2012, securing a position as the global
market leader with an overall share of 23.4%. Samsung also maintained its global market leader
positions in other key product areas, including TVs, monitors, semiconductors and digital
appliances. And will continue to lead the global market with cutting-edge technologies and
quality products.
(Kwon, June 28. 2013)
Company 2:
GOOGLE
Google X
One of the most mysterious, yet widely known secret labs out there is Google X, which is
overseen by co-founder Sergey Brin. The lab works on more than 100 "shoot for the stars" type
Page | 5
ideas like space elevators, indoor mapping systems, self driving cars, and wearable computers.
The lab's at an undisclosed location in Northern California.
Page | 6
Learning Process:
Google is full of smart people working on some of the hardest problems in Computer Science.
Many Googlers have PhDs and come from a research background, but research is not treated as a
separate activity at Google -- research happens across the company, on many different teams.
This means there is a blurry line between research and product development.
Engineering and research projects alike are done by small teams on a rapid schedule. Most
projects have time horizons of just 6-12 months, and aim to deliver results and iterate quickly.
That said, for some higher-risk or longer-term projects, some research groups do work with a
certain level of isolation - but even then, we encourage organizational flexibility and the free
flow of information within the company (and often outside of the company as well). Nearly all
projects at Google are bottom-up efforts, started by a few Googlers who want to tackle a new
problem. Were very light on management. We have more problems than we have people, so
theres always a big problem just around the corner waiting for someone to solve.
At Google, you have the freedom to work on many different areas. Google researchers and
engineers often move between projects, based on shifting interests and new opportunities. This
means that its not uncommon for a Googler who has been with the company for several years to
have worked on very different areas, such as search, Gmail, maps, and core networking. You get
to work with different people on new challenges and constantly learn new things. Of course, if
you prefer to stay on one team, you can do that too! Google has a tremendous number of exciting
challenges that only arise with the vast amount of data and sheer scale of systems that we build.
Most people know about Googles research activities that back our major products, such as
search algorithms, systems infrastructure, machine learning, and programming languages. These
are just the tip of the iceberg.
Page | 7
But firms should be aware that the enabler model is not just about allocating capital for corporate
entrepreneurship. Personnel development and executive engagement are also critical. Google
spends an extraordinary amount of time and effort on recruiting. To be hired, a program manager
or senior engineering candidate might go through 20 interviews in multiple stages before the
company determines whether that individual has the right combination of entrepreneurial
DNA, broad technical talent and intellectual agility. Executive engagement is essential for
people to trust that the process of corporate entrepreneurship is being taken seriously that is,
the company will indeed pursue the development and commercialization of good ideas. Without
sufficient support from senior management, promising concepts can end up as casualties of
conflicts with established businesses. Another danger is that the enabler model could degenerate
into bowling for dollars, in which people apply for funds for ordinary business-unit projects or
for ideas that they are not really seriously interested in pursuing.
References
Kwon, O. h. -H., June 28. 2013. Samsung Electronics. [Online]
Available at: http://biztek.edu.pk/ibt/qec/7.1/1%20Practicing%20the%20Intrapreneurship.pdf
[Accessed 1 12 2015].
Source: IBS center for Management Research: http://www.financepractitioner.com/informationsources/ibs-centre-of-management-research-icmr
Page | 9