Pedagogical Knowledge
Pedagogical Knowledge
PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE
Pedagogical knowledge is a key to successful teaching. Pedagogical
Knowledge is the deep knowledge about the processes and practices or methods of
teaching and learning and how it covers overall educational purposes, values and
aims. This is a general form of knowledge which includes extent of student learning,
classroom management, and lesson plan development and implementation and
student evaluation.
To teach
Principle of involvement
Principle of self-control
Have rules
Timely intervention
It is one in which students and staff alike recognize, appreciate, and capitalize on
diversity so as to enrich the overall learning experience.
Ask students how they prefer to learn, and where possible, examine how you
might adapt your teaching and learning activities accordingly. For example, inviting
students to write a self-reflective essay to explain their learning style; completing a
learning style inventory assessment, or providing an online forum to openly discuss
how they like to learn are ideal methods to explore learning styles
4.
Use inclusive language and appropriate modes of address
Use inclusive language that avoids ethnocentric tones (family name rather
than last name; given name rather than Christian name)
Fluency
Content
Conventions
Syntax
Vocabulary
Too often teachers focus their attention primarily on surface features of a student's
composition related to the mechanical aspects of writing, or conventions. A
balanced assessment should look at all five aspects of a student's writing. The
following are simple methods for assessing each product variable. In some
instances quantifiable measures are used; in others, qualitative assessments seem
more appropriate.
Fluency: ability of translating thoughts into words comprises:
message quality (ability to explain concepts and write without copying from
some text
directional principles (correct spacing, right mode of writing, start top left,
move left to right, or return down left
A simple curriculum-based measure of fluency is total number of words written
during a short writing assignment. When fluency is the focus, misspellings, poor
word choice, and faulty punctuation are not considered. Attention is only directed to
the student's facility in translating thoughts into words. A baseline of at least three
writing samples should be collected and the total number of words counted for
each. For the purpose of evaluation, this total can be compared with those of
proficient writers of the same age or grade level. However, total words may be used
5
best in monitoring the student's progress, comparing performance with his or her
own previous fluency.
If the total number of words is less than 20, aim for doubling it by the end of the
school year.
If the number of words is between 25 and 30, aim for a 50% increase.
If the number of words is between 35 and 45, aim for a 25% increase.
If the number of words is greater than 50, choose another objective.
Content
Content is the second factor to consider in the writing product. Content features
include the composition's organization, cohesion, accuracy (in expository writing),
and originality (in creative writing). General questions the classroom teacher can
ask regarding a composition's organization include:
Is there a good beginning sentence?
Is there a clear ending?
Is there a logical sequence of subtopics or events?
Cohesion questions include:
Does the writer stick to the topic?
Is it clear what words like it, that, and they refer to?
Does the writer use key words that cue the reader to the direction of the discourse
(First , Then , Therefore , On the other hand )?
Originality is assessed through questions like:
Did the writer attempt humor?
Did the writer present a unique point of view?
Analytical scales are the best way to lend some objectivity to evaluation of content.
One can choose from a general rating scale, appropriate to almost any writing
assignment, or one tailored to a specific genre or text structure.
Evaluating student writing with five distinct scores helps students to see
themselves as multidimensional writers, with weaknesses and strengths
Students who are poor spellers can be recognized for the quality of their
ideas, while perfect spellers may realize that correct writing is not necessarily
interesting writing.
Students can learn to recognize their strengths and work to improve their
areas of weakness.
6
paragraph relates to the others rather than What does this have to do with
anything?
2.
Guide substantive thought. Again, the goal is to help students improve
their writing in general, and while it might feel easier to focus solely on surface-level
issues, it is likewise important to help them with important issues like critical
thought, development, and purpose. Of course, different kinds of assignments and
students might determine the amount of attention you pay to surface-level issues
(Is it a very formal assignment? Is it a very young student who struggles so much
with clarity that content is completely obscured?)
3.
Be specific. Providing students with some details specific to their writing will
help them understand our response and work towards improvement. This means
going beyond noting, for instance, that a passage is awkward, to explaining why
that passage is awkward. Such details can help overcome the common complaint
that comments are cryptic or rubberstamped.
4.
Encourage skills improvement and emphasize choice. When possible,
we should strive to provide feedback that will help students recognize and improve
foundational skills. For example, instead of just indicating that a paragraph is
unclear, you might suggest that the student include a topic sentence to provide
focus. Similarly, it is important to emphasize that there can be many right choices
in writing, and in your commentary, it can be beneficial to leave students with those
choices in order to imbue them with ownership of the piece. This can help
circumvent that student impulse to just fix whatever the instructor marked and
instead encourage them to approach the revision in a thoughtful way.
5.
Provide a positive environment. Ultimately, we must remember that
unlike taking a test, writing and receiving feedback is an intensely personal
experience for many. When providing feedback, we should respect that vulnerability
and create a positive environment that will encourage students to improve, rather
than discourage them from trying. And as Nick Carbone points out, student writers
dont have the same experiences as we do, so we need to learn to like their honest
attempts.
6.
Responding to ideas rather than just presentation can show that you
value what the student has to say. Further, asking questions and responding as an
audience can also help take the sting out of a critical comment. And dont forget to
highlight what the student has done well in addition to what needs work.
1.
Prioritize. It is in your best interest as well as your students to pick your
battles when providing feedback on their writing. Too many comments on too many
aspects of writing can confuse and overwhelm them as well as devour your time
and energy. After reading an essay, choose what you believe to be the most
important areas on which to concentrate; try focusing on higher-order concerns
first, such as focus and development. To help you accomplish this, try reading
through the entire paper first without marking it at all to help you get a good idea of
what the primary issues are.
7
2.
Do not edit! Yes, you want to make it clear that surface errors matter, but if
you fix every error in an essay, students will not learn to identify the problems and
make the corrections themselves, and you will have wasted a great deal of time.
Here are a few strategies regarding surface errors:
Discuss common problems with the entire class. If you find that a problem is
common to many papers in the class, you do not have to take the time to explain it
on every single paper. Instead, explain the problem and teach the skills to your
class as a whole.
Try marking errors with a check mark or X in the margin. Let the students
figure out what needs to be revised.
Carefully edit just one paragraph, showing the level of correctness you expect
for the entire paper.
Note major patterns of error you see throughout the paper, offering a few
examples.
Tailor comments based on the type of assignment. Remember that not all
kinds of assignments require the same type of feedback and grading process. Short
journal assignments might call for short, more content-oriented feedback, while
longer, more formal essays would call for more extensive commentary. If you are
responding to a paper that is likely to be revised, provide substantial feedback to
assist with the revision. Conversely, if it is an end-of-term paper that will not be
revised, your feedback might be more summative.
Conclusion