F33C06: Atoms, Photons and Elementary Particles: 1 Radioactivity
F33C06: Atoms, Photons and Elementary Particles: 1 Radioactivity
Particles
Adam Moss
September 30, 2013
1
1.1
Radioactivity
Radioactive decay
1.2
Natural radioactivity
The earth formed about 4.5 109 years ago from the debris of long dead stars.
Most of the elements were radioactive but have since decayed into stable nuclei.
However a few have half lives long compared to the age of the earth and so we
can still observe their radioactivity. Most are very heavy elements. They decay
by and emission. emission decreases A by 4, whereas emission leaves A
unchanged. There are therefore 4 independent decay chains, as shown in Fig. 2.
The decay process will concentrate the nuclei in the longest lived member of
the chain, and provided its half life is of the order of the age of the earth (or
longer), we can still observe that activity today.
If it were not for the very long half life of 235 U and 238 U there would be no
natural uranium and so no obvious source of nuclear power (or nuclear weapons).
1.3
Activity
1. Radioactivity
1.1. Radioactive decay
Definition: The spontaneous emission of radiations that change the
nucleus.
Of
about 250
nuclides, only ab
stable. The stable
a narrow distributi
of N versus Z.
nuclei change
radioactive decay
become more st
nuclide
with
Z > 83 CBi)is stab
100
90
eo
60
50
40
30
10
20 30
40
50
60
70
eo
90
Neutron Dumber N
Figure
1.1
Segre
Chart
Figure
1: :Segre
chart.
Nucleus
4n+3
Nucleus
40+2
206Pb
40 +(Stable
208Pb
2I(y}
09Bi
235U
238U
4.47
109 )
232Th1.41
2.14
106
1010
7.04
xX207Pb
108
~
237N
P4n
Half-Life,
Longest-Lived Member
The earth formed about 4.5 x 109 years ago from the debris of long dead
of the elements were radioactive but have since decayed into stable nuclei
have half lives long compared to the age of the earth and so we can still o
radioactivity. Most are very heavy elements. They decay by alph
emission. Alpha emission decreases A by 4 units, whereas beta emissi
Figure 2: The disintegration
series
of the heavy4elements
(n is an integer).
unchanged.
There are
therefore
independent
decay chains. The decay
concentrate the nuclei in the longest lived member of the chain, and prov
Figure
disintegration
seriesage
of theof
heavy
is an integer)
life is
of 1.2
the: Theorder
of the
theelements
earth(n (or
longer), we can still observe
today.
2
If it were not for the very long half life of 235U and 238 U there would be no natural
uranium and so no obvious source of nuclear power (or nuclear weapons).
1.3. Activity
Definition:
= 1 decay/so
I,)
Figure
law ofofradioactive
decay.
Figure3:1.3Exponential
: Exponentia11aw
radioactive decay
1.4
number
Example: The
Carbon
datingof radioactive nuclei, dN , decaying in a time dt is proportional to
N, so
dN
Primary cosmic radiation converts 14N
in the
into 1:C eiN(n, p) 1:C)
= atmosphere
N ,
(1)
dt 1:C combines with oxygen to form CO2
which has a half life of 5730 years. This
which
is taken
up by
plants. When or
thedecay
plant dies
the decay
of the
1:Cberadioactivity
where
is the
disintegration
constant.
Eqn.
1 can
integrated to
cangive
be used
to
determine
its
age.
the exponential law of radioactive decay
If the activity of a sample of wood found
theet
tomb, of one of the Pharaohs is 6.8 (2)
N =in N
0
counts/minute/gram of carbon and the activity of 14Cin living plant material is 15.3
counts/min/gram
of number
carbon, what
is the at
aget =
of 0.
the The
woodhalf
sample?
where N is the
of nuclei
life, t , is the time taken
0
1/2
= N0 et1/2 ,
t1/2
(3)
ln 2
.
(4)
6~o( occur,
;J
Activity is the rate at which decays
i.e.
A = N .
(5)
6
Why is it always an alpha particle that is ejected?
-7.26
7Li
6Li
Emitted
6He
4He
sHe
Release
Particle
-1.94
-6.12
-2.59
+5.41
-6.19
-3.79
-10.70
-10.24
-9.92
Energy
Emitted
(MeV)
(Me V)
1.5
232
U.
Types of decay
There
is a strong
relationship (the Geiger-Nuttall rule) relating the energies of the
1.5.1
decay
ex particles emitted 4and the half lives ofthenucIides, with large energies associated
In this process a He nucleus ( particle) is emitted
with short half lives.2 The variation in half life is astounding (note the log axis in Fig
A
1.5).
X A4 Y +4 He .
(6)
Z
Z2
4
222
86 Y +2 He ,
(7)
10
Q (NeY)
Figure 1.5 : The inverse relationship between ex-decay half life and ex-decay
energv
There is a strong relationship (the Geiger-Nuttall rule) relating the energies of the
ex particles emitted and the half lives ofthenucIides, with large energies associated
with short half lives. The variation in half life is astounding (note the log axis in Fig
1.5).
218rh
10
Q (NeY)
Figure 5: The inverse relationship between decay half life and decay energy.
the nucleus.
There
is actually
not muchbetween
reason toex-decay
believe half
particles
do exist
Figure
1.5 : The
inverse
relationship
life and
ex-decay
separately, but the model works quite
well. The potential is shown in Fig. 6,
energv
where Q is the disintegration energy.
To obtain the tunnelling probability recall the time-independent Schrodinger
equation for a particle of mass m in one dimension,
~2 d 2
+ V (x)(x) = E(x),
2m dx2
(8)
where (x) is the wave function. The complete solution, including time dependence is (x, t) = (x)eiE/~ t . For the case of E > V (x) the solutions are
oscillatory. For a constant potential V (x) = Vc the wave function is given by
= Aeikx + Beikx ,
where
(9)
2m(E Vc )
.
(10)
~2
The solutions are exponential when E < V (x). Again for a constant potential
V (x) = Vc we have
= Cekx + Dekx ,
(11)
k=
where
r
k=
2m(Vc E)
.
~2
5
(12)
(t~= 1.4
Th
(t~= 1.0
218
= 4.08
1010y; Q
X 10-7
s; Q
,jj::
MeV)
I""';")
.-hJr 60
= 9.85
MeV)
-_.
b ~)
;;_1.
('t!
~
__
I"
-_.
_1.
;; ('t!
~)
~
__
~~~~j
r-
.--
L;
if
1.
jJ
hJr 60
r~
,jj::
I""';")
~~~~j
r-
I-
'"
...J
'"
L;
...J
if
1.
jJ
I"
r~
nucleus system
Figure
6: 1.6
Potential
energy
diagram
anan alpha
particle/daughter
system.
Figure
: Potential
energy
diagramforfor
particle/daughternucleus
nucleus
system
We can simplify the potential through which the alpha particle has to tunnel.
We can simplify the potential through which the alpha particle has to tunnel.
-.- CQ
-'
-'
-~
-~
-VD
~ ~
-VD
1:
1:
,
~
~I
,
I
"-----"------ - -
(~c:)
2__
L\~
i2.. -.-3....
j~
2-(~c:)
L\~
-.-3....
~__
1-11-;. -;.
i2..
-.-
-:7
..
-:7
.......
.......
..
For our model of the nucleus we can simplify the potential which the
particle has to tunnel to that of Fig. 7. The average value of Vc E in the
barrier region is (B Q)/2, which means (in the barrier region)
r
m(B Q)
.
(13)
k=
~2
Obtaining solutions in the other regions and applying boundary conditions, one
can compute the transmission coefficient, defined as the ratio of transmitted to
incident particle currents, as
P =
jtransmitted
ek(ba) .
jincident
(14)
(15)
where f is the frequency with which the particle hits the barrier, roughly v/a,
where v is the velocity of the particle.
1.6
decay
p + e
negative decay ,
n+e
positive decay ,
p + e
(16)
In the case of decay, the particles are emitted with precise energies, but for
decay there is a continuous distribution up to a maximum energy. For example,
in the case of the decay of 210 Bi, the change in the nuclear mass suggests
that the particles should have an energy of 1.16 MeV. Instead a continuous
distribution is observed.
Pauli provided an explanation for this in 1931 by proposing that a second
particle was released in the decay process. These were later named by Fermi
as the neutrino, , and anti-neutrino, , and accounted for the missing energy.
Thus Eqn. 16 should properly be written as
n
p+e
p + e + ,
(17)
n+e +,
n+.
14
7 N+e
18
+
8 O+e
+ ,
+.
(18)
In the case of ex: - decay, the ex: particles are emitted with precise energies, but for f3
decay there is a continuous distribution up to a maximum energy. For example, in the
case of the f3 - decay of 210Bi, the change in the nucleur mass suggests that the f3 =
particles should have an energy of 1.16 MeV. Instead a continuous distribution is
observed.
/'
r; /.I
,J<.Nr."
).' L:,'
- decay
210
Bi.
of 210Bi
Unlike for decay, in the case of decay there is no barrier to penetrate. The
particle
neutrino
notinexist
the decay that
process
and particle was
Pau1i and
provided
an (anti-neutrino)
explanation fordothis
1931before
by proposing
a second
wereleased
must account
theirprocess.
formation.
In 1934
theoryasof the
neutrino Cv)
in the for
decay
These
wereFermi
later developed
named bya Fermi
decay
based
on
Paulis
neutrino
hypothesis.
It
requires
an
interaction
that
is
and anti-neutrino Cv) and accounted for the missing energy. Thus Eqn 1.7 should
weak
compared
to the interaction
that gives rise to the (quasi) stationary states.
properly
be written
as:
The transition rate is given by Fermis Golden Rule (see later).
2
, + iJ
n = ~~|Vfi |2 (E
f ) ep+
n
(19)
+ e+ + v
1.7
decay
decay is the nuclear equivalent of optical or x-ray transitions within the electronic structure of an atom. An excited nucleus can decay towards the ground
state by emission of a ray photon. In the process Z and A are unchanged.
An example is 99m
43 Tc, which has t1/2 6 h and a ray energy of 140 keV
(here the m stands for metastable, or long lived). It is widely used in nuclear
medicine as a radiotracer.
1.8
Uses of radioactivity
All of you will be aware of the potentially harmful effects of exposure to radioactivity. First and foremost of these is its ability to cause cancer. However,
there are also many positive uses of radioactivity. Examples include
8