0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views5 pages

Solution 2

The document contains a homework problem set involving vector calculus concepts such as vector products, Stokes' theorem, and coordinate transformations. Problem 1 involves taking vector products and applying properties of the Levi-Civita symbol. Problem 2 uses Stokes' theorem to evaluate line integrals over surfaces and computes a surface integral directly. Problem 3 examines whether a vector field is rotational or solenoidal. Problem 4 derives the scale factors and volume element for parabolic cylinder coordinates. Problem 5 provides two rigorous proofs that the Gaussian function converges to the Dirac delta function as its width approaches zero.

Uploaded by

prof.tobes
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views5 pages

Solution 2

The document contains a homework problem set involving vector calculus concepts such as vector products, Stokes' theorem, and coordinate transformations. Problem 1 involves taking vector products and applying properties of the Levi-Civita symbol. Problem 2 uses Stokes' theorem to evaluate line integrals over surfaces and computes a surface integral directly. Problem 3 examines whether a vector field is rotational or solenoidal. Problem 4 derives the scale factors and volume element for parabolic cylinder coordinates. Problem 5 provides two rigorous proofs that the Gaussian function converges to the Dirac delta function as its width approaches zero.

Uploaded by

prof.tobes
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Andriy Petrashyk

Homework 2

October 19, 2015

Problem 1.


~
~
We use the definition of the vector product, A B = ijk Aj Bk and the following
i
property of the Levi-Civita symbol, ijk ilm = jl km jm kl .
Part (a)
~ B)
~ (C
~ D)
~ = (A
~ B)
~ i (C
~ D)
~ i
(A
= (ijk Aj Bk )(ilm Cl Dm ) = ijk ilm Aj Bk Cl Dm
= (jl km jm kl )Aj Bk Cl Dm
= (Aj Cj )(Bk Dk ) (Aj Dj )(Bk Ck )
~ C)(
~ B
~ D)
~ (A
~ D)(
~ B
~ C).
~
= (A

Part (b)
h


 

i
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
C D
(A B) (C D) = ijk A B
j

= ijk (jlm Al Bm )(knp Cn Dp ) = ijk jlm knp Al Bm Cn Dp


= jlm Al Bm (in jp ip jn ) Al Bm Cn Dp




~B
~ Dj Ci A
~B
~ Cj Di
= A
j
j
nh

i
h
 i o
~B
~ D
~ C
~ A
~B
~ C
~ D
~ .
=
A
i

Problem 2.
Note that
~ F~ = (2, 0, 2).
We are looking at F~ = (y + z)i (x + z)j + (x + y)k.
Part (a)
For this part, we can apply Stokes theorem.
I
Z
Z
~
k d = 2.
~
~
~
F dl = F d~ = (2i 2k)

Part (b)
Same thing as in the previous part:
I
Z
Z
~
j d = 0.
~
~
~
F dl = F d~ = (2i 2k)

Andriy Petrashyk

Homework 2

October 19, 2015

Part (c)
Here, we have to compute the actual integral:
I

F~ d~l =

(1,0,0)
Z

F~ i dx +

(0,0,0)

(1,0,1)
Z

F~ k dz +

(1,0,0)

(1,1,1)
Z

F~ (j) dy +

(1,0,1)

(0,0,0)
Z

dy
F~ (i + j + k)

(1,1,1)

Z0
=0+12+

2y dy = 1 1 = 2.
1

Part (d)
Again, need to compute the actual integral:
I

F~ d~l =

(0,0,2)
Z

F~ d~l +

(0,0,0)

(0,0,0)
Z

F~ k dz

(0,0,2)

Z2
[(sin t + t) sin t (1 cos t + t) cos t + (1 cos t + sin t)] dt + 0 = 2.

=
0

Problem 3.
We are looking at ~u = yz x + zx
y + zy
z.
Part (a)
Its rrotational:


x y z


~ ~u = x y z = 0.



yz zx xy
Its also solenoidal:
~ ~u = x (yz) + y (zx) + z (xy) = 0.

Part (b)
This is simple: x = yz = xyz + C; With this , we also have: y = xz, z = xy.
Thus, = yz x + zx
y + zy
z = ~u. Note that is a scalar field, while ~u is a vector field.

Andriy Petrashyk

Homework 2

October 19, 2015

Part (c)
Yes, this is true for any irrotational field. There are many candidates, but one choice is, for
example,

~ = 1 xz 2 x + x2 y y + y 2 z z .
A
2

Problem 4.
Part (a)
We are looking at the parabolic cylinder coordinates, x = 21 (u2 v 2 ), y = uv, z = z. In
terms of (u, v, z), we have:
dx = udu vdv,
dy = udv + vdu,
dz = dz;
ds2 = dx2 + dy 2 + dz 2 = (u2 + v 2 )(du2 + dv 2 ) + dz 2 .
The metric is

u2 + v 2
0
0
u2 + v 2 0
gij = 0
0
0
1

and so the scale factors are hu = hv = u2 + v 2 , hz = 1.


The volume element is


u v 0




(x, y, z)
dudvdw = v u 0 dudvdw = (u2 + v 2 )dudvdw.
dV = dxdydz =



(u, v, w)
0 0 1

From d~s = ~an dxn = (udu vdv)i + (udv + vdu)j + dz k = (ui + vj)du + (uj vi)dv + dz k,
we get

~au = u2 + v 2 eu = ui + vj,

~av = u2 + v 2 ev = uj vi,

~az = ez = k.

Part (b)
For this part, the coordinates are a bit more complicated, but the procedure is the same.
Repeating the steps above for
x = a cosh u cos v,
y = a sinh u sin v,
z = z,
3

Andriy Petrashyk

Homework 2

October 19, 2015

and using cos2 x = 1 sin2 x and cosh2 x = 1 + sinh2 x, we get:


ds2 = a2 (sinh2 u + sin2 v)(du2 + dv 2 ) + dz 2 ,
p
hu = hv = a sinh2 u + sin2 v, hz = 1,
dV = a2 (sinh2 u + sin2 v)dudvdz,
p
~au = a sinh2 u + sin2 v
eu = a(sinh u cos vi + cosh u sin vj),
p
ev = a(sinh u cos vj cosh u sin vi),
~av = a sinh2 u + sin2 v

~az = ez = k.

Problem 5.
There are two ways to do this rigorously.
(a) The first way relies on the fact that a test function is smooth and integrable. These
two conditions together imply that the test function can be bounded from above by a
constant C = max(f ). This, in turn, implies that something called the dominated
convergence theorem can be applied.
The dominated convergence theorem states the following. Suppose that the sequence
fn of real-valued measurable functions converges to a function f and is dominated by
some integrable function
g in the
R
R sense that |fn (x)| g(x) n , x. Then f is
integrable and lim fn d = lim fn d.
n

With this, we look at


Z
lim

n
2 2
en x f (x) dx = lim
n

function G(x) =
to the last integral:
Z
lim

u
1
2
eu f
du.
n

The sequence of functions g(x) =


2
1 eu

2
1 eu f

u
n

is dominated by the integrable

C, and so we can apply the dominated convergence theorem

u
1
2
eu f
du =
n

u
1
2
lim eu f
du =
n
n

All in all then, because


Z
lim

n
2 2
en x f (x) dx = f (0)

for all test functions f (x), it is true that


n
2 2
lim en x = (x).
n

1
2
eu f (0) du = f (0).

Andriy Petrashyk

Homework 2

October 19, 2015

(b) The second way is conceptually much simpler and relies on the fact that we can
expand the test function f (x) in a Taylor series around 0:
Z
lim

n
2 2
en x f (x) dx = lim
n

= lim

k=0

X uk
1
2
eu
f (k) (0) du
k k!
n

k=0
Z

lim

k
1
2 u
eu k f (k) (0) du
n k!

Ck
,
n nk k!

f (k) (0) lim

= f (0) +

k=1

where Ck =

1 u2  u 
e f
du
n

2
1 eu uk

du is a finite number (which incidentally is equal to zero for

odd k). Thus, the sum in the last expression is equal to zero in the limit n ,
meaning that
Z
lim

n
2 2
en x f (x) dx = f (0)

for all test functions f (x), and hence,


n
2 2
lim en x = (x).

You might also like