Scribd
Upload
142 views4 pages

Adjoint Operators

1) The document discusses adjoint operators and their properties, including that the adjoint of an operator T maps from the codomain space W to the domain space V such that the inner product of Tv and w is equal to the inner product of v and the adjoint of T applied to w. 2) It also covers that for finite-dimensional spaces V and W, every operator T has a unique adjoint T*. Additionally, the map taking an operator to its adjoint is conjugate-linear. 3) For self-adjoint operators where T=T*, the spectral theorem states that they admit an orthonormal eigenbasis with real eigenvalues.

Uploaded by

Stephanie Bush
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
142 views4 pages

Adjoint Operators

1) The document discusses adjoint operators and their properties, including that the adjoint of an operator T maps from the codomain space W to the domain space V such that the inner product of Tv and w is equal to the inner product of v and the adjoint of T applied to w. 2) It also covers that for finite-dimensional spaces V and W, every operator T has a unique adjoint T*. Additionally, the map taking an operator to its adjoint is conjugate-linear. 3) For self-adjoint operators where T=T*, the spectral theorem states that they admit an orthonormal eigenbasis with real eigenvalues.

Uploaded by

Stephanie Bush
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Lecture 17: Adjoint, self-adjoint, and normal

operators; the spectral theorems! (1)


Travis Schedler
Tue, Nov 9, 2010 (version: Tue, Nov 16, 4:00 PM)
Goals (2)
Adjoint operators and their properties, conjugate linearity, and dual spaces
Self-adjoint operators, spectral theorems, and normal operators
As time allows: corollaries.
Adjoint operators (3)
Let T L(V, W ), where V and W are inner product spaces.
Definition 1. An adjoint operator T L(W, V ) is one such that
hT v, wi = hv, T wi,

v V, w W.

(0.1)

Proposition 0.2. If V is finite-dimensional, then for all T L(V, W ), there


exists a unique adjoint T L(W, V ).
Proof.

Let (e1 , . . . , en ) be an orthonormal basis of V .

Then, T must satisfy hej , T wi = hT ej , wi for all j.


Pn
Hence, T w = j=1 hT ej , wiej . So T must be unique.
Define T in this way. Then (0.1) is satisfied for v = ej .
By linearity, (0.1) is satisfied for all v V . So T exists.
Conjugate-linearity (4)
Definition 2. A map T : V W is conjugate-linear if T (u + v) = T (u) + T (v)
and T (v) = T (v).

Conjugate-linear maps still have nullspace, range, the rank-nullity theorem,


etc. They also still form a vector space. We could have used this to prove
V = U U before: U is the nullspace of the conjugate-linear map
V L(U, F),

v 7 h, vi.

The rank-nullity theorem then implies dim U = dim V dim U . Then, since
U U = 0, we deduce V = U U . (Alternatively, U is the nullspace of the
linear map b 7 hv, i: now V L(U, F) =the vector space of conjugate-linear
maps U F.)
Properties of adjoints (5)
Let V and W be inner product spaces, and let V be finite-dimensional.
Proposition 0.3. The map L(V, W ) L(W, V ), T 7 T , is conjugate-linear.
Proof.

Have to check: (T + S) = T + S and (T ) = T .

These follow by additivity and homogeneity of h, i, e.g.: hv, (T +


S) wi = h(T + S)v, wi = hT v, wi + hSv, wi = hv, T wi + hv, S wi =
hv, (T + S )wi.
Note that, when (T ) exists, it equals T . Hence:
Corollary 3. If V and W are finite-dimensional, then the adjoint map is invertible, and is inverse is also the adjoint map.
Dual space and linear functionals (6)
Definition 4. The dual space to V is V := L(V, F ).
Elements V are linear functionals V F. Note that, when V is
finite-dimensional, V
= V since they have the same dimension. This is not a
canonical (=natural) isomorphism! When V is an inner product space, we
can do better:
Corollary 5 (Theorem 6.45). Let V be a finite-dimensional inner product space.

Then the adjoint map is a conjugate-linear isomorphism V


V .

Specifically, V = L(F, V )
L(V, F) = V . Explicitly,

u 7 u V s.t. u (v) = hv, ui, u V.


Then, for T L(V, W ) and w W , T (w) can alternatively be defined as:
T (w) = the unique u V such that
u (v) = hT v, wi, i.e., hv, ui = hT v, wi, v V.

Further properties (7)


Let T : V W , with V, W finite-dimensional inner product spaces.
Proposition 0.4 (Proposition 6.46).

(a) null T = (range T )

(b) range T = (null T )


(c) null T = (range T )
(d) range T = (null T )
Proof. (a) T w = 0 hv, T wi = 0 for all v hT v, wi = 0 for all v w
(range T ) .
(d) Take

of both sides of (a), using (U ) = U .

(b)(c) Swap T with T , using (T ) = T .


Matrix of operators and adjoints (8)
Let (e1 , . . . , en ) and (f1 , . . . , fm ) be orthonormal bases of V and W .
Proposition 0.5. Let A = (ajk ) = M(T ) and B = (bjk ) = M(T ). Then
t
ajk = hT ek , fj i and bjk = hT fk , ej i = akj . Hence, B = A .
Pm
Proof.
The formula for A follows because T ek = j=1 hT ek , fj ifj .
The formula for B follows for the same reason (just replace T with T ).
Then, bjk = akj is a consequence of the definition of T together with
conjugate symmetry.
Self-adjoint operators (9)
Definition 6. An operator T L(V ) is self-adjoint if T = T .
Proposition 0.6 (Proposition 7.1). All eigenvalues of a self-adjoint operator
are real.
Proof. Let v V be nonzero such that T v = v. Then, hv, vi = hT v, vi =
hv, T vi = hv, vi.
Spectral theorem for self-adjoint operators (10)
From now on, all our vector spaces are finite-dimensional inner product
spaces.
Theorem 7 (Theorem 7.13+). T is self-adjoint iff T admits an orthonormal
eigenbasis with real eigenvalues.
Proof.
Proof for F = C: we already know that M(T ) is upper-triangular
in some orthonormal basis.

Then, T = T iff the matrix equals its conjugate transpose, i.e., it is


upper-triangular with real values on the diagonal.
Now let F = R. In some orthonormal basis, the matrix is block uppertriangular with 1 1 and 2 2 blocks.
Then, the matrix equals its own transpose iff it is block diagonal with real
diagonal entries and symmetric 2 2 blocks.
However, in slide (6) next lecture we show that the 2 2 blocks are antisymmetric. So there are none.

You might also like