Probe 2004.4 Fall
Probe 2004.4 Fall
org
Probe
THE
Probe
THE
legislators at the beginning of the the back page, check the ARB Section box,
legislative session. The Adolescent Risky and send in the form. If you are not already
Behavior Legislative Handbook contains a member of another section, it doesn’t cost
pertinent facts about Oregon adolescents you anything more than your normal
TERRY HAMMOND Editor
and recommends legislative actions to OPHA dues. If you are a member of
help prevent or intervene early in another section, the cost is an additional Dana Kaye Communication Chair
negative behavior. Topics range from $10. If you have questions, please contact HELENA WOLFE Design
alcohol use and abuse through obesity to Katie Riley at [email protected]
KATE KARLSON Webmaster
OPHA is in CRISIS
Marjorie McGee Web Apprentice
The Oregon Public Health Association Executive Committee is calling News published in The Probe aims to
an emergency meeting for members, friends, and supporters of OPHA. provide information. Views expressed in
Topic: Recommendation to dissolve OPHA. this newsletter do not necessarily
December 3, 3-5 p.m. represent the views of OPHA members
Kaiser Town Hall (next to Kaiser Center for Health Research) or its board of directors.
3800 N Interstate
Vote to continue or abolish OPHA Give us your news!
• Declining membership • Declining member participation
• Declining board attendance • Two of four sections not operational We invite you to send stories, news
• Less than 10% of members active • Officers contribute personal funds and graphics. Submission dates:
• No funds to replace operations manager
ISSUE STORY DEADLINE
Celebration event cancelled Winter Dec 21
Spring Mar 21
The Health of Multnomah County 2004 Summer
Fall
Jun 21
Sep 21
Now available for publication on the 10th of
Includes data on Maternal and Infant Health, Children’s Health, Adolescent January, April, July, and December
Health, Adult Health, Health of Older Adults, Communicable Disease,
Unintentional Injury and Violence, and Leading Causes of Death Contact Terry at [email protected]
or
Find the report on the Multnomah County Health Department website Oregon Public Health Association,
http://www.co.multnomah.or.us/health/
818 SW 3rd Ave, #1201, Ptd 97204
Hard copy is available on request: (503) 988-3674 x28185
Fall 2004 3
A potheosis of the
BY TERRY HAMMOND
Fiscal parent drains resolve
olicy aradigm
seriously discuss personal civil and
criminal liability for individual executives
DEQ
Heumann (pronounced “human”) – attenuates accountability. concern for the uranium ammunition
BLS
manager of the Environmental and
RO
NIOSH
Occupational Epidemiology program,
D
under the Office of Disease Prevention
and Epidemiology in the Oregon Dept
SH
of Human Services – appears largely
ATS
PARC
unaware of his alphabet armor.
DR
A small part of the language derives
from local state initiatives, like the
interagency Pesticide Analytical and SHINE
Response Center, which has made
pesticide poisoning a sentinel event in In fact, with the feds working on a strewn over Afghanistan and Iraq, which
Oregon. Another small part derives from credit card, it almost appears like no one is causing nationwide birth defects,
interstate cooperative endeavors, like really has to pay for efforts to clean up disease, and death. In addition to this
the Council of State and Territorial pollution from private companies deposit- grave health hazard we have exported,
Epidemiologists, which helps to prioritize ing chromium and lead in the drinking oddly, no one in the USA seems very
health indicators in line with available water around Corvallis, uranium in the concerned about the one million children
data, and supports the interface of public Fremont Forest, lead oxide in Lake in Iraq at risk of death “in the event of a
health research and practice. Oswego, aluminum in Troutdale and The crisis,” as reported in The Probe (Spring
Mostly, though, state officials learn Dalles, asbestos in Klamath Falls, a soup 2003) before the war, drawn from a report
their ABCs from the feds. Heumann’s EOE of chemicals in the Portland harbor, and publicized by a team of physicians who
program is 95 percent funded by grants so on and so on. Heumann and others visited the country. Clearly, it is not our
from the federal government and private are helping communities with these sites, prosperity and way of life these people
foundations. Most other public health tracking hazards, exposures, and health resent. Killing babies is one sure way to
programs in the state show the same outcomes through Oregon’s Superfund induce hatred and terrific resistance, just
dependence. Heumann estimates only 10 Health Investigation and Education as the world rose up in revulsion at the
percent of Oregon’s public health infra- program, funded by the Agency for Toxic crimes of the Nazis.
structure is supported by the state’s Substances and Disease Registry, under
general fund. The Oregon State Public the Centers for Disease Control and
Pay to save Oregon
Health Laboratory, along with an ever- Prevention, in the U.S. Department of Lack of accountability is painting a
growing share of government services, Health and Human Services. more dramatic picture in distant lands,
subsists on fees. Even PARC, a home- Corporations may be fined or taken to but the problem is also evident here.
grown achievement, has been drawn into court to help pay (or wriggle away) for Incrementally, our homeland security is
the orbit of funding from the Department damage and clean up, but one wonders, being destroyed. Heumann reports there
of Agriculture and the Environmental if Oregon had to pay directly, perhaps are at least 1100 priority hazardous waste
Protection Agency. local leaders and citizens would begin to (continued on page 7)
Fall 2004 7
Solving the mystery of data translation saw the nature of the problem, involving
poison oak, he found another firm that
(from page 8) Healthy Start children who are also first- social service field, and a number are
analyses, we assure that we are not just births. The status report mentions this public health nurses.
comparing high-risk, high-stress Healthy variation as a caution in interpreting the In closing, we welcome opportunities
Start families to the general nonserved study results. to discuss our state’s Healthy Start
population. Some Healthy Start programs do serve program and its evaluation. No evaluation
subsequent births, and these families are is perfect, and we certainly would not
Universal Prevention included in the Healthy Start service argue that this one is any exception.
A universal approach to child abuse group in the analysis of maltreatment However, we firmly believe the Healthy
prevention is supported in a recent rates. It is worth noting however, that Start evaluation, and its associated
research report on preventing child there are few studies on the influence of reports, are grounded in solid research
maltreatment (NCIPC, 2004), which states, birth order on maltreatment rates, and this methodology, produce useful and under-
“a universal program potentially benefits literature tends to focus on specific standable information for stakeholders,
all parents through multiple levels of populations (e.g., teen moms). More and continue to show that the Healthy
intervention tailored to parents who consistent in the maltreatment literature Start program is successful in helping to
experience a range of problems” (p. 1). is the finding that the highest rates of reduce the risk for and incidence of child
Levels of intervention can range from abuse and neglect involve young child- abuse and neglect among participating
basic parenting information, like Healthy ren, specifically those under age 3 families.
Start’s basic services, to more intensive (NCCANI, 2002). For this reason, the
services for families with more problems. focus on abuse rates for this population References
Not all families receive long-term is appropriate. Center for Law and Social Policy. (1998). More
intensive services, because not all fami- than one: Teen mothers and subsequent
lies need it. In times of limited funding,
Other Issues childbearing. Authors.
targeting intensive, costly services to Two additional assertions warrant Green BL, Mackin JR, Tarte J, Cole RTM &
those most at risk makes good sense. At comment. First, the evaluation of Brekhus J. (2003). Healthy Start of Oregon
the same time, recognizing that all new Oregon’s Healthy Start program is 2001 – 2002 Status Report. A report to the
parents need support, Healthy Start conducted by a disinterested party. NPC Oregon Commission on Children and
implements a standardized protocol to Research is a private, professional Families.
make decisions about the level of support evaluation firm and we take considerable McCall RB & Green B. (2004). Beyond the
most appropriate for each family. pride in our ability to provide timely, gold standards in developmental research:
Edmonds challenges Healthy Start’s useful, and objective information to our Considerations for policy and practice. The
intensive service, stating that “only 9% clients. We adhere strictly to American Society for Research in Child Development’s
Social Policy Report, 18(2), p. 3-12.
of first-birth families received service.” In Evaluation Association standards of
fact, of the 4,620 first birth families who practice (Newmann et al., 1994), which National Center for Injury Prevention and
consented to Healthy Start services and include systematic inquiry using the most Control. (2004). Using evidence-based
parenting programs to advance CDC
sharing their data with DHS and the appropriate technical standards, along
efforts in child maltreatment prevention
evaluation team, 1,574 of those families with standards to avoid bias, including research activities. Centers for Disease
(34%) received intensive service. disclosure of conflicts of interest and full Control and Prevention.
disclosure of findings.
Maltreatment and Birth Order Second, Edmonds mistakenly inter-
National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and
Neglect Information. (2004). Child mal-
Edmonds raises the concern that prets articles in the June 2004 issue of treatment 2002: Summary of key findings.
Healthy Start’s evaluation compares rates Child Abuse and Neglect as indicating Authors.
of maltreatment for Healthy Start families that Healthy Start, in general, shows little Newmann D, Scheier MA, Shadish W &
(primarily first births) to the general evidence of positive effects. That article Nye C. (1994). Guiding principles for
population of 0-2 year olds (which series, conducted on a home-visiting evaluators: A report from the AEA task
includes subsequent births). A few program in Hawaii, is a single-site force on guiding principles for evaluators.
articles have found maltreatment rates to evaluation, with uncertain applicability American Evaluation Association.
be higher in families with more children elsewhere. The Hawaii program is dif- Patton MQ. (2004). http://videocast.nih.gov/
(Zuravin, 1988; Center for Law and Social ferent from Oregon Healthy Start in ppt/nci_patton091404.ppt
Policy, 1998). From data made available several ways, perhaps most significantly Zuravin S. (1988). Fertility patterns: Their
through the Department of Human by relying on paraprofessional home relationship to child physical abuse and
Services, the evaluation team was unable visitors. Many Oregon program staff child neglect. Journal of Marriage and the
to identify a comparison group of non- have at least a bachelor’s degree in a Family,50(4), 983-993.
10 The Probe