Design of Long Span Exhibition Hall of Steel Structure

International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: [email protected]

Volume 4, Issue 10, October 2015
ISSN 2319 - 4847
Design of Long Span Exhibition Hall of Steel

Structure
Amit A. Gudadhe
1
Asst. Professor, Datta Meghe Institute of Engineering, Technology & Research, Salod (H), Wardha, Maharashtra, India
ABSTRACT
The current demand from Society/Industry is large clear span structures. A variety of pre-engineered options are available
today. For exhibition hall of permanent nature, an attempt has been made to choose a different geometry than that offered by
pre-engineered suppliers. The arch shape long span steel structure has been analyzed and designed using the software
applications. The trusses designed here are of circular hollow sections since they are of special interest from aesthetic
viewpoint. For getting a view of open spaces only three numbers of columns are placed in the interior side of the structure. The
span of 25m is kept open on front side of structure for the purpose of entrance and exit, and can be closed with the help of
shutters. The roof sheeting over the truss is of galvalume sheet of 0.55mm thickness and in the central strip translucent sheet is
provided for natural skylight. Initially the forces are calculated and are applied on the structure modeled in Staad-Pro, then the
structure is analyzed and designed. Finally the results are discussed & compared the trusses of different spacing.
Keywords: -Long span structure, steel structure, trusses, hollow sections
1. INTRODUCTION
During the last 50 years our country has continued to lag behind in infrastructure development and consequently poor
consumption of iron and steel. Published studies by the Steel Construction Institute (U.K) have established that
countries which have a higher rate of growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP), have proportionately higher
consumption of iron and steel. Soon after independence, our country had to gear itself to meet the demands for
development and industrial growth and in the first few Five Year plans made reasonable strides in the area of
production and usage of iron and steel. Due to various reasons, steel consumption in our country has been stagnating
during the past 2-3 years. Further, steel industry is facing stiff global competition through imports. There is also
considerable under utilization of installed capacity for steel production. For sustenance of steel industry, extensive
usage of structural steel in the construction sector is an important requirement. Our country has to live up to the global
competition as we have done in Information Technology!
The design of steel structures involves the planning of the structure for specific purposes, proportioning of members to
carry loads in the most economical manner, and considerations for erection at site. First, the structure should serve the
purpose for which it is intended and this is achieved by proper functional planning. Secondly, it should have adequate
strength to withstand direct and induced forces to which it may be subjected during its life span. An inadequate
assessment of forces and their effects on the structure may lead to excessive deformation and its failure. Therefore, the
design of structures includes functional planning, acknowledge of the various forces, strength of materials and the
design methods. In addition the structure should be economical and easy to erect.
Steel structures are composed of elements which are rolled to a basic cross-section in a mill, and worked to the desired
size and form in a fabricating shop or site. A significant difference between steel and concrete constructions is that the
designer is normally compelled to use standard rolled sections. Fortunately, the variety of steel sections available is so
great that any desired structural effect can be achieved in steel.
2.ANALYSIS OF TRUSSES
Generally truss members are assumed to be joined together so as to transfer only the axial forces and not moments and
shears from one member to the adjacent members (they are regarded as being pinned joints). The loads are assumed to
be acting only at the nodes of the trusses. The trusses may be provided over a single span, simply supported over the
two end supports, in which case they are usually statically determinate. Such trusses can be analyzed manually by the
method of joints or by the method of sections. But in the case of multi-span indeterminate trusses, as well as in the case
of trusses in which the joint rigidity has to be considered the available computer programs are very useful.
3.DESIGN OF TRUSSES
While trusses are stiff in their plane they are very weak out of plane. In order to stabilize the trusses against out- ofplane buckling and to carry any accidental out of plane load, as well as lateral loads such as wind/earthquake loads, the
Page 91

ISSN 2319 - 4847
trusses are to be properly braced out -of -plane. The instability of compression members, such as compression chord,
which have a long unsupported length out- of-plane of the truss, may also require lateral bracing.
In the case of roof trusses, a member normally under tension due to gravity loads (dead and live loads) may experience
stress reversal into compression due to dead load and wind load combination. Such stress reversals and the instability
due to the stress reversal should be considered in design. The design standard (IS: 800) imposes restrictions on the
maximum slenderness ratio i.e. (/r).
4.TUBULAR SECTIONS
Tubular sections are the most efficient sections. The tubular sections have lot of advantages compared to the other
sections. The advantages are:
1. The load carrying capacity increases because of increase in moment of inertia.
2. Circular section may have as much as 30 to 40% less surface area than that of an equivalent rolled shape and thus
reduces the cost of maintenance, cost of painting.
3. There is no better section than the tabular one for torsional resistance.
4. Tubes are of special interest to architect from an aesthetics viewpoint.
5. The external surface of the tube does not permit the collection of moisture and dust thus reducing the possibility of
corrosion.
6. Under dynamic loading the tube has a higher frequency of vibration than any other cross section including a solid
round bar.
5.PLANNING OF EXHIBITION HALL
In this project a long-span exhibition hall of steel structure of size 50.72m x 100m is designed by using Staad-Pro.
After the manual calculation of forces i.e. dead load, live load and wind load, the structure has been analyzed and
designed in Staad-Pro. The plan area of the hall is 50.72m x 100m. The arch shape truss is used with top chord, bottom
chord and web members which are rested on the built-up column sections. The trusses are spaced at 12.5m c/c. The
trusses at gable end i.e. truss T1 is supported on 5 columns, 2 external and 3 intermediate columns, whereas truss T2 is
supported on 2 external columns and truss T3 is supported on 2 external and 1 intermediate column. The height of all
exterior columns is 5.43m and the height of all intermediate columns is 6m. Truss T2 and T3 are alternately placed as
shown in the plan. The triangular shape beam is placed perpendicular to the truss in the plane of bottom chord at centre
of truss, throughout in the longitudinal direction. The bracings in the form of cross member are provided on all three
faces of triangular beam. The truss T2 having no intermediate column gets supported on this beam.
For the structure to be stable and to resist the wind load, the horizontal cross bracing is provided in first and last plane
of the structure while the vertical bracings are provided on all sides of the structure. Only on the front side central two
panels are kept open for entrance and exit. On top of the truss galvalume sheet is provided while in the central strip
translucent sheet is provided for skylight in longitudinal direction which is supported on purlins. On all sides of the
structure side sheeting are provided which is supported on side rails.
Page 92

ISSN 2319 - 4847
6. STAAD-PRO RESULTS
After calculating the forces, the modal has been prepared in Staad-Pro as shown in the figure. Dead load and live load
are applied on nodes in downward direction, whereas the wind load is applied in upward direction perpendicular to the
member. Initially individual load is applied and afterward the combination of loads is applied on the structure.
After applying the loads the modal has been analyzed and designed. The sections applied to truss are of tubular hollow
section and the I Section is provided to the columns. The properties applied to different trusses are shown in the
figure. The overall weight of the structure is coming as 4258 kN.
7. DETAILS OF CONNECTIONS
Page 93

ISSN 2319 - 4847
8. RESULTS
Thus the overall weight per meter square of the structure is coming as 85.58 Kg/m. The following are the total length
and weight of different structural members-
Comparison between spacing of trusses and overall weight of structure

The spacing of trusses is mostly determined by the functional requirements of column free space in the building. Where
there are no functional limitations, the spacing should be such that the cost of the roof is a minimum. Larger is the
spacing, smaller is the cost of trusses but larger is the cost of purlins and vice-versa. The economic range of spacing of
roof trusses is 1/5 to 1/3 of span. Larger is the span, smaller is kept the ratio of spacing to the span. For lighter load,
say carrying no snow or superimposed load excepting wind, the larger spacing is more economical.
Here the comparison has been made between the two structures where the trusses are spaced at 10m and 12.5m and
their overall weight of structure. The weight of structure for 10m spacing of trusses is coming as 83.64 kg/m and for
12.5m its 85.58 kg/m. The comparison is shown in graphical representation.
COMPARISON BETWEEN SPACING OF

TRUSSES AND WEIGHT OF STRUCTURE
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
SPACING OF
TRUSSES IN METER
WEIGHT OF
STRUCTURE IN Kg/m2
9.Conclusion
The overall weight of the structure though slightly higher than that for pre-engineered structure, the aesthetic appeal of
this structure surpasses any pre-engineered building and offers clear column free spaces which is the requirement of
exhibition hall displaying variety of merchandise/goods these days.
References
[1]. W.F.Chen , Handbook of Structural Engineering
[2]. Bvick Davison & Graham W. Owens , Steel Designers Manual (SCI)
Page 94

ISSN 2319 - 4847
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
A.S.Arya & J.L.Ajmani , Design of Steel Structures

L.S.Negi , Design of Steel Structures
IS: 800 1984 (Second Revision) Code of practice for general construction in steel.
IS: 875 1987 (Parts 1 to 5) Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and
structures.
[7]. S. K. Duggal , Design of Steel Structures
[8]. Teaching Resource on Structural Steel Design INSDAG documents.
[9]. Jeffrey Smith, Creating Models of Truss Structures with Optimization Carnegie Mellon University.
[10]. Dr. Kourosh Kayvani, Advances in Long Span Steel Roof Structures Connell Mott MacDonalds Advance
Analysis Group.
Page 95

Design of Long Span Exhibition Hall of Steel Structure

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design of Long Span Exhibition Hall of Steel Structure

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design of Long Span Exhibition Hall of Steel Structure

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: [email protected]

ISSN 2319 - 4847