2015 03 12+lecture 9 The Property Model
2015 03 12+lecture 9 The Property Model
2015 03 12+lecture 9 The Property Model
Arve Nss
Practical information
Exercise #6 (REV) to be published March 17th Deadline March 24th at 16:00
NTG Exercise March to be published published March 24th
Revised lecture plan Cut Offs NTG Thursday 19th March
Review of Lecture 8
Determinism and Probability
Property modelling workflow
The distribution can be done directly or via a rock model (e.g. object based model).
Caution with the statistical validity if the experimental spatial correlation structure.
Use the conceptual model to also steer property modelling
Rock model
Property model
Property model
Porosity
Total porosity is the sum of all
connected and isolated pore volumes.
Interconnected porosity (sometimes
called effective porosity) is the sum
of all pore volumes that are connected
and potentially can contribute to flow.
Presence of clay minerals are
particularly challenging when defining
porosity.
The clay minerals can contain micro
porosity and parts of their associated
fluids can be movable.
Intergranular
porosity
Heavy
mineral
Clay (with
micro porosity)
Quartz
Cement
Mica
Permeability
Navier-Stoke equation can be used to
describe the fluid flow behaviour in
the pore network.
However, the description and solution
is very complicated (if possible).
A macroscopic description of fluid
flow is given by the Darcy law:
Intergranular
porosity
Heavy
mineral
Clay (with
micro porosity)
Cement
Mica
Quartz
Lectures 9
1. 3D reservoir gridding
2. Model elements What to model
3. Model build How to model
4. Determinism and probability
Find the balance
Essential statistics
Some definitions
Homogeneous
Homogeneous
The material is uniform in composition
and consists of one phase.
Heterogeneous
Heterogeneous
The material is non-uniform in
composition and consists of two or more
phases.
Isotropic
The measurement is direction
independent.
kx=ky
Anisotropic
The measurement is direction dependent.
kx>ky
Some definitions
10
Measurement 2
Measurement 1
Well
Calibration
Permeability
log
Well in
model
Correlation
Un-cored
= Blocking/Averaging/Upscaling
11
Well
Calibration
Un-cored
Permeability
log
Correlation
= Blocking/Averaging/Upscaling
12
Well in
model
Reservoir Engineer
Petrophysicist
Data
Model
13
Wavy bedded,
fine grained
heterolithic
sand interpreted as
tidal channel infill
on a lower delta
plain
Free Fluid
VMA
k, Sw, , Pc,
Kro, Krw
We must not confuse the observations (data) with the model (a hypothesis) and
both of these with the truth (an unknown).
Often the data are forced to fit the models.
The data are however a limited subset of the subsurface: Data Model Truth
Our models should be consistent with data, but should aim to capture a wider range
(approaching the truth)
14
Measured
value X1
Measured
value X2
Average
Property
value
Precision
Accuracy
15
Detector
Response
volume
Wireline
log
Core
plugs
Vertical resolution
Dependent on tool design (e.g. distance between receiver
and emitter).
Features thinner than the vertical resolution can still be
recorded, but only a fraction of the true value.
Shoulder
bed
effect
16
Depth of
investigation
Vertical
resolution
Detector
Depth of investigation
Response
volume
Wireline
log
Core
plugs
The volume of investigation (or vertical resolution) of the well data must
be taken into account when interpreting the response in relation to
sedimentary features.
17
Permeability variations
Permeability varies with several order of magnitudes and is directly linked to the
productivity of a reservoir.
In the conventional property modelling workflow, an average or representative
permeability (and all other properties) must be specified.
This process is generally known as upscaling.
18
Permeability variations
Standard deviation of permeability
increases when the mean increases.
Useful variability measures for
permeability:
Coefficient of Variation (CV); a normalized
measure of dispersion.
19
Upscaling
Discrete variable
Facies A
N=10
Facies B
N=15
Homogenous medium
Upscaling
Facies B
Heterogeneous
medium
Upscaling method:
Dominant element
Homogenous medium
Upscaling
=20%
N=10
=30%
N=15
Continuous variable
High resolution
Fine scale
Microscopic
=26%
Upscaling method:
Arithmetic average
20 10 + 30 15
= 26%
10 + 15
Low resolution
Coarse scale
Macroscopic
Upscaling
Homogenization
Effective medium theory
Continuum approach
20
Upscaling
Discrete variable
Facies A
N=10
Facies B
N=15
Homogenous medium
Upscaling
Facies B
Heterogeneous
medium
Upscaling method:
Dominant element
Homogenous medium
Upscaling
=20%
N=10
=30%
N=15
Continuous variable
High resolution
Fine scale
Microscopic
=26%
Upscaling method:
Arithmetic average
20 10 + 30 15
= 26%
10 + 15
Low resolution
Coarse scale
Macroscopic
Upscaling
Homogenization
Effective medium theory
Continuum approach
Upscaling
21
21
Upscaling
Discrete variable
Facies A
N=10
Facies B
N=15
Homogenous medium
Upscaling
Facies B
Heterogeneous
medium
Homogenous medium
Upscaling
=20%
N=10
=30%
N=15
=
Continuous variable
=26%
Upscaling method:
Arithmetic average
20 10 + 30 15
= 26%
10 + 15
=20%
N=10
=30%
N=15
=30%
=26%
Heterogeneous
medium
=25%
Low resolution
Coarse scale
Macroscopic
=24%
High resolution
Fine scale
Microscopic
22
Upscaling method:
Dominant element
=26%
Upscaling
Discrete variable
Facies A
N=10
Facies B
N=15
High resolution
Fine scale
Low resolution
Coarse scale
Homogenous medium
Upscaling
Facies B
Heterogeneous
medium
Homogenous medium
Upscaling
=20%
N=10
=30%
N=15
Continuous variable
Core plugs
=26%
Upscaling method:
Arithmetic average
20 10 + 30 15
= 26%
10 + 15
Grid cell
5m
x 15
20 cm2
100 m
300 cm2
High resolution
Fine scale
23
Upscaling method:
Dominant element
50000 m2
Low resolution
Coarse scale
V1=V2
Upscaling
=0.15
Upscaling
=0.15
Upscaling
24
1 1 + 2 2
=
1 + 2
=0.15
=
1
V1=V2
Arithmetic
average, kA
Upscaling
kx=50.5
Harmonic
average, kH
Upscaling
kx=1.98
Upscaling
25
k=<kA,kH>
25
Permeability averages
100% sand
0% mud
Sandstone
100 mD
Mudstone
0,1 mD
0% sand
100% mud
26
26
Permeability averages
100% sand
0% mud
Sandstone
100 mD
Mudstone
0,1 mD
0% sand
100% mud
Layered system
27
Permeability averages
100% sand
0% mud
Sandstone
100 mD
Mudstone
0,1 mD
0% sand
100% mud
Layered system
28
Permeability averages
Random distribution
100% sand
0% mud
Sandstone
100 mD
Mudstone
0,1 mD
0% sand
100% mud
Layered system
29
Upscaled permeability
The upscaled permeability is
defined as the permeability of a
hypothetical homogenous block
as the real rock medium.
The upscaled permeability can either
be measured or calculated given the
fine scale distribution of permeability
values.
30
Upscaled permeability
For some simple systems, the
upscaled permeability can be
calculated analytically.
For a plane parallel system:
Vertical permeability is the harmonic
average.
Horizontal permeability is the
arithmetic average.
31
Upscaled permeability
32
Upscaled permeability
, k..
33
Boundary conditions
The boundary conditions (BC) specify
how the flow is behaving on the
boundaries.
Fixed boundary
conditions (FBC)
P1
P2
No flow
No flow
Linear boundary
conditions (LBC)
P1
P2
No flow across
boundaries (i.e. similar
to laboratory core
flooding)
Obtain the diagonal
elements of the
permeability tensor (kxx,
kyy and kzz)
Output is a non-symmetric
9-elements permeability
tensor
Periodic boundary
conditions (PBC)
34
Periodic or repeatable
structure
Permeability tensor
The orange layers have lower
permeability than the yellow layers.
=
35
Upscaling
kx=kz: Isotropic
kxkz: Anisotropic
Px
k1
k2
For more in-depth overview of this topic, see Renard and Marsily
(1997) Not part of the course material.
Upscaling steps:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Calculate the permeability for all the grid cells (kblock) using
Darcys Law for the upscaled block.
7.
Upscaling is the method for replacing a high resolution, fine scale heterogeneous
medium with a homogeneous low resolution, coarse scale medium.
The upscaled (or block) permeability is defined as the permeability of an
homogeneous block which under the same pressure boundary conditions will give
the same average flows as the heterogeneous block.
36
Upscaling
k=<kA,kH>
P1
P2
P1: Grain
P2: Pore
37
= 1 , 2
P1
P2
38
P1
P2
39
Non-additive properties
Dependent on
spatial
distributions of
components
Additive properties
40
Dependent on
volume fraction of
components
Bulk property
41
2.
3.
4.
42
1)
REV
keffective
kblock
Well
Calibration
Un-cored
Permeability
log
Correlation
= Blocking/Averaging/Upscaling
43
Well in
model
Need attention
Heterogeneous system from
core plug to wireline log
scale
44
1m
1m
Core
plug
Core
plug
Wireline log
Wireline log
Sedimentary hierarchy
Clinoform
Clinoform surfaces
45
Sedimentary hierarchy
Lobe
Lobe
element
Bed
46
Test
Sedimentary hierarchy
47
2 mm
Sedimentary hierarchy
5m
48
Test
2 mm
100 m
Sedimentary hierarchy
5m
49
2 mm
100 m
Core
plug
Wirline
log
30 m
90m
30 m
Simulation model
(~ 100 x 100 x 10 m)
Geological model
(~ 50 x 50 x 1 m)
50
Lithofaices model
(~ 1 x 1 x 1 m)
2) Lithofacies to geomodel
Lithofacies is distributed in a
geological model according to
conceptual model.
Trends are modelled.
Averaging of well data directly into the flow simulation grid: Fast and simple, but
Upscaling approaches
Core
plug
Wirline
log
Multiphase upscaling in x, y and z. Try to take into account both multiscale and
multiphase effects. Time and resource demanding. Less seldom applied. Ongoing
research in this field.
30 m
90m
30 m
Simulation model
(~ 100 x 100 x 10 m)
51
See also Fig. 4-18 in Reservoir Modelling Design
Geological model
(~ 50 x 50 x 1 m)
Lithofaices model
(~ 1 x 1 x 1 m)
Averaging of well data directly into the flow simulation grid: Fast and simple, but
Core
plug
Upscaling approaches
Wirline
log
Multiphase upscaling in x, y and z. Try to take into account both multiscale and
multiphase effects. Time and resource demanding. Less seldom applied. Ongoing
research in this field.
30 m
These four degrees of upscaling complexity help define the number and dimensions
of models required.
90m
1
3
2
The number of scales modelled is typically related to the complexity and precision of
answer sought.
30 m
Improved oil recovery (IOR) strategies and reservoir drainage optimisation studies
areSimulation
often model
the reason for starting
multi-scale approach.
Geologicala
model
Lithofaices model
Lamina or core plug properties
(~ 100 x 100 x 10 m)
52
See also Fig. 4-18 in Reservoir Modelling Design
(~ 50 x 50 x 1 m)
(~ 1 x 1 x 1 m)
(~ 2 x 2 x 2 cm)
2.
REV
keffective
kblock
53
54
54
Multiscale REV
Note that this is a conceptual sketch and the variation in
measured property and scale on the x-axis will be
property and case dependent.
55
Moderately
sorted fine
sand
Poorly
sorted
medium
sand
56
57
58
Measured property
Multiscale REV
Relation to conventional measurements
59
59
Nordahl & Ringrose, 2008, Identifying the Representative Elementary Volume for permeability in
heterolithic deposits using numerical rock models, Mathematical Geoscience, vol. 40, p. 753-771.
Multiscale REV
60
The balance of forces concept gives the framework for udnerstanding which scale
most affect flow, e.g. capillary trapping is likely to be important for rocks with
permeability variations at the small scale, while fluid segregation is more important
over larger (vertical) distances and for larger permeabilities.
Relate also to Floras Rule lecture 3.
62
63
Acknowledgements to:
Statoil for data, models and
experience
Kjetil Nordahl, Philip
Ringrose and Mark Bentley
for inspiration and examples
Kjetil Nordahl for providing
the majority of the lecture
notes
Geological Reservoir Modelling:
Arve Nss
[email protected]
www.statoil.com
64