Agri Sci - IJASR - Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Safflower

International Journal of Agricultural
Science and Research (IJASR)

ISSN(P): 2250-0057; ISSN(E): 2321-0087
Vol. 5, Issue 5, Oct 2015, 151-158
TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.
ASSESSMENT OF GENETIC DIVERSITY IN SAFFLOWER

(Carthamus tinctorius L.) GERMPLASMS
PAVITHRA K. P, RAJESH S. PATIL, YALLAPPA HARIJAN, & NISHANTH, G. K
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
ABSTRACT
A quantum assessment of genetic divergence for fifteen quantitative characters among 150 accessions of
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L) representing different geographical areas by Mahalanobis D2 statistical showed that
there is a substantial genetic diversity. The D2 values of accessions ranged between 10.90 to 84.32. The intra cluster
distances were ranged from 18.94 to 30.87. These accessions were grouped into 24 clusters the clustering pattern
necessarily associated with geographical diversity in the set of germplasm. Among the plant attributes biological yield,
harvest index, plant height, volume weight, number of seeds per capitulum and capitula per plant were found to be
important in the present study.
KEYWORDS: Safflower, D2 Analysis, Genetic Divergence, Adaptation, Germplasm

INTRODUCTION
Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) is one of oldest oilseed crop belongs to the family Asteraceae. It has
multipurpose crop being grown over 60 countries in the world. India is the largest producer of safflower with 54 % area
and 40 % production in the world. In India, It is cultivated in an area of 1.5 lakh ha with a production of 1.13 lakh tons
giving a productivity of 726 kg/ha. Maharashtra and Karnataka are the first and second with reference to area and
production, respectively whereas, productivity is highest in West Bengal (1000 kg/ha) followed by Bihar (805 kg/ha) and
Karnataka (719 kg/ha) (Indiastat, 2014).
The assessment of the genetic diversity in crop species is of interest for the conservation of genetic resources,
broadening of the genetic base and practical applications in breeding programs. Safflower possesses considerable diversity
across different regions of the world (Knowles, 1989). In order to design an appropriate breeding program, it is important
to know how much the phenotypic variation of a trait is heritable (Kearsey and Pooni, 1996), since the efficiency of a
selection program is mainly dependent on the magnitude of genetic variation and heritability of a trait (Falconer and
Mackay, 1996). Genetic diversity of a crop species has been investigated using either agro-morphological traits or
molecular markers.
Genetic diversity is of considerable practical interest in any crop improvement programme. Precise information on
the nature and degree of genetic divergence would help the plant breeder in choosing the right type of parents for different
breeding programmes. Therefore, the present investigation was undertaken to study the nature and magnitude of genetic
divergence in 150 germplasm accessions of safflower.
www.tjprc.org
[email protected]
152
Pavithra, K. P, Rajesh S. Patil, Yallappa Harijan, & Nishanth, G. K
MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hundred and fifty germplasm accessions obtained from different parts of India and seven checks of safflower
(Carthamus tinctorius L.) were selected for study. These accessions and checks were sown in the experimental area of
Agriculture Research Station, Annigeri, Karnataka, India during rabi season 2011-2012, with spacing between rows was
45 cm and the distance between plants was 20 cm. Data were analyzed using Windostat software version 9.1. A
recommended package of practice was followed to raise healthy crop under natural conditions.
Observations on yield and yield related traits viz., plant height (cm), rosette period (days), days to 50 % flowering,
days to maturity, capitula per plant, capitulum diameter (cm), number of seeds per capitulum, floret weight (g), test weight
(g), volume weight (g), oil content (%), hull content (%), biological yield (g), harvest index (%), seed yield per plant (g).
The observations were recorded on five randomly selected plants for each accession. The genetic divergence was worked
out by using Mahalanobis D2 statistics as described by Rao (1952). On the basis of D2 values the genotypes were grouped
into different clusters by employing Tochers method as out lined by Rao (1952).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Group Constellations
A method suggested by Tocher (Rao, 1952) was used to group the accessions in to different clusters based on D2
values. The set of 150 accessions grouped into twenty four clusters indicating the presence of appreciable amount of
genetic diversity among the accessions under study. The distribution pattern in to various clusters is depicted in Table 1 &
Fig.1. The maximum number of accessions (99) was grouped into Cluster I, followed by Cluster III with 17 accessions,
Cluster VIII with 12 accessions and Cluster XVI with two accessions. Remaining twenty Clusters (II, IV, V, VI, VII, IX,
X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV, XVII, XVIII, XIX, XX, XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV) were solitary containing one accession
each. The intra-cluster D2 values ranged from 18.94 to 30.87 (Table 2). The average intra- cluster distance among the
members of Cluster VIII was the maximum followed by among members of Cluster XVI. The inter-cluster D2 values
ranged widely with minimum value of 10.90 and maximum value of 84.32. Clusters XIII and XXII were strikingly diverse
from the rest of the clusters. The divergence between these two clusters was high as evident from their high inter-cluster
distance. The minimum inter-cluster D2 value (10.90) was observed between Clusters IV and V, indicating a closer
relationship between accessions of these two clusters. Selection of parents for hybridization from different clusters was
performed on the basis of mean statistical distance as suggested by Bhat (1970).
Contribution of Characters towards Divergence
Among the fifteen characters studied, the most important character contributing to the divergence was biological
yield, followed by harvest index, plant height, volume weight, number of seeds per capitulum, capitula per plant, hull
percentage and rosette period (Table 3). These observations were accordance with earlier studies by Shivani et al. (2011)
and Safavi et al. (2012). The above results implied that in order to select genetically diverse genotypes for hybridization
the material should be screened for important traits like biological yield, harvest index, plant height, volume weight,
number of seeds per capitulum and capitula per plant. It is then expected that desirable segregants can be isolated from
planned crosses between diverse accessions for the above traits. Farthest and nearest clusters has been grouped based on
the D2 value (Table 4). Indicating that genetic divergence between the groups based on divergence value helps for
predicting the future hybrid development programmes.
Impact Factor (JCC): 4.7987
NAAS Rating 3.53
Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Safflower

(Carthamus tinctorius L.) Germplasms
153
Analysis of Cluster means

It indicated substantial variation among clusters grouped according to D2 analysis (Table 5). Based on the range of
means it is possible to know the characters influencing divergence. In the accessions of the present study, Cluster XV
recorded the first rank for the yield contributing traits viz., plant height, capitulum diameter, number of seeds per capitulum
and test weight. It indicates that combination of these traits is very important for the improvement of seed yield so
accessions belonging to these clusters can be further used in genetic improvement. Similar results were reported by
Ghongade and Navale (1995). Days to 50% flowering recorded the lowest mean in the Cluster VI. Rosette period was the
shortest in the Clusters VI and XXII. Cluster XV had the highest mean value for capitulum diameter and number of seeds
per capitulum. Oil content and volume weight were highest in Cluster IX. Biological yield and seed yield showed the
highest values in Cluster XIII. The clusters with multiple accessions also had comparably higher values indicating the wide
range of variability available in the germplasm collection. Such distribution has also been reported by Pourdad and Singh
(2002) and Shivani et al. (2011). The well spread out accessions can be utilised in genetic improvement programmes.
Cluster XV had highest plant height and low plant height was observed in the Clusters VI, XVIII, XVII and XXII while
remaining clusters had moderate plant height indicating the wide range of genetic diversity available in the accessions.
REFERENCES
1.
Bhat, G. M. (1970). Multivariate analysis approach to selection of parents or hybridization. aiming at yield
improvement in self-pollinated crops. Aust. J. agric. Res. 21 : 1-7.
2.
Falconer, R. A and Mackay, T. F. C., 1996, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics
3.
Ghongade, R. A. and Navale, P. A., 1995, Genetic divergence in safflower. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 20(2) :
249-251.
4.
Knowles, P. F. and Ashri, A., 1995, Safflower Carthamus tinctorius (Compositae). International Smartt Journal.
London., pp 4750.
5.
Kearsey, M. J. and Pooni, H.S., 1996, The genetical analysis of quantitative traits. London: Chapman & Hall.
6.
Pourdad, S. S. and Singh, J. B., 2002, Evaluation of germplasm collection of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius and
C. oxyacantha) in dry land conditions of Iran. Indian J. Genet. Pl. Breed., 62(1) : 87-88.
7.
Rao, C. R., 1952, An advanced statistical method in biometric research. John Wiley and Sons., New York.
8.
Safavi, M. S., Pourdad, S. S. and Safavi, S. A., 2012, Assessment of genetic diversity in safflower [Carthamus
tinctorius (L.)] genotypes using agro-morphological traits. Ann. Biol. Res., 3(5): 2428-2432.
9.
Shivani, D., Sreelakshmi, C. H. and Kumar, C. V., 2010, Genetic divergence studies in safflower [Carthamus
tinctorius(L.)]. Electronic J. Pl. Breed., 1(5) :1354-1357.
www.tjprc.org
[email protected]
154
Table 1: Clustering Pattern of 150 Accessions of Safflower Based on D2 Analysis in a Germplasm Collection of
Safflower Accessions (Carthamus Tinctorius L.) At ARS, Annigeri During Rabi 2011-12
Cluster
No.
Number of
Accessions
99
II
III
17
IV
V
VI
VII
1
1
1
1
VIII
12
Name of the Accessions

GMU3635, GMU 3703, GMU 3632, GMU 3634, GMU 3653, GMU 3769, GMU
3670, GMU 3708, GMU 3675, GMU 3726, GMU 3649, GMU 3639, GMU 3740,
GMU 3652, GMU 3642, GMU 3698, GMU 3699, GMU 3691, GMU 3687, GMU
3777, GMU 3756, GMU 3690, sGMU 3633, GMU 3757, GMU 3764, GMU 3796,
3749
GMU 3696
GMU 3674, GMU 3711, GMU 3713, GMU 3760
GMU 3673
GMU 3624
GMU 3621
GMU 3682
GMU 3638, GMU 3662, GMU 3672, EC 523367, GMU 3663, GMU 3739, GMU
3658, GMU 3680, GMU 3752, GMU 3721, GMU 3666, GMU 3705
Cont
Table 1
Cluster no.
IX
X
XI
XII
XIII
XIV
XV
XVI
XVII
XVIII
XIX
XX
XXI
XXII
XXIII
XXIV
Number of
Accessions
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Name of the Accessions

GMU 3643
GMU 3718
GMU 3686
GMU 3765
GMU 3719
GMU 3677
GMU 3715
GMU 3664, EC 523373
GMU 3750
GMU 3709
GMU 3730
GMU 3716
GMU 3641
GMU 3733
GMU 3660
GMU 3681
NAAS Rating 3.53
155

Table 2: Average Intra-Cluster and Inter-Cluster D2 Values of 24 Clusters in Safflower Accessions at ARS,
Annigeri during Rabi 2011-12
Table 3: Per cent Contribution of 15 Characters towards Divergence in Safflower Germplasm Accessions
Sl. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Characters
Plant height (cm)
Rosette period (days)
Days to fifty percent flowering
Days to maturity
Capitula per plant
Capitulum diameter (cm)
Number of seeds per capitulum
Floret weight (g)
Test weight (g)
Volume weight (g)
Oil content (%)
Hull percentage
Biological yield (g)
Harvest index (%)
Seed yield/ plant (g)
Times Ranked 1st

1103
149
110
86
476
00
723
00
00
771
2
426
4633
2693
3
Contribution %
9.87
1.33
0.98
0.77
4.26
0.00
6.47
0.00
0.00
6.90
0.02
3.81
41.46
24.10
0.03
Table 4: Nearest Cluster and Farthest Cluster from Each other Based on D2
Values in 150 Safflower Accessions at ARS, Annigeri During Rabi 2011-12
Cluster
Number
I
II
III
IV
V
www.tjprc.org
Nearest
Cluster
IV (28.47)
III(25.02)
II (25.02)
V (10.90)
IV (10.09)
Farthest
Cluster
XIII (51.39)
XVI (66.46)
XXII (61.64)
XXI (61.37)
XXI (64.99)
[email protected]
156
Table 4: cond.,
V (12.62)
IV (11.84)
V (26.13)
IV (30.12)
XI (22.09)
X (22.09)
XIX (20.92)
II (26.54)
XX11(23.49)
XIX (21.24)
XIV (28.97)
XXII (29.08)
II (28.25)
XV (21.24)
IX (23.32)
XIII (30.88)
XIV (28.49)
II (29.31)
XIII (33.96)
VI
V`II
VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
XIII
XIV
XV
XVI
XVII
XVIII
XIX
XX
XXI
XXII
XXIII
XXIV
XXI (67.65)
XXI (58.09)
XXI (66.39)
XXIV (67.50)
XIII (65.18)
XIII (61.38)
XXI (59.72)
XXII (84.32)
XIII (79.49)
XXII (67.71)
XXI (77.06)
XIII (72.33)
XVI (60.64)
XXII (60.24)
XXII (56.10)
XXII (77.39)
XIII (84.32)
XXII (72.57)
XXII (72.50)
Table 5: Cluster Means for 15 Quantitative Characters in a Germplasm

Collection of 150 Safflower Accessions Evaluated at ARS, Annigeri During Rabi 2011-12
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
XIII
XIV
XV
XVI
XVII
XVIII
XIX
XX
XXI
XXII
XXIII
XXIV
PH
59.48
57.20
65.06
65.60
59.40
55.20
72.20
63.50
56.20
58.20
59.60
65.20
66.20
66.40
84.40
67.60
51.00
54.80
75.40
73.40
65.66
46.20
69.80
70.80
RP
31.37
29.00
32.19
32.00
29.00
28.00
33.00
31.42
32.00
31.00
35.00
46.00
35.00
35.00
46.00
43.50
33.00
29.00
45.00
46.00
35.00
28.00
39.00
30.00
DFF
72.82
71.00
74.29
72.00
73.00
66.00
75.00
73.75
74.00
76.00
78.00
86.00
79.00
77.00
86.00
84.50
73.00
70.00
87.00
87.00
76.00
68.00
80.00
74.00
DM
132.90
131.00
134.30
133.00
133.00
131.00
135.00
133.80
134.00
136.00
138.00
148.00
139.00
139.00
143.00
145.00
133.00
132.00
147.00
143.00
136.00
128.00
140.00
134.00
CPP
22.56
31.40
23.09
25.40
27.80
26.00
25.80
19.88
26.60
10.20
24.60
24.40
30.80
16.60
21.20
10.40
11.20
34.20
26.80
14.60
21.80
14.40
45.20
21.60
CD
2.17
2.18
2.24
1.84
1.92
2.20
2.18
2.22
2.04
2.22
2.08
2.16
2.24
1.92
2.46
2.38
1.80
1.98
2.26
2.18
1.26
1.88
2.00
2.40
NSPC
23.27
22.00
28.95
15.40
19.40
24.80
19.60
30.04
17.80
36.60
24.60
25.80
23.40
15.75
36.80
31.40
7.80
24.00
26.20
17.40
11.60
15.00
27.80
32.00
FW
0.46
0.24
0.46
0.19
0.19
0.34
0.33
0.44
0.28
0.43
0.40
0.48
0.34
0.25
0.42
0.51
0.36
0.56
0.25
0.42
0.48
0.53
0.36
0.32
TW
4.76
5.60
4.90
4.75
4.40
4.30
5.80
4.61
4.24
3.80
3.90
6.15
4.99
3.92
6.03
3.83
5.13
4.01
4.44
6.59
5.55
6.08
4.80
4.45
VW
61.12
59.22
59.77
63.95
60.25
55.80
66.52
63.99
82.64
53.58
53.50
59.44
60.24
61.16
60.85
47.83
65.94
63.80
59.13
64.54
63.46
54.15
52.81
34.81
OC
31.20
31.90
31.38
29.92
34.63
31.53
30.61
31.88
34.75
28.86
28.45
28.60
29.93
30.74
31.20
30.89
30.28
31.12
31.75
27.01
30.58
31.65
32.55
28.09
HP
47.57
49.72
47.32
48.20
48.58
53.64
53.38
49.32
54.44
54.12
63.12
50.16
44.30
44.60
49.44
49.24
41.86
27.52
46.00
58.38
48.10
50.52
50.60
44.70
BY
55.05
80.00
75.88
50.00
50.00
50.00
55.00
50.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
100.00
25.00
65.00
27.50
40.00
65.00
60.00
60.00
95.00
25.00
80.00
85.00
HI
28.20
26.80
20.73
46.12
49.28
49.32
44.54
44.97
29.56
18.27
23.23
29.07
26.14
34.76
22.02
25.18
11.95
24.45
33.52
25.52
8.13
27.42
16.58
25.25
SYPP
15.47
21.44
15.71
23.06
24.64
24.66
24.50
22.27
13.30
8.22
10.45
13.08
26.14
8.69
14.31
7.01
4.78
15.89
20.11
15.31
7.72
6.86
13.26
21.46
PH: Plant height (cm) RP: Rosette period (days) DFF: Days to fifty percent flowering DM: Days to maturity
CPP: Capitula per plant CD: Capitulum diameter (cm) NSPC: Number of seeds per capitulum FW: Floret weight
(g)
TW: Test weight (g) VW: Volume weight (g) OC: oil content (%) HP: Hull percentage
BY: Biological yield per plant (g) HI: Harvest index (%) SYPP: Seed yield per plant (g)
NAAS Rating 3.53
157

Figure 1: Dendrogram Showing Clustering of 150 Safflower Accessions by Tochers Method
www.tjprc.org
[email protected]

Agri Sci - IJASR - Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Safflower

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Agri Sci - IJASR - Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Safflower

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Agri Sci - IJASR - Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Safflower

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Journal of Agricultural

Science and Research (IJASR)

ASSESSMENT OF GENETIC DIVERSITY IN SAFFLOWER

KEYWORDS: Safflower, D2 Analysis, Genetic Divergence, Adaptation, Germplasm

Pavithra, K. P, Rajesh S. Patil, Yallappa Harijan, & Nishanth, G. K

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

NAAS Rating 3.53

Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Safflower

Analysis of Cluster means

Falconer, R. A and Mackay, T. F. C., 1996, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics

Pavithra, K. P, Rajesh S. Patil, Yallappa Harijan, & Nishanth, G. K

Name of the Accessions

Impact Factor (JCC): 4.7987

Name of the Accessions

NAAS Rating 3.53

Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Safflower

Times Ranked 1st

Pavithra, K. P, Rajesh S. Patil, Yallappa Harijan, & Nishanth, G. K

Table 5: Cluster Means for 15 Quantitative Characters in a Germplasm

Impact Factor (JCC): 4.7987

NAAS Rating 3.53

Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Safflower

Figure 1: Dendrogram Showing Clustering of 150 Safflower Accessions by Tochers Method

You might also like