Scribd
Upload
45 views2 pages

Math 171 Solutions To Homework Problems Spring 2005

This document contains solutions to homework problems from a Math 171 class in spring 2005. It includes: 1) Computing the upper and lower Riemann sums for a function f(x)=x^2 over a partition P, and showing that the lower sum is a better approximation of the integral, due to the concave up nature of the function graph. 2) Finding formulas for the upper and lower Riemann sums of f(x)=x^2 over a general partition Pn, and using them to compute the value of the integral from 0 to 1. 3) Proving properties of the integral of an absolute value function, including that the integral is only 0 if the function is 0

Uploaded by

lusienopop
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
45 views2 pages

Math 171 Solutions To Homework Problems Spring 2005

This document contains solutions to homework problems from a Math 171 class in spring 2005. It includes: 1) Computing the upper and lower Riemann sums for a function f(x)=x^2 over a partition P, and showing that the lower sum is a better approximation of the integral, due to the concave up nature of the function graph. 2) Finding formulas for the upper and lower Riemann sums of f(x)=x^2 over a general partition Pn, and using them to compute the value of the integral from 0 to 1. 3) Proving properties of the integral of an absolute value function, including that the integral is only 0 if the function is 0

Uploaded by

lusienopop
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Math 171

Solutions to homework problems

Spring 2005

Section 5.1
1


2 1 3
0, , , , 1 .
5 2 5
0
Find out whether the lower sum or the upper sum is a better approximation to
the integral. Graph f and explain why this is so.
1(c) For f (x) = x2 x, compute U (f, P ), L(f, P ), and

f (x)dx, where P =

2/5 1/2 3/5

 
 
2 1
3 1
2
2
U (f, P ) = f (0) + f
+f
+ f (1) = 0.048.
5
5 10
5 10
5
 
 
 
 
1 1
1 1
3 2
2 2
+f
+f
+f
= 0.242.
L(f, P ) = f
5 5
2 10
2 10
5 5
 1
 3
Z 1
1 1
x2
1
x
= = = 0.16.

f (x)dx =

3
2 0
3 2
6
0
y

   


  

      


     

2/5 1/2 3/5

  

   

 



  

  

2/5 1/2 3/5

L(f,P)

U(f,P)

The lower sum is a better approximation. We see from the graphs that the function is concave
upward, and so for each subinterval, the difference between the area of the lower approximating
rectangle and the area of the region above the curve is less than the difference between the area
of the upper approximating rectangle and the area of the region above the curve.



j
: j = 0, 1, . . . , n . Use Exercise 1, p. 17, to find formulas for
n
the upper and lower sums of f (x) = x2 on Pn , and use them to compute the value
Z 1
of
f (x)dx.

2(c()) Let Pn =

U (f, Pn ) =

 
n
n
n
X
1 X 2 n(n + 1)(2n + 1)
(n + 1)(2n + 1)
i 1 X i2
=
=
=
.
i =
f
3
3
3
n
n
n
n
6n
6n2
i=1
i=1
i=1



n
n
n
n1
X
i 1 1 X (i 1)2
1 X
1 X 2 (n 1)n(2n 1)
2
L(f, Pn ) =
f
=
=
(i

1)
=
i =
n
n
n3
n3 i=1
n3 i=0
6n3
i=1
i=1
=

(n 1)(2n 1)
.
6n2
(1 + n1 )(2 + n1 )
2
1
(n + 1)(2n + 1)
=
lim
= = .
n
n
6n2
6
6
3

lim U (f, Pn ) = lim

(1 n1 )(2 n1 )
2
1
(n 1)(2n 1)
=
lim
= = .
n
n
n
6n2
6
6
3
Z 1
1
1
Since lim U (f, Pn ) = lim L(f, Pn ) = ,
f (x)dx = .
n
n
3 0
3
lim L(f, Pn ) = lim

4 Suppose that [a, b] is a closed, nondegenerate interval and f : [a, b] R is bounded.


Z b
|f (x)|dx > 0.
(a) Prove that if f is continuous at x0 [a, b] and f (x0 ) 6= 0, then (L)
a

Since f (x0 ) 6= 0, |f (x0 )| > 0, and by the sign-preserving property there exist > 0 and
> 0 such that |f (x)| > for x (x0 , x0 + ). Let P be a partition such that one of its
subintervals is contained in (x0 , x0 +). Then the area of the lower approximating rectangle
over that subinterval is positive, and the areas of all other lower approximating rectangles is
Z b
nonnegative, therefore the lower Riemann sum over P is positive. Then (L)
|f (x)|dx > 0.
a

(b) Show that if f is continuous on [a, b], then

|f (x)|dx = 0 if and only if f (x) = 0


a

for all x [a, b].


() If there exists x0 [a, b] such that f (x0 ) 6= 0 then by part (a) (L)
Z b
therefore
|f (x)|dx 6= 0.

|f (x)|dx > 0, and


a

() If f (x) = 0 for all x then

|f (x)|dx =
a

0 = 0.
a

(c) Does part (b) hold if the absolute values are removed? If it does, prove it. If
it does not, provide a counterexample.
Z 1
No. Counterexample:
xdx = 0 but f (x) = x 6= 0.
1

Z b
Z b
Z b
7(a) Prove that (U )
(f (x) + g(x))dx (U )
f (x)dx + (U )
g(x)dx and
a
a
Z b
Z b
Z ba
(L)
(f (x) + g(x))dx (L)
f (x)dx + (L)
g(x)dx.
a

Let P be any partition. Then for each subinterval and for all x in that subinterval,
(f + g)(x) = f (x) + g(x) Mi (f ) + Mi (g), therefore Mi (f + g) Mi (f ) + Mi (g). Multiplying
both sides of this inequality by (xi xi1 ) and taking the sum over i from 1 to n gives U (f +
g, P ) U (f, P ) + U (g, P ). Taking inf of both sides over P gives the first inequality.
Similarly, (f + g)(x) = f (x) + g(x) mi (f ) + mi (g), therefore mi (f + g) mi (f ) + mi (g).
Multiplying both sides of this inequality by (xi xi1 ) and taking the sum over i from 1 to
n gives L(f + g, P ) L(f, P ) + L(g, P ). Taking sup of both sides over P gives the second
inequality.

You might also like