Zzazazazzzzzaa
Zzazazazzzzzaa
Zzazazazzzzzaa
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SALES GAS PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS
1 of 13
CLIENT
PROJECT TITLE
LOCATION
31-Mar-09
25-Aug-08
ASW
SFL
BHK
REV. NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
PREPD
CHKD
APPD
Rev 1
SINGA GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Rev 1
SINGA GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SALES GAS PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS
3 of 13
REV. NO
DATE
DESCRIPTION
25-Aug-08
31-Mar-09
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. SCOPE
3. DEFINITIONS
4
Rev 1
SINGA GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SALES GAS PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS
4 of 13
4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
5. REFERENCE
8. PIPING SUPPORTS
ATTACHMENT
APPENDIX-1
APPENDIX-2
APPENDIX-3
APPENDIX-4
APPENDIX-5
Rev 1
SINGA GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SALES GAS PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS
1.
5 of 13
INTRODUCTION
This document provides the report of Stress Analysis at critical area long of onshore
Sales Gas Pipeline required for SINGA field in Lematang Block South Sumatera
operated by Contractor, hereinafter referred as COMPANY.
The result of this Stress Analysis document will be used for pipe stress analysis.
2.
SCOPE
This document provided modeling for stress and flexibility calculation for above
ground & buried/underground pipeline section in Lematang South Sumatera for SINGA
GAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
Flexibility stress analysis of the pipeline has been performed to achieve the followings:
To ensure that the above ground piping stress are within the allowable
limit as per design code ASME B31.8
To make a sure that the under ground pipeline stress are within the
allowable limit as per design code ASME B 31.8
Optimize the pipe support location and the piping load on to the support
To determine the anchor loads at both ends of the above ground piping
stress
3.
DEFINITIONS
SINGA GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SALES GAS PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS
6 of 13
1. Temperature
2. Ambient Temperature
a. Maximum
b. Minimum
c. Average
3. Relative Humidity
a. Maximum
b. Minimum
c. Average
4. Soil Resistivity / Characteristics
5.
REFERENCE
API 5L
ASME
ANSI
SGA-G-GL-00-001
SGA-L-ES-00-002
Pipeline Data
6.
Rev 1
SINGA GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SALES GAS PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS
PIPE CHARACTERISTICS
Descriptions
Design Pressure
Unit
Value
(P1)
Psig
1330
Psig
1050
Psig
1194
Psig
Design Temperature
(T1)
170
120
80
80
83
Design life
year
Min 20
Design Factor
0.5
Corrosion allowance
inch
0.125
Resistivity of Soil
Ohm-meter
0.35
70
Weight of Content/Density
t/m3
0.97-1.98
F
F
F
Rev 1
7 of 13
SINGA GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SALES GAS PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS
8 of 13
SOIL CHARACTERISTICS
Descriptions
Unit
Value
Friction Coefficient
Kg/cm
0.13 1.22
Soil Density
t/m3
0.97 1.98
1.5
Friction Angle
deg
1.1-17.2
Kg/cm2
0.43-1.87
7.
7.1
7.2
7.3
Hydrotest
Load case for Hydrotest can be given as follow :
SINGA GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Job No. : 07001
9 of 13
Note :
7.4
: Full weight
P1
: Design Pressure
P2
: Operating Pressure
P3
: Hydrotest Pressure
T1
: Design Temperature
T2
: Operating Temperature
T3
: Water Temperature
SE
Sy
Slp
SB
St
SE + SL < Syield
(OPE)
(SUS)
(EXP)
7.5
7.6
Anchor Block
8.
8.1
PIPING SUPPORTS
General
This section presents the type of piping supports to be used to keep the line
system stress within the allowable limit and the summary of piping loads.
8.2
General Supports
Rev 1
SINGA GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SALES GAS PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS
10 of 13
The number and location of supports have been chosen to satisfy static free span
requirement. Fix type and guide of support attached to the piping system is
chosen to compensate elongation due to combined load both of design,
operating and test condition.
9.
Toward to the pipeline, after the pig launcher area, before and after the LBCV at Kp.
16+000 & Kp. 32+000, and before the pig receiver, the pipes are buried to the ground.
Due to temperature changes and pressure, buried pipe deforms laterally in areas
immidiately adjacent to changes in directions (bends). In areas far from bends, the
deformation is primarily axial.
Stress analysis of the piping has been carried out using a non linear computer program
Caesar II Version 4.2. The pipeline has been modeled from pipeline anchor block area
between buried pipe and above ground pipeline (at surface of the ground). Both the ends
of above ground pipeline are anchored. Initially the number and the location of supports
were chosen to satisfy the free span requirement. Environmental loads are ignored for
static stress analysis.
Stress analysis is performed for different load cases defined in section 7.0 and found that
the system stresses are within the allowable limit as per ASME B 31.8. The result
summary of stresses has been presented in Table 9.1.1. until Table 9.3.2. Computer plot
and the stress isometric have been presented in Attachment-1.
Rev 1
SINGA GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SALES GAS PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS
11 of 13
Table 9.1.1. Summary of maximum stresses as per ASME B 31.8 at Pig Launcher (Above
Ground) Burried Pipe Sales Gas Pipeline
Allowable Stress (Psi)
Load
Case
No.
@Node
No.
Stress (Psi)
SUS 1
(W+P1)
25
SUS 2
(W+P2)
SUS 3
(W+P3)
Load Case
Ratio
SL
SE
Sy
(%)
11143.6
45000
24.76
25
9153.0
45000
20.34
25
13574.9
45000
30.17
EXP (T1)
70
137.7
43200
0.32
EXP (T2)
70
109.3
43200
0.25
OPE
(W+T1+P1)
25
11013.3
60000
18.36
OPE
(W+T2+P1)
25
11040.1
60000
18.40
OPE
(W+T3+P3)
25
13562.3
60000
22.60
Table 9.1.2. From calculated stress Pig Launcher Burried Pipe SGP, the maximum
operational condition load at Anchor Block will be given as follow:
Forces (lb)
Load Case
OPE (W+T1+P1)
@Node
70
Fx
Fy
Fz
-166
-278
-16
Rev 1
SINGA GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SALES GAS PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS
12 of 13
Table 9.1.3. From calculated stress Pig Launcher Burried Pipe SGP, the maximum
displacement report will be given as follow:
Translation (in)
Load Case
Rotation (deg)
@Node
OPE (W+T1+P1)
Dx
Dy
Dz
Rx
Ry
Rz
-0.55
-0.02
0.012
Table 9.2.1. Summary of maximum stresses as per ASME B 31.8 at LBCV Kp. 16+000 and
LBCV Kp. 32+000
Allowable Stress (Psi)
Load
Case
No.
@Node
No.
Stress (Psi)
SUS 1
(W+P1)
120
SUS 2
(W+P2)
SUS 3
(W+P3)
EXP (T1)
EXP (T2)
OPE
(W+T1+P1)
OPE
(W+T2+P1)
OPE
(W+T3+P3)
Load Case
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
Ratio
(%)
SL
SE
Sy
12376.6
45000
27.50
10386.0
45000
23.08
14807.9
45000
32.91
16087.0
43200
37.24
7884.0
43200
18.25
25874.9
60000
43.12
18991.9
60000
31.65
16111.8
60000
26.85
Rev 1
SINGA GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SALES GAS PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS
13 of 13
Table 9.2.2. From calculated stress LBCV 16+000 & 32+000 SGP, the maximum
operational condition load at Anchor Block will be given as follow:
Forces (lb)
Load Case
@Node
OPE (W+T1+P1)
Condition
Fx
Fy
Fz
30
-41530
-6313
Design
OPE (W+T2+P1)
30
-20690
-3180
Operation
OPE (W+T3+P3)
30
-4607
-762
Hydrotest
Table 9.2.3. From calculated stress LBCV 16+000 & 32+000 SGP, the maximum
displacement report will be given as follow:
Translation (in)
Load Case
Rotation (deg)
@Node
OPE (W+T1+P1)
109
Dx
Dy
Dz
Rx
Ry
Rz
-0.14
-0.87
0.018
Table 9.3.1. Summary of maximum stresses as per ASME B 31.8 at Burried Pipe - Pig
Receiver (Above Ground) SGP
Allowable Stress (Psi)
Load
Case
No.
@Node
No.
Stress (Psi)
SUS 1
(W+P1)
80
SUS 2
80
Load Case
Ratio
SL
SE
Sy
(%)
11378.5
45000
25.29
9387.9
45000
20.86
Rev 1
SINGA GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
14 of 13
(W+P2)
SUS 3
(W+P3)
80
13809.9
45000
30.69
EXP (T1)
50
4515.5
43200
10.45
EXP (T2)
50
3583.8
43200
8.30
OPE
(W+T1+P1)
50
13506.3
60000
22.51
OPE
(W+T2+P1)
50
12670.4
60000
21.12
OPE
(W+T3+P3)
50
13789.5
60000
22.98
Table 9.3.2. From calculated stress Burried Pipe - Pig Receiver (Above Ground) SGP, the
maximum operational condition load at Anchor Block will be given as follow:
Forces (lb)
Load Case
OPE (W+T1+P1)
@Node
50
Fx
Fy
Fz
1354
-97
6408
Table 9.3.3. From calculated stress LBCV 16+000 & 32+000 SGP, the maximum
displacement report will be given as follow:
Translation (in)
Load Case
OPE (W+T1+P1)
Rotation (deg)
@Node
2
Dx
Dy
Dz
Rx
Ry
Rz
-0.68
Rev 1