Emc On Printed Circuitboard
Emc On Printed Circuitboard
Mark I. Montrose
IEEE
PRESS
The Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers, Inc.
New York
U.S.A.
IEEE PRESS
445 Hoes Lane, PO Box 1331
Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331
IEEE PRESS Editorial Board
John B. Anderson, Editor in Chief
R. S. Muller
I. Peden
W. D. Reeve
E. Snchez-Sinencio
D. J. Wells
G. F. Hoffnagle
R. F. Hoyt
S. V. Kartalopoulos
P. Laplante
J. M. F. Moura
R. S. Blicq
S. Blanchard
M. Eden
R. Herrick
To
Margaret,
Maralena, and
Matthew
Contents
Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiii
Chapter 1Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Fundamental Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
EMC and the Printed Circuit Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
North American Regulatory Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
Worldwide Regulatory Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
Additional North American Regulatory Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
Supplemental Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Reference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Chapter 2Printed Circuit Board Basics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
Layer Stackup Assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
Two-layer boards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
Four-layer boards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Six-layer boards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Eight-layer boards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24
Ten-layer boards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25
20-H Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26
Grounding Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
Single-point grounding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
Multipoint grounding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30
Ground and signal loops (Excluding eddy currents) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32
Image planes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34
Partitioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38
Logic Families . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41
vii
viii
Contents
Contents
ix
Contents
Clocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .198
Interconnects and I/O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .202
Electrostatic Discharge Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .204
Backplanes and Daughter Cards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .205
Additional Design Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .208
Appendix B: International EMI Specification Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .211
Definition of Classification Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .211
FCC/DOC Emission Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .212
International Emission Limits Summary (Sample List) . . . . . . . . . . . . .216
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .223
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .227
Preface
This design guide is presented to assist in printed circuit board design and
layout, with the intent of meeting North American and international EMC
compliance requirements. Many different layout design methodologies
exist. This technical guide illustrates generally applicable layout methods
for EMC compliance. Implementation of these methods may vary for a
particular printed circuit board design.
The intended audience for this guide is engineers who design electronic products that use printed circuit boards. These engineers may focus
on analog, digital, or system-level boards.
Regardless of their specialties, all engineers must produce a design that
is suitable for actual production. Frequently, more emphasis is placed on
functionality of the design than on overall system integration. System
integration is usually assigned to product engineers, mechanical engineers, or others within the organization. Design engineers must now consider other aspects of product design, including the layout and production
of printed circuit boards for EMC, which includes cognizance of the manner in which the electromagnetic fields transfer from the circuit boards to
the chassis and/or case structure.
Not only must a design work properly, it must also comply with international regulatory requirements. Engineers who specialize in regulatory
issues must evaluate products based on different standards. This guide
presents techniques that will alleviate existing conflicts among various
layout methods.
A great deal of technical information related to printed circuit board
design and layout is available commercially as well as from publicdomain documents. Typically, these sources provide only a brief discusxi
xii
Preface
Acknowledgments
xiii
1
Introduction
niques for EMC Compliance is written for engineers who never studied
applied electromagnetics in school or who have limited hands-on experience with high-speed, high-technology printed circuit board design as it
specifically relates to EMC compliance.
A minimal amount of mathematical analysis is presented herein. It is
the intent of this guideline to describe hands-on techniques that have been
successfully applied to many real-world products. Data is presented in a
format that is easy to understand and implement. Those interested in
Maxwells equations or the more highly technical aspects of PCB design
theory will find a list of appropriate materials in the bibliography.
The focus of this guideline is strictly on the printed circuit board. Discussion of containment techniques (box shielding), internal and external
cabling, power supply design, and other system-level subassemblies that
use printed circuit boards as subcomponents will not be thoroughly discussed. Again, excellent reference material is listed in the bibliography on
these aspects of EMC system design engineering.
Controlling emissions has become a necessity for acceptable performance of an electronic device in both the civilian and military environment. It is more cost-effective to design a product with suppression on
the printed circuit board than to build a better box. Containment measures are not always economically justified and may degrade as the EMC
life cycle of the product is extended beyond the original design specification. For example, end users often remove covers from enclosures for
ease of access during repair or upgrade. Sheet metal covers (particularly
internal subassembly covers that act as partition shields) in many cases
are never replaced. The same is true for blank metal panels or faceplates
on the front of a system that contains a chassis or backplane assembly.
As a result, containment measures are compromised. Proper layout of a
printed circuit board with suppression techniques also assists in EMC
compliance at the level of cables and interconnects, whereas box shielding (containment) does not.
While it is impossible to anticipate every application or design concern possible, this book provides details on how to implement a variety
of design techniques for most applications. The concepts presented are
fundamental in nature and are applicable to all electronic products.
While every design is different, the basic fundamentals of product
design rarely change, and EMC theory is constant.
Why worry about EMC compliance? After all, isnt speed the most
important design parameter? Legal requirements dictate the maximum
permissible interference potential of digital products. These requirements
are based on experience in the marketplace related to emission and immu-
Introduction
nity complaints. Often, these same techniques will aid in improving signal quality and signal-to-noise performance.
This text discusses high-technology, high-speed designs that require
new and expanded techniques for EMC suppression at the PCB level.
Many techniques that were used successfully several years ago are now
less that effective for proper signal functionality and compliance. Components have become faster and more complex. Use of custom gate array
logic and ASICs presents new and challenging opportunities for EMC
engineers. The design and layout of a printed circuit board for EMI suppression at the source must always be optimized while maintaining system-wide functionality.
1.1
FUNDAMENTAL DEFINITIONS
Traditionally, EMC has been considered an art of black magic. In reality, EMC can be explained by mathematical concepts. Some of the relevant equations and formulas are complex and beyond the scope of this
design guideline. Fortunately, simple models can be formulated to
describe how and why EMC can be achieved.
Many variables exist in the creation of EMI. This is because EMI is
often the result of exceptions to the normal rules of passive component
behavior. A resistor at high frequencies acts like a series combination of
inductance with resistance in parallel with a capacitor. A capacitor at high
Introduction
unfamiliar with the types and levels of compliance required. The general
guidelines offered in this book will remove the mystery from the hidden
schematic.
When an EMI problem occurs, the engineer should approach the situation logically. A simple model that describes the field of EMC has three
elements:
1. a source of energy
2. a receptor that is disrupted by this energy
3. a coupling path between the source and receptor
For interference to exist, all three elements must be present. If one of the
three elements is removed, there is no interference. It therefore becomes
our first task to determine which is the easiest element to remove. Generally, designing a printed circuit board that eliminates most sources of RF
interference is the most cost-effective approach (called suppression). The
second and third elements tend to be addressed with containment techniques. Figure 1.2 illustrates the relationship between these three areas and
presents a list of products typically associated with each element.
A product must be designed for two levels of performance: one to minimize RF energy exiting an enclosure (emissions), and the other to minimize the amount of RF energy entering the enclosure (susceptibility or
immunity). In both cases, there are considerations of radiated and conducted EMI. This relationship is shown in Fig. 1.3.
When dealing with emissions, the general rule of thumb is:
The higher the frequency, the greater the likelihood of a radiated
coupling path; the lower the frequency, the greater the likelihood of
a conducted coupling path.
There are five major considerations in EMI analysis, as enumerated
below:
1. Frequency. Where in the frequency spectrum is the problem
observed?
2. Amplitude. How strong is the source energy level, and how great is
its potential to cause harmful interference?
3. Time. Is the problem continuous (clock signals), or does it exist
only during certain cycles of operation (i.e., disk drive write operation)?
4. Impedance. What is the impedance of both the source and receptor
units and the impedance of the transfer mechanism between the
Introduction
Noise Source
NATURAL
Terrestrial
Atmospheric
Triboelectric
Extraterrestrial
Sun
Cosmic
Radio stars
MAN-MADE
Communications
Broadcast
Navigation
Radar
2-way radio
Industrial
Arc welders
Ultracleaners
RF induction heaters
Fluorescent lights
Medical
CAT scanners
Diathermy
Home
Shavers
HV bug killers
Microwave ovens
Computing devices
Line receivers
Power supplies
Disk drives
Video amplifiers
Propagation Path
Susceptor
RADIATION
Far-field
Plane wave
Near-field
Capacitive crosstalk
Inductive crosstalk
Forward crosstalk
Backward crosstalk
Conduction
Power distribution
Signal distribution
Ground loops
BIOLOGICAL
Man
Animal
Plants
MAN-MADE
Communications
Broadcast receivers
Navigation receivers
Radar receivers
2-way radio receivers
Industrial controllers
Amplifiers
Medical
Biomedical sensors
Ordnance
EEDs
Dynamic caps
Computing devices
Line receivers
Power supplies
Disk drives
Video amplifiers
two?
5. Dimensions. What are the physical dimensions of the emitting
device? RF currents will exit an enclosure through chassis leaks
that equal fractions of a wavelength or significant fractions of a
rise-time distance. Trace lengths on a printed circuit board are
also transmission paths for RF currents.
Regarding impedance, if both source and receptor have the same
impedance, one should expect greater emission problems than if the
source and receptor have different impedances. This is because highimpedance sources have minimal impact on low-impedance receptors,
and vice-versa. Similar rules apply to radiated coupling. High impedances
Noise Source
Propagation Path
Control Emissions
(Reduce noise source level)
(Reduce propagation efficiency)
Conducted
Radiated
Susceptor
Control Susceptibility
(Reduce propagation efficiency)
(Increase susceptor noise immunity)
Conducted
Radiated
are associated with electric fields, whereas low impedances are associated
with magnetic fields.
1.3
Introduction
network. This Part provides a uniform standard to protect the telephone network from harm caused by terminal equipment connected to it.
The FCC and DOC define a digital device as:
An unintentional radiator (device or system) that generates and
uses timing signal pulses at a rate in excess of 9,000 pulses
(cycles) per second and uses digital techniques; inclusive of
telephone equipment that uses digital techniques or any device
or system that generates and utilizes radio frequency energy
for the purpose of performing data processing functions, such
as electronic computations, operations, transformation, recording, filing, sorting, storage, retrieval or transfer.
Digital computing products are classified into two Categories: Class A and
B. The FCC and DOC use the same definitions:
Class A: A computing device that is marketed for use in a commercial,
industrial, or business environment, exclusive of a device which is
marketed for use by the general public or is intended to be used in the
home.
Class B: A computing device that is marketed for use in a residential
environment, notwithstanding its use in a commercial, industrial or
business environment.
If a product contains digital circuitry and has a clock frequency greater
than 9 kHz, it is defined as a digital device and is subject to rules and regulations of the FCC and DOC. Electromagnetic interference may occur
due to both time-domain and frequency-domain components of both digital and analog circuits. These products are subject to both domestic and
international regulations.
The FCC and DOC regulate conducted emissions on power cords (line
conducted interference) from 450 kHz to 30 MHz. Radiated emissions are
measured from 30 MHz to 1000 MHz.
1.4
WORLDWIDE REGULATORY
REQUIREMENTS
10
Introduction
11
EN 50 082-1: 1993
Electromagnetic compatibility generic immunity standardPart 1:
Residential, commercial and light industry
EN 50 082-2: 1994
Electromagnetic compatibility generic immunity standardPart 2:
Heavy industrial environment
EN 55 011: 1991
Limits and methods of measurements of radio disturbance characteristics of industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) radio-frequency
equipment (CISPR 11: 1990 ed. 2)
EN 55 013: 1993
Limits and methods of measurements of radio disturbance characteristics of broadcast receivers and associated equipment (CISPR 13:
1975 ed. 1 + Amendment 1: 1992)
EN 55 014: 1993
Limits and methods of measurements of radio disturbance characteristics of household electrical appliances, portable tools and similar
electrical apparatus (CISPR 14: 1993 ed. 3)
EN 55 020: 1993
Limits and methods of measurements of radio disturbance characteristics of broadcast receivers and associated equipment (CISPR 20:
1990 ed. 2 + Amendment 1: 1990)
EN 55 022: 1987
Limits and methods of measurements of radio disturbance characteristics of information technology equipment (CISPR 22: 1985 ed. 1)
Products are classified into two categories of emissions: Class A and Class
B. CISPR defines these categories as:
Class A: Equipment is information technology equipment if it satisfies
the Class A interference limits but does not satisfy the Class B limits.
In some countries, such equipment may be subjected to restrictions
on its sale and/or use.
(Note: The limits for Class A equipment are derived for typical commercial establishments for which a 30 m protection distance is used.
The class A limits may be too liberal for domestic establishments and
some residential areas).
Class B: Equipment is information technology equipment if it satisfies the
Class B interference limits. Such equipment should not be subjected
to restrictions on its sale and is generally not subject to restrictions on
its use.
12
(Note: The limits for Class B equipment are derived for typical
domestic establishments for which a 10 m protection distance is
used).
Limits for European standards are similar but different from the North
American requirements. Appendix B illustrates the specification limits
for FCC/DOC (Part 15/SOR 88/475) and various international standards
in both tabular and graphical format.
European standards for susceptibility (immunity) are provided in the
IEC 1000-4-X series. This series describes the test and measurement
methods of basic standards. Basic standards are specific to a particular
type of EMI phenomenon. It is not limited to a specific type of product.
Internal to this series are the following:
terminology
descriptions of the EMI phenomenon
instrumentation
measurement and test methods
ranges of severity levels with regard to the immunity of the equipment
The IEC 1000-4-X series is based on the well known IEC 801-X
requirements. The main difference is in the title and publication number.
Future changes in technical requirements may be significant between the
IEC 1000-4-X and the IEC 801-X series. IEC requirements were officially withdrawn from circulation and replaced with a newly designated
series. The subparts of IEC 1000-4-X are listed below. As of the date of
writing, only IEC 1000-4-2/3/4 are legally required for EMC compliance.
It is anticipated that in the future, additional test standards and requirements will be mandatory. Currently, immunity tests are mandated in
Europe, only recommended in North America, and optional worldwide.
Introduction
13
1.5
Immunity
Indicates that the standard, as of the date of writing, is in draft form, published but not official, or not
yet legally required as part of the EMC directive. The reader should verify the existence and status
of a particular IEC 1000-4-X documents before implementing tests.
14
Subject Area
SAE J 551
NACSIM 5100
(a.k.a. TEMPEST)
MIL-STD-461/462
1.6
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION