Linguistic Anthropology

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Linguistic anthropology is the interdisciplinary study of how language influences social life.

It
is a branch of anthropology that originated from the endeavor to document endangered
languages, and has grown over the past 100 years to encompass almost any aspect of language
structure and use.
Linguistic anthropology explores how language shapes communication, forms social identity and
group membership, organizes large-scale cultural beliefs and ideologies, and develops a common
cultural representation of natural and social worlds.

STRUCTURAL LINGUISTICS. An approach to LINGUISTICS which treats language as an


interwoven structure, in which every item acquires identity and validity only in relation to the
other items in the system. All linguistics in the 20c is structural in this sense, as opposed to much
work in the 19c, when it was common to trace the history of individual words. Insight into the
structural nature of language is due to the Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure, who compared
language to a game of chess, noting that a chess piece in isolation has no value and that a move
by any one piece has repercussions on all the others. An item's role in a structure can be
discovered by examining those items which occur alongside it and those which can be
substituted for it. The structural approach developed in a strong form in the US in the second
quarter of the century, when the prime concern of American linguists was to produce a catalogue
of the linguistic elements of a language, and a statement of the positions in which they could
occur, ideally without reference to meaning. Leonard BLOOMFIELD was the pioneer among
these structuralists, attempting to lay down a rigorous methodology for the analysis of any
language. Various Bloomfieldians continued to refine and experiment with this approach until the
1960s, but from the late 1950s onwards, structural linguistics has sometimes been used
pejoratively, because supporters of generative linguistics (initiated by Noam CHOMSKY) have
regarded the work of the American structuralists as too narrow in conception. They have argued
that it is necessary to go beyond a description of the location of items to produce a grammar
which mirrors a native speaker's intuitive knowledge of language.

SOCIOLINGUISTICS
Sociolinguistics is the study of the relationships between language use and social structure. It
investigates the correlation between linguistic (i.e., phonological, lexical, and grammatical)
variables and social (i.e., gender, age, status, and ethnicity) variables. Since sociolinguistics is
concerned with both linguistic and social aspects of language, researchers identify two main
distinctions in sociolinguistic inquiry. Micro-sociolinguistics focuses on the social aspects of
language, while macro-sociolinguistics examines how linguistic features can provide
explanations for certain social phenomena. In other words, micro-sociolinguistics investigates
how society influences the way people communicate, while macro-sociolinguistics studies
society in relation to language.

Historical linguistics, also called diachronic linguistics, is the scientific study of language
change over time.[1]Principal concerns of historical linguistics include: [2]
1. to describe and account for observed changes in particular languages
2. to reconstruct the pre-history of languages and to determine their relatedness, grouping
them into language families (comparative linguistics)
3. to develop general theories about how and why language changes
4. to describe the history of speech communities
5. to study the history of words, i.e. etymology

You might also like