The Ultraviolet Detection of Corona Discharge in Power Transmission Lines
The Ultraviolet Detection of Corona Discharge in Power Transmission Lines
The Ultraviolet Detection of Corona Discharge in Power Transmission Lines
ABSTRACT
Corona discharge is a common phenomenon in power transmission lines external insulation, and it may cause serious
defect if without effective detection. The ultraviolet (UV) imagery technology has been widely used to detect the corona
discharge in industry in recent years, but some influence factors functions are not definite. In this paper, the fracture
aluminum strands which is common in power transmission lines were used as the electrode model while a SuperB ultraviolet imager were utilized to detect, the photon count rate was detected with different detect distance, electric field,
aluminum strands length and UV gain were applied. Then the multivariate regression analysis (MRA) was taken to calculate the function between the photon count and the factors.
Keywords: Corona Discharge; Transmission Lines; Defect Detection; UV Imager; Multivariate Regression Analysis
1. Introduction
With the development of Extra High Voltage (EHV) and
Ultra High Voltage (UHV), the electromagnetic environment problem caused by corona discharge of conductor was paid attention increased [1-3]. The corona discharge could generate the negative phenomenon such as
radio interference, audible noise, ozone-forming, electrochemical reaction [4-6]. The detection of the defect of
the corona discharge has been added to the daily inspect
in transmission lines in recently years [7].
The corona discharge in the transmission lines often
occurred at the high voltage terminal of amour clamp,
split clamp, conductor surface and the end of fractured
aluminum strands caused by lightning stroke or conductor galloping. And the influence of fractured aluminum
strands is extra clear, it not only generate corona discharge by distort the electric field at the end of the
strands, but also make a bad influence on the mechanical
behavior of the conductor, the defect would make serious
harm to transmission security if without fix timely [8].
So it is important to find and fix fractured aluminum
strands at the early stage in transmission lines patrol.
The traditional ovular estimate and infrared thermography technology dont have well effect on the fractured
aluminum strands detection. For the ovular estimate,
people may have different vision disparity and the corona
discharge could be find nearly only in intensity at night
[9]. While the infrared thermograph technology is able to
detect the defect with consecutive electrothermal effect,
Copyright 2013 SciRes.
L. CHEN ET AL.
1299
And the different strand length, detection distance, applied voltage, UV gain level were show in Table 1. The
electric field of the conductor surface (not the top of
strand) was calculated by ANSOFT for applied voltage
as 10.7 kV/cm, 13.6 kV/cm, 16.4 kV/cm, 19.3 kV/cm,
and respectively.
2. Introduce of Experiment
2.1. Test System
The experiment was carried out in a shielding hall with a
size of 66 m 30 m 18 m, and the test model was
4LGJ300/40, bundle space was 45 cm, height was 6.8
m, the model picture was showed in Figure 1. And the
temperature was 8.4~10.8relative humidity was
35%~43%.
The UV imager with type of DayCor SuperB was
showed in Figure 2. And the 50 Hz source with maximum of 1000 kV and 1000 kVA was showed in Figure
3.
And the measurement system schematic diagram was
showed in Figure 4.
content
2
150
7
60
4
190
9
80
6
230
11
100
8
270
13
120
10
EPE
L. CHEN ET AL.
1300
(a)10.7 kV/cm
(b)13.6 kV/cm
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
(c)16.4 kV/cm
35000
25000
30000
25000
20000
UV gain 120
Distance 9m
15000
10000
40000
9
10
11
Detection distancem
12
13
30000
2cm
4cm
6cm
8cm
10cm
UV gain 100
Electric field 19.3kV/cm
7
2cm
4cm
6cm
8cm
10cm
2cm
4cm
6cm
8cm
10cm
Distance 9m
Electric field 16.4kV/cm
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Electric field of conductor surfacekV/cm
60
70
80
90
UV gain
100
110
120
L. CHEN ET AL.
(1)
In the equation, electric field was set as E, kV/cm; detection distance was set as L, m; UV gain was set as K;
length of strand was set as s, cm.
And the significance test was taken, including R, F and
T test , showed in Equation (2) ,(3) and (4).
R
i 1
i 1
( yi y )2 ( yi y )2
( yi yi )2 (n m 1)
REFERENCES
i 1
5. Conclusions
(2)
( yi y )2
~ F (m, n m 1)
(3)
~ t (n m 1)
(4)
[1]
[2]
[3]
Y. B. Shu and W. Z. Zhang, Research of Key Technologies for UHV Transmission, Proceedings of the CSEE,
Vol. 27, No. 31, 2007, pp. 1-6.
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
i 1
Tj
(b j j )
n
( yi yi )2
c jj
(n m 1)
i 1
(5)
347.7 K 754.4 s
10.7kV/cm
13.6kV/cm
16.4kV/cm
19.3kV/cm
20000
UV gain 100
Distance 9m
16000
12000
8000
4000
2
4
6
8
Length of strandcm
10
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6520.2004.06.014
Value
49.29
101230
347.7
754.4
[10] Y. Cai and X. Hu, State of the Art and Future Trend of
Detectors for Infrared Imaging Seekers, Infrared and
Laser Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2006, pp.7-11.
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2006.01.002
T
0
1301
[11] F. Chen and Y. R. Zhou, Study on Infrared Image Library and Remote Diagnosis Aid Systems, East China
Electric Power, Vol. 36, No. 12, 2008, pp. 55-58.
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-9529.2008.12.016
[12] R. S. Arbusov and A. G. Ovsyannikov, UV-inspection of
EPE
L. CHEN ET AL.
1302
HV Equipment, ISH 2005, 2005.
[13] W. L. Vosloo, G. R. Stolper and P. Baker. Daylight Corona Discharge Observation and Recording System,
Proceedings of 10th International Symposium on HV Engineering, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Vol. 6,1997, pp.
161-164.
[14] P. Lindner, Inspection for Corona and Arcing with the
Daycor Camera, Proceeding of World Insulator Congress and Exhibition, Hong Kong, China, 2005.
[15] M. Lindner, S. Elstein, P. Lindner, J. M. Topaz and A. J.
Phillips, Daylight Corona Discharge Imager, Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on High Voltage
Engineering, London, UK, 1999, pp. 349-352.
[16] X. Lin and Y. B. Zhang, Application of Ultraviolet Imaging Technology to the Discharge of High-voltage Corona, Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2011, pp.
80-82. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5634.2011.05.023
[17] Y. Kim and K. Shong, The Characteristics of UV
Strength According to Corona Discharge from Polymer
Insulators Using a UV Sensor and Optic Lens, IEEE
Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2011, pp.
1579-1585.
[18] W.T. Hu and S. H. Wang, Brief Discussion on Influence
Factors in Detecting Corona Discharge by UV Detector,
North China Electric Power, No. 1, 2009.
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-9171.2009.01.002
[19] I. A. D. Giriantari, Monitoring the Insulator Condition
by On-Line Voltage Distribution Measurement, 2008
International Conference on Condition Monitoring and
Diagnosis, Beijing, China, April 21-24, 2008, pp. 392394.
[20] O. P. Ivanov, V. E. Stepanov, S. V. Smirnov and A. G.
Volkovich, Development of Method for Detection of
Alpha Contamination with Using UV-camera DayCor
by OFIL, Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), IEEE, 2011, pp.
2192-2194.
[21] L. Chen, X. M. Bian, F. L. Chen, X. B. Meng, L. M
Wang and Z. C. Guan, Method to Judge Corona Inception Voltage of AC Transmission Lines Using Corona
Cage, High Voltage Engineering, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2011,
pp. 85-90.
EPE