Removing sulfurcrete from Claus plant sulfur condensers

with TubeMaster, the tube cleaning system of mycon

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1
1. Blasting for removal of sulfurcrete .......................................................................................................... 2
1.1
Process description ......................................................................................................................... 2
1.2
Sulfurcrete removal ........................................................................................................................ 3
2. Comparison to other cleaning methods .................................................................................................. 5
3.Summary................................................................................................................................. Summary
4.Literature ................................................................................................................................. Literature

Introduction
Sulfurcrete consists of elemental sulfur, salts formed from sulfur plus CO 2, SO2, NH3, and dust from abrasion
of Claus catalysts. The hardness of this material matches that of granite (see e.g. /1/). Almost any Claus
plant operator knows the nasty problems sulfurcrete creates. Primarily it sooner or later plugs the tubes in
sulfur condensors. Under the surface of the sufurcrete layer traces of sulfuric acid are formed and lead to
corrosion. Both effects of course are highly unfavorable and therefore sulfurcrete has to be removed.
However, that is a very difficult task indeed. Sulfur recovery plants convert toxic H 2S to harmless elemental
sulfur. That is a very important task and therefore sulfur recovery plants must have a very high onstream
factor. Cleaning sulfur condensers, however necessitates down-time which has to be as short as possible.
But sulfurcrete is extremely hard and therefore its mechanical removal is possible only by very massive
means, as drilling. That in turn causes substantial mechanical stress on the equipment to be cleaned and
often leads to damages. Washing sulfurcrete out is not an option as it is insoluble in most common solvents,
especially those which are easy to handle, as water.
Though this problem is common to many of the roughly 1 000 Claus plants worldwide there was no
satisfactory answer available. But recently a surprisingly simple method for the removal of sulfurcrete was
introduced.

CONTACT:

mycon GmbH
Senner Strae 156
33659 Bielefeld

Fon.: +49 (0)521/403090

Fax.: +49 (0)521/402482
E-Mail: [email protected]

1.

Blasting for removal of sulfurcrete

1.1

Process description

For slight soiling dry ice can be used as an abrasive.

Dry ice is solid CO2, i.e. gas cooled to appr 78C where it solidifies. The rice-grain size pellets of
dry ice in the units hopper (see Fig. 2) are metered into a stream of compressed air or inert gas. In
the blasting nozzle the carrier gas reaches almost the speed of sound which accelerates the
pellets to speeds of 180 to 330 m/s. The pellets hitting the deposits have three effects:
-

The low temperature of 78C cools the deposit down locally. That makes the deposits on the
surface brittle and leads to a slight contraction of the deposits. Due to the local thermal shock
cracks form in the deposit
Where the pellets hit the surface high pressure is generated at the edges. This causes the CO 2
to liquefy as ice under the skates of an iceskater. This liquid CO2 is a good solvent for many
substances which helps to break the integrity of the deposits surface. Dry ice migrates into
these cracks and evaporate there very fast, almost explosively. That multiplies the dry ice
volume and in the process breaks off the deposits.
Kinetic energy of the dry ice particles which impact on the deposits surface mechanically
remove it and the carrier gas conveys them to the outlet.

Fig. 1: Process principle of dry ice blasting

Schematically these effects are shown in Fig. 1. It highlights the very narrowly confined local
cooling due to the dry ice impact (blue section in Fig. 1) which is the cause for thermal stress within
the layer to be removed. It also demonstrates that the underlying carrier surface is only very little
affected by temperature reduction. Therefore the thermal stress remains primarily confined to the
deposit which effects the thermal sheer between deposit and carrier surface. The different thermal
expansion of deposit and carrier surface enhances to sheer off the deposit.
There no additional waste is created since the dry ice evaporates and leaves the site as gaseous
CO2. The surface, now cleaned may be further treated with the dry ice. The pellets are not hard
enough to cause abrasion. Rather this treatment just reduces the roughness of the surface and
actually polishes it.
CONTACT:

mycon GmbH
Senner Strae 156
33659 Bielefeld

Fon.: +49 (0)521/403090

Fax.: +49 (0)521/402482
E-Mail: [email protected]

The blasting pressure is adjustable from typically 2 to 16 bar. Specific nozzles are to be applied
depending on the geometry of the surface to be cleaned.

The use of dry ice pellets as a blasting medium is not sufficient for heavy and hard sulphur
deposits or for removing rust. An abrasive blasting agent is used here. The blasting agent to be
used is selected according to the condition of the surface. The special nozzles from Mycon and her
sister company Kipp Umwelttechnik are accurately set according to the requirements. This
accurate selection means the interior surface of the pipe is not only cleaned but also milled or
polished. This results in substantial improvements in surface quality and significantly reduces
energy costs. It also facilitates future cleaning, as deposits may be less likely to settle. Mycon and
Kipp Umwelttechnik have many years experience of cleaning and surface improvement of all kinds
of pipes. It has successfully cleaned steel, stainless steel, bronze, red bronze, copper, brass,
titanium (there are special requirement characteristics for the blasting procedure here) and
graphite pipes. For curved pipes, specific criteria need to be considered for the blasting procedure.
1.2

Sulfurcrete removal

The task of Claus plants is to convert toxic hydrogen sulfide to elemental sulfur. They can also
remove pollutants, particularly by converting ammonia to nitrogen and water. There are many
publications about Claus plants which describe the details (see, for instance, /2/). Figure 4 shows a
schematic diagram of a Claus plant, and Figure 5 is a photograph.

F1
W1, W2
W3, W4

Claus furnace with waste-heat boiler

Preheaters
Sulfur condensers

C1
Sulfur separator
R1, R2 Catalytic reactors
F2
Incinerator

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of a Claus plant

CONTACT:

mycon GmbH
Senner Strae 156
33659 Bielefeld

Fon.: +49 (0)521/403090

Fax.: +49 (0)521/402482
E-Mail: [email protected]

Figure 3: A 700 t/d Claus plant at NEAG Voigtei, Germany

Sulfurcrete forms in relatively cool spots of Claus plants, especially in sulfur condensors. In Claus
plants they are operated typically in the temperature range 125C to 160C. At higher temperature
the sulfur becomes highly viscous and therefore does not flow freely from the condensor. At lower
temperature than 125C the temperature difference to the sulfur solidification point at appr 119C*
becomes too small. The lower the temperature the lower the vapor pressure of sulfur becomes and
therefore sulfur condensors in principle are more efficient at low temperature. However, the salts
forming during sulfur condensation in the heat exchanger are then more stable which makes higher
temperature preferable. The optimum therefore usually is to operate the sulfur condensors at the
higher end of the feasible range. Especially the formation of CO2 salts of ammonia can be avoided
by operation at higher than 150C. But what still remains are stable SO2 and SO3 salts of
ammonia, dust from catalyst abrasion plus sulfur droplets which tend to plug the condensors.
Operation at higher temperature may enhance ease of operation, however comes at the cost of
reduced sulfur recovery as some sulfur vapor passes through the condenser unrecovered. In view
of current stringent regulations with respect to sulfur recovery that often is not an acceptable
option. So whatever operators try to overcome the problem of plugging in sulfur condensors, all
they can achieve is reducing the problem, not really solving it: Sooner or later tubes in the sulfur
condensors contain sulfurcrete deposits and may eventually even be plugged. Compounding the
problem is the hardness of sulfurcrete which matches that of granite.
The conventional method of removing sulfurcrete is drilling the layer out of the tubes. That leads
necessarily to minor or major scratches on the surface of the tubes which then serve as preferred
spots of a new deposit formation. Also major damage may occur when drills deviate into the steel
rather than removing the deposits. Since sulfur condenser tubes are usually made of carbon steel
there always is some corrosion after an extended operating period. Corroded areas are especially
*

Depending on the modification of sulfur various solidification points exist, ranging from 113C to 119C, see e.g. /2/.
CONTACT:
mycon GmbH
Fon.: +49 (0)521/403090
Senner Strae 156
Fax.: +49 (0)521/402482
33659 Bielefeld
E-Mail: [email protected]

sensitive to breakage due to the mechanical stress by drilling. And finally many sulfur condensors
use U-tubes and the bended part of the tubes cannot be reached by drilling. That means that part
of the tubes remains uncleaned reducing the useful service life of that heat exchanger. With
TubeMaster all these problems can be overcome.
The deflector is moved at appr 3 to 12 m/min through the tube driven by the carrier gas. The speed
is controlled depending on the cleaning effect and has to be adapted for each application
individually. It depends on many parameters, as the material of the deposits, the thickness of the
deposit layer and its hardness.
This process has been applied in a Claus plant of NEAG at Voigtei/Germany. There gas from
natural gas fields is treated. The concentrated H2S fraction is recovered from three different
absorption processes. NEAG has three Claus plants in parallel, equipped with MODOP as the tail
gas treatment. The plants have a total sulfur capacity of 1000 t/d. The sulfur condenser of the
700 t/d unit contains 1882 tubes of appr. 50 mm diameter and is 6400 mm long. More than
70% of the tubes contained deposits. In the lower section of the heat exchanger tubes were even
totally blocked by sulfurcrete. Cleaning of the tubes has not been necessary for many years
because the exchanger had sufficient overdesign so that it worked satisfactorily despite the
plugging.
Cleaning with dry ice blasting could be carried out at speeds of appr 4 to 6 m/min so that cleaning
took appr one minute per tube. Overall cleaning could be finished within 28 working hours.
Cleaning was complete, i.e. 100% of the surface were metallic again. Cleaning of totally plugged
tubes takes longer, but is possible to do.

2.

Comparison to other cleaning methods

TubeMaster is more expensive e.g. high pressure water for cleaning surfaces. But it has a number
of advantages that often far outweigh its higher price. These advantages are:
Dry cleaning
Excellent cleaning results
Improves surface quality within the pipe
Significant energy savings
Extends operating times

CONTACT:

mycon GmbH
Senner Strae 156
33659 Bielefeld

Fon.: +49 (0)521/403090

Fax.: +49 (0)521/402482
E-Mail: [email protected]

Fig. 4: Cleaning a heat exchanger using TubeMaster

One can clearly see the small diameter of the tubes which are cleaned. Usually cleaning-in-place of equipment is
possible. This specific exchanger was cleaned with the tube bundle withdrawn from the shell.

In parallel the market for the sulfur rich heavy residues is shrinking forcing refineries to upgrade
them by hydrogenation and/or treat them in a visbreaker or converting them in a coker. The heat
exchangers upstream of the visbreaker or coker get regularly plugged by soot and highly viscous
organic material. They have to be cleaned routinely to avoid total blockage. Up to now that is done
mostly by high pressure water with detrimental effects, as is demonstrated by an example case
described here in more detail:
A visbreaker heat exchanger had to be cleaned from the typical deposits of soot, heavy
hydrocarbons and undefinable polymers. The tubes were 25 x 2.6 mm, 7 600 mm long. The client
up to now had used high pressure water of 2 500 bar pressure. Despite this high pressure the
cleaning effect was only 90%. Furthermore the huge energy input through the water added to the
corrosive effect and increased the unevenness of the tube inner surface. This undesirable situation
led the client to try dry ice blasting.
The deposit layer before cleaning was appr 2 mm. That required forceful cleaning. Therefore, as
the blasting medium dry ice plus slightly abrasive material was applied. With CryoClean the heat
exchanger could be cleaned within 22 hours. After that treatment the inner tube surface was 100%
metallic and clean, while with high pressure water only 90% cleaning could be realized.
Due to the already progressed corrosion of the tubes the inner walls of the tubes were polished
after cleaning again using TubeMaster. The result was very good smoothness of less than 0.6 .
This corresponds to the quality of a honed surface.
Such smooth surface offers little nuclei for new deposits. Therefore the interval between cleanings
of the heat exchanger could be prolonged by about 50% compared to high pressure water
cleaning.
The non-abrasive action of TubeMaster also increases the lifetimes of the components. Cleaning
can take place more often without detrimental effect on the component.
Because the process is easily controlled, even complex units can be cleaned easily.
TubeMaster is of particular interest for turn-arounds. It is finding rapidly growing interest in
refineries especially where it is important to keep equipment dry during and after cleaning and
where a speedy re-start pays.

3.

Summary

TubeMaster allows to clean in tubes down to a diameter of 3 mm. Deposits to be removed may be
as weak as oils and fats, or as hard as sulfurcrete. The cleaning process is non-abrasive so that in
one case studied even after 50 routine cleaning cycles the original wall thickness of the pipe was
still intact. TubeMaster allows to clean most equipment items in place, i.e. no disassembly and
later re-assembly is required. In addition the cleaned surface mostly is of better smoothness after
treatment than before. This reduces adhesion and thus increases the service intervals between
cleanings.
There is a lot of experience available which makes it possible to optimize additives and the blasting
process to the specific application.
CONTACT:

mycon GmbH
Senner Strae 156
33659 Bielefeld

Fon.: +49 (0)521/403090

Fax.: +49 (0)521/402482
E-Mail: [email protected]

Dry ice blasting can help increase the on-stream time and thus this process and especially the
patented cleaning of tubes can ensure better economy.

4.

Literature

1.

H. G. Paskall, J. A. Sames, Sulfur recovery by the modified Claus process, Calgary, 1992.

2.

H. Fischer et al., Sulphur, Sulphur Dioxide, Sulphuric Acid, British Sulphur Corp. London
1984

3.

M. Heisel, A. Buinger, J. Kipp Sulfur 2004

CONTACT:

mycon GmbH
Senner Strae 156
33659 Bielefeld

Fon.: +49 (0)521/403090

Fax.: +49 (0)521/402482
E-Mail: [email protected]