Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 41 views

    Physics in Daily Life: Hear, Hear... : Acknowledgements

    Uploaded by

    Julia Alikki
    The document discusses several key aspects of sound and how the human ear perceives it: 1. The human ear has an astonishingly large range of sensitivity to sound, spanning 12 orders of magnitude around 1 kHz. This means that noise pollution travels much further than one might expect. 2. The threshold of hearing increases more steeply with decreasing frequency compared to the threshold of pain. When turning down the volume, low frequencies tend to get lost first. 3. On average, normal speech produces about 10-5 W of sound energy at a distance of 2 m from the speaker. Even talking non-stop for 100 years would produce less than 1 cent's worth of energy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Physics in Daily Life: Hear, Hear... : Acknowledgements

    Uploaded by

    Julia Alikki
    41 views1 page
    The document discusses several key aspects of sound and how the human ear perceives it: 1. The human ear has an astonishingly large range of sensitivity to sound, spanning 12 orders of magnitude around 1 kHz. This means that noise pollution travels much further than one might expect. 2. The threshold of hearing increases more steeply with decreasing frequency compared to the threshold of pain. When turning down the volume, low frequencies tend to get lost first. 3. On average, normal speech produces about 10-5 W of sound energy at a distance of 2 m from the speaker. Even talking non-stop for 100 years would produce less than 1 cent's worth of energy.

    Original Description:

    everyday physics

    Original Title

    Hear Hear

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses several key aspects of sound and how the human ear perceives it: 1. The human ear has an astonishingly large range of sensitivity to sound, spanning 12 orders of magnitude around 1 kHz. This means that noise pollution travels much further than one might expect. 2. The threshold of hearing increases more steeply with decreasing frequency compared to the threshold of pain. When turning down the volume, low frequencies tend to get lost first. 3. On average, normal speech produces about 10-5 W of sound energy at a distance of 2 m from the speaker. Even talking non-stop for 100 years would produce less than 1 cent's worth of energy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    41 views1 page

    Physics in Daily Life: Hear, Hear... : Acknowledgements

    Uploaded by

    Julia Alikki
    The document discusses several key aspects of sound and how the human ear perceives it: 1. The human ear has an astonishingly large range of sensitivity to sound, spanning 12 orders of magnitude around 1 kHz. This means that noise pollution travels much further than one might expect. 2. The threshold of hearing increases more steeply with decreasing frequency compared to the threshold of pain. When turning down the volume, low frequencies tend to get lost first. 3. On average, normal speech produces about 10-5 W of sound energy at a distance of 2 m from the speaker. Even talking non-stop for 100 years would produce less than 1 cent's worth of energy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    FEATURES

    Acknowledgements
    I would like to thank several colleagues for their reading and suggestions, in particular 1. Pape, P. Janot, R. Barate and I. Timmermans.
    About the author
    Daniel Treille is a senior physicist at CERN and a former
    spokesman of the DELPHI experiment.

    Physics in daily life:


    Hear, hear...
    L,f.E Hermans, Leiden University, The Netherlands

    ........................................................................................................................

    References
    ven a tiny cricket can make a lot of noise, without having to

    [1] G. Kane, in Scientific American, June 2003, for a brief reminder of the
    SM and Supersymmetry Basics can be found in H. Georgi, Scientific
    American, April 80, p 104, G. t'Hooft, ibid., June 80, p 104

    "refuel" every other minute. illustrates what we physicists


    E
    have known all along: Audible sound waves carry verylittle energy.

    [2] All EW results are those provided by the LEP EW Group

    Or, if you wish: the human ear is pretty sensitive-if the sound
    waves are in the right frequency range, of course.
    How exactly our ears respond to sound waves has been sorted
    out by our biophysical and medical colleagues, and is illustrated
    by the familiar isophone plots that many of us remember from the
    textbooks. They are reproduced here for convenience. Each isophone curve represents sound that seems to be equally loud for
    the average person.
    The figure reminds us that the human ear is not only rather sensitive, but that it also has an astonishingly large range: 12 orders of
    magnitude around 1 kHz. This is, in a way, a crazy result, if we
    think of noise pollution. It means that if we experience noise loud
    enough to reach the threshold of pain, and we assume a 1/fl decay
    of the sound intensity, we would have to increase the distance from
    the source by a factor of 106 to get rid of the noise. Or, if we
    stand at 10 m from the source, we would
    ------.
    1lI,w1(,6cP
    have to walk away some 10 000 km.
    -....
    All this assumes that the attenuation /:fj
    Sa<ND .-PT
    can be neglected, since we have been ~
    o
    taught that sound wave propagation is an
    adiabatic process. Obviously, real life isn't
    that simple. There are several dissipative
    terms. For example, think of the irreversible
    heat leaks between the compressed and the
    expanded areas: the classical absorption
    coefficient is proportional to the frequency squared, which makes distant
    thunder rumble. Then there is
    attenuation by obstacles.
    There is the curvature of the
    earth. There is the curvature of the
    sound waves themselves, usually away
    from the earth due to the vertical temperature gradient.Without loss terms like these, forget a solid sleep.
    Asecond fea4U'e worth noticing is the shape ofthe curves.Where- ~
    as the pain threshold is relatively flat, the threshold of hearing ~.
    increases steeply with decreasing frequency. If we turn our audio g
    amplifier from ahigh to a lowvolume, we tend to loose the lowest fre- ~
    quencies. The"loudness" control is supposed to compensate for this. ~
    Finally, it is interesting to notice the magnitude of the sound if
    intensity. How much sound energy do we produce when we
    speak? Let us assume that the listener hears us speak at an average ~
    sound level of 60 dB, which corresponds to 10-6W1m2 as seen from ~
    the right-hand vertical scale. Assuming that the listener is at 2 m,
    the sound energy is smeared out over some 10 m2 This means
    that we produce, typically, 10-5 W of sound energy when we talk.
    That is very little indeed. During our whole life, even if we talk day
    and night and we get to live 100 years, we will not talk more than
    106 hours. With the above 10-5 W, this means a total of 10 Wh. Even
    with a relatively high price of 50 EurocentslkWh, this boils down to
    less than one cent for life-long speaking. Cheap talk, so to speak.

    [3] CERN Courier, Jan-Feb 02, article 6, p7


    [4] EJ.M. Farley; Europhysics News, (2001) Vo!. 32 No.5,
    CERN Courier Jan-Feb. 2004, article 2. The last g-2 result is from
    hep-ex/0401008
    [5] M. Davier et al.,Eur.Phys.!.C 31, 503 (2003),S. Ghozzi and
    E Jegerlehner, hep-exJ0310181
    [6] M.A. Bouchiat, 1. Pottier, Scientific American, June 1984
    [7] Y. Karyotakis, G. Hamel de Monchenault, Europhysics News, (2002)
    Vo!.33 No.3
    [8] J.E Grivaz, Europhysics News, (2003) Vo!. 34, No. 1

    [9] CERN Courier, June 03, article 2, p6, July-Aug 03, article 6, p8, Sept
    03, article 6, p9
    [10] CERN Courier, Sept 03, article 1, pS, and a review by R. Jaffe and
    EWilczek, hep-phl0401034
    [11] K. Lane, Two lectures on Technicolour, hep-phl0202255

    [12] CERN Courier, Dec. 2000, article 19


    CERN Courier, Jan-Feb. 2002, article 15
    [13] CERNCourier,March 1991, article 1
    [14] CERNCourier,Sept 02, article 17, ibid. Sept 03,article 17
    [15] P. Binetruy,EurophysicsNews, (2002) Vo!.33 No.2
    Scientific American, August 2000,
    CERN Courier, March 2000, article 6

    [16] CERN Courier, vol.43, n06, article 15 by I.Antoniadis


    [17] B. Greene, The elegant Universe,
    H. Haber and G. Kane, Scientific American, April 83, p56,
    M. Green, Scientific American, Sept. 86, page 44,
    CERN Courier, April 99, article 11
    [18] E Wilczek, QCD made simple, Physics Today, Aug. 2000,
    CERN Courier, April 03, article 15
    [19] CERNCourier,Jan-Feb.2oo2,article 16,
    HERA with polarized e: CERN Courier, April 03, article I, pS, HERMES: CERN Courier, Nov 01, article 18,
    COMPASS: CERN Courier, Sept. 99, article 19,
    RHIC: CERN Courier, April 02, p8, Jan-Feb 03

    [20] CERN Courier, Jan-Feb 03, article 1,.}uly-Aug 03, article 2


    [21] CERN Courier,April 01, article 15, may 2002, article 2, see also reference 7
    [22] KTeV: CERN Courier, April 99, article 2, July-Aug. 2001, article 1,
    E787: CERN Courier, March 2002, article 2, p4
    KLOE: CERN Courier, Sept. 99, article 23
    NA48: CERN Courier, Sept. 99, article 2, July-Aug. 2001, article 1

    [23] Europhyslcs News, (2000) Vo1.31, No. 3,


    CERN Courier, Oct. 2002, article 13
    [24] CERN Courier, Sept. 03, article 18
    [25] CERN Courier, May 1999, article 7
    86

    It

    Article available at http://www.europhysicsnews.org or http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epn:2004305


    europhysics news MAY/JUNE 2004

    You might also like