Introduction To The OpenDSS

The OpenDSS is a comprehensive electrical system simulation tool used for modeling and analyzing electric utility distribution systems. It supports steady-state analyses like power flow and can model elements with multiple phases. The OpenDSS was developed to provide more flexibility than other tools and support emerging needs like distributed generation analysis. It has a script-based interface that allows customizing analyses and has built-in functions for various simulations like harmonics, faults, and dynamics. The tool is open source and can be extended through custom models or interfaced with other programs.

Uploaded by

anoopeluvathingal100

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

0% found this document useful (0 votes)

245 views

Introduction To The OpenDSS

Uploaded by

anoopeluvathingal100

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 4

Introduction to the OpenDSS

The Open Distribution System Simulator (OpenDSS, or simply, DSS) is a comprehensive

electrical system simulation tool for electric utility distribution systems. OpenDSS technically
refers to the open-source implementation of the DSS. It is implemented as both a stand-alone
executable program and a COM DLL designed to be driven from a variety of existing software
platforms. The executable version adds a basic user interface on to the solution engine to assist
users in developing scripts and viewing solutions.
The program basically supports all rms steady-state (i.e., frequency domain) analyses commonly
performed for utility distribution systems. In addition, it supports many new types of analyses that
are designed to meet future needs, many of which are being dictated by the deregulation of US
utilities and the formation of distribution companies worldwide. Many of the features found in the
program were originally intended to support distributed generation analysis needs. Other features
support energy efficiency analysis of power delivery and harmonics analysis. The DSS is
designed to be indefinitely expandable so that it can be easily modified to meet future needs.
The OpenDSS program has been used for:

1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
4

Distribution Planning and Analysis

General Multi-phase AC Circuit Analysis
Analysis of Distributed Generation
Interconnections
Annual Load and Generation Simulations
Wind Plant Simulations
Analysis of Unusual Transformer Configurations
Harmonics and Interharmonics analysis
Neutral-to-earth Voltage Simulations
Development of IEEE Test feeder cases
And more .

Hour

Snapshot Power Flow

Daily Power Flow
Yearly Power Flow
Harmonics
Dynamics
Faultstudy
And others

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec

0
10

The program has several built-in solution modes,

including:

Month

Through the COM interface, the user is able to add other solution modes and features externally
and perform the functions of the simulator, including definition of the model data. Thus, the DSS
could be implemented entirely independently of any database or fixed text file circuit definition.
For example, it can be driven entirely from a MS Office tool through VBA, or from any other 3rd
party analysis program that can handle COM. Users commonly drive the OpenDSS with the
familiar Mathworks MATLAB program. This provides powerful external analytical capabilities as
well as excellent graphics for displaying results.
Many users find the scripting interface available with the stand-alone executable version sufficient
for nearly all their work. As users find themselves repeatedly needing a feature for their work, the
feature is implemented within the program and connected to the text-based command interface.
Introduction to the OpenDSS

April 2009

MWh

The COM interface also provides direct access to the text-based command interface as well as
numerous methods and properties for accessing many of the parameters and functions of the
simulator's models. Through the command interface, user-written programs can generate scripts
to do several desired functions in sequence. The input may be redirected to a text file to
accomplish the same effect as macros and also provide some database-like characteristics.
Many of the results can be retrieved through the COM interface as well as from various output
files. Output files are typically written in Comma-separated Value (CSV) format that imports easily
into other tools for post processing.
The experienced software developer has two additional options for using the OpenDSS tool:
1. Downloading the source code and modifying it to suit special needs.
2. Developing DLLs that plug into generic containers the OpenDSS provides [This interface
is being revised as of this writing.]. This allows developers to concentrate on the model of
the device of interest while letting the DSS executive take care of all other aspects of the
distribution system model. Such DLLs can be written in most common programming
languages.
The DSS structure is illustrated in Figure 1

Scripts

COM
Interface

Main Simulation Engine

Scripts,
Results

UserWritten
DLLs

Figure 1. DSS Structure

Introduction to the OpenDSS

April 2009

Brief History and Objectives of the DSS

Development of the DSS began in April 1997 at Electrotek Concepts, Inc. by Roger Dugan and
Thomas McDermott. The DSS was acquired by EPRI Solutions in 2004, which was united with
EPRI in 2007. In 2008, EPRI released the software under open source to participate with other
grid modernization efforts active in the Smart Grid area.
There were two events that triggered the development of the DSS in 1997:
1. EPRI had issued an RFP earlier for software to support the application of distributed
generation to distribution systems. While Electrotek was not awarded a contract there
had been enough thinking about the project to have arrived at a function spec for a
simulator that would support the vast majority of electrical system analysis for evaluating
DG for distribution planning purposes.
2. Roger Dugan was serving as Chair of the IEEE PES Software Engineering Working
Group and one of the hot topics at that time was object-oriented programming and data
representations. The late Mark Enns of Electrocon had issued a challenge to the group
for someone to implement some of the principles we had been discussing in a power
system analysis program. The distribution system simulator concept seemed the perfect
vehicle to experiment with some of those ideas and also provide a useful tool to support
the needs of a consulting company.
Prior to 1997, Electrotek had been performing DG studies for distribution planning using
conventional distribution system analysis methods that are still employed by many tools today.
We were well aware of the limitations of these methods and wanted a tool that was more powerful
and flexible. One issue we discovered early on is that no two DG planning studies were exactly
alike and we were constantly having to adjust our models. Thus, we needed a tool that would not
lock us in to particular types of analysis. Other issues we set out to address were:
1. The distribution system model data we received from utilities came in all sorts of different
formats, each with various strengths and various modeling limitations. One design goal
was to develop an object-oriented circuit description language that minimized the
conversion effort.
2. Window-based programs can be very user friendly, but we noticed some of the
distribution system analysis tools actually limited what you can do by limiting the
interaction to what is available on the dialog forms. By being fundamentally script-driven,
the DSS program gets around much of the limited-dialog issue and allows the user to
better adapt the analysis process to the problem at hand.
3. The greater value of DG is often found on the subtransmission system serving a
distribution planning area. Many distribution planning tools represent only the radial
distribution system. Because of the methods employed by the economists we were
working with at the time, we wanted a tool that would allow us to model several
substations and the distribution circuits between them simultaneously.
4. A key capability desired for the tool was to capture the time- and location- dependent
value of DG. The location-dependent value is captured by modeling the DG in its actual
location on the circuit. Capturing the time-dependent value requires extraordinary
loadshape modeling capability.
5. There are many instances where it becomes necessary to model elements with many
phases not just three. For example, power poles in North America with multiple circuits
may have as many as 4 circuits sharing a common neutral. Also, we wanted to be able to
model what happens when a 69 kV line falls into the 13.2 kV distribution line. Or to model
a communications signal passing from one voltage level to another through the
Introduction to the OpenDSS

April 2009

interwinding capacitance of the transformer this was not possible in many traditional
distribution system analysis tools.
6. We wanted a tool that could seamlessly incorporate harmonics analysis into the power
flow analysis without requiring the user to laboriously enter nonlinear device models. We
also recognized that we would need at least simple dynamics analysis sufficient for DG
interconnection evaluation. Simple models are built in and this feature continues to be
developed.
7. Recognizing that distribution automation was going to become increasingly important, we
wanted a testbed upon which to evaluate control algorithms and their impact on the
operation of the system.
8. Recognizing that it was impossible to anticipate all possible user needs, we wanted a
program that would allow users to write their own models or solution procedures
commensurate with their software capabilities.
9. We wanted a program that would simulate the behavior of devices on the distribution
system as they would actually occur for changing load and system faults and other
disturbances. This is important for modeling DG interactions and it also allows the tool to
be used for many other things as well, such as energy efficiency analysis.
The present version of the OpenDSS has achieved the majority of these goals and has evolved
into an extraordinary tool that has acquired many other features not commonly found in other
distribution system analysis tools. While DG analysis continues to be one of its key uses, many
other types of analysis have been performed with the tool.
The DSS is a general-purpose frequency-domain simulation engine that has special features for
creating models of electric power distribution systems and performing many types of analysis
related to distribution planning and power quality. It does not perform electromagnetic transients
(time domain) simulations; all types of analysis are currently in the frequency domain (i.e.,
sinusoidal steady state, but not limited to 60 Hz).
Most electrical engineers learned how to write nodal admittance equations in their early University
courses, and this is basically how the DSS represents distribution circuits. Each element of the
system is represented by a primitive nodal admittance (Y) matrix. This is generally
straightforward, although it can be tricky for some power system elements such as transformers.
Each primitive Y is then coalesced into one large system Y matrix, and the system of equations
representing the distribution system is solved using sparse matrix solvers like one might also find
in MATLAB. One trick is that nonlinear behaviors of some devices (e.g., some load models) are
modeled by current source injections, which some refer to as compensation currents. That is,
the current predicted from the linear portion of the model that resides in the system Y matrix is
compensated by an external injection to iteratively obtain the correct current. This is a common
technique for representing loads in distribution system analysis tools. One advantage of this
method is that it allows for quite flexible load models, which is important for performing some
types of analysis such as done in energy efficiency studies.
The programs heritage is closer to a harmonic flow analysis program, or even a dynamics
program, than a typical power flow program. This may seem a strange place to start designing a
tool that will be used a great deal for power flow studies, but it gives the tool great modeling
flexibility particularly for accommodating all sorts of load models and unusual circuit
configurations.