Biodegradation Aspects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons A Review
Biodegradation Aspects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons A Review
Biodegradation Aspects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons A Review
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/24427524
CITATIONS
READS
551
1,292
2 AUTHORS:
A.K. Haritash
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Review
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 7 February 2009
Received in revised form 30 March 2009
Accepted 30 March 2009
Available online 7 April 2009
Keywords:
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Biodegradation
Bacteria
Fungi
Phytoremediation
a b s t r a c t
PAHs are aromatic hydrocarbons with two or more fused benzene rings with natural as well as
anthropogenic sources. They are widely distributed environmental contaminants that have detrimental biological effects, toxicity, mutagenecity and carcinogenicity. Due to their ubiquitous occurrence,
recalcitrance, bioaccumulation potential and carcinogenic activity, the PAHs have gathered signicant
environmental concern. Although PAH may undergo adsorption, volatilization, photolysis, and chemical
degradation, microbial degradation is the major degradation process. PAH degradation depends on the
environmental conditions, number and type of the microorganisms, nature and chemical structure of the
chemical compound being degraded. They are biodegraded/biotransformed into less complex metabolites, and through mineralization into inorganic minerals, H2 O, CO2 (aerobic) or CH4 (anaerobic) and
rate of biodegradation depends on pH, temperature, oxygen, microbial population, degree of acclimation, accessibility of nutrients, chemical structure of the compound, cellular transport properties, and
chemical partitioning in growth medium. A number of bacterial species are known to degrade PAHs and
most of them are isolated from contaminated soil or sediments. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomons
uoresens, Mycobacterium spp., Haemophilus spp., Rhodococcus spp., Paenibacillus spp. are some of the
commonly studied PAH-degrading bacteria. Lignolytic fungi too have the property of PAH degradation.
Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Bjerkandera adusta, and Pleurotus ostreatus are the common PAH-degrading
fungi. Enzymes involved in the degradation of PAHs are oxygenase, dehydrogenase and lignolytic enzymes.
Fungal lignolytic enzymes are lignin peroxidase, laccase, and manganese peroxidase. They are extracellular and catalyze radical formation by oxidation to destabilize bonds in a molecule. The biodegradation
of PAHs has been observed under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions and the rate can be enhanced by
physical/chemical pretreatment of contaminated soil. Addition of biosurfactant-producing bacteria and
light oils can increase the bioavailability of PAHs and metabolic potential of the bacterial community.
The supplementation of contaminated soils with compost materials can also enhance biodegradation
without long-term accumulation of extractable polar and more available intermediates. Wetlands, too,
have found an application in PAH removal from wastewater. The intensive biological activities in such
an ecosystem lead to a high rate of autotrophic and heterotrophic processes. Aquatic weeds Typha spp.
and Scirpus lacustris have been used in horizontalvertical macrophyte based wetlands to treat PAHs. An
integrated approach of physical, chemical, and biological degradation may be adopted to get synergistically enhanced removal rates and to treat/remediate the contaminated sites in an ecologically favorable
process.
2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Contents
1.
2.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Microbial degradation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1.
Bacteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2.
Fungi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3.
Algae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corresponding author. Present address: Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Delhi College of Engineering, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Tel.: +91 9911710444.
E-mail address: [email protected] (A.K. Haritash).
0304-3894/$ see front matter 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.137
2
2
2
4
5
A.K. Haritash, C.P. Kaushik / Journal of Hazardous Materials 169 (2009) 115
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Enzymes in degradation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Oxygen: determining the path . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Effect of substrate, pretreatment and amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Inhibition and co-metabolism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Kinetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
PAHs removal by composting, wetlands and phytoremediation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Microbial genetic adaptations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1. Introduction
PAHs are aromatic hydrocarbons with two or more fused benzene rings. They are formed during the thermal decomposition
of organic molecules and their subsequent recombination. Incomplete combustion at high temperature (500800 C) or subjection
of organic material at low temperature (100300 C) for long periods result in PAH production. They occur as colorless, white/pale
yellow solids with low solubilities in water, high melting and boiling points and low vapour pressure (Table 1). With an increase
in molecular weight, their solubility in water decreases; melting
and boiling point increase and vapour pressure decreases [1,2]. The
chemical structures of some commonly studied PAHs are given
in Fig. 1. The common sources of PAHs in environment include
natural as well as anthropogenic. Natural sources are forest and
rangeland res, oil seeps, volcanic eruptions and exudates from
trees. Anthropogenic sources of PAH include burning of fossil fuel,
coal tar, wood, garbage, refuse, used lubricating oil and oil lters
[3], municipal solid waste incineration and petroleum spills and
discharge. They are ubiquitously present contaminants which are
toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic [4]. PAHs were, perhaps, the rst
recognized environmental carcinogens. They do not degrade easily
under natural conditions. Persistence increases with increase in the
molecular weight. They have gathered signicant concern because
of their presence in all components of environment, resistance
towards biodegradation, potential to bio-accumulate and carcinogenic activity. Though they are the chief pollutants of air [5], soil acts
as the ultimate depository of these chemicals. Their fate in environment includes volatilization, photo-oxidation, chemical oxidation,
adsorption on soil particles, leaching and microbial degradation [6].
The hazards associated with the PAHs can be overcome by the
use of conventional methods which involve removal, alteration, or
isolation of the pollutant. Such techniques involve excavation of
contaminated soil and its incineration or containment. These technologies are expensive, and in many cases transfer the pollutant
from one phase to another. On the other hand, bioremediation
is the tool to transform the compounds to less hazardous/nonhazardous forms with less input of chemicals, energy, and time
[7,8]. Although PAH may undergo adsorption, volatilization, photolysis, and chemical degradation, microbial degradation is the major
degradation process [9,10]. Microbes are known for their catabolic
activity in bioremediation, but changes in microbial communities are still unpredictable and the microbial community is still
termed as a black box [11]. The PAH-degrading microorganism
could be algae, bacteria, and fungi. It involves the breakdown of
organic compounds through biotransformation into less complex
metabolites, and through mineralization into inorganic minerals,
H2 O, CO2 (aerobic) or CH4 (anaerobic). The bioremediation of a
pollutant and its rate depends on the environmental conditions,
number and type of the microorganisms, nature and chemical
structure of the chemical compound being degraded. Thus, to
devise a bioremediation system, a number of factors are to be
counted for. Both bacteria and fungi have been extensively studied
for their ability to degrade xenobitics including PAHs. The extent
Table 1
Physicalchemical properties of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs).
S. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Name
Benzo[k]uoranthene
Anthracene
Benzo[b]uoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Fluoranthene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Benzo[ghi]perylene
Pyrene
a
b
c
M.F.
C20 H12
C14 H10
C20 H12
C20 H12
C16 H10
C10 H8
C14 H10
C22 H12
C16 H10
B.Pt. ( C)a
480
342
481
493
375
218
340
500
150.4
M.Pt. ( C)a
215.7
216.4
168.3
178.7
108.8
80.2
100.5
277
393
V.P. (Pa at 25 C)
8
5.2 10
1 103
6.7 105
4 107
1.2 103
11
2 102
6 108
6.0 104
0.015
0.25
30
12
0.120.18
IARCc group
2B
3
2B
3
3
n.e.
3
3
3
[156].
[157].
[4].
There has been growing concern over the mounting concentration of PAHs in marine environment. Mangrove sediments,
important estuarine wetlands are closely tied to human activities
and are subjected to PAH contamination. Bacteria isolated from the
mangrove sediments are known to degrade phenanthrene from 42%
to 78% with different degradation potential depending upon the
different sediments [23]. Romero et al. [19] studied phenanthrene
degradation by microorganisms isolated from a contaminated
A.K. Haritash, C.P. Kaushik / Journal of Hazardous Materials 169 (2009) 115
Degradation of PAHs requires a consortium of microorganisms and algae is no exception. Prokaryotic and eukaryotic
photoautotrophic marine algae (i.e. cyanobacteria, green algae,
and diatoms) are known to metabolize naphthalene to a series
of metabolites [4244], though there are indications that cishydroxylation of naphthalene by cyanobacteria, Oscillatoria and
Agmenellum spp. involve pathways similar to fungus [4246]. BaP
is known to be transformed to diols, and quinones by marine algae
in a period of 56 days. Warshawsky et al. found that Selenastrum capricornutum, a freshwater green alga metabolizes BaP to
cis-dihydrodiols using a dioxygenase enzyme system as found in
heterotrophic prokaryotes. It was observed that S. capricornutum
produced 11,12-dihydrodiol under gold light and 9,10-dihydrodiol
under white light. With increasing light energy from gold to
white to UV-A in PAH-absorbing region, BaP quinone production increased. The study also concluded that only green algae
almost completely metabolized BaP to dihydrodiols, whereas yellow algae and blue green algae failed in metabolizing the PAH.
Higher doses of PAHs prove phytotoxic to algae [47,48]. Certain
algae have been reported to enhance the removal uoranthene
and pyrene when present with bacteria. Borde et al. [49] rst
reported case of photosynthesis-enhanced biodegradation of toxic
aromatic pollutants by algalbacterial microcosms in a one-stage
treatment. The potential of algalbacterial microcosms for the
biodegradation of salicylate, phenol and phenanthrene was studied.
Pseudomonas migulae and Sphingomonas yanoikuyae were studied
for phenanthrene degradation. The green alga Chlorella sorokiniana was cultivated in the presence of the pollutants at different
concentrations, showing increasing inhibitory effects in the order
salicylate < phenol < phenanthrene. A substantial removal (>85%)
was recorded only in the systems inoculated with both algae and
bacteria and incubated under continuous lighting. Such studies
have demonstrated synergistic relationships in the algalbacterial
microcosms. Recently different microalgal species have been
reported to degrade uoranthene and pyrene [50]. The study of
uoranthene, pyrene, and a mixture of uoranthene and pyrene
by Chlorella vulgaris, Scenedesmus platydiscus, Scenedesmus quadricauda, and Selenastrum capricornutum has shown that removal is
algal species-specic and toxicant-dependent. PAHs removal in 7
days of treatment was 78% and 48%, respectively by S. capricornutum
and C. vulgaris. The removal efciency of uoranthene and pyrene
in a mixture higher than the respective single compound, suggesting that the presence of one PAH stimulated the removal of the
other PAH. A heterotrophic green microalgal strain Prototheca zopi
immobilized in polyurethane foam has also been reported to help
accumulation of mixture of PAHs in the matix [51], whereas the free
living cells of the alga can reduce PAHs and n-alkanes [52]. Hong
et al. [53] studied the accumulation and biodegradation of phenanthrene and uoranthene by the algae enriched from a mangrove
aquatic ecosystem. The isolated microalgal species S. costatum and
Nitzschia sp. were capable of accumulating and degrading the two
typical PAHs simultaneously. The accumulation and degradation
abilities of Nitzschia sp. were higher than those of S. costatum.
Degradation of uoranthene by the two algal species was slower,
indicating its recalcitrance. The microalgal species also showed
comparable or higher efciency in the removal of the mixture than
phenanthrene or uoranthene singly, suggesting that the presence
of one PAH stimulated the degradation of the other. The studies and
A.K. Haritash, C.P. Kaushik / Journal of Hazardous Materials 169 (2009) 115
A.K. Haritash, C.P. Kaushik / Journal of Hazardous Materials 169 (2009) 115
towards biodegradation. The phenomenon is known as sequestration. The phenomenon of contaminant sequestration has recently
been a topic of discussion due to the anticipated impact of this process. Since the particles are inaccessible to the solution phase and
are partially immobilized, they pose less risk/threat to the environment and human health and their remediation carries unnecessary
economic burden with minimal health and safety benets [90].
Several mechanisms have been proposed to describe sequestration of contaminants into/onto organic matter. Different studies
[91,92] explain that the interaction of the contaminant molecule
and soil particle begins with the partitioning of the molecule
into/onto humic acid or fulvic acid polymer layers present at the
surface of soil particle. Later, the molecule diffuses into the threedimensional micropores of the particles which are present in the
humin core of the particle and partially inaccessible to the solution phase by the overlying layer of polymeric humic acid and
fulvic acid [93]. The outer layer of the core is lipophilic and, therefore, binds the organic pollutant strongly rendering it recalcitrant
[94]. Later it was concluded that organic matter content is not the
only factor responsible for sequestration. Cation exchange capacity (CEC), micropore volume, soil texture, and surface area, too,
play a role in it [95]. Studies have also been reported in contradiction to the earlier model of sequestration. White et al. found that
extraction of soluble organic matter (humic acid and fulvic acid),
leaving humin, increased the extent of PAH sequestration [96]. A
study by Bogan and Sullivan, demonstrated that addition of fulvic acid or a material rich in fulvic acid can result in higher rate
of contaminant degradation [90]. It concluded that the sequestration of contaminant molecule is primarily because of the humin
fraction. The members of genus Mycobacterium are widely used
in bioremediation of aged contaminated sites. It has been established that mycobacteria have exceptionally lipophilic surfaces
which makes them suitable organisms for the uptake of bound
pollutants from the soil particles. They are also known to have
good catabolic efciency towards PAHs up to ve benzene rings
[9799].
The biological degradation/extraction of a pollutant can be
enhanced by physical/chemical pretreatment of contaminated soil.
The slow rate of degradation in soil is primarily due to the slow rate
of desorption of contaminants from soil particles and not due to
the slow rate of degradation by the microorganisms. The reasons
for slow desorption are slow diffusion of contaminants through
the pore liquid and through the soil organic matter. In order to
increase the rate of diffusion, the soil is subjected to thermal or
chemical treatment prior to the microbial remediation. An increase
in temperature can decrease the soilwater partition coefcient
and as a result, dissolution of contaminants in water is observed.
The partition-coefcient of PAHs decreases by 2030% for every
10 rise in temperature between 5 and 45 C [100,101]. Apart from
it, the mass transfer within the soil increases with increase in
temperature. The mass transfer depends on the effective diffusion
coefcient, which is proportional to the diffusion coefcient and
inversely proportional to the partition coefcient [102,103]. The diffusion coefcient of water increases by 45 times with an increase
in temperature from 20 to 120 C and results in about 150 times
increase in the effective diffusion coefcient. Bonten et al. [104]
studied the effects of short-term heating on subsequent biodegradation of PAHs. Heating at 120 C for 1 h increased the degree of
degradation after 21 days of an aged PAH contamination from 9.5%
to 27%. Lower temperatures resulted in smaller increases. Chemical
pretreatment for organic soil contaminants is addition of an organic
solvent which increases the rate of mass transfer of hydrophobic
compounds in soil. Such an increase in the rate of mass transfer may
lead to redistribution of contaminants from sites exhibiting slow
desorption rate to those exhibiting a fast one. The most prominent
effect of soaking with an organic solvent is a change in partition
coefcient. The soilsolvent partition coefcient decreases exponentially with an increase in acetone concentration [105,106]. A
4:1 acetonewater mixture can desorb more than 95% of all the
PAHs present within an hour [107]. Bonten et al. [104] studied that
soaking of the contaminated sludge in 4:1 (v/v) acetonewater mixture increased the degree of degradation from 9.5% to 20.4% as a
result of dissolution of PAHs. Another chemical technique is the
oxidation with ozone or hydrogen peroxide in combination with
UV-radiation. Usual chemical methods involve a heavy input of
chemicals and formation of harmful residues, whereas UV-ozone
treatment produces no signicant toxic products and it can destroy
more than 90% of PAHs [108].
Introduction of a group of natural microbial strains or a genetically engineered variant to treat contaminated soil is termed
bioaugmentation and it can enhance the rate of degradation.
Addition of biosurfactant-producing microbes can enhance the
bioavailability of PAHs. Addition of biosurfactant-producing bacteria (i.e. Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and addition of light oils can
increase the bioavailability of PAHs and metabolic potential of
the bacterial community. Addition of oils includes the inorganic
nutrients and bacterial strains capable of degrading PAHs cometabolically (i.e. Sphingomonas paucimobilis) [109]. Surfactant
compounds produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa can increase the
concentration of PAHs in the aqueous phase of the system. Increases
in aqueous concentrations are generally in direct proportion to the
amount of surfactant present. Inclusion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
surfactant in the land farm operation can increase the accessibility
of PAHs to soil bacteria [110].
Addition of a carbon source as a nutrient in contaminated soil is
known to enhance the rate of pollutant degradation by stimulating
the growth of microorganisms responsible, termed as biostimulation. It has been suggested that the addition of carbon in the
form of pyruvate stimulates the microbial growth and enhances
the rate of PAH degradation [111]. It did not show diauxic growth
and accelerated the adaptation of P. putida G7 to naphthalene and
enhanced the rate of in situ bioremediation. Mushroom compost
and spent mushroom compost (SMC) are also applied in treating organopollutant contaminated sites [112,113]. Addition of SMC
results in enhanced PAH-degrading efciency (82%) as compared to
the removal by sorption on immobilized SMC (46%). It is observed
that the addition of SMC to the contaminated medium reduced
the toxicity, added enzymes, microorganisms, and nutrients for the
microorganisms involved in degradation of PAHs [114]. In a study
by Guerin [115], polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contaminated
soil from a creosoting plant was remediated using an ex situ land
treatment process. The process involved soil mixing, aeration, and
fertilizer addition. The indigenous PAH utilizing microorganisms
were shown to increase during the treatment process, indicating
that biostimulation was effective. The most extensive degradation
was apparent with the 2- and 3-ring PAH, with decreases of 97% and
82%, respectively. The higher molecular weight 3- and 4-ring PAHs
were degraded at slower rates, with reductions of 45% and 51%,
respectively. Six-ring PAHs were degraded the least with average
reductions of 35%.
Laboratory experiments have shown that the rate of biodegradation is more in liquid medium under constant steering than in
soil/medium with soil added in it. The difference is due to the tendency of PAH particles to adsorb on soil particles and this renders
reduced availability to microorganisms [21]. It has been observed
that soils amended with municipal and petroleum sludge have
higher rate of PAH degradation than the rate in soil alone. Since, the
sludge is rich in number of microorganisms and level of different
nutrients, they favour vigorous growth of microbes and enhanced
biodegradation rates. The decrease in nitrate, sulfate, and phosphate content in the medium accounted for the consumption as
nutrients during biodegradation.
A.K. Haritash, C.P. Kaushik / Journal of Hazardous Materials 169 (2009) 115
ance from the soil [135]. Soil planted with ryegrass was observed to
lose a greater amount of a mixture of hydrocarbons than soil that
was unplanted. The hydrocarbon mixture included n-alkanes (C10,
C14C18, C22, C24), as well as pristane, hexadecane, phenanthrene,
anthracene, uoranthene, and pyrene. After 22 weeks, the initial
extractable hydrocarbon concentration of 4330 mg total hydrocarbon per kg soil decreased to less than 120 mg per kg soil (97%
reduction) in planted soils, but to only 790 mg per kg soil (82%
reduction) in unplanted soil. Larger microbial numbers and activity
in the planted versus unplanted soil led the authors to conclude that
plant roots enhanced biodegradation of the hydrocarbons by stimulating the soil microbes [136]. Another indirect role that plants
play in the degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons is the release
of enzymes from roots. These enzymes are capable of transforming organic contaminants by catalyzing chemical reactions in soil.
Ref. [137] identied plant enzymes as the causative agents in the
transformation of contaminants mixed with sediment and soil. The
identied enzyme systems included dehalogenase, nitroreductase,
peroxidase, and laccase. These ndings suggest that plant enzymes
may have signicant spatial effects extending beyond the plant
itself and temporal effects continuing after the plant has died [138].
The phytoremediation potential of two cold-hardy plants, Arctared
red fescue and annual ryegrass, planted together in soil contaminated with either crude oil or diesel has also been examined [139].
Results indicated that contaminated soils planted with the two
species had signicantly lower concentrations of total petroleum
hydrocarbon (TPH) compared to unplanted controls. The initial
crude oil concentration for planted treatments and unplanted controls was approximately 6200 mg TPH per kg soil, while the initial
diesel concentration was approximately 8350 mg TPH per kg. After
640 days, crude oil contaminated soil planted with both species had
1400 mg TPH per kg soil (77% reduction), while the unplanted control contained 2500 mg TPH per kg soil (60% reduction). Likewise,
diesel-contaminated soil planted with both species had 700 mg TPH
per kg soil (92% reduction) after 640 days compared to 2200 mg
TPH per kg soil (74% reduction) for the unplanted control. Rasmussen and Olsen [140] studied the efciency of orchard grass
(Dactylis glomerata) towards PAH-removal. The study reported that
a soil/sand mixture vegetated with orchard grass exhibited high
treatment efciency with an input from the microbial catabolic
degradation by plant exudates.
Wetlands, too, have found an application in PAH removal from
wastewater. Specic macrophytes, microora and microfauna are
the characteristic feature of wetlands. The intensive biological activities in such an ecosystem lead to a high rate of autotrophic and
heterotrophic processes. Aquatic weeds Typha spp. and Scirpus
lacustris have been used in horizontalvertical macrophyte based
wetlands to treat phenanthrene [141]. The removal of phenanthrene is found to be greater than 99.9%. During the degradation
of phenanthrene, 1-hydroxy-2-napthoic acid (HNA) has been identied as an initial conversion product. HNA is a naphthalene
derivative and originates from phenanthrene. The occurrence of
HNA as an intermediate metabolite in phenanthrene degradation
indicates the presence of bacterial microora. Pilot-scale wetlands
have been used for the treatment of PAH-contaminated water
[142], particularly uoranthene, and the possible role of fungi
in these ecosystems has been investigated. Giraud et al. isolated
40 fungal species from a contaminated wetland and a control
wetland [142]. They reported that uoranthene was degraded efciently by 33 species while only 2 species were able to remove
anthracene over 70%. The most frequently isolated species were
Absidia cylindrospora, Mucor hiemalis, Aspergillus fumigatus, Cladosporium cladosporoides, Fusarium solani, and Trichoderma viride.
No PAHs were detected when analyzing the efuent water of the
constructed wetland. An analysis of microbial population showed
an increase in fungal population in the contaminated system when
11
Fig. 5. Proposed pathway for microbial catabolism of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [158].
A.K. Haritash, C.P. Kaushik / Journal of Hazardous Materials 169 (2009) 115
[7] M.A. Providenti, H. Lee, J.T. Trevors, Selected factors limiting the microbial
degradation of recalcitrant compounds, J. Ind. Microbiol. 12 (1993) 379395.
[8] O.P. Ward, A. Singh, J. Van Hamme, Acclerated biodegradation of petroleum
hydrocarbon waste, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30 (2003) 260270.
[9] J.A. Bumpus, Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61 (1989) 26312635.
[10] S.Y. Yuan, J.S. Chang, J.H. Yen, B.V. Chang, Biodegradation of phenanthrene in
river sediment, Chemosphere 43 (2001) 273278.
[11] M. Dua, A. Singh, N. Sethunathan, A.K. Johri, Biotechnology and bioremediation: successes and limitations, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 59 (2002)
143152.
[12] A. Singh, O.P. Ward, Biodegradation and Bioremediation: Series: Soil Biology,
vol. 2, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004.
[13] B. Ye, M.A. Siddiqi, A.E. Maccubbin, S. Kumar, H.C. Sikka, Degradation of
polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons by Sphingomonas paucimobilis, Environ.
Sci. Technol. 30 (1996) 136142.
[14] M.D. Aitken, W.T. Stringfellow, R.D. Nagel, C. Kazunga, S.H. Chen, Characteristics of phenanthrene-degrading bacteria isolated from soils contaminated
with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Can. J. Microbiol. 44 (1998) 743752.
[15] U. Walter, M. Beyer, J. Klein, H.J. Rehm, Degradation of pyrene by Rhodococcus
sp. UW1, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34 (1991) 671676.
[16] J. Schneider, R. Grosser, K. Jayasimhulu, W. Xue, D. Warshawsky, Degradation of pyrene, benz[a]anthracene and benzo[a]pyrene by Mycobacterium sp.
strain RJGII-135, isolated from a former coal gasication site, Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 62 (1996) 1319.
[17] D. Trzesicka-Mlynarz, O.P. Ward, Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by a mixed culture and its component pure cultures, obtained
from PAH-contaminated soil, Can. J. Microbiol. 41 (1995) 470476.
[18] M.A. Heitkamp, W. Franklin, C.E. Cerniglia, Microbial metabolism of Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons: isolation and characterization of a Pyrene-degrading
bacterium, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54 (1988) 25492555.
[19] M.C. Romero, M.C. Cazau, S. Giorgieri, A.M. Arambarri, Phenanthrene degradation by microorganisms isolated from a contaminated stream, Environ. Pollut.
101 (1998) 355359.
[20] K. Rehmann, H.P. Noll, C.E.W. Steiberg, A.A. Kettrup, Pyrene degradation by
Mycobacterium sp. Strain KR2, Chemosphere 36 (14) (1998) 29772992.
[21] S.Y. Yuan, L.C. Shiung, B.V. Chang, Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by inoculated microorganisms in soil, Bull. Environ. Conatm. Toxicol.
69 (2002) 6673.
[22] D. Dean-Ross, J. Moody, C.E. Cerniglia, Utilisation of mixtures of Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by bacteria isolated from contaminated sediment, FEMS
Microbiol. Ecol. 41 (2002) 17.
[23] N.F.Y. Tam, C.L. Guo, W.Y. Yau, Y.S. Wong, Preliminary study on biodegradation of phenanthrene by bacteria isolated from mangrove sediments in
Hong-Kong, Mar. Poll. Bull. 42 (2002) 316324.
[24] L.L. Daane, I. Harjono, G.J. Zylstra, M.M. Haggblom, Isolation and characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons-degrading bacteria associated with
the rhizosphere of salt marsh plants, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67 (6) (2001)
26832691.
[25] L.L. Daane, I. Harjono, S.M. Barns, L.A. Launen, N.J. Palleroni, M.M. Haggblom, PAH-degradation by Paenibacillus spp. and description of Paenibacillus
naphthalenovorans sp. nov., a naphthalene degrading bacterium from the rhizosphere of salt marsh plants, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52 (2002)131139.
[26] G.J. Verrhiest, B. Clement, B. Volat, B. Montuelle, Y. Perrodin, Interactions
between a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixture and microbial communities in a natural freshwater sediment, Chemosphere 46 (2002) 187196.
[27] T.J. Cutright, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation and kinetics
using Cunninghamella echinulata var. elegans, Int. Biodet. Biodeg. 35 (4) (1995)
397408.
[28] T. Cajthaml, V. Pacakova, V. Sasek, Microbial degradation of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons, Chem. Listy. 95 (2001) 404.
[29] M. Hofrichter, K. Schneibner, I. Schneegab, W. Fritzche, Enzymatic combustion of aromatic and aliphatic compounds by manganese peroxidase from
Nematoloma frowardii, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64 (1998) 399404.
[30] B.R.M. Vyas, S. Bakowski, V. Sasek, M. Matucha, Degradation of anthracene by
selected white rot fungi, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 14 (1994) 6570.
[31] A.R. Clemente, T.A. Anazawa, L.R. Durrant, Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by soil fungi, Braz. J. Microbiol. 32 (2001)255261.
[32] I.S. Silva, M. Grossman, L.R. Durrant, Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (27 rings) under microaerobic and very-low-oxygen conditions by
soil fungi, Int. Biodet. Biodeg. 63 (2) (2009) 224229.
[33] T. Cajthaml, M. Moder, P. Kacer, V. Sasek, P. Popp, Study of fungal degradation
products of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using gas chromatography with
ion trap mass spectrometry detection, J. Chromatogr. A 974 (2002)213222.
[34] D. Boyle, C. Wiesner, A. Richardson, Factors affecting the degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil by white rot fungi, Soil Biol. Biochem. 30
(7) (1998) 873882.
[35] F.K. Higson, Degradation of xenobiotics by white rot fungi, Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 122 (1998) 111152.
[36] J.A. Field, E. DeJong, G.F. Costa, J.A.M. DeBont, Biodegradation of polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons by new isolates for white rot fungi, Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 58 (1992) 22192226.
[37] C. Kennes, J.M. Lema, degradation of major compounds of creosotes (PAH and
Phenols) by Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Biotechnol. Lett. 16 (1994) 759764.
[38] B.E. Anderson, T. Henryson, Accumulation and degradation of dead-end
metabolites during treatment of soil with polycyclic aromatic with ve
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
[56]
[57]
[58]
[59]
[60]
[61]
[62]
[63]
[64]
[65]
[66]
13
A.K. Haritash, C.P. Kaushik / Journal of Hazardous Materials 169 (2009) 115
15