Calculation Algorithm For Single Phase Bridge Rectifier With Capacitor Filter
Calculation Algorithm For Single Phase Bridge Rectifier With Capacitor Filter
Calculation Algorithm For Single Phase Bridge Rectifier With Capacitor Filter
Jelgava, 24.-25.05.2012.
Introduction
The authors of the paper had a target to discover a full and easy-to-use analyzing algorithm for a
single phase bridge rectifier with a capacitor filter. As readily available calculation tool software
MS Excel was chosen. So, the formulas in the algorithm had to answer to Excel functionality. It means
that the formulas must not contain advanced mathematical operations. As a base for the new
development a simple algorithm from the reference was taken [1].
Reference analysis
One of the key formulas which were taken from the reference [1] is formula (12) in its modified
form peak value of secondary winding current. The second formula in its modified form is (15)
conduction interval of secondary current. The third formula in its modified form is (16) average
output voltage. Formulas (11), (13), (36), (38) are taken from the reference [2]. Formula (31) is
common in several capacitor manufacturer datasheets.
Structure of the algorithm
The introduced formulas are (5), (19), (20), (24), (27), (28), (33), (48). The rest of the formulas
are basic electrical engineering formulas. In the formula evaluating process online calculation tool
Wolphram Alpha was used. As a circuit simulator 5SPICE was used.
Due to the algorithm complexity there is a necessity for the iterative process. Since software
EXCEL cannot automatically calculate such a problem without specially programmed macros, there
must be break points introduced to avoid Circular Reference error. In EXCEL spreadsheet values
from formulas (13) and (17) are manually operated to get the iteration process to its convergence.
Consequently the algorithm is semi-automatic, however, it can be supplemented with specially
programmed macros which allow obtaining fully automated operation.
The input values are presented as the following physics exercise. The given single phase
transformer connected to f = 50 Hz AC grid. No load voltage at the secondary winding is equal to
V20 = 25V, short circuit resistance RT = 0.26 , short circuit reactance XT = 0.23 . Also the given
single phase bridge rectifier with one diode threshold voltage V(T0) = 0,78V and slope resistance
rT = 0.055 . At the rectifier output a capacitor battery is connected which contains NCP = 1 capacitors
in parallel and NCS = 1 capacitors in series. Each capacitor capacitance C = 16500 F and rated voltage
VCR = 50 V. Load resistance Rload = 5.91 . All formulas operate correctly with SI units.
Formula series which form the mentioned algorithm follow here.
AC grid oscillation period T:
456
Jelgava, 24.-25.05.2012.
T=
1
.
f
(1)
R = RT + rT .
(2)
Z = R2 + X T2 .
(3)
C ekv = C
N CP
.
N CS
(4)
ESR =
0.02
.
C VCR
(5)
ESRekv = ESR
N CS
.
N CP
(6)
XC =
1
.
2 f C
(7)
RC = R + ESRekv .
(8)
2
Z C = RC
+ X T2 .
(9)
V2PK = 2 V20 .
(10)
Tcom =
I Z
T
arccos1 d
2
U 20P
(11)
I 2PK =
Vd0
(12)
2
2 RC
+ ( X T X C ) 2 Rload
VF = V(T0) + I 2PK Rd .
(13)
Vd0 = V2PK 2 VF .
457
(14)
Jelgava, 24.-25.05.2012.
Z C
T
T
4
+ com .
2 2 Rload
2
TCI =
(15)
Z
VdAVG = Vd0 1
2 Rload
(16)
Id =
VdAVG
.
Rload
(17)
TCI
2 .
T
(18)
CI =
Short circuit peak current I2SPK ():
I 2SPK =
I 2PK
CI
1 sin
2
(19)
I
CI
+ d .
2 I 2SPK
CU = 2 arcsin sin
(20)
T
.
2
(21)
T
TCU .
2
(22)
I d TDU
.
C ekv
(23)
TCU = CU
Output voltage decreasing interval TDU:
TDU =
Output voltage ripple swing Vd:
V d =
Output voltage minimum Vdmin:
3 T
Vdmin = VdAVG Vd CU .
4 T
(24)
Vdmax = Vdmin + Vd .
(25)
V d
100% .
Vd
(26)
Vd% =
Secondary RMS current I2RMS:
458
I 2RMS =
1
2
Jelgava, 24.-25.05.2012.
CI
2
2
2
CI 3I 2SPK + 4 I 2SPK I 2PK + 2 I 2 PK + I 2SPK sin CI + 8I 2SPK I 2 PK I 2SPK sin 2 . (27)
I 2AVG =
1
CI I 2PK I 2SPK + 2 I 2SPK sin CI .
(28)
I 2 RMS
I VDRMS =
(29)
I 2AVG
.
2
(30)
I VDAVG =
Single capacitor leakage current ILEAK:
(31)
I LEAK = N CP I LEAK .
(32)
(33)
I CRMS = I 22RMS I d2 .
(34)
PTR = I 22RMS RT .
(35)
(36)
PVD4 = 4 PVD1 .
(37)
2
PC = VdAVG I LEAK + I CRMS
ESR EKV .
(38)
(39)
I CRMS =
I CRMS
.
N CP
(40)
Vdmax
.
N CS
(41)
VCmax =
459
Jelgava, 24.-25.05.2012.
Load power:
Pd = VdAVG I d .
(42)
P1 = Pd + PTR + PVD4 + PC .
(43)
S1 = V20 I 2 RMS .
(45)
S 2 = V2RMS I 2 RMS .
(46)
1 =
P1
.
S1
(47)
(48)
1 =
1
.
cos 1
(49)
Pd
.
P1
(50)
Efficiency:
Jelgava, 24.-25.05.2012.
Unit
A
eV
F
V
s
V
A
SKN20
170n
0.009
2
1.55
400p
1
0.35
0.5
10n
400
4m
1
0
3
GBPC1510
6.5n
0.028
1.45
1.11
300p
1
0.494
0.5
10n
1000
5u
1
0
3
Excel spreadsheet with the corresponding values is visible in Figure 3 where the green cells
contain the given values; gray cells are manually operable ones while the yellow cells display key
values for comparison. Calculation result comparison between Excel algorithm and SPICE simulation
is given in Table 2.
Table 2
Result comparison between Experiment, Excel algorithm and SPICE model
Parameter
TCI
Vd0
I2PK
VdAVG
Id
TCU
TDU
Vd
I2RMS
I2AVG
PVD4
V2RMS
Unit
ms
V
A
V
A
ms
ms
V
A
A
W
V
Experiment
5.5
33.4
12.3
25.7
4.35
4.4
5.6
1.45
6.6
4.3
13
23.3
461
Excel
5.0
32.9
15.2
26.6
4.5
4.7
5.3
1.6
7.8
5.0
14.4
23.0
SPICE
5.2
14.3
4
6
1.50
Jelgava, 24.-25.05.2012.
Table 2 (continued)
Parameter
ICRMS
Vdmax
Vdmin
Pd
P2
Unit
A
V
V
W
W
Experiment
4.9
112
125
Excel
6.3
27.3
25.8
120
135
SPICE
27.3
25.8
Analyzing the calculation results we can note that significant calculation error (18 %) is
introduced in formula (27) I2RMS. Formula (27) is evaluated on the simplified mathematical model
assuming that Vd = 0, besides, the result is calculated using the values of I2PK and I2SPK, which are
also calculated through approximated models. The rest or the formulas which are not after I2RMS give
the value within 4% tolerance range.
462