Levels of Measurement

Levels of Measurement
The level of measurement refers to the relationship among the values

that are assigned to the attributes for a variable. What does that mean?
Begin with the idea of the variable, in this example "party affiliation." That
variable has a number of attributes. Let's assume that in this particular
election context the only relevant attributes are "republican", "democrat",
and "independent". For purposes of analyzing the results of this variable,
we arbitrarily assign the values 1, 2 and 3 to the three attributes.
The level of measurement describes the relationship among these
three values. In this case, we simply are using the numbers as shorter
placeholders for the lengthier text terms. We don't assume that higher
values mean "more" of something and lower numbers signify "less". We
don't assume the the value of 2 means that democrats are twice
something that republicans are. We don't assume that republicans are in
first place or have the highest priority just because they have the value
of 1. In this case, we only use the values as a shorter name for the
attribute. Here, we would describe the level of measurement as
"nominal".
Why is Level of Measurement Important?

First, knowing the level of measurement helps you decide how to
interpret the data from that variable. When you know that a measure is
nominal (like the one just described), then you know that the numerical
values are just short codes for the longer names. Second, knowing the
level of measurement helps you decide what statistical analysis is
appropriate on the values that were assigned. If a measure is nominal,
then you know that you would never average the data values or do a ttest on the data.
There are typically four levels of measurement that are defined:
Nominal
Ordinal
Interval
Ratio
In nominal measurement the numerical values just "name" the attribute

uniquely. No ordering of the cases is implied. For example, jersey
numbers in basketball are measures at the nominal level. A player with
number 30 is not more of anything than a player with number 15, and is
certainly not twice whatever number 15 is.
In ordinal measurement the attributes can be rank-ordered. Here,
distances between attributes do not have any meaning. For example, on
a survey you might code Educational Attainment as 0=less than H.S.;
1=some H.S.; 2=H.S. degree; 3=some college; 4=college degree; 5=post
college. In this measure, higher numbers mean more education. But is
distance from 0 to 1 same as 3 to 4? Of course not. The interval between
values is not interpretable in an ordinal measure.
In interval measurement the distance between attributes doeshave
meaning. For example, when we measure temperature (in Fahrenheit),
the distance from 30-40 is same as distance from 70-80. The interval
between values is interpretable. Because of this, it makes sense to
compute an average of an interval variable, where it doesn't make sense
to do so for ordinal scales. But note that in interval measurement ratios
don't make any sense - 80 degrees is not twice as hot as 40 degrees
(although the attribute value is twice as large).
Finally,
in ratio measurement
there is always an
absolute zero that is
meaningful. This means
that you can construct a
meaningful fraction (or
ratio) with a ratio
variable. Weight is a
ratio variable. In applied
social research most
"count" variables are ratio, for example, the number of clients in past six
months. Why? Because you can have zero clients and because it is
meaningful to say that "...we had twice as many clients in the past six
months as we did in the previous six months."
It's important to recognize that there is a hierarchy implied in the level of
measurement idea. At lower levels of measurement, assumptions tend to
be less restrictive and data analyses tend to be less sensitive. At each
level up the hierarchy, the current level includes all of the qualities of the
one below it and adds something new. In general, it is desirable to have
a higher level of measurement (e.g., interval or ratio) rather than a lower
one (nominal or ordinal).

Levels of Measurement

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Levels of Measurement

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Levels of Measurement

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Levels of Measurement

The level of measurement refers to the relationship among the values

Why is Level of Measurement Important?

In nominal measurement the numerical values just "name" the attribute

You might also like