The 2008 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice: Kevin Foster, Erik Meijer, Scott Schuh, and Michael A. Zabek

No. 09‐10
The 2008 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice
Kevin Foster, Erik Meijer, Scott Schuh, and Michael A. Zabek
Abstract:
This paper presents the 2008 version of the Survey of Consumer Payment Choice (SCPC), a
nationally representative survey developed by the Consumer Payments Research Center of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and implemented by the RAND Corporation with its American
Life Panel. The survey fills a gap in knowledge about the role of consumers in the transformation
of payments from paper to electronic by providing a broad‐based assessment of U.S. consumers’
adoption and use of nine payment instruments, including cash. The average consumer has 5.1 of
the nine instruments, and uses 4.2 in a typical month. Consumers make 53 percent of their
monthly payments with a payment card (credit, debit, and prepaid). More consumers now have
debit cards than credit cards, and consumers use debit cards more often than cash, credit cards,
or checks individually. Cash, checks, and other paper instruments are still popular and account
for 37 percent of consumer payments. Most consumers have used newer electronic payments,
such as online banking bill payment, but they only account for 10 percent of consumer payments.
Security and ease of use are the characteristics of payment instruments that consumers rate as the
most important.
JEL Classifications: D12, D14, E42
Kevin Foster, Scott Schuh, and Michael A. Zabek are with the Consumer Payments Research Center in the research
department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Kevin Foster is a survey methodologist, Scott Schuh is the director
of the Center and a senior economist and policy advisor, and Michael A. Zabek is a senior research assistant. Erik
Meijer is an economist with the Roybal Center for Financial Decision Making of the RAND Corporation. Their email
addresses, respectively, are [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], and
[email protected].
This paper, which may be revised, is available on the web site of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston at
http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/ppdp/index.htm.
The authors thank the executives and staff of the Boston Fed, the employees of the Federal Reserve System, the Roybal
Center for Financial Decision Making of RAND Corporation, the Board of Advisors for the Survey of Consumer
Payment Choice, individuals from Javelin Strategy & Research and the staff at the Bank of Canada for providing
invaluable assistance and support. Complete and detailed acknowledgments appear on the first page of this paper.
The primary authors are responsible for any errors that may remain.
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. They do not
necessarily represent the views of the other Federal Reserve Banks, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, or the RAND Corporation.
This version: January 2010
Survey of Consumer Payment Choice. Version of January 2010. ©2008‐2010 Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

Acknowledgments

The SCPC would not have been possible without the foresight and support of former Federal
Reserve Bank President Cathy Minehan—support that has continued and expanded under
current President Eric Rosengren. The entire Senior Executive Committee of the Bank has
supported the SCPC fully and enthusiastically. Special thanks are due to former Executive Vice
President Sally Green and current Executive Vice President Jeff Fuhrer for establishing and
overseeing the Consumer Payments Research Center (originally called the Emerging Payments
Research Group), which developed the SCPC. First Vice President Paul Connolly and Senior
Vice President Jim Cunha also provided invaluable insight, guidance, and support. Senior Vice
President Geoff Tootell proposed the original idea of the SCPC and provided the impetus for its
development.

The original version of the SCPC was developed in 2003 by Marques Benton, Krista Blair,
Marianne Crowe, and Scott Schuh, a team of Boston Fed staff who implemented the survey
with Bank employees as part of a leadership training program. Thanks are due to the Boston
Fed employees for supporting and participating in that voluntary effort. Likewise, thanks are
due to the employees of the Federal Reserve System for their voluntary participation in the 2004
Survey implemented by the same Boston Fed team.

A limitation of early versions of the SCPC was their reliance on convenience samples of Federal
Reserve System employees. In 2006, the AARP and Woelfel Research implemented a revised
version of the 2004 SCPC survey instrument with a random sample of U.S. consumers. The
CPRC worked closely with the AARP to revise and improve the survey instrument. We thank S.
Kathi Brown, Sharon Hermanson, and the rest of the AARP for their contributions to the SCPC
program, and for providing the data from their 2006 version of the survey.

Building on the AARP model and success, the Consumer Payments Research Center undertook
a major redesign of the SCPC that was implemented with U.S. consumers in 2008. Contributors
to the SCPC from the Consumer Payments Research Center were: Krista Becker, Margaret
Carten, Charles Choi, Marianne Crowe, David DeRemer, Kevin Foster, Sergei Koulayev,
Benjamin Levinger, Nasreen Quibria, Sarojini Rao, Heather Roberts, Scott Schuh (Director), Oz
Shy, Joanna Stavins, Caroline Theoharides, Michael A. Zabek, and Jeffery Zhang.

The Roybal Center for Financial Decision Making of the RAND Corporation worked with the
Consumer Payments Research Center to revise and implement the 2008 SCPC with RAND’s
American Life Panel of consumers. Contributors to the SCPC from the Roybal Center for
Financial Decision Making were: Sandy Chien, Tim Colvin, Jeffrey Dominitz, Tania Gutsche,
Arie Kapteyn (Director), Erik Meijer, Julie Newell, Matthias Schonlau, and Albert Weerman.

ii
The authors of this document thank their colleagues at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and
RAND Corporation for many helpful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts, as well as for
valuable contributions to the construction of the survey and tables.

Several employees of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston made important contributions to the
development of the SCPC. Suzanne Lorant provided excellent editorial services and publication
oversight for this document and related publications. Patricia Allousie provided outstanding
legal services. David Brown and Marcella Venci‐Wiegand provided superlative administrative
and analytical services for the pre‐2008 versions of the SCPC.

Finally, several groups of experts outside of the Boston Fed and RAND made important
contributions to the SCPC. We thank the Board of Advisors of the Survey of Consumer Payment
Choice for providing outstanding advice, insights, guidance, and assistance to the SCPC
program, beginning in 2009. (See Appendix C for the list of current Advisory Board members.)
We thank Stephen Knighten, Heather Peters, and James Van Dyke from Javelin Strategy &
Research for reviewing and testing the 2008 SCPC survey instrument. And we thank Carolos
Arango, Lorraine Charboneau, and Varya Taylor from the Bank of Canada for assistance and
support.

iii
Contact List
Please contact the following individuals at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston or the RAND
Corporation for questions and information about the Survey of Consumer Payment Choice in the
designated areas of interest.

Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Media and Public Relations
Thomas Lavelle
Vice President and Public Information Officer
(617) 973‐3647
[email protected]
Survey of Consumer Payment Choice
Kevin Foster
Survey Methodologist
Consumer Payments Research Center
(617) 973‐3955
[email protected]
Consumer Payments Research Center
Scott Schuh
Director and Economist
(617) 973‐3941
[email protected]
RAND Corporation
American Life Panel
Tania Gutsche
Panel Manager and Technical Support
Roybal Center for Financial Decision Making
RAND Corporation
(310) 393‐0411, x6559
[email protected]
Arie Kapteyn
Director
RAND Corporation
(310) 393‐0411 x7973
[email protected]

iv
Table of Contents

I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1
II. Banking and Payment Concepts ..................................................................................................... 3
III. Survey Overview .............................................................................................................................. 5
IV. Comparable Data .............................................................................................................................. 6
V. Selected Results .................................................................................................................................. 8
Results for Adoption ................................................................................................................................. 9
Results for Use ......................................................................................................................................... 9
Results for Characteristics ...................................................................................................................... 10
VI. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 10
VII. The 2008 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice: Tables* ..................................................... 12
Adoption of Bank Accounts and Payment Instruments ........................................................................ 12
Current Ownership of Bank Accounts and Account Access Technologies ............................ 12
Historical Ownership and Discarding of Bank Accounts and Account Access Technologies
............................................................................................................................................................ 13
Primary Bank Account Holdings, By Type of Account and Financial Institution ................. 14
Current Adoption of Payment Instruments ................................................................................ 15
Current Adoption of Payment Instruments, By Instrument Features ..................................... 16
Historical Adoption and Discarding of Payment Instruments ................................................. 17
Number of Adopted Bank Accounts and Payment Cards ........................................................ 18
Number of Adopted Payment Instruments,* By Type of Adopter of Bank Accounts and
Payment Instruments ...................................................................................................................... 19
Experience with Bank Accounts and Payment Instruments .................................................... 20
Cash Holdings and Cash Withdrawals ........................................................................................ 21
Cash Holdings, By Adoption of Bank Accounts and Payment Instruments .......................... 22
Cash Withdrawals, By Adoption of Bank Accounts and Payment Instruments .................... 23
Cash Withdrawal Preferences ....................................................................................................... 24
Use of Payment Instruments .................................................................................................................. 25
Incidence of Use of Payment Instruments ................................................................................... 25
Incidence of Transactions ............................................................................................................... 26
Incidence of Use of Payment Instruments, By Type of Transaction ........................................ 27
Incidence of Use of Payment Instruments, By Type of Bill Payment ...................................... 28
Incidence of Use of Payment Instruments, By Type of Retail or Other Transaction ............. 29

v
Use of Payment Instruments in a Typical Month, by Type of Instrument .............................. 30
Transactions in a Typical Month, by Type of Payment ............................................................. 31
Use of Payment Instruments in a Typical Month, By Type of Transaction ............................ 32
Use of Payment Instruments in a Typical Month, By Type of Bill Payment .......................... 33
Use of Payment Instruments in a Typical Month, By Type of Retail or Other Transaction . 34
Number of Payment Instruments Used in a Typical Period, By Type of Instrument and
Transaction ....................................................................................................................................... 35
Actual and Expected Changes in Use of Payment Instruments, By Period of Change ......... 36
Assessments of Payment Instruments ................................................................................................... 37
Assessments of Characteristics of Payment Instruments .......................................................... 37
Assessments of Payment Instruments, By Characteristic .......................................................... 38
Demographics and Financial Information .............................................................................................. 40
Demographics: Gender, Age, Race, and Education, Weighted Sample .................................. 40
Income, Weighted Sample ............................................................................................................. 41
Assets and Liabilities, Weighted Sample ..................................................................................... 42
Time Allocation, Weighted Sample .............................................................................................. 43
VIII. Appendices ..................................................................................................................................... 44
Appendix A: Definitions ........................................................................................................................ 44
A.1 Definitions of Banking Concepts ........................................................................................... 44
A.2 Definitions of Payment Instruments ..................................................................................... 46
A.3 Definitions of Adoption .......................................................................................................... 48
A.4 Definitions of Use .................................................................................................................... 49
A.5 Definitions of Transactions .................................................................................................... 50
A.6 Definitions of Characteristics of Payment Instruments ..................................................... 52
A.7 Definitions of Miscellaneous Payment Practices and Concepts ....................................... 53
Appendix B: Survey Methodology ......................................................................................................... 55
Survey Instrument ........................................................................................................................... 55
Conversion of Statistics for Other Uses ........................................................................................ 55
American Life Panel ........................................................................................................................ 56
Item Non‐response and Extreme Observations .......................................................................... 58
Sampling Weights ........................................................................................................................... 60
Standard Errors ................................................................................................................................ 61
Appendix C: Board of Advisors (2009) .................................................................................................. 64
Appendix D: References ......................................................................................................................... 65

vi
I. Introduction
In 2003, the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston launched the Survey of Consumer Payment
Choice (SCPC) program to develop high‐quality, timely, comprehensive, and publicly available
data on consumer payment behavior. A general shortage of such data has inhibited the
payments industry, researchers, and public policy makers from fully understanding the
ongoing transformation of the U.S. payment system.1 Traditional paper‐based payment
instruments have been giving way to new payment instruments that have emerged from
innovations in information and communication technologies as well as from innovations in
financial markets.
This paper presents the 2008 SCPC, a nationally representative survey of consumer
payment behavior. The Consumer Payments Research Center (CPRC) of the Boston Fed
developed the survey instrument; the 2008 version is the fourth since 2003.2 The RAND
Corporation administered the half‐hour, Internet‐based survey to a sample of U.S. consumers
drawn from its American Life Panel. The 2008 SCPC data should help researchers learn how
consumers choose among the nine payment instruments — including cash. It should also help
public policy makers design policies affecting the payment system and economy. These data,
which are expected to be produced annually, can be used for at least two purposes:
1. To create aggregate time‐series data that can be used to characterize and analyze
trends in payment markets pertaining to U.S. consumers.
2. To create a longitudinal panel of data that can be used to study consumer
payment behavior and evaluate public policies pertaining to the U.S. payment
system.

1 For more details about the shortage of data, see Schreft (2006), Benton, Blair, Crowe, and Schuh (2007), and Carten,
Littman, Schuh, and Stavins (2007).
2 For more information about the 2003–2004 SCPC, see Benton, Blair, Crowe, and Schuh (2007). For more information
about the 2006 version of the survey, see AARP and Woelfel Research (2007). The AARP took the lead in developing
that version with the assistance of the CPRC. The 2008 SCPC was developed by the CPRC with RAND’s assistance
and benefitted from the 2006 development work.

1
The consumer‐level micro data from the 2008 and 2009 SCPC will be released to the public in
2010.
The primary purpose of this paper is to publish and document the aggregate statistics
obtained from the 2008 SCPC for general readership. These statistics appear in a series of
detailed tables later in this paper. More detailed supporting documents, materials, and
information may be obtained from the Consumer Payments Research Center at the Federal
Reserve Bank of Boston, including the survey instrument, tables of standard errors, and the
purpose and methodology of the SCPC (see Schuh 2010, forthcoming).3
A secondary purpose of this paper is to provide a very brief snapshot of the U.S.
payments transformation from paper instruments to electronic and other new payment
instruments. We report the most salient basic facts here, but we do not provide any economic or
business interpretation of the 2008 facts. A companion paper (Foster, Schuh, and Zabek 2010,
forthcoming) will provide a more in‐depth, yet still non‐technical, overview of the results from
the 2008 SCPC. That paper will include economic and business interpretations of the 2008 facts
in historical context with results from other surveys and data.
In 2008, U.S. consumers had more payment instruments to choose from than ever before:
four types of paper instruments—cash, check, money order, and travelers checks; three types of
payment cards – debit, credit, and prepaid; and two electronic instruments—online banking bill
payment (OBBP) and electronic bank account deductions (EBAD) using their bank account
numbers. The average consumer had 5.1 of the nine instruments in 2008, and used 4.2
instruments in a typical month. Consumers made 52.9 percent of their monthly payments with a
payment card. More consumers now have debit cards than credit cards (80.2 percent versus 78.3
percent), and consumers use debit cards more often than cash, credit cards, or checks
individually. However, paper instruments are still popular and account for 36.5 percent of
consumer payments. Most consumers have used newer electronic payments at some point, but
these only account for only 9.7 percent of consumer payments. Security and ease of use are the
characteristics of payment instruments that consumers rate as most important.

3 For more information about the CPRC, see http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/cprc/index.htm.

2
Note that the 2008 SCPC aggregate statistics released in this paper are preliminary and
subject to revision. At present, these statistics do not reflect the use of imputation procedures to
correct for item non‐response among respondents. Instead, missing values have been excluded
from the calculation of certain statistics in the tables. As a result, a small number of statistics in
the tables may differ from the sum of their components. Also, a very small number of extreme
outlier observations have been replaced with the average values from similar consumers.
Further evaluation and imputation of the data are likely, so the statistics reported in this
document may be revised in the future. See Appendix B for more details about these issues.
II. Banking and Payment Concepts
The SCPC is designed to measure the payment choices of consumers, so the survey
concepts and definitions are constructed from the perspective of a typical consumer. This
demand‐side approach to payments helps to fill a gap in knowledge about consumer payment
behavior. It also provides the information needed to understand payment trends and to develop
optimal public policies toward payments.
The consumer‐oriented concepts and definitions may seem different from the
terminology and perspectives of the supply side of the payment system, especially in the area of
electronic payments. For example, the supply‐side perspective (banks, the Federal Reserve
System, non‐bank payment service providers and consultants, and merchants who accept
payment from consumers) focuses on the network on which payments are settled.4 In contrast,
the SCPC looks at payments from the perspective of how a consumer initiates the payment.
Appendix A contains the definitions of concepts used in the Survey and the tables.
Most consumer payments involve some form of depository or banking institution. The
2008 SCPC asks questions about two types of depository accounts (checking and saving) and
about the type of banking institution where consumers have their primary accounts
(commercial bank, saving and loan, credit union, Internet bank, and other). Collectively, these

4 For example, see the latest Federal Reserve Payment Study Federal Reserve System (2007).

3
institutions are referred to as “banks” for simplicity. The 2008 SCPC also asks questions about
numerous technologies consumers use to access their bank accounts for making payments and
for other purposes. See Appendix A.1 for definitions of banking concepts.
The central focus of the SCPC is on measuring consumer choices about payment
instruments. The 2008 SCPC asks questions about nine payment instruments commonly
available to consumers: four types of paper instruments—cash, checks, money orders, and
travelers checks; three types of payment cards—debit, credit, and prepaid; and two types of
electronic payment instruments—online banking bill payment (OBBP) and electronic bank
account deduction (EBAD).5
The EBAD instrument is a prime example of how the consumer perspective on
payments differs from the supply‐side perspective. EBAD is any electronic payment in which a
consumer gives his or her bank account number to a third party who then uses the number to
obtain payment from the consumer’s bank. In a sense, it is like an electronic check. Payments
made by consumers using their OBBP function also are like electronic checks, except the
consumer’s bank does not disclose the bank account number (or other personal information) to
a third party. Yet viewed from the supply side of payments, both OBBP and EBAD consumer
payments settle on the Automatic Clearing House (ACH) network and thus could be combined
into one “ACH payment” instrument, as in the Federal Reserve Payment Studies (for example,
Federal Reserve 2007). See Appendix A.2 for definitions of payment instruments.
Consumers make three basic choices about payment instruments: (1) whether to get, or
“adopt,” them; (2) whether or not to use them (incidence of use); and (3) how often to use them
(frequency of use, or simply “use”). The 2008 SCPC measures consumers’ adoption of payment
instruments, as well as various banking and other payments practices of consumers. See
Appendix A.3 for definitions of adoption. The 2008 SCPC also measures the use of payment
instruments by incidence (the percentage of consumers who use them) and frequency (the

5 The EBAD terminology is not fully satisfactory. Strictly speaking, OBBP also is an “electronic bank account
deduction.” A more accurate term for an EBAD is a “bank account number” (BAN) payment because these are
payments in which consumers use their bank account numbers in a way they do not with OBBP or any other
payment instrument. The BAN terminology is being used with the 2009 SCPC.

4
number of payments made by consumers).6 Most SCPC results concerning use are reported in
terms of a typical month, but survey respondents were allowed to respond in terms of a
frequency of their choice (typical week, month, or year). See Appendix A.4 for definitions of
payment use.
Consumers use their payment instruments for various types of transactions. The 2008
SCPC asks questions about seven types of payment transactions: three types of bill payments—
automatic, online, and in person/by mail; one type of non‐bill online payment; two types of
retail goods payments—essential and non‐essential; and other non‐retail payments. For each of
the seven transaction types, the SCPC asks questions about the number of payments made with
each payment instrument that can be used for that type of transaction. See Appendix A.5 for
definitions of types of transactions.
Payment instruments have characteristics that are important to consumers who choose
among the available instruments.7 The 2008 SCPC asks respondents to rate eight types of
payment instrument characteristics—acceptance for payment; acquisition and setup; control
over payment timing; cost; ease of use; payment records; payment speed; and security. The
survey obtains these ratings for each of six payment instruments—cash, check, debit card, credit
card, prepaid card, and both types of electronic account deductions (EBAD and OBBP
combined). See Appendix A.6 for definitions of payment instrument characteristics.
III. Survey Overview
The 2008 SCPC was administered to a sample of U.S. consumers in the fall of 2008
(September through November) by the RAND Corporation as a module of the American Life
Panel (ALP). Panelists for the ALP were recruited from the Michigan Survey of Consumers,
which randomly selects U.S. consumers for voluntary participation using telephone random

6 Ideally, the SCPC also would measure use of payment instruments by the dollar value of payments, but the 2008
survey did not provide enough time to include both measures (number and dollar value). Number of payments,
rather than dollar value, was chosen, based on the assumption that consumer recall would be easier and more
accurate for the number of payments than for the dollar value of payments.
7 For example, see the paper by Schuh and Stavins (2009).

5
digit dialing.8 The final sample size of the 2008 SCPC was 1,010 respondents. In 2009, the SCPC
will include twice as many respondents. About half of the 2009 respondents will be the same as
in 2008, which will make the SCPC longitudinal. The other half of 2009 respondents will be
new. Comparison of the 2009 results for old and new respondents will offer an opportunity to
measure the educational impact of the SCPC on consumer payment behavior.
The SCPC survey instrument was developed by the Consumer Payments Research
Center (CPRC) and is available from the CPRC public website.9 It was administered online with
respondents viewing it using a computer or Web TV. It took the typical respondent an average
of one‐half hour to complete. Survey responses were reviewed and tabulated by the CPRC in
consultation with RAND. A very small number of outlier responses were replaced with values
representing the mean responses of consumers with similar demographic characteristics. See
Appendix B for more details about the survey methodology underlying the 2008 SCPC.
IV. Comparable Data
The SCPC complements and supplements existing sources of payments data. The two
main publicly available sources are the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) and the Federal Reserve
Payment Studies (FRPS).10 The two main advantages of the SCPC over both of these alternative
data sources are: (1) it is higher frequency (annual instead of tri‐annual), so it will provide more
timely information on payments; and (2) it contains a more comprehensive assessment of
payment behavior.
Regarding payments, the SCF primarily contains information about the adoption of a
small number of non‐cash payment instruments and practices (checks, credit cards, debit cards,
and automatic bill payments), as well as information about the use of credit cards. In contrast,
the FRPS primarily contains information about the use of a wide range of non‐cash payment
instruments, but it does not contain much information about the adoption or acceptance of

8 For more information about the Michigan Survey of Consumers see http://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/.
9 See http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/cprc/index.htm.
10 See Bucks, Kennickell, Mach, and Moore (2009) for more information about the SCF, and Federal Reserve System
(2007) or Gerdes (2008) for more information about the FRPS.

6
payment instruments. The SCPC contains information about both the adoption and use of a
wider range of payment instruments, including cash. Like the SCF, the SCPC focuses on
consumers, but the SCF surveys households while the SCPC surveys individual consumers.
Several key results emerge from the SCF data on consumer payments. First, the SCF
measures adoption of four non‐cash payment instruments—checks, credit cards, debit cards,
and automatic bill payments (ABP).11 According to the SCF, the number of payment
instruments held by the average consumer increased from 1.5 (out of four) in 1989 to 2.8 in 2007.
In the 2007 SCF, the percentage of consumers who had adopted checks (89.7 percent), credit
cards (73.0 percent), and debit cards (67.0 percent) was quite similar to the 2008 SCPC results
(see SCPC Table 4), except that the SCPC suggests that debit card adoption increased
substantially even in one year (2007 to 2008). Finally, the SCF shows that the average U.S.
household made $889 worth of credit card charges per month in 2007, which represents 12.7
percent of average household income. The SCF does not include any additional information
about payment use for other instruments or in terms of number of payments.
In contrast to the SCF and SCPC, the FRPS measures non‐cash payment use for all
sectors of the economy (consumers, firms, and government). The primary result emerging from
the FRPS data is that, since 2000, the use of checks has been declining and the use of other
payment instruments has been increasing. Total U.S. check use (by consumers plus business
and government) declined 27.0 percent between 2000 and 2006. In contrast, total U.S. debit card
use increased 204.8 percent and ACH use increased by 135.5 percent during the same period. In
2006, the FRPS shows that the consumer‐originated share of check use was 58.0 percent.
However, the FRPS does not provide any other details about consumer payment behavior
distinct from business and government payments.
A number of private companies also provide some data on consumer payment behavior.
Among others, these sources include: the American Bankers Association; Hitachi (formerly

Automatic Bill Payments are defined somewhat differently in the SCF than in the SCPC. The SCF asks whether
11
consumers have payments “automatically deducted from [their] accounts” without further specifying which specific
accounts. Furthermore, it excludes automatic payroll deductions. The SCPC does include payroll deductions and
specifies payment instruments that consumers use for this purpose. For more information see the 2007 SCF codebook,
available at http://www.federalreserve.gov/Pubs/OSS/oss2/2007/scf2007docs.html.

7
Dove Consulting), which contributed to the FRPS; Javelin Strategy & Research; The Ohio State
University Consumer Finance Monthly; Phoenix Marketing International; Synergistics Research
Corp; the U.S. Postal Service Household Diary (NuStats); and Visa Inc. Most of these data
sources are proprietary and either unavailable to the public or prohibitively expensive. The
details and methodology underlying these alternative data sources are often not clearly stated
and are difficult to obtain. For these reasons, we do not report, analyze, or compare the results
of these surveys to the publicly available data sources that do disclose such details. The section
labeled “Conversion of Statistics for Other Uses” in Appendix B does, however, provide a
suggestion for converting the statistics in this document to statistics comparable with many
other data releases, including those of the Federal Reserve Payments Study.
Together, the information in these public and private data sources overlaps a great deal.
As a result, an opportunity exists to consolidate and streamline the data collection process into
one publicly available, standardized, and consistent data source on consumer payment
behavior. The SCPC offers that opportunity and the CPRC welcomes partners in this endeavor.
Toward that end, the CPRC developed a Board of Advisors in 2009 that includes representatives
from industry, academia, and the public sector to provide input and help develop a
consolidated and standardized data source. See Appendix C for members of the Board.
V. Selected Results
The 2008 SCPC provides a snapshot of U.S. consumers’ payment choices. The tables
included in this paper provide an extensive set of detailed results covering most of the
questions in the SCPC. Below is a list of highlights and salient facts. They are provided without
interpretation or commentary and are organized by topic: adoption of payment instruments,
use of payment instruments, and characteristics of payment instruments. For a more detailed
description and analysis of the results, see Foster, Schuh, and Zabek (2010 forthcoming).
Readers interested in converting these results to statistics for the entire U.S. economy should
consult the section “Conversion of Statistics for Other Uses” in Appendix B.

8

Results for Adoption

1. U.S. consumers have more payment instruments to choose from than ever before (nine).
In 2008, the average consumer had 5.1 payment instruments and used 4.2 payment
instruments in a typical month. See Tables 8 and 24 in the 2008 SCPC Tables.

2. Consumers have widely adopted some, but not all, payment instruments. Essentially all
consumers have adopted cash.12 Checks have been adopted by 91.3 percent of
consumers. A payment card has been adopted by 93.4 percent of all consumers: 80.2
percent have a debit card and 78.3 percent have a credit card, but only 17.2 percent have
a prepaid card. Finally, 81.2 percent of consumers have adopted an electronic payment
method. More than half of consumers (52.5 percent) have adopted online banking bill
payment, and 73.4 percent of consumers have debited their bank account via an external
website (this process is called an electronic bank account deduction in this survey). See
Table 4 in the 2008 SCPC Tables.

3. The discard rate is the percentage of consumers who once owned or adopted a payment
instrument but no longer have that instrument. As of 2008, 14.0 percent of consumers
had discarded a credit card and 27.5 percent had discarded a prepaid card, compared
with 4.9 percent of consumers who had discarded checks and 5.9 percent who had
discarded debit cards. See Table 6 in the 2008 SCPC Tables.

4. The average adopter of credit cards has 3.5 credit cards. Per capita, consumers have 2.7
credit cards each. See Table 7 in the 2008 SCPC Tables.

5. The average U.S. consumer has $79 of cash on his or her person and the median
consumer has $30. The average consumer also has $157 of cash on his or her property
(home, car, or office) and the median consumer has $14. The average U.S. consumer gets
cash 4.3 times per month from a variety of sources. More than half of consumers (53.6
percent) get cash most often from an ATM. See Tables 10 and 13 in the 2008 SCPC
Tables.

6. The average age at which a U.S. consumer under the age of 35 first adopted a credit card
is 20.8 years. The average age of credit card adoption for a consumer over the age of 65 is
40.6 years. See Table 9 in the 2008 SCPC Tables.

Results for Use

12 See Appendix B for a further discussion of the cash adoption measure in the standard errors section.

9
7. The average U.S. consumer makes 76.7 payments in a typical month. Consumers use
cards most often for payments. In a typical month, 52.9 percent of consumer payments
are made using cards, and only 36.5 percent are made using paper instruments. The
remaining payments are made electronically or directly from income. These are
percentages of the number of payments, not the dollar value of payments. See Table 19
in the 2008 SCPC Tables.

8. More than half of all payments by U.S. consumers are retail payments. In a typical
month, 65.6 percent of consumer payments are retail payments. Bill payments compose
25.8 percent of payments, and the remaining 8.6 percent are online payments. These are
percentages of the number of payments, not the dollar value of payments. See Table 20
in the 2008 SCPC Tables.

9. More than half of U.S. consumers (51.6 percent) said that they wrote fewer checks in
2008 than they did in 2005. In contrast, during the same time period 49.5 percent of
consumers reported an increase in their use of debit cards, 42.6 percent reported an
increase in their use of electronic bank account deduction, and 60.6 percent reported an
increase in their use of online banking bill payments. See Table 25 in the 2008 SCPC
Tables.

10. Cash is the most widely used payment instrument for retail payments, and checks are
still the most widely used for bill payments: 86.4 percent of consumers used cash to
make retail payments, and 73.5 percent of consumers made bill payments using checks
or money orders. Credit cards and debit cards are the second and third most widely
used payment instruments for retail payments—they were used to make retail payments
by 65.0 percent of consumers and 64.5 percent of consumers, respectively. Electronic
bank account deduction is the second most widely used payment instrument for bill
payments, with an incidence of use of 62.9 percent. See Table 16 in the 2008 SCPC Tables.

Results for Characteristics

11. Security and ease of use are the two most important characteristics of payment
instruments to U.S. consumers: 31.6 percent of consumers said security is the most
important characteristic while 28.7 percent of consumers said ease of use was the most
important characteristic to them. See Table 26 in the 2008 SCPC Tables.
VI. Conclusions
This paper provides new estimates of U.S. consumer payment behavior in 2008 from a
rigorous and comprehensive new survey named the Survey of Consumer Payment Choice. In 2008,

10
consumers had and used a wide variety of payment instruments, and they relied less on
traditional paper instruments, such as cash and checks, than in the past. Beginning in 2009, the
SCPC data will provide the opportunity to estimate the changes in consumer adoption and use
of payment instruments. The Consumer Payments Research Center of the Boston Fed welcomes
collaborators in development of the SCPC and partners in its broader research program on
studying consumer payment behavior.

11
VII. The 2008 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice: Tables*
Adoption of Bank Accounts and Payment Instruments

Table 1
Current Ownership of Bank Accounts and Account Access Technologies
Percentage of consumers
Percent
Bank accounts
Bank account (checking or saving) 93.8
Checking 91.3
Saving 78.0
Checking and saving 75.5
Bank account features
Primary checking account bears interest 49.1
Primary saving and checking accounts linked 54.5
Bank account access technologies
ATM or debit card 84.9
ATM card 27.0
ATM card only 4.7
Debit card 80.2
Debit card only 57.9
ATM card and debit card 22.3
Telephone banking 41.3
Mobile banking 8.2
Online banking 70.7

*Estimates in all tables are preliminary and subject to revision.

12
Table 2
Historical Ownership and Discarding of Bank Accounts and Account Access Technologies
Ever
owned Discarded*
Bank accounts
Bank account 97.5 3.7
Checking 96.2 4.9
Saving 95.6 17.6
Bank account access technologies
ATM access 92.2 7.2
ATM card 58.8 31.7
Debit card 86.1 5.9
Telephone banking 48.9 7.7
Online banking 72.9 2.2
* Discarding is defined as the difference between historical and current ownership rates.

13
Table 3
Primary Bank Account Holdings, By Type of Account and Financial Institution
Percentage of account adopters
Percent
Primary checking account
Commercial bank 76.7
Savings and loan 1.4
Credit union 20.3
Other institutions 1.6
Internet bank 0.6
Not specified 1.1
Primary savings account
Commercial bank 61.9
Savings and loan 1.5
Credit union 32.4
Other institutions 4.2
Internet bank 2.7
Not specified 1.5

14
Table 4
Current Adoption of Payment Instruments
Percent
Paper instruments 98.3
Cash 98.2
Check 91.3
Money order* 18.3
Travelers check* 4.7
Payment cards 93.4
Debit 80.2
Credit 78.3
Prepaid 17.2
Other payment instruments 81.2
Online banking bill payment 52.5
Electronic bank account deduction* 73.4
* Adoption is defined by incidence of use in a given year.

15
Table 5
Current Adoption of Payment Instruments, By Instrument Features
Percent
Debit cards 80.2
Contactless 21.7
Credit cards 78.3
Rewards 59.6
Rewards card only 24.4
No rewards 53.9
Non‐rewards card only 18.7
Rewards and non‐rewards 35.2
Contactless 25.7
Prepaid cards 17.2
Bought for own use 6.3
Bought for own use only 3.6
Received from others 13.6
Received from others only 11.0
Both bought and received 2.7
Contactless 4.4
Other contactless payment instruments 9.5
Electronic toll payment 9.5
Key fob 1.7
Any contactless payment instrument 44.3

16
Table 6
Historical Adoption and Discarding of Payment Instruments
Ever
adopted Discarded*
Paper instruments
Cash na na
Check 96.2 4.9
Money order ** na na
Travelers check ** na na
Payment cards
Debit 86.1 5.9

Credit 92.5 14.0
Prepaid 44.8 27.5
Other payment instruments
Online banking bill payment 58.3 5.0

Electronic bank account deduction ** na na
* Discarding is defined as the difference between historical and current adoption rates.
** Adoption is defined by incidence of use in a given year.

17
Table 7
Number of Adopted Bank Accounts and Payment Cards

Per Per
adopter capita
Bank accounts 2.8 2.6
Checking 1.5 1.4

Saving 1.6 1.3
ATM and debit cards 1.7 1.5
ATM 1.2 0.3

Debit 1.4 1.1
Credit Cards 3.5 2.7
Rewards 2.3 1.4

No rewards 2.5 1.3
Prepaid cards 2.4 0.4
Bought for own use 2.0 0.1

Received from others 2.1 0.3

18
Table 8
Number of Adopted Payment Instruments,* By Type of Adopter of Bank Accounts and Payment Instruments

Per
capita
Actual number of payment instruments adopted 5.1
Bank account non‐adopters 1.3
Bank account adopters 5.4
Checking, no savings 5.0
Savings, no checking 3.1
Checking and saving 5.5
Paper adopters 5.2
Cash 5.2
Check 5.4
Money order 5.5
Travelers check 6.7
Payment card adopters 5.4
Debit 5.6
Credit 5.6
Prepaid 6.0
Other payment instrument adopters 5.7
Online banking bill payment 6.0
Electronic bank account deduction 5.7
* The nine payment instruments are cash, check, money order, travelers checks, credit card, debit card, prepaid card, online banking
bill payment, and electronic bank account deduction.

19
Table 9
Experience with Bank Accounts and Payment Instruments
Years
Age of consumer at adoption
Current Age
Under 35 35–44 45–54 55–64 65 and over
Bank accounts and access
Checking account 20.0 22.4 25.5 30.3 30.8
ATM card 20.5 24.0 33.9 44.8 57.5
Telephone banking 23.0 30.6 39.6 51.0 59.6
Mobile banking 22.7 37.6 44.3 54.4 62.0
Online banking 23.0 33.4 43.6 53.4 64.2
Payment instruments and practices
Debit card 20.8 27.8 38.0 48.0 60.8
Credit card 20.8 24.4 28.6 35.3 40.6
Prepaid card 22.8 33.1 43.3 53.4 65.8
Online banking bill payment 23.5 34.0 43.1 54.0 64.1
Automatic bill payment 23.6 33.5 42.0 51.6 60.7
Time since original adoption by consumer
Bank accounts and access
Checking account 6.7 17.1 23.9 28.8 40.4
ATM card 6.5 15.5 15.7 14.4 13.5
Telephone banking 4.5 8.7 9.5 8.0 11.9
Mobile banking 1.9 1.5 4.9 5.4 5.0
Online banking 3.6 6.1 5.8 5.5 6.8
Payment instruments and practices
Debit card 5.5 11.6 11.2 10.9 10.3
Credit card 6.2 15.2 20.8 23.8 30.7
Prepaid card 4.3 6.2 5.9 5.1 5.4
Online banking bill payment 3.1 5.4 6.0 5.3 6.8
Automatic bill payment 4.1 6.0 7.3 7.5 10.3

20
Table 10
Cash Holdings and Cash Withdrawals
Dollars, except as noted
Mean Median
Cash Holdings, per capita 230 70
On person 79 30
On property 157 14
Cash Withdrawals, per month* 336 180

Typical amount per withdrawal* 102 50
Withdrawals (number) 4.3 3.0
Prepaid Card Reloadings
Reloads (number per month, adopters) 1.1 0.0
* The 2008 SCPC questionnaire asks respondents "what amount [of cash] do you get most often?" If the amount of cash
consumers get most often is different from the average amount, then the computed total amount of cash per month will differ
from the actual amount that the consumer gets per month.

21
Table 11
Cash Holdings, By Adoption of Bank Accounts and Payment Instruments
Dollars per capita
Adopters Non‐adopters
Mean Median Mean Median
Bank account
Total 230 73 238 55
On person 77 30 116 15
On property 158 20 136 0
ATM or debit card
Total 215 60 316 115
On person 68 25 141 55
Credit card
Total 252 80 153 40
On person 81 30 73 18
Prepaid card
Total 212 84 234 66
On person 64 30 82 25
Money order
Total 241 70 225 75
On person 124 30 69 25

22
Table 12
Cash Withdrawals, By Adoption of Bank Accounts and Payment Instruments
Dollars per month, except as noted
Adopters Non‐adopters
Mean Median Mean Median
Bank account
Total per month* 328 200 446 174
Amount per withdrawal* 99 50 146 30
Withdrawals (number per month) 4.3 3.0 3.6 2.0
ATM or debit card
Credit card
Prepaid card
Money order
* The 2008 SCPC questionnaire asks respondents "what amount [of cash] do you get most often?" If the amount of cash consumers
get most often is different from the average amount, then the computed total amount of cash per month will differ from the actual
amount that the consumer gets per month.

23
Table 13
Cash Withdrawal Preferences
First Second Third

choice choice choice
Cash withdrawal methods
ATM or debit card 60.5 34.0 21.5

Withdrawal from ATM 53.5 13.5 7.4
Cash back from store 7.0 20.5 14.2
Account withdrawal 11.4 29.3 18.2
Personal check cashing 6.9 13.4 16.2
Paycheck cashing 10.0 6.2 9.7
Payment in cash by employer 1.6 0.5 1.2
Other 3.0 5.1 8.7
Cash withdrawal location or source
ATM 53.5 13.5 7.4

Bank teller 22.6 43.7 37.2
Check cashing store 1.8 1.9 1.2
Retail or grocery store 9.0 24.2 16.9
Employer 5.3 2.0 5.4
Family 2.7 4.5 8.0
Other 0.3 0.7 0.7

24
Use of Payment Instruments

Table 14
Incidence of Use of Payment Instruments
Monthly Annual
Paper instruments 95.1 96.3
Cash 86.5 88.9

Check or money order 83.0 87.5
Travelers check 0.5 4.7
Payment cards 89.2 90.2
Debit 67.0 69.0

Credit 68.9 72.8
Prepaid 5.9 8.7
Prepaid card reloading
All consumers na 5.3
Prepaid card adopters only na 31.0
Other payment instruments 73.9 76.3
Online banking bill payment 33.7 35.5

Electronic bank account deduction 70.6 73.4
Direct deduction from income 18.6 19.4

25
Table 15
Incidence of Transactions
Monthly Annual
Bill payments 95.5 95.7
Automatic bill payment 56.7 57.2

Online bill payment 65.5 70.2
By mail or in person payment 82.3 88.5
Online payments, excluding bills 61.1 78.6
Retail and other payments 96.3 96.3
Retail
Essential 94.4 94.6
Non‐essential 83.5 91.8
Other 81.9 89.5

26
Table 16
Incidence of Use of Payment Instruments, By Type of Transaction
Retail
Bill Online and other
Monthly incidence payments payments payments
Paper instruments 78.0 32.2 90.6

Cash 22.3 na 86.4
Check or money order 73.5 32.2 60.9
Travelers check na na na
Payment cards 72.7 47.7 88.1

Debit 58.1 30.1 64.5
Credit 57.6 30.8 65.0
Prepaid 2.2 2.5 5.4
Other payment instruments 70.8 35.0 na

Online banking bill payment 33.7 na na
Electronic bank account deduction 62.9 35.0 na
Direct deduction from income 18.6 na na
Annual incidence

Cash 25.8 na 89.1

Debit 61.2 39.5 66.6
Credit 62.8 46.4 69.9
Prepaid 2.7 3.4 8.1


27
Table 17
Incidence of Use of Payment Instruments, By Type of Bill Payment
By mail or in
Monthly incidence Automatic Online person
Any instrument 56.7 65.5 82.3
Paper instruments na na 78.0
Cash na na 22.3
Check or money order na na 73.5
Debit 21.4 30.8 27.3
Credit 27.9 22.1 20.5
Prepaid na na 2.2
Online banking bill payment na 33.7 na
Electronic bank account deduction na 70.6 na
Addendum:
Payment made on a company web site na 57.1 na
Annual incidence
Cash na na 25.8
Debit 22.8 34.7 29.4
Credit 30.9 28.0 25.9
Prepaid na na 2.7
Electronic bank account deduction na 73.4 na
Addendum:

28
Table 18
Incidence of Use of Payment Instruments, By Type of Retail or Other Transaction
Monthly incidence Retail Other

Essential Non‐essential payments

Cash 81.3 60.7 58.9

Debit 62.6 52.0 42.5
Credit 57.9 51.3 44.8
Prepaid 5.0 2.3 2.5
Electronic payments na na na
Online banking bill payment na na na
Electronic bank account deduction na na na
Annual incidence

Cash 84.4 68.0 67.3

Debit 65.0 58.7 50.2
Credit 64.0 63.3 55.7
Prepaid 7.8 4.6 3.7
Electronic payments na na na

29
Table 19
Use of Payment Instruments in a Typical Month, by Type of Instrument

Percent Number per capita
Share Mean Median
Total payments 100.0 76.7 59.1
Cash 22.7 17.6 9.8

Travelers check 0.0 0.0 0.0
Debit 31.0 23.9 10.0

Credit 21.3 16.4 5.0
Prepaid 0.6 0.4 0.0
Other payment instruments 9.7 7.4 4.0
Online banking bill payment 2.7 2.2 0.0

Electronic bank account deduction 7.0 5.3 2.0
Direct deduction from income 1.0 0.8 0.0

30
Table 20
Transactions in a Typical Month, by Type of Payment

Percent Number per capita
Share Mean Median
Total 100.0 76.7 59.1
Bill payments 25.8 19.6 12.0
Automatic 6.7 5.1 1.0

Online 8.4 6.4 2.0
By mail or in person 9.7 7.4 4.0
Direct deduction from income 1.0 0.8 0.0
Online payments, excluding bills 8.6 6.6 2.0
Retail and other payments 65.6 50.0 35.0
Retail 51.5 39.3 27.4

Essential 35.5 27.0 19.4
Non‐essential 16.0 12.2 5.3
Other 14.1 10.8 6.0

31
Table 21
Use of Payment Instruments in a Typical Month, By Type of Transaction
Number of transactions per capita
Retail
Bill Online and other
payments payments payments

Cash 1.2 na 16.6

Debit 4.6 2.1 17.5
Credit 3.6 1.6 11.4
Prepaid 0.0 0.1 0.3

Share (percentage of transactions)

Cash 1.4 na 21.4

Debit 5.7 2.7 22.6
Credit 4.6 2.1 14.7
Prepaid 0.0 0.1 0.5


32
Table 22
Use of Payment Instruments in a Typical Month, By Type of Bill Payment
By mail or
Automatic Online in person
Cash na na 1.2
Debit 1.6 1.7 1.4
Credit 1.4 1.1 1.2
Prepaid na na 0.0
Addendum:
Cash na na 1.4
Debit 2.0 2.0 1.7
Credit 1.7 1.4 1.5
Prepaid na na 0.0
Addendum:

33
Table 23
Use of Payment Instruments in a Typical Month, By Type of Retail or Other Transaction
Retail Other
Essential Non‐essential payments

Cash 9.4 4.1 3.4

Debit 10.2 4.3 3.3
Credit 6.3 2.8 2.5
Prepaid 0.2 0.1 0.1
Other payment instruments na na na

Cash 11.9 5.2 4.2

Debit 12.9 5.5 4.1
Credit 8.0 3.6 3.2
Prepaid 0.2 0.1 0.1
Other payment instruments na na na

34
Table 24
Number of Payment Instruments Used in a Typical Period, By Type of Instrument and Transaction
Per capita
Transaction Type
Retail
All Bill Online and other
payments payments payments payments
Typical Month
Maximum number of payment instruments 9 8 5 6
All instruments 4.2 3.1 1.2 2.8
Paper instruments 1.8 1.0 0.3 1.5

Payment cards 1.4 1.1 0.6 1.3
Other payment instruments 1.0 0.9 0.3 na
Typical Year
Maximum number of payment instruments 9 8 5 6
All instruments 4.5 3.4 1.6 3.1
Paper instruments 2.0 1.2 0.4 1.7

Payment cards 1.5 1.2 0.9 1.4
Other payment instruments 1.1 1.0 0.4 na

35
Table 25
Actual and Expected Changes in Use of Payment Instruments, By Period of Change
Decreased Decreased About the Increased Increased
a lot somewhat same somewhat a lot
One‐Year Changes
Actual (2007–2008)
Cash 13.7 14.8 62.9 7.3 1.2
Checks 11.7 22.8 60.7 3.4 1.4
Debit cards 5.8 2.1 53.8 28.4 9.8
Credit cards 14.6 13.2 48.2 19.1 4.9
Prepaid cards 31.2 6.2 55.6 6.2 0.8
Electronic account deduction 7.8 2.5 62.6 23.9 3.1
Online bill payments 2.4 0.7 53.7 27.1 16.0
Expected (2008–2009)
Cash 6.1 10.7 73.0 7.7 2.4
Checks 9.1 14.3 71.0 4.0 1.7
Debit cards 5.6 2.9 63.4 22.6 5.6
Credit cards 13.8 15.0 60.8 7.4 3.0
Prepaid cards 25.7 5.1 65.4 3.1 0.7
Three‐Year Changes
Actual (2005–2008)
Cash 22.5 20.5 41.0 7.2 8.8
Checks 31.1 20.5 40.1 7.4 0.9
Debit cards 13.8 3.5 33.3 22.4 27.1
Credit cards 20.1 8.4 37.3 21.7 12.5
Prepaid cards 25.4 3.3 57.2 9.2 4.9
Expected (2008–2011)
Cash 10.6 21.7 54.3 7.5 5.9
Checks 19.0 20.0 52.7 6.1 2.2
Debit cards 6.2 4.8 54.1 22.8 12.1
Credit cards 12.2 14.1 53.6 15.0 5.2
Prepaid cards 23.4 5.5 60.3 8.3 2.5

36
Assessments of Payment Instruments

Table 26
Assessments of Characteristics of Payment Instruments
Most Least
Important Important
Instrument characteristic rating
Acceptance for Payment 8.6 7.6
Acquisition and Setup 0.4 41.3
Control over Payment Timing 10.9 18.1
Cost 10.1 5.5
Ease of Use 28.7 4.7
Payment Records 5.8 4.1
Payment Speed 4.0 17.9
Security 31.6 0.8

37
Table 27
Assessments of Payment Instruments, By Characteristic
Almost
Rarely Occasionally Often Usually always
Acceptance for payment accepted accepted accepted accepted accepted
Cash 1.9 2.3 7.9 11.6 76.3
Check 1.6 11.3 31.5 36.3 19.3
Debit card 1.4 1.6 12.4 36.6 47.9
Credit card 1.7 0.1 7.1 31.8 59.3
Prepaid card 3.8 10.2 22.9 28.9 34.2
Electronic bank account deduction 13.5 19.3 26.3 19.4 21.5
Very hard Hard to Neither Easy to Very easy
to get or get or set hard nor get or to get or
Acquisition and set up set up up easy set up set up
Cash 2.4 5.1 12.5 19.2 60.8
Check 2.6 8.9 20.7 47.5 20.4
Debit card 1.4 5.1 21.0 47.1 25.4
Credit card 5.0 7.7 21.1 43.0 23.3
Prepaid card 5.3 13.6 32.2 32.7 16.1
Neither
Very low Low high nor High Very high
Control over payment timing control control low control Control control
Cash 9.8 9.3 14.2 17.7 49.0
Check 5.8 22.7 26.9 33.2 11.4
Debit card 7.2 11.7 20.3 37.7 23.0
Credit card 5.8 14.2 21.8 39.3 19.0
Prepaid card 9.8 12.6 31.1 27.9 18.6
Neither
Very High high nor Low Very
Cost high cost cost low cost cost low cost
Cash 1.8 4.1 18.9 8.3 66.9
Check 2.1 12.4 21.8 40.9 22.8
Debit card 2.5 9.2 25.2 30.0 33.2
Credit card 20.2 31.3 17.0 18.2 13.3
Prepaid card 5.2 15.5 43.4 17.3 18.7

38
Table 27
Assessments of Payment Instruments, By Characteristic—Continued
Neither
Very Hard hard nor Easy Very
Ease of use hard to use to use easy to use to use easy to use
Cash 1.7 6.4 18.8 24.5 48.6

Check 2.3 19.3 29.8 34.1 14.5
Debit card 1.9 2.3 16.3 31.1 48.4
Credit card 1.4 2.7 12.4 32.1 51.3
Prepaid card 4.5 8.8 32.2 25.9 28.5
Neither
Very poor Poor good nor Good Very good
Payment records records records poor records records
Cash 30.7 21.0 25.7 11.5 11.1
Check 0.9 4.6 13.8 45.0 35.6
Debit card 2.4 5.0 20.1 39.8 32.7
Credit card 0.9 4.1 12.3 39.3 43.4
Prepaid card 12.1 20.9 41.0 13.6 12.5
Neither
Very slow nor Very
Payment speed slow Slow fast Fast fast
Cash 1.3 4.6 17.8 20.1 56.1
Check 8.6 29.0 33.5 22.3 6.7
Debit card 1.6 5.4 18.4 40.0 34.6
Credit card 1.9 6.1 17.2 40.9 34.0
Prepaid card 4.4 6.1 31.4 32.8 25.3
Neither
Very risky nor Very
Security risky Risky secure Secure secure
Cash 41.5 14.1 13.6 8.4 22.4
Check 11.9 33.4 19.7 24.4 10.6
Debit card 13.3 30.0 18.7 27.9 10.0
Credit card 15.4 27.8 14.6 28.9 13.3
Prepaid card 25.1 22.3 24.8 16.7 11.2

39
Demographics and Financial Information

Table 28
Demographics: Gender, Age, Race, and Education, Weighted Sample
Unit of observation Individual
Gender
Male 48.3
Female 51.7
Age
18–24 13.0
25–34 17.8
35–44 19.4
45–54 19.3
55–64 14.6
65 and older 15.8
Addendum:
18–34 30.8
Race
White 76.7
Black 11.5
Asian 4.8
Other 7.0
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino 13.5
Education
No high school diploma 7.1
High school 38.2
Some college 26.5
College 19.2
Post‐graduate study 9.1

40
Table 29
Income, Weighted Sample
Household income Percent
Less than $75,000 72.3
Less than $25,000 17.5
$25,000–$49,999 33.1
$50,000–$74,999 21.6
$75,000 or more 27.7
$75,000–$99,999 14.2
$100,000–$124,999 6.3
$125,000 or more 7.0
Category unknown 0.2
Respondent income
Highest in household 53.3
About equal with highest 13.9
2nd highest 24.6
3rd highest or lower 8.2

41
Table 30
Assets and Liabilities, Weighted Sample

Mean Median
Net worth, total (dollars) 299,265 145,000
Net worth total, non‐homeowners 124,998 30,000

Net worth total, homeowners 372,774 189,000
Net worth, excluding primary home 230,933 100,000
Net worth, primary home 145,221 85,000
Market value 242,768 190,000
Debt 96,502 70,000
Loan to value ratio 0.46 0.47
Home ownership rate (percentage of consumers) 71.1 na
Credit card debt
Unpaid balance last month (dollars) 3,389 90
Carried unpaid balance during the past 12 months (percentage of consumers) 56.3 na
Change in unpaid balance, past 12 months (percentage of consumers)
Much lower 19.6 na
Lower 25.9 na
About the same 28.8 na
Higher 16.2 na
Much higher 9.5 na

42
Table 31
Time Allocation, Weighted Sample
Labor force status Percent
In labor force
Employed 70.5
Unemployed 5.9
Not in labor force
Retired 17.3
Homemaker 4.4
Other 2.0
Financial Responsibility
Consumer's Responsibility
Shared
None Some equally Most All
Household Financial Task
Budgeting 6.4 13.2 21.4 12.6 46.4
Paying bills 10.4 12.5 17.2 9.7 50.3
Shopping 4.8 16.1 25.7 13.3 40.1
Managing assets 14.9 9.7 23.4 11.7 40.2

43
VIII. Appendices
Appendix A: Definitions
A.1 Definitions of Banking Concepts

Automated Teller Machine (ATM) ‐ A machine that allows customers to access their
bank accounts with an ATM card, debit card, or credit card to conduct any banking
business, such as withdrawing cash, making deposits, viewing account balances,
transferring money, and making other related transactions.

ATM card ‐ A card that allows the cardholder to access bank accounts at an automated
teller machine (ATM) or bank branch, but does not allow the cardholder to make
payments by debiting a bank account.

Bank ‐ A financial institution that accepts deposits in checking accounts and savings
accounts. Examples include a commercial bank, savings and loan, credit union, and
Internet bank.

Checking account (also called a demand deposit account) ‐ A bank account that allows
an unlimited number of on‐demand withdrawals, and payments by check, debit card,
or other payment instruments.

Debit card (also called a check card) ‐ A card that allows the cardholder to make a
payment that is deducted directly from a bank account at the time payment is made. A
debit card may have a Visa or MasterCard logo, but it is not a credit card. A debit card
also works as an ATM card.

Mobile banking ‐ A method of accessing a bank account with a mobile device (cell
phone, PDA, etc.) to conduct any banking business by accessing a bank’s website on the
Internet via text messaging or short message service (SMS), or by using a downloadable
application for mobile banking. It is not the same as telephone banking conducted with
a landline or cellular telephone.

Online banking ‐ A method of accessing a bank account with a computer to conduct
banking business by accessing a bank’s website on the Internet. Also see “electronic
bank account deduction” for related definitions.

44

Primary checking account bears interest – The consumer’s primary checking account
earns interest from the bank.

Primary saving and checking accounts linked – The consumer’s primary checking
account is linked to a savings account at the same bank to allow the bank to transfer
money between these two accounts when the consumer overdraws the account. This
feature is one type of overdraft protection.

Savings account (also called a time deposit account) ‐ A bank account that allows a
limited number of withdrawals per month, and only a limited number of payment
options (no checks, for example).

Telephone banking ‐ A method of accessing a bank account with a telephone (landline
or cellular) to conduct any banking business by accessing an automated system orally,
with the telephone keypad, or by speaking with a customer service representative. It is
not the same as mobile banking with a mobile device.

45
A.2 Definitions of Payment Instruments

Cash (also called currency) ‐ Coins, Federal Reserve notes, and other paper bills.

Check ‐ A draft piece of paper directing a bank or other financial institution to pay a
specific amount of money from a demand deposit account, as instructed, to a person or
business.

Credit card (also called a charge card) ‐ A card that authorizes the cardholder to make a
purchase by granting a line of credit that will be paid back to the card company at a
later date, possibly in installments. Examples include: Visa, MasterCard, Discover,
American Express, and cards branded by retail, gasoline, or other companies.

Debit card (also called a check card) ‐ A card that allows the cardholder to make a
payment that is deducted directly from a bank account at the time of purchase or bill
payment. A debit card may have a Visa or MasterCard logo, but it is not a credit card. A
debit card also works as an ATM card.

Electronic bank account deduction (EBAD) ‐ An electronic payment made directly
from a bank account and initiated by a consumer who provides a bank account number
and bank routing number to a non‐bank third party via the Internet, orally, or in
writing. This payment is made without using a paper check or payment card, and can be
automatic or initiated and processed as needed. Examples include: automatic bill
payment, bill payment made online at a company’s web site (but not using online
banking bill payment), other online payment, or payment made directly from income.

Money order ‐ A draft piece of paper issued by a bank, post office, or telegraph office
authorizing payment of a specified amount of cash from the issuing institution to the
individual named on the order.

Online banking bill payment (OBBP) ‐ A bill payment made directly from a bank
account and initiated by a consumer using the bank’s online banking bill payment
function on the bank’s website. The payment can be initiated either via the Internet or
via a mobile banking application. This payment is made without using a paper check or
payment card, and can be automatic or initiated and processed as needed.

Prepaid card (called a stored value card or gift card) ‐ A card that can be used for
payments up to the amount of money stored (or loaded) on the card. Often these cards
may have a Visa or MasterCard logo, but they are not credit or debit cards. Examples

46
include: general purpose, specific purpose (retailers, telephone, public transportation,
etc.), payroll card, and electronic benefits transfer (EBT).

Travelers check ‐ A draft piece of paper issued by a bank or company and directing the
issuer to pay a specific amount of money in cash, as instructed, to a person or business.
It is similar to a check but works like cash and is protected against forgery, loss, and
theft.

47
A.3 Definitions of Adoption

Concept Consumer Behavior that Defines Adoption
ATM card* Has a bank account and has an ATM card.
Cash Holds cash (on person or on property), gets cash on a regular
basis, or uses cash in a typical year.
Check Has a checking account.
Credit card* Has at least one credit card (with or without rewards).
Current adoption The percentage of consumers who own a bank account or have a
payment instrument, for example, and have not discarded it as
of the time of the survey.
Debit card* Has a bank account and has a debit card.
Discarding rate The difference between historical and current adoption or
ownership rates. It measures the minimum percentage of
consumers who owned a bank account or had a payment
instrument, for example, but discarded it and thus do not own or
have it now.
Electronic bank account Uses electronic bank account deduction in a typical year.
deduction (EBAD)
Historical adoption The percentage of consumers who have ever owned a bank
account or had a payment instrument, for example, at any time
(currently or in the past).
Mobile banking Has a bank account and has set up mobile banking.
Money order Uses a money order in a typical year.
Online banking bill payment* Has a bank account, has set up online banking, and has set up
(OBBP) access to the online bill payment function.
Online banking* Has a bank account and has set up online banking.
Ownership Equivalent to adoption for bank accounts.
Prepaid card* Has at least one prepaid card (bought by the consumer or
received from someone else).
Telephone banking* Has a bank account and has set up telephone banking.
Travelers check Uses a travelers check in a typical year.

* In a small number of cases where respondents did not answer the direct adoption question for this concept, additional
information from other questions was used to infer adoption in a manner consistent with the primary definition.

48
A.4 Definitions of Use

Concept Consumer Behavior that Defines Use
Frequency of use See “Use.”
Incidence of use The percentage of consumers who have used a particular payment
instrument at least once during a typical period of time.
Incidence of use, The percentage of consumers who have used a particular payment
annual instrument at least once in a typical year.
Incidence of use, The percentage of consumers who have used a particular payment
monthly instrument at least once in a typical month.
Use The number of times consumers use a particular instrument for
payment during a typical month (use for a typical week or year was
converted to a typical month for comparability).
Typical period A recent week, month, or year in which the consumer does not
experience any unusual payments or other related events. Consumers
choose the reporting frequency they prefer most. The most recent
period is implied and assumed but not stated explicitly in the survey
questions.

49
A.5 Definitions of Transactions

Automatic bill payment ‐ A payment set up by a consumer to occur on a regularly
scheduled basis, typically monthly, pre‐authorizing a company to initiate regular
payment from the consumer for a bill. Once set up, an ABP does not require additional
effort by the consumer. An ABP can be set up orally (in person or by phone), in writing,
or online. An ABP can be processed via electronic bank account deduction (EBAD),
online banking bill payment (OBBP), debit or credit card, or directly from the
consumer’s income.

Bill payment – A payment made to a company or person at some date after the time
when the company or person provided goods or services to a consumer. Examples
include a payment to utility company for energy services provided during a month
payment or a payment to service a loan such as a mortgage payment. Most bill
payments occur at regular frequencies such as a week, month or year.

Essential retail payment ‐ A payment made in person to buy basic goods from retail
outlets, including: grocery stores, supermarkets, food stores, restaurants, bars, coffee
shops, superstores, warehouses, club stores, drug or convenience stores, and gas
stations.

In person/By mail bill payment ‐ A bill payment made in person or through the mail.

Non‐essential retail payment ‐ A payment made in person to buy other goods from
retailers, including: general merchandise, department stores, electronics and appliances
stores, home goods, hardware stores, furniture stores, office supply stores, and other
miscellaneous and specialty stores.

Online bill payment (OBP) ‐ A bill payment made using the Internet, either via the
website of a bank, company, or other institution that sent the bill, or via a payment
intermediary such as PayPal. Consumers make an OBP at their discretion and as
needed, not automatically. An OBP can be made via electronic bank account deduction
(EBAD), online banking bill payment (OBBP), or debit or credit card.

Online payment (OP) ‐ A payment (other than payment of a bill) made for an online
transaction or transfer of funds. The purchase or transfer initiated either via the website
of a seller of goods and services or other institution, or via a payment intermediary,
such as PayPal. Consumers make an OP at their discretion and as needed. Included in
this definition are payments made via check or money order (sent by mail) as well as

50
payments made via debit or credit card or via electronic bank account deduction
(EBAD), so long as the payment is made in connection with transaction initiated online.

Other non‐retail payments ‐ A payment made in person by a consumer for services
such as: transportation and tolls, medical, dental, health and fitness, education, child
care, personal care (for example, hair), recreation, entertainment, travel, maintenance
and repairs, other professional services (business, legal, etc.), charitable donations, and
person‐to‐person gifts.

51
A.6 Definitions of Characteristics of Payment Instruments

Characteristic Text from SCPC Questions
Security Suppose a payment method has been stolen, misused, or
accessed without the owner’s permission. Rate the security of
each method against permanent financial loss or unwanted
disclosure of personal information.
Examples: None
Acquisition & set up Rate the task of getting or setting up each payment method
before you can use it.
Examples: length of time, paperwork, learning to use or install it, or
travel.
Acceptance for payment Rate how likely each payment method is to be accepted for
payment by stores, companies, online merchants, and other
people or organizations.
Examples: None
Cost Rate the cost of using each payment method.
Examples that raise the cost: fees, penalties, postage, interest paid or
lost, subscriptions, materials.
Examples that reduce the cost: cash discounts, rewards (like frequent
flyer miles.
Control over payment timing Rate the control each payment method offers over the timing
of the actual payment and of the deduction of funds from a
bank account.
Examples: date of payment, time of payment, flexibility to change the
date or timing of payment, grace periods, float.
Payment records Rate the quality of records (paper or electronic) offered by
each payment method.
Examples: proof of purchase, account balances, spending history,
usefulness in error or dispute resolution, or ease of storage.
Payment speed Rate the speed of each payment method during a payment
transaction. Do not include delays unrelated to the actual use
of the payment, such as waiting in line.
Examples: None.
Ease of use Rate the ease of use of each payment method.
Examples: effort to carry, physical requirements at time of payment,
or ability to keep or store.

52

A.7 Definitions of Miscellaneous Payment Practices and Concepts

Canceled check ‐ A check that a bank or other financial institution has honored by
having paid the specific amount directed. Canceled checks may be paper or electronic.
They usually indicate ʺpaidʺ on them and cannot be used for further payment.

Check conversion ‐ A process by which the information printed on a paper check given
for payment is converted into a one‐time electronic payment on the automatic clearing
house (ACH) network. Conversion may occur at the point of sale (POS) for a retail
payment or after delivery to a U.S. Post Office box for a bill payment.

Contactless payment technology ‐ Information technology embedded in a payment
card, cell phone, or other device that allows a payment to occur by tapping or waving
(but not swiping) the card or device near a special electronic reader without requiring a
signature or entry of a personal identification number (PIN) to authorize the payment.

Electronic toll payment ‐ A type of contactless payment technology affixed to a motor
vehicle that allows drivers to pass through the toll gates and have the toll automatically
billed to them rather than stopping to pay. Examples include: EZ‐Pass, I‐Pass, Smart
Lane, and Smart Tag. The payment can be processed by electronic bank account
deduction, pre‐funded bank account or prepaid card, credit card, and sometimes other
methods.

Identity theft or fraud ‐ All types of crime in which someone uses (or attempts to use)
someone elseʹs personal information or data without the ownerʹs permission to
purchase goods or services, make payments, steal money, set up accounts, or commit
fraud. Examples of information used include name and address, Social Security
number, credit card or debit card number, and other related financial information.

Key fob ‐ A type of contactless payment technology that attaches to a key chain or
similar device. Key fobs typically are branded by gas stations and credit card companies
such as Visa, MasterCard, or American Express. A Mobil Speedpass is an example.

Overdraft protection ‐ An agreement between a bank and its customer that directs the
bank how to honor a payment made by the customer from a checking account when
there are insufficient funds in the customerʹs account to cover the payment. Examples
include: transfer from a linked savings account and credit card charge.

53

Overdraft ‐ A payment or withdrawal from a checking account for more money than is
currently in the account (also called ʺinsufficient fundsʺ). Overdrafts may occur when
paying with a check, debit card, or electronic bank account deduction (EBAD).

Paid directly from income ‐ A payment made for a consumer by an employer or other
income provider directly from the consumer’s wages and salaries or other income
payments (such as interest and dividends, social security payments, retirement plan
distributions, alimony, child support, welfare, trust fund distributions, and other
money received).

Person‐to‐person payment ‐ A transfers or transaction that is made directly between
two consumers and does not involve a bank, private company, or government.

Reward ‐ Any type of benefit given to payment cardholders when they use their cards
to make purchases and other payments. A reward is usually proportional to the dollar
value of the purchase or payment. Examples include: cash back (a percentage of the
dollar value), frequent flyer miles (airlines), frequent stay points (lodging), college
tuition funding, and shopping network points.

54
Appendix B: Survey Methodology

Survey Instrument
The survey instrument for the 2008 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice (SCPC)
was developed primarily by the Consumer Payments Research Center (CPRC) of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. The 2008 SCPC is the fourth in a series of survey
instruments focusing on U.S. consumer payment behavior that have been developed
and implemented by the CPRC or AARP since 2003. For more details about the SCPC
survey instruments, see Schuh (2010, forthcoming). The 2003, 2004, and 2008 SCPC can
be downloaded from the CPRC website.13 The 2006 version of the survey can be
downloaded from the AARP website.14
Conversion of Statistics for Other Uses
Results from the 2008 SCPC are presented at the micro level, from the
perspective of the consumer. Users may wish to convert these statistics into numbers
that represent the total U.S. macro‐economy, as opposed to an average consumer in the
U.S. For example, where the 2008 SCPC tables present the percentage of U.S.
consumers who have a credit card, a researcher may want the total number of credit
card users in the U.S. or, where the tables report the number of credit cards held per
capita, they may need to know the total number of credit cards in the U.S. The easiest
way to perform these conversions is to multiply the appropriate statistic by an estimate
of the total number of applicable U.S. consumers.
The SCPC was in the data collection phase during November 2008. In that
month, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that the total civilian noninstitutionalized

13 See http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/cprc/psp/index.htm.
14 See http://www.aarp.org/research/surveys/money/credit/debt/articles/consumer_payment.html.

55
population in the United States aged 18 years and over was 225,852,350.15 The civilian
noninstitutionalized population is defined as the total U.S. population minus people
residing in institutions such as nursing homes, prisons and jails, mental hospitals, or
juvenile facilities, as well as the active duty Armed Forces population residing in the
United States. This is the population that the 2008 SCPC seeks to measure and a
member of this population is referred to in this document as a ʺconsumer.ʺ
For example, to estimate the total number of credit card users in the U.S. from
the percentage of U.S. consumers who had a credit card in 2008, one would take the
percentage of U.S. consumers who had adopted credit cards from Table 4 (78.3 percent),
divide by 100, and multiply by the population in 2008 (225,852,350) to get 176.8 million
consumers. Similarly, to estimate the total number of credit cards held by U.S.
consumers in 2008, one would multiply the per capita number of adopted credit cards,
which is reported in Table 7 (2.7 cards), by the same population count to get a total of
609.8 million credit cards held by U.S. consumers. Please note that the Federal Reserve
Bank of Boston only officially endorses the values reported in the 2008 SCPC tables.
American Life Panel
The RAND Corporation administered the 2008 SCPC module with the American Life
Panel (ALP). In the fall of 2009, the ALP contained approximately 2,500 individuals from U.S.
households who respond to Internet‐based surveys either by using their own computers to log
on to the Internet or by using a Web TV device that gives Internet access via a television.16 Web
TV allows respondents who did not have previous Internet access to participate in the ALP and
to browse the Internet or use email. Approximately 7 percent of ALP respondents use Web TV.

15 The specific statistic is available at http://www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/2008‐nat‐ni.html. For more
information on the U.S. Census Bureau estimates, please see Monthly Postcensal Civilian Noninstitutionalized
Population (2008)
16 For more details about Web TV, see http://www.webtv.com/pc/.

56
Participants in the ALP are invited simultaneously to complete survey modules on a
first‐completed, first‐included basis. About twice a month, respondents receive an e‐mail
message with a request to visit the ALP URL and fill out questionnaires on the Internet.
Typically an interview will take no more than 30 minutes. Respondents are paid an incentive of
about $20 per 30 minutes of interviewing (and proportionately less if an interview is shorter).
Once the desired sample size for a survey module is reached, RAND closes the survey to the
remaining ALP participants.
Official participants in the ALP are recruited from survey programs that collect
representative samples of U.S. consumers. At the time of the 2008 SCPC, participants in the ALP
were recruited from among individuals ages 18 years and older who had responded to the
Monthly Survey (MS) of the University of Michiganʹs Survey Research Center (SRC).17 Each
month, the MS interviews approximately 500 households, of which 300 households are a list‐
assisted random‐digit‐dial (RDD) sample and 200 are re‐interviewed from the RDD sample
surveyed six months previously. The 200 re‐interview Michigan participants are referred to
RAND each month. Through August 2008, about 51 percent of these referrals agreed to be
considered for the ALP, and about 58 percent of them actually participated in at least the
household characteristics module of the ALP. Thus, about 30 percent (51 percent × 58 percent)
of the Michigan recruits participated in the ALP during the recruitment period of potential
panelists for the SCPC. Once in the ALP, participants tend to remain indefinitely;
approximately three participants leave the ALP each month.18
Originally, the ALP included only respondents 40 years of age and older. However,
since November 2006, the ALP has included respondents 18 years of age and older. Because the

17 The MS is a consumer sentiment survey that incorporates the long‐standing Survey of Consumer Attitudes (SCA)
and produces, among other outputs, the widely used Index of Consumer Expectations. For more details, see
http://www.src.isr.umich.edu/.
18 The ALP also includes some respondents who were not obtained from the Michigan MS. These participants, called
the “snowball sample,” were recruited by giving official ALP respondents the opportunity to suggest friends or
acquaintances who might want to participate in the ALP. RAND then contacted those friends and invited them to
participate. Because the snowball sample is not randomly selected or representative of U.S. consumers, it is used only
for testing survey modules. ALP snowball recruits tested the 2008 SCPC but were not included among the 1,010
official respondents.

57
SCPC target population is adults of ages 18 years and older, the ALP sample of respondents was
restricted to include only individuals recruited after November 2006. The sample size for the
2008 SCPC was determined by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston to be approximately 1,000.
The actual sample size is 1,010, which represents a 90.7 percent response rate from the 1,113
panelists who were invited to participate.
Item Non‐response and Extreme Observations
As with all surveys, the SCPC contains two types of problematic responses: (1) missing
responses due to the non‐response of consumer to survey questions (called “item non‐
response”); and (2) contaminated responses due to respondent error, ambiguity in the survey
question or survey instrument, and other factors. This subsection explains briefly how each of
these issues was handled in compiling the aggregate statistics in this document.19 For more
information on item non‐response see Groves, et al. (2009).
Many statistical agencies mitigate the effects of item non‐response by imputing missing
values. However, development of comprehensive imputation procedures is difficult and time
consuming. The statistics in this document reflect a limited set of imputations for item non‐
response and data cleaning of a small number of extreme outlier responses. Missing values
were resolved by performing consistency edits and using information from other survey
questions wherever possible. Otherwise, statistics were calculated by excluding missing values.
The CPRC anticipates performing more rigorous and comprehensive imputation procedures in
the future and revising data as appropriate. For a further discussion of survey imputation, see
Kalton and Kasprzyk (1982).
Overall, non‐response bias is likely to have a relatively small impact on the statistics
presented in this document. Most SCPC questions outside of the payment use section have non‐
response rates of less than 5 percent and most use questions have non‐response rates in the
single digits. Several survey design features were chosen to minimize non‐response. Some of
the key survey questions included online verification of respondent non‐response. Also, the

More detailed documentation of these issues is forthcoming and will be posted on the CPRC website.
19

58
survey instrument solicited zero responses where it was difficult to distinguish non‐response
from a zero response. The latter problem was largest in the payment use section. Missing values
for payment use were treated as zeros in the calculation of aggregate statistics and percentage
shares, so higher non‐response rates in the payment use questions are less troubling.
The data underlying the statistics in this document have been partially cleaned for
extreme outliers. Many survey questions produce categorical or bounded responses that do not
allow for quantitatively large outliers. Consequently, all of the outliers identified were
associated with continuous variables whose responses were in dollar values (for example, cash
holdings, net worth, etc.) or the number of payments in a typical period. In some cases the
survey instrument discouraged outliers by prompting respondents to verify their answer if they
answered an unusually large value or a value that was inconsistent with earlier responses.
Outliers were identified by extensive investigation and analysis using a variety of
quantitative and qualitative methods that exploited the structure and interrelationships of the
entire SCPC. In addition to the survey itself, the analysis of outliers used evidence from outside
of the SCPC, including logic as well as economic and statistical theory. For dollar values, the
distributions of both individual variables and the linear combinations of variables reported in
the tables were evaluated for outliers. For number of payments, however, some of the
disaggregated statistics shown in the tables have not yet been evaluated for influential outliers.
The statistics in Tables 19 and 20 have been fully evaluated for outliers, but the statistics in
Tables 21–23 have not been fully evaluated for outliers.
In some cases, outliers could be cleaned by correcting obvious and logical errors. In most
cases, however, extreme outlier observations were set to missing and then imputed. (Note that
only the missing values from outliers were imputed; missing values from item non‐response,
described above, were not imputed.) The imputed values were obtained from simple cell means
for similar consumers. In most cases, the cell means were constructed with one or two
demographic variables (often including income) and one other economic variable. The variables
used to construct the cell means were chosen according to their correlation with the data for the
imputed variable and hence accounted for a high proportion of variance in the data.

59
In theory, the sampling weights used to construct the statistics presented here (see the
next subsection) should be adjusted to account for item non‐response and standard errors
should be adjusted for the imputation of very extreme outliers. In the future, the statistics may
be revised to account more fully for these issues and republished. At present, each aggregate
statistic is constructed with the same set of unadjusted sampling weights without adjustment
for non‐response on specific questions.

Sampling Weights
As with all surveys based on random samples, the composition of the un‐weighted
sample differs from the population composition. RAND constructs sampling weights to correct
for this sampling error and to make the sample as representative of the population of interest as
possible so that the SCPC statistics presented in this document will be unbiased estimates of
characteristics of the U.S. population 18 years of age and older. The benchmark distributions
against which the ALP is weighted are derived from the Current Population Survey (CPS). This
choice follows common practice in surveys of consumers, for example, the Health and
Retirement Study (HRS). The sampling weights for the 2008 SCPC were constructed using the
March 2008 wave of the CPS, which includes the annual income supplement.
Three weighting methods have been implemented for the ALP: cell‐based post‐
stratification, logistic regression, and raking.20 After some experimentation, raking was
found to give the best results for the SCPC. It allows finer categorizations of variables of
interest (in particular, age) than cell‐based post‐stratification does, while still matching
these distributions exactly. Variables were created that account for interactions with
gender, so that all distributions are matched separately for males and females. The
resulting set of variables whose distributions are matched exactly is:

Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages. For a detailed description of these (and other) weighting
20
methods, see Kalton and Flores‐Cervantes (2003) for example.

60
 Gender × age, with 14 categories: (1) male, 18–24; (2) male, 25–34; (3) male, 35–44;
(4) male, 45–54; (5) male, 55–64; (6) male, 65–74; (7) male, 75+. Categories (8) –
(14) are the same as (1) – (7), except that they are for females instead of males.
 Gender × race/ethnicity, with six categories: (1) male, non‐Hispanic white; (2)
male, non‐Hispanic African American; (3) male, Hispanic and other; (4) female,
non‐Hispanic white; (5) female, non‐Hispanic African American; (6) female,
Hispanic and other.
 Gender × (household) income, with eight categories: (1) male, <$25,000; (2) male,
$25,000–$49,999; (3) male, $50,000–$74,999; (4) male, $75,000+; (5) female,
<$25,000; (6) female, $25,000–$49,999; (7) female, $50,000–$74,999; (8) female,
$75,000+.
 Gender × education, with six categories: (1) male, high school or less; (2) male,
some college or a bachelor’s degree; (3) male, more than a bachelor’s degree; (4)
female, high school or less; (5) female, some college or a bachelor’s degree; (6)
female, more than a bachelor’s degree.
All aggregate U.S. statistics for the SCPC were weighted using the sampling weights
constructed in this manner.

Standard Errors
Standard errors for the estimates reported in the 2008 SCPC Tables were
calculated using conventional methods but are not included in this document. Tables
containing the complete set of standard errors can be downloaded from the CPRC
website.21
The 2008 SCPC Tables report two types of estimates: means (averages) and
medians. Median statistics are reported alongside the mean statistics for questions for

See http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/cprc/psp/index.htm.
21

61
which the distribution of responses indicates large differences between the mean and
median. These questions include the dollar values of cash (Tables 10–12) and net worth
(Table 30), and the frequency of use of payment instruments (Tables 19–20).
Standard errors of the estimates were calculated using the SAS software package.
Weighted standard errors of the estimates of the means were computed, using the SAS
procedure “Surveymeans” with the SCPC weighting variable (r_weight). Weighted
standard errors for the estimates of the medians were computed in SAS, using the
bootstrapping method described in Efron and Tibshirani (1986). All standard errors
were calculated after the treatment of item non‐response and the data cleaning had
been completed.22
The magnitude of the standard errors in the SCPC depends on the type of
reported statistic. Most of the standard errors range between approximately 1 and 3
percentage points for estimates reported in terms of percentage of consumers—
including those concerning adoption, incidence of use, characteristics of payment
instruments, and demographic information. An exception is changes in use (Table 25),
for which the typical range of standard errors is approximately 2 to 5 percentage points.
Most of the standard errors are 1 percent or less for estimates of the percentage of
payments made by a consumer in a typical month (Tables 19–23).
The standard errors of statistics reported in natural units depend on the absolute
magnitude of the statistic. For example, the standard error of cash holdings is $30,
compared with a mean estimate of $230, and the standard error of monthly cash
withdrawals is $24, compared with a mean estimate of $336 (Table 10). For adoption of
payment instruments by consumers, the standard error of the number of instruments
per consumer is 0.1, compared with a mean estimate of 5.0 (Table 8). For consumer ages,
most standard errors are less than 2 years (Table 9).

The data cleaning and imputation process has a very minor effect on a small number of the standard errors.
22

62
The 95 percent confidence intervals for the estimates are obtained from the
formula   1.96  SE , where  is the estimated statistic and SE is the standard error of
our estimate. For some types of survey estimates that are bounded, such as percentages,
the 95 percent confidence intervals may contain the bound (0 percent or 100 percent).
For example, the percentage of consumers who have adopted cash as a payment
instrument is 98.2 percent (Table 4) and the 95 percent confidence interval for this
estimate includes the estimate of 100 percent. This conclusion is an imperfection of the
method of approximation by the normal distribution that underlies these confidence
intervals. There are ways to avoid such anomalies, such as computing confidence
intervals for a nonlinear transformation of the statistics and then retransforming them
back to the original scale. However, as in most applications, we have not done this.
Instead, we simply interpret our confidence intervals as implying that “very high”
percentages are not excluded on statistical grounds, although an estimate of exactly 100
percent is excluded on logical grounds.
Another way to measure the precision of the estimates is to construct the relative
standard error (RSE), which is defined as SE /  . The RSE is a normalized statistic, like
the coefficient of variation (CV), which can be used to determine the relative precision
and reliability of an estimate in terms of the percentage deviation of the standard error
from the estimate. A common standard of precision for the RSE is 30 percent (RSE ×
100). For estimates (mean or median) that are very near zero, the RSE can be
particularly sensitive to small changes in the SE . Roughly 5 percent of the
approximately 2,700 data points (means and medians) in the 2008 SCPC Tables have an
RSE greater than 30 percent. Users of the SCPC should exercise caution when
interpreting data results with an RSE of 30 percent or greater.

63
Appendix C: Board of Advisors (2010)

Academia
Andrew Caplin New York University
Richard Curtin University of Michigan
David Humphrey University of Florida
Peter Ireland Boston College
Martha Starr American University
Jay Zigorsky The Ohio State University

Government
Carlos Arango Bank of Canada
Paul Bauer Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Geoff Gerdes Federal Reserve Board of Governors
Chad Harper Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Fumiko Hayashi Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Dan Littman Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Rich Oliver Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Adrienne Wells Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Industry
Peter Burns Heartland Payment Systems
Roger Johnston Fiserv
Leon Majors Phoenix Marketing International
Bill McCracken Synergistics Research Corporation
Aaron McPherson International Data Corporation
Steve Mott BetterBuyDesign
Tom Welander Global Concepts
Jane Yao American Bankers Association

64
Appendix D: References

AARP and Woelfel Research (2007). “Consumer Payment Study.”
http://www.aarp.org/research/surveys/money/credit/debt/articles/consumer_payment.html
Benton, Marques, Krista Blair, Marianne Crowe, and Scott Schuh (2007). “The Boston Fed Study
of Consumer Behavior and Payment Choice: A Survey of Federal Reserve System
Employees.” Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Public Policy Discussion Paper 07‐1.
Bucks, Brian K., Arthur B. Kennickell, Traci L. Mach, and Kevin B. Moore (2009). “Changes in
U.S. Family Finances from 2004 to 2007: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer
Finances.” Federal Reserve Bulletin, A1–A56, February.
Efron, B. and R. Tibshirani (1986). “Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence
Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy.” Statistical Science, 1(1): 54–75.
Foster, Kevin, Scott Schuh, and Michael A. Zabek (2010). “The Payment Behavior of U.S.
Consumers: Evidence from the 2008 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice.” Federal
Reserve Bank of Boston Public Policy Discussion Paper, forthcoming.
Federal Reserve System (2007). The 2007 Federal Reserve Payments Study. Noncash Payment Trends
in the United States: 2003–2006. Federal Reserve System: Washington, D.C.
Gerdes, Geoff (2008). “Recent Payment Trends in the United States.” Federal Reserve Bulletin,
A75–A106, October.
Groves, Robert M., Floyd J. Fowler, Jr., Mick P. Couper, James M. Lepkowski, Eleanor Singer,
and Roger Tourangeau (2009). Survey Methodology (2nd Edition). Hoboken, New Jersey:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kalton, Graham and Ismael Flores‐Cervantes (2003). “Weighting Methods.” Journal of Official
Statistics, 19: 81–97.
Kalton, Graham and Kasprzyk, Daniel (1982). ʺImputing for Missing Survey Responses.ʺ
American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, 22‐
31.
Schreft, Stacey L. (2006). “How and Why Do Consumers Choose Their Payment Methods?”
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Research Working Papers, RWP 06–04, April.
Schuh, Scott (2010). “The Survey of Consumer Payment Choice, 2003–2008: Purpose and
Methodology.” Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper, forthcoming.
Schuh, Scott and Joanna Stavins (2009). “Why Are (Some) Consumers (Finally) Writing Fewer
Checks? The Role of Payment Characteristics.” Journal of Banking and Finance, (in press).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). “Monthly Postcensal Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population, by
single year of age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin.”
http://www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/2008‐nat‐ni.html.

65

The 2008 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice: Kevin Foster, Erik Meijer, Scott Schuh, and Michael A. Zabek

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The 2008 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice: Kevin Foster, Erik Meijer, Scott Schuh, and Michael A. Zabek

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The 2008 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice: Kevin Foster, Erik Meijer, Scott Schuh, and Michael A. Zabek

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

payment instrument characteristics—acceptance for payment; acquisition and setup; control

University Consumer Finance Monthly; Phoenix Marketing International; Synergistics Research

Debit 86.1 5.9

Online banking bill payment 58.3 5.0

Bank accounts 2.8 2.6

Checking 1.5 1.4

ATM and debit cards 1.7 1.5

ATM 1.2 0.3

Credit Cards 3.5 2.7

Rewards 2.3 1.4

Prepaid cards 2.4 0.4

Bought for own use 2.0 0.1

Cash Withdrawals, per month* 336 180

First Second Third

ATM or debit card 60.5 34.0 21.5

ATM 53.5 13.5 7.4

Paper instruments 95.1 96.3

Cash 86.5 88.9

Payment cards 89.2 90.2

Debit 67.0 69.0

Other payment instruments 73.9 76.3

Online banking bill payment 33.7 35.5

Direct deduction from income 18.6 19.4

Bill payments 95.5 95.7

Automatic bill payment 56.7 57.2

Online payments, excluding bills 61.1 78.6

Retail and other payments 96.3 96.3

Paper instruments 78.0 32.2 90.6

Payment cards 72.7 47.7 88.1

Other payment instruments 70.8 35.0 na

Direct deduction from income 18.6 na na

Paper instruments 85.8 38.9 93.3

Payment cards 75.7 65.2 89.1

Other payment instruments 73.6 42.5 na

Direct deduction from income 19.4 na na

Monthly incidence Retail Other

Paper instruments 84.5 64.6 72.0

Payment cards 85.0 73.6 63.2

Any instrument 94.6 91.8 89.5

Paper instruments 87.5 73.1 81.9

Payment cards 86.5 83.2 73.1

Total payments 100.0 76.7 59.1

Paper instruments 36.5 28.1 19.3

Cash 22.7 17.6 9.8

Payment cards 52.9 40.3 27.3

Debit 31.0 23.9 10.0

Other payment instruments 9.7 7.4 4.0

Online banking bill payment 2.7 2.2 0.0

Direct deduction from income 1.0 0.8 0.0

Total 100.0 76.7 59.1

Bill payments 25.8 19.6 12.0

Automatic 6.7 5.1 1.0

Online payments, excluding bills 8.6 6.6 2.0

Retail and other payments 65.6 50.0 35.0

Retail 51.5 39.3 27.4

Paper instruments 5.1 1.6 21.6

Payment cards 7.9 3.7 28.8

Other payment instruments 6.0 1.4 na

Direct deduction from income 0.8 na na