Use of Rice Husk Ash As Partial Replacement With Cement in Concrete - A Review
Use of Rice Husk Ash As Partial Replacement With Cement in Concrete - A Review
Use of Rice Husk Ash As Partial Replacement With Cement in Concrete - A Review
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
01 Sept. 2015
Use of Rice Husk Ash as Partial Replacement with Cement In Concrete- A Review
Sourav Ghosal, S.C.Moulik
Department of Civil Engineering, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar-751024
Corresponding E mail: [email protected]
Abstract:Rapid increase in construction activities has resulted
in shortage of conventional construction materials.In the
present scenario, the high cost of conventional building
materials is a major factor affecting housing delivery in the
world.This has necessitated research into alternative materials
of construction.The effective housing techniques deal with
reduction in cost of construction as well as providing strength
to buildings.Mainly gravel,sand and cement are used in the
preparation of conventional concrete.While the use of
agricultural by-product i.e. rice husk as a partial replacement
with the conventional fine aggregates is expected to serve the
purpose of encouraging housing developers in building
construction.Rice husk is produced in about 100 million tons
per annum in India. Twenty kg of rice husk are obtained from
100 kg of rice.It contains organic substances and 20%
inorganic material.Ash from rice is obtained as a result of
combustion of rice husk at suitable temperature. Proper
utilization of it aims to save the environment,encourages the
Government to find solutions regarding disposal to land fills of
waste materials,and provides new knowledge to the contractors
and developers on how to improve the construction industry by
using rice husk, to sustain good product performance and to
meet recycling goals.The rice husk ash concrete aims to
prepare light weight structural concrete which may reduce
considerably the self load of structures and permits large
precast units to be handled.The main objective is therefore to
encourage the use of these seemingly waste products as
construction materials in low cost housing.The various basic
properties of rice husk concrete are reviewed in this paper.
Keywords:Rice Husk Ash, Agricultural Residues Utilization,
Light Weight Structural Concrete, Cost Effective Housing
I.
Introduction
The construction industry relies heavily on conventional
materials such as cement,sand and granite for production of
concrete.Concrete is the basic civil engineering composite.The
quality of concrete is determined by the quality of paste/mix.It is
the worlds most consumed man made material.Its great
versatility and relative economy in filling wide range of needs
has made it a competitive building material.The demand for
concrete for todays infrastructural development is rising day-by
-day.In light of this, the non-availability of natural resources to
future generation has also been realized.Concrete production is
not only a valuable source of societal development but also a
significant source of employment.Following a natural growth in
population, the amount and type of waste materials have
increased
accordingly
creating
thus
environmental
problems.Historically agricultural and industrial wastes have
created waste management and pollution problems.Different
IJER@2015
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
01 Sept. 2015
Malhotra and Mehta (2004) reported that ground RHA with fine
particle size than OPC improves concrete properties,including
higher substitution amounts in lower water absorption values
and the addition of RHA caused an increment in the
compressive strength.
Adewuyi and Ola (2005) have carried out research on the binary
blends of OPC with different pozzolanic material in making
cement composites.Supplementary cementious materials have
been proven to be effective in meeting most of the requirements
of durable concrete.
Habeeb and Fayyadh (2009) have investigated the influence of
RHA average particle size on properties of concrete and found
out that at early ages the strength was comparable,while at the
age of 28 days,the finer RHA exhibited higher strength than the
sample with coarser RHA.
Lee et al (2005) in their study concluded that some of the waste
products like Rice husk which possess pozzoalanic properties
and used in the blended cements include fly ash,silica
fume,volcanic ash,corn cob ashhence providing good strength
properties to concrete.
Gunduz and Ugur (2004) in their study concluded that the
greatest advantages of light weight concrete are its low
density,allowing for construction on the ground with only
moderate bearing capacity,the use of less reinforcement, the
ability to construct taller structures,greater economy in lifting
and use of more thermally efficient material.The unit weight of
rice husk concrete can be lowered by either using porous
materials,therefore lightweight aggregates instead of ordinary
ones,introducing air into mortar or removing the fine fraction of
aggregate and then by partially compacting the concrete.In all
cases,the main goal is to introduce voids into aggregates and
mortar or between mortar or aggregate.
Khedari et al (2001) have studied the characteristic properties of
various light weight aggregates like pumice,coal slag,flying
ash,rice husk,straw,saw dust,cork granules,wheat husk,coconut
fiber and coconut shell used in partial replacement for concrete
production.The organic waste used in light weight concrete is
mainly of plant origin.They concluded that by using plant waste
that is abundantly found in rural areas, it may be possible to
construct cheaper and good quality agricultural constructions.
Sari and Pasamehmetoglu (2004) have concluded that rice husk
as an organic waste,is a significant problem in rice cultivating
areas because it is not used profitably and is generally burned
after harvest,which causes environmental problems.Generally
concrete with a unit weight of less than 2000 kg/cum is
classified in the light concrete class.According to ACI
(American Concrete Institute) Committee, light weight concrete
is divided into three categories on the basis of its strength and
density.
Properties
Unit
weight
(kg/m3)
Compressive
Strength (MPa)
IJER@2015
Moderate
<1000
1000-1500
0.70-2.00
2.00-15.00
Structura
l
15002000
16.0042.00
IJER@2015
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
01 Sept. 2015
R Sathish Kumar (2012) in his experimental study on the
properties of concrete made with alternative construction
materials concluded that,
-Compressive strength of Rice Husk Concrete was found to be
70-80% more than that of conventional concrete for
areplacement of cement upto 20%
-Early strength of Rice Husk Ash Concrete was found to be less
and the strength increased with age.
-Due to lower density of RHA concrete,the self weight of
structure gets reduced which results in overall savings.
-The RHA concrete occupies more volume than cement for
same weight.So total volume of RHA concrete increased for a
particular weight as compared to conventional concrete which
results in economy.
-From the cost analysis it was found that cost of RHA concrete
was less than conventional Concrete.
Smita Singh and Dilip Kumar (2014) in their studies regarding
use of rice husk concluded that,
-At all the cement replacement levels of RHA,there is a gradual
increase in compressive strengthfrom 0-7 days.However there is
a significant increase in compressive strength from 7-14 days.
-At the initial ages with the increase in percentage replacement
of RHA, compressive strength increases.
-By using RHA in concrete as replacement,the emission of
green house gases can be decreased to a greater extent.As a
result there is greater possibility to gain more number of carbon
credits.
-The technical and economic advantages of incorporating RHA
in concrete should be exploited by the construction and rice
industries,more so for growing nations of Asia.
-Moreover with the use of RHA,weight of concrete reduces,thus
making concrete lighter which can be used as light weight
construction material.
Khassaf et al (2014) have established the following facts about
RHA replacement concrete in lining canals.
-There is a significant reduction in workability in fresh lining
concrete with increase in RHA content in concrete.
-The partial replacement of cement by RHA indicated that at
long term ages the RHA concrete showed higher compressive
strength in comparison with that of concrete without RHA.
-It is convenient to state that there is a substantial increase in
tensile strength due to addition of RHA.
-As the percentage of RHA increased,there is decrease in drying
shrinkage.
Sheth et al (2014) in their investigation with RHA and
Styrofoam(Polymer Materials) in concrete preparation arrived at
the following conclusions,
-With the addition of RHA to concrete,there is a significant
decrease in water absorption.
-The concrete mixes under consideration produced strength in
the range of 17-26 MPa at 7 days which is beyond the minimum
requirement for structural lightweight concrete applications.
-The replacement degrees of RHA trials showed an increase in
compressive strength to a particularlevel of replacement,but
decreased if replaced to a higher degree.
-The use of smaller size aggregates of styrofoam showed strong
compressive strength at the corner of the concrete cubes and
remained soft at the faces.
Page 508
IJER@2015
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
01 Sept. 2015
viii. Sari ,D. and A.G. Pasamehmetoglu(2004),The effects of
Gradation and Admixture on the Pumice Lightweight Aggregate
Concrete.Cement Concrete Res,35;pp:936-942.
ix. Obilade,I.O.(2014),Experimental Study On Rice Husk As
Fine Aggregates In Concrete;The International Journal of Engineering
and Science(IJES),Vol.3;pp:09-14.
x. C.B. Sisman,E. Gezer and I. Kocaman(2001),Effects of
Organic Waste (Rice Husk) On The Concrete Properties For Farm
Buildings;Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science,17(No. 1);pp: 4048.
xi. Tomas U. Ganiron Jr(2013),Effects of Rice Husk As
Substitute for Fine Aggregate in Concrete Mixture;International
Journal of Advanced Science and Technology,Vol. 58;pp:29-40
xii. K.S.Low and C.K. Lee(1997),Quaternized Rice Husk as
Sorbrnt
For
Reactive
Dyes,Bioresource
Technology;Vol.61(No.2);pp;121-125.
xiii. W.T. Tsai,M.K. Lee and Y.M. Chang(20070,Fast Prolysis of
Rice
Husk-Product
Yield
and
Composition,Bioresource
Technology,Vol.98(No.1);pp:22-28.
xiv. M.Fang(2004),Experimental Study on Rice Husk Combustion
in
a
Circulating
Fluidized
Bed-Fuel
Preocessing
Technology,Vol.85(No. 11);pp:1273-1282.
xv. H. Premalal,H. Ismail and A. Baharin(2002),Comparison of
the Mechanical Properties of Rice Husk Powder Filled Polypropylene
Composites With Talc Filled Polypropylene Composites,Poly-mer
Testing,Vol.21(No.7);pp:833-839.
xvi. V.M.
Srivastava,I.O.
Mall
and
I.M.
Mishra
(2006),Characterization of Mesoporous Rice Husk Ash(RHA) and
Adsorption Kinetics of Metal Ions from Aqueous Solutiononto
RHA,Journal of Hazardous Materials,Vol.134(No.1);pp:257-267.
xvii. A.H. Mahvi,A. Maleki and A. Eslami(2004) ,Potential of Rice
Husk and Rice Husk Ash for Phenol Removal in Aqueous
Systems,American Journal of Applied Science,Vol. 1(No.4);pp:321326.
xviii. T.G. Chuah(2005),Rice Husk as a potentially Low Cost BioSorbent
for
Heavy
Metal
and
Dye
Removal:An
overview,Desalination,Vol.175(No.3);pp:315-316.
xix. Prof.Kumar R. Sathish(2012),Experimental Study On The
Properties Of Concrete Made With Alternate Construction
Materials,International Journal of Modern Engineering and
Research,Vol.2;pp:3006-3012.
xx. Singh Smita (Research Scholar) & Mr. Kumar Dilip (Asst.
Prof.) (2014),Alternate and Low Cost Material-Rice Husk
Ash(RHA),International Journal of Innovative Research in Advance
Engineering,Vol.1;pp:214-218.
xxi. S.I. Khassaf,A.T. Jasim,F.K. Mahdi(2014),Investigation of
the properties of concrete containing RHA to reduce seepage in
canals;International Journal of Scientific and Technology
Research,Vol.3;pp:348-354.
xxii. Sheth
Ananya,Goel
Anirudh,Pai
Venkataram
B.H.(2014),Properties of concrete on replacement of coarse aggregates
and cementious materials with Styrofoam and Rice Husk Ash
respectively;American
Journal
of
Engineering
and
Research,Vol.3;pp:268-271
Page 509