0% found this document useful (0 votes)
88 views14 pages

SME 430 Class Notes 02/03/2010 17:25:00: Week 2

1. The document discusses the evolution of concepts like zero, fractions, and negative numbers in mathematics. It describes how zero started as a placeholder but later became recognized as a quantity. Fractions evolved from representing parts of wholes to their current form. Negative numbers came to be accepted as solutions to equations, though initially they were ignored. 2. The students debate whether 9/9 equals 0.999 repeating. One student shows that 0.999 repeating equals 1 by adding three copies of 1/3. This demonstrates that 9/9 equals 1. 3. Negative numbers can be described as numbers less than zero on the number line, or in real world contexts like owing money or hot air balloons losing altitude

Uploaded by

oneluckyclover2
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
88 views14 pages

SME 430 Class Notes 02/03/2010 17:25:00: Week 2

1. The document discusses the evolution of concepts like zero, fractions, and negative numbers in mathematics. It describes how zero started as a placeholder but later became recognized as a quantity. Fractions evolved from representing parts of wholes to their current form. Negative numbers came to be accepted as solutions to equations, though initially they were ignored. 2. The students debate whether 9/9 equals 0.999 repeating. One student shows that 0.999 repeating equals 1 by adding three copies of 1/3. This demonstrates that 9/9 equals 1. 3. Negative numbers can be described as numbers less than zero on the number line, or in real world contexts like owing money or hot air balloons losing altitude

Uploaded by

oneluckyclover2
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

SME 430 Class Notes 02/03/2010 17:25:00

← Week 2

← In your opinion, what are important characteristics for a number


system to have?

• Base value 10 – instinctual and biological - ?

o Perhaps just to have a base value – a number that makes


sense. This limits the number of symbols. Can perform
calculations more easily

• Important to have a symbol for zero. This makes it much more


clearer than a space would provide.

• Large numbers can be written consistently and concisely. (Don’t


need to write down infinite symbols.

• Using symbols that are simpler (not intricate)

• Using a limited number of symbols.

• Symbols should be read in only one direction

• The reading of a number should not involve computations.

← In your group, come up with your own definition of a positional number


system, then… discuss which of the number systems we discussed last week
fit your group’s definition of positional?

1. In a positional number system, rearranging the symbols will change


the value./The position of the symbols is important to determining
the value of the number.

i. Positional – Roman, Babylonian, Mayan, Chinese/Japanese,

ii. Non-positional – Egyptian, Greek

2. Any number system with place value that has some sort of base
number system

i. Positional – Chinese/Japanese, Mayan, Babylonian

ii. Non-positional – Greek, Egyptian, Roman


3. A positional number system has a constant multiplier

i. Positional – Babylonian, Chinese/Japanese

ii. Non-positional – Mayan, Egyptian, Roman, Greek

← To classify things, you have to make sure everyone has the same
definition. Definition was “relative” – depending on different definitions,
different classifications could be obtained.

← What are the characteristics of our base 10 number system?

• 10 symbols (0-9)

• Efficient positional structure

• Can compute directly with the numbers

• Have symbols for non-integers

• Base-10

• Place value exists

• Can use the symbol “0” to hold place value

• Large numbers can be represented with few symbols

• Every number has a name

• Has properties (distributive, associative, commutative)

• Symbols are always read from left to right

• Have standard (and easy to use) algorithms for different operations

• Multiple representations for numbers (1/4, .25, 1:4)

• Symbolic representation for special numbers (π, i, e, ln, c, repeated


digit 0.33333)

← Do we need 4 different operations? Can two be enough?

• What mathematics can & can’t we do if we only use addition and


subtraction in a number system?
• Do multiplication and division provide access to any additional
mathematics?

← The “2” Camp

• Two may be enough (addition or subtraction) & (multiplication or


division).

• Only addition (multiplication is addition)

• If we’re tricky about it, we can treat some operations like others.

← The “4” Camp

• Hard to manage with less than 4.

• ½ * ¼ seems difficult (if not impossible) with only addition

• Might not be able to represent all numbers if we don’t have all the
operations

← Further mathematics might be difficult/impossible

← If we start with 0-9 and +/-, then we can get negatives, we can get all
the integers, Natural, Integers. We’re missing rational numbers, irrationals,
imaginary numbers.

← If we start with 0-9, and +/-/*/÷, we can get natural numbers, integers,
rational numbers & irrational numbers (real numbers). imaginary?

← Do you think that you can use the standard algorithm for addition or
multiplication we are using today in other number systems. Why or why not?
If yes, how?

• Can do

o Egyptian could do addition if you go horizontally and may


need regrouping.

o Greek could do addition

o Roman could do addition if you also kept track of subtractions.

• Can’t do
o Systems without a zero placeholder, we can’t perform the
standard algorithm for multiplication

← Week 3

← How has zero evolved in mathematics and as a number?

• Why was there a need for zero?

o Before there was a symbol for zero, there was just an empty
space. This led to confusion, so a dot was used (sometimes
the same as the punctuation for the end of a sentence). Zero
began as being a symbol for a placeholder (first recognized as
the absence of a quantity). Later recognized as a quantity.
Our symbol for zero evolved from a tiny circle used as a place
holder.

• How was zero named in different cultures?

o Set properties/identities of zero including the additive


property (any number plus zero is the original number) and
the multiplicative identity (any number times zero is zero).

o Confusion existed when dividing by zero? (Is the answer zero,


one, something else?)

• What new mathematics became possible with each of these


changes in conceptions of zero?

o Algebra was developed (setting an equation equal to zero).


Originally, variables were used on both sides of an equation.
Now all variables could be put on one side of an equation.
Quadratic equations could be used to find roots of a quadratic
equation (which is where the graph crosses the x-axis, if there
are two real roots/one real root touches the axis/no real roots
does not cross the axis). These are sometimes called the
zeros of the equation.

← How have fractions evolved in mathematics?

• Why was there a need for fractions?


o Fractions began as representations of parts of a whole. There
was a need for greater precision in measurement (feet -> half
feet -> quarter feet, etc.). Sometimes fractions were given
unique names instead of parts of a larger whole (cups, pints,
quarts, gallons, etc.)

• How were fractions described and used in different cultures?

o Chinese avoided using unit fractions (7/3 was instead written


as 2 and 1/3).

• What is the difference between our current use of fractions and the
unit fraction approach?

o Unit fractions consisted of a 1 in the numerator. Some


fractions were represented as the sum of unit fractions.
Chinese were perhaps the first to go from unit fractions to
more conventional notations of fractions (multiples of a small
unit -> instead of ½ +1/4 you can now say ¾).

o Fractions could be written as decimals. This allowed easier


computations (which led to better understandings of square
roots and pi). Percents (Per=per, cent=100) came from
fractions. Base 60 used in time and navigation (from
Babylonians).

← What are some of the logical difficulties that arise when you attempt to
define 0/0 to be 1 or 0?

• Conflict – anything divided by zero is undefined/anything divided by


itself is 1/zero divided by anything is zero.

← Issue – what does this problem represent?

• 0/0=0 is the same as 0 times what equals zero (of which there are
an infinite number of answers). Zero times what equals 1 is not
possible. Quotient Remainder Theorem


Imagine a teacher shows her students a shortcut for dividing single digits by
9. She says that all you have to do is to write the numerator as a repeating
decimal (for example, 1/9=.1 repeating, that is 0.1111111..., and 4/9=.4
repeating, that is 0.4444444...). A student raises their hand and asks if that
means that 9/9=.9 repeating. A different students says that this is impossible
because 9/9 has to be equal 1. What would say to these two students?

3/9=1/3=.333333…

0.333….+0.333…+0.333=0.999…

1/3+1/3+1/3=3/3=1 These are the same.

X=.99999…

10X=9.9999….

• subtract these two things…

10X-X=9.9999…-0.99999…

9X=9

x=1

← Week 4

← Discussion on Negatives

← What shifts in people’s conceptions of numbers were required to


accept negative numbers?

• Previously, had counted number (thought of numbers) as objects


and measurements. There needed to be a purpose for negative
numbers (reasons they had to exist). Had a new way of referring to
negatives (as debts). People had to conceptualize something less
than nothing.

• There was confusion about where to put the negatives as compared


to their positive counterparts. People had seen that negatives were
coming up as solutions to equations, but previously they had
ignored them (false root/fictitious solutions).
← One descriptions of negative numbers are numbers that are “less than
nothing”. How would you explain or verify that negative numbers are “less
than nothing”?

• A problem may exist with using 0 and nothing interchangeably.

• What other descriptions for negative numbers can you think of?

← _________________ 0

← | |

← | |

← | |

← \______________/

• Absolute value -> Distance from zero.

• Real world examples

o Owing money.

o Hot air balloon with negative numbers as sandbags.

← Have the number line displayed with both positive and negatives.

• Operations with negative numbers have defined rules (negative plus


negative is negative, negative times negative is positive, etc.). How
can you justify those rules?

o Proof of Negative times Negative?

• Negative times Positive = Negative -> Negative *Negative is the


opposite of Negative times Positive, which is Positive.

o Bad things happen to good people is a bad thing, but a bad


thing happening to bad people is a good thing. Good things
happening to good people is good. Good things happening to
bad people is bad. (Friends of friends/friends of enemies…)

o Logic based – Not going to the store -> not going, but not not
going to the store is going.

o Using the two negative bars to form a plus sign.


 -n * -m = -(-n * m) = -(-nm)= nm
← Discussion on Imaginary Numbers

• What shifts in people’s conceptions of numbers were required to


accept imaginary numbers?

o People had to understand that imaginary numbers were NOT


useless. These were not impossible solutions. They had to
create the conception of imaginary numbers. This didn’t exist
before and actually had to create the conceptions. Had to
have an understanding of negative numbers, as well as an
understanding of square roots.

• Where are the roots of f(x)=x3+5x2+2x-8, and g(x)=x3-3x2+3x-


9?

o Roots of f(x) are -4, -2, 1

o Root of g(x) is 3

• Order from least to greatest -2, -1+i, 3-i, 4i, √7-3i. Explain your
methods.

o Possibly square each number then sum them.

o Possibly substitute i for another known number.

← Week 5

← What is the structure/organization of Euclid’s Elements?

• Split into 13 different books among 4 topics.

o 1,2,3,6 – Plane Geometry

o 11, 12, 13 – Solid Geometry

o 5, 10 – Magnitudes and Ratios

o 7,8,9 – Whole Numbers

• Within each book – statement -> diagram -> proof -> Q.E.D

o Split into postulate, definitions, common notions

← How did Elements contribute to mathematics?


• Taught a different way of thinking (step by step using logic), and
going through proofs. The step by step process of the Elements
were a source of inspiration for two-column proofs.

• Defined the entire field of plane geometry. Unified and made


consistent the theorems of geometry, number theory, etc.
← What are some reasons that the Pythagorean Theorem is so useful and
widely known among all different cultures?

• Theorem has many practical uses – architecture, land use.

• Theorem is “natural”. This theorem is also easily observable.


Independently discovered in many cultures. Various justifications
exist for this theorem.

← Of the different justifications of the Pythagorean Theorem in the text,


which stood out to you as being the clearest, simplest, most elegant, and
most convincing? Why?

• Display 1 – Tilted square inscribed in a square. – Easy to visualize.


Had seen proof before. Use non-complex skills to arrive at formula.
Didn’t have to manipulate picture.

← Week 6

← What is the mathematical definition/description of pi?

• Π=Ratio of circumference of a circle to its diameter

← How have people represented pi throughout history?

• Fractions or Mixed numbers - between 3+10/71 and 3+10/70, using


the symbolic symbol pi, decimal approximations, 22/7.

← Why has there been so attention paid to pi throughout history?

• Since pi is irrational, we’ll never know all the digits of the decimal.
There also is no patterns found in the digits. Challenge to find more
digits. Ratio is used so often (so popular) because of its relation to a
circle. Also, possible discovers await if we can discover about the
nature of irrational numbers within the digits.

← Week 7

← Coordinate Geometry

• What is the mathematical definition/description of analytic


geometry?
o Representation of shapes by equations.

o This provided a “numerical address” to shapes. Combined


algebra and geometry, links between the two.

o Related to the coordinate plane, need a concept of distance


and how to measure distance on a plane. Plots and
trajectories.

• How has a coordinate system been used throughout history?

o Originally used to divide land into districts.

o Greece, 350 b.c., Appolonious plotted points that were a fixed


distance away from a given point to form a circle.

o A grid has been used to make maps and survey land.

o Pierre de Fermat in 1630, plot relationships between unknown


points.

• What new mathematics became available because of the use of


analytic geometry (and the perpendicular y-axis)?

o Helps with negative numbers (provided a boundary between


positive and negatives).

o Can represent more than one variable at a time now. Can use
this to find areas and lengths.

o Can represent functions, this also led to discoveries in


Calculus.
o

← Platonic Solids

• What are the names/properties of the Platonic Solids?

o Tetrahedron (4 sides)

o Dodecahedron (12 sides)

o Icosahedron (20 sides)

o Hexahedron (Cube) (6 sides)

o Octahedron (8 sides)

o All the faces are the same regular shapes. Every vertex has
the same number of faces meeting (number of edges as well).

o The angles at each vertex must add to less than 360 degrees
(or else it’ll be flat.)

o Symmetry around each vertex.

o At least three faces must meet at each vertex.

• What associations did the Pythagoreans make with these solids?

o 4 elements

 Tetrahedron (4) -> Fire (looks like a triangle/four


necessities for fire)

 Hexahedron (6) -> Earth (belief earth was flat/set on a


surface, won’t roll/six major land forms on Earth)

 Octahedron (8) -> Air

 Icosahedrons (20) -> Water (most spherical, most likely


to roll out of your hand)

 Dodecahedron (12) -> Universe

• What is the distinction between Platonic solids and Archimedean


Solids?
o Archimedean solids have the same properties as Platonic
solids, but the faces don’t all have to be the same one shape.
Each type of shape has to be congruent to all of the same
shapes in the figure.

You might also like