Process Control: WWW - Control-Systems-Principles - Co.uk. CE117 Process Control
Process Control: WWW - Control-Systems-Principles - Co.uk. CE117 Process Control
PROCESS CONTROL
Peter Wellstead, www.control-systems-principles.co.uk
ABSTRACT: This is one of a series of white papers prepared by Control Systems
Principles to explain control problems and techniques that are often encountered in
industry. They describe what makes a particular type of system important and how it is
dealt with using feedback control. The white papers are background for the laboratory
models of real systems that Control Systems Principles has designed for training in control
techniques. This one is about control in the process industries as explained by our Process
Trainer System. Like most of our designs the Process Trainer is manufactured and
distributed by a partner company under licence. Details of the Process Trainer System can
be found at: www.tecquipment.com/Control/Process-Control/CE117.aspx.
See the continuous manufacture of paper by typing fourdrinier paper making in your search engine.
1
www.control-systems-principles.co.uk.
Level, pressure, temperature and flow transducers link naturally to the most common control
systems requirements:
(i)
Regulating the amount of material in a reservoir at a constant level as the demand
downstream in the process varies with production rate;
(ii)
Keeping the flow rate through a pipe at a constant level and loads and supplies
changes;
(iii) Maintaining the pressure at which material is treated in a vessel during a process;
(iv)
And controlling the temperature in a process vessel during a chemical reaction.
2.2. Process Regulation.
Regulation at a constant desired value - the
set point - is a hallmark of process control
systems. Sometimes set points are subject to
change by a higher level of control system or
human operator, but usually they stay
constant. Often controlled variables (like,
level, pressure and temperature) interact with
each other and it is necessary to regulate
several related variables simultaneously. As
an example, consider the process vessel
system shown in Figure 1.
fluid in
stirrer
Ti , wi
V
Q
Heat exchanger
www.control-systems-principles.co.uk.
1. Level control. Here the task is to control the volume of fluid in the vessel, usually by
manipulating the inflow to the vessel, without regard to the temperature.
2. Temperature control. Here the task is only to control the temperature in the vessel,
without regards to the precise volume of fluid.
For both these control tasks, a three-term controller is normally used (see our white paper:
http://www.control-systems-principles.co.uk/whitepapers/three-term-control.pdf for details of
this technique). And usually a suitably tuned Proportional plus Integral (P, I) controller is
sufficient.
However, the situation can be more
complex, because changing one of the
Flow
control variables will change both of the
Controller
system outputs. Thus if the inflow
temperature is lower that the tank
FC
temperature, then an increase in wi will
tend to decrease the tank temperature.
Since both outputs must be held constant,
FT Flow
the two control systems can interact with
Transmitter
each other. In this case an extra control
mechanism is used to compensate for the
Flow
interaction between the two control
actuator
loops.
fluid flow , w
Level Controller
LC
FCL
Flow Control
Loop
Process vessel
(stirred tank)
LT
Level
Transmitter
fluid out
Figure 3: Level control loop
www.control-systems-principles.co.uk.
actuation signal from the level controller is used as the set point for the flow control loop. This is
shown in Figure 3, where the level control loop consists of the Level Transmitter, the Level
Controller and the Flow Control Loop.
This is an example of cascade control, where the set point to an inner loop (flow control) is
derived from the output of the controller in an outer loop (level control). In this cascade system,
the flow control loop is the slave loop and the outer level control loop is the master loop.
Note that not all systems have a local control flow loop. If control is sufficiently good with just
the level controller then the extra cost of a flow controller and flow transmitter is not justified.
However, the inner loop control gives more flexibility in controller design. It is, in a way, the
process control equivalent to the state feedback discussed in the ball and beam white paper.2
Local control of actuators can also help if the actuation process is significantly non-linear with
dead-zone, saturation or rate limiting. These non-linearities are demonstrated in the Servo
Trainer and the Engine Speed Control Systems.3 The message in all this discussion is that a
higher quality of control can be obtained with inner loop cascade control Thus, if there is no
economic argument against, then do it.
3.3 Temperature Control Loop
Temperature
Transmitter
TT
Process vessel
(stirred tank)
TC
Heat exchanger
Temperature
Controller
Figure 4: Temperature control loop
If there is a flow control system associated with the vessel, and there are significant variations in
the temperature and the rate of in flow, then the temperature and level control systems will
interact significantly. There several control schemes for compensating for this interaction.
Feedforward control is the best known and simplest. We will use it as a way of introducing how
to handle interaction. Feedforward was developed as a way of compensating for changes in a
known disturbance to a process. So if we consider the temperature control to be the main control
loop, we will show how feedforward from a flow control system can help reduce disturbances in
temperature as the flow changes.
2
www.control-systems-principles.co.uk.
FFC
LC
Feed forward
loop
FCL
Level control
loop
TT
Temperature
control
loop
Process vessel
(stirred tank)
LT
TC
Heat exchanger
The pressurised head box of a paper making machine is an example of this form of system.
5
www.control-systems-principles.co.uk.