D. Boullier, M. Crépel, Vélib and Data: A New Way of Inhabiting The City, Urbe - Brazilian Journal of Urban Management, v. 6, N. 1, P. 47-56, Jan./abr. 2014
D. Boullier, M. Crépel, Vélib and Data: A New Way of Inhabiting The City, Urbe - Brazilian Journal of Urban Management, v. 6, N. 1, P. 47-56, Jan./abr. 2014
D. Boullier, M. Crépel, Vélib and Data: A New Way of Inhabiting The City, Urbe - Brazilian Journal of Urban Management, v. 6, N. 1, P. 47-56, Jan./abr. 2014
[a]
[b]
PhD in Sociology, HDR in information and Communication Sciences, master degree in Linguistics, professor in Sociology
at SciencesPo, CEE, Medialab, Paris - France, e-mail: [email protected]
Medialab, Sciences Po - Paris, e-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
The Vlib bike rental system is worth analyzing in order to understand how cities move out of a model of
large infrastructures towards a personal service principle connected to digital traceability and mapping of
all activities. The new offer of bikes distributed all over the city creates a new map for access to mobility resources while introducing citizens to a personal-public device. Each feature of the system requires a very
well designed information system to match the needs for bikes and to charge the users through cards (credit
or transportation cards). Personal data is the essential entity that fuels the whole system and that creates
potential privacy problems as well as monetization opportunities. The paper relies on a theoretical framework, called habitele, which accounts for the process of inhabiting that is now extended to the personal
data ecosystem. The portability of mobile phones (and other devices such as cards) creates an envelope that
follows the urban citizen and equips all his activities while it makes a new layer of the city appear, adapted
to the personal involvement in the urban environment.
Resumo
O sistema de aluguel de bicicletas Vlib um caso interessante de anlise para compreender a forma pela qual as
cidades abandonam um modelo de grandes infraestruturas em favor do princpio de servio individual, conectado
rastreabilidade digital e ao mapeamento de todas as atividades. A nova oferta de bicicletas, distribudas pela
cidade, cria um novo mapa para o acesso aos recursos de mobilidade, ao mesmo tempo que introduzem aos cidados um dispositivo individual-pblico. Cada caracterstica deste sistema exige um sistema de informao bem
desenhado para corresponder demanda por bicicletas e arrecadar dos usurios atravs de cartes (de crdito ou
de transporte). Os dados pessoais so a entidade essencial que alimenta todo o sistema e gera potenciais problemas
de privacidade bem como oportunidades de monetarizao. O artigo se baseia em um modelo terico chamado
urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gesto Urbana (Brazilian Journal of Urban Management), v. 6, n. 1, p. 47-56, jan./abr. 2014
48
habitele, voltado anlise do processo de habitao que agora estendido para o ecossistema de dados pessoais.
A portabilidade de telefones celulares (e outros dispositivos, tais como cartes) cria um envelope que acompanha o
cidado urbano e complementa as suas atividades, ao mesmo tempo em que engendra o aparecimento de uma nova
camada da cidade, adaptada ao envolvimento pessoal no ambiente urbano.
Palavras-chave: Mobilidade. Bicicleta. Ecosistema de informao pessoal. Habitele. Cidade digital.
Introduction
The Vlib-type bicycle system is now quite common in cities around the world. Many of these cities
decided during the last 10 years to follow the examples of Rennes (1998), Lyon (2005) and Paris (2007),
trying to avoid the failures of Berlins Call a Bike. The
principle is a rather strange private-public partnership based on a contract between a private advertising company and the city governments. According to
this contract, the city sells the billboards on the transportation systems in exchange for the installation and
management of a network of stations renting bicycles
at affordable rate. The contract may seem a strange
transfer of rights and opportunities for these companies but it is a key feature of the data exchange that is
required for operating the system reliably.
The landscape of cities has been changed by the
installation of a network of Vlib stations where
citizens or tourists can rent the bike for a short
period of time for a very small fee. Identical bikes
are parked in stations along the streets where anybody can rent them through a terminal. The user
must insert his credit card, choose a password and
he receives a one-day ticket, allowing him to rent a
bike for 24 hours, by period of 30 minutes. Bikes are
identified by a chip connected to the rack that detects when the user returns the bike. Frequent users
can subscribe to the service for periods up to one
year and simply scan their public transportation
access card on the rack to identify themselves. The
whole system is controlled by a central command
center where all movements and status of bikes and
stations are monitored using the chips information
as well as CCTV. All these new opportunities have
transformed the behavior of urban inhabitants. The
availability of inexpensive rental bicycles enables
them to bicycle while avoiding the stress of bike
ownership bikes being the most commonly stolen object in urban environments.
urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gesto Urbana (Brazilian Journal of Urban Management), v. 6, n. 1, p. 47-56, jan./abr. 2014
among which the effort required, the absence of protection of any kind, the failure of streets to adequately
protect bike paths, the risk of theft, and so on. Although
bicycling was valued as a sport, as contributing to better health, and as a very efficient and ecological mode
of transportation (even in Illichs terms of general efficiency, Robert, 1980), bicycling in cities as an everyday practice remained difficult. Moreover it was often
dismissed as either old fashioned or masochist. With
the introduction of the Vlib-style system, we consider
that the anthropological balance may have moved in
favor of bikes as a means of mobility. The quality of
the experience no longer depends on ownership and
does not require a long-term engagement. Rather, it
depends on there being a permanent display of opportunities through a very well designed distribution of
Vlib stations throughout the urban space. The urban
environment was changed in order to become a web
of bikes stations, covering more densely the cities than
the public transportation stations does and, by doing
so, alleviating the liability of the door-to-door connection. Your bike is not in your courtyard anymore, for
sure, but it is so easy to reach at the station next-door
that you can build new strategies based on this availability. The visual display of this permanent availability is absolutely crucial for enhancing the attractiveness of the service and the trust in its reliability. Today
the bicycle, although not owned, has become part of
the inhabiting experience. It has become an extension of homes and workplaces, much like garages and
parking lots. The issue of the quality of the envelope
remains unsolved. There are no guarantees of quality,
not even in the new design of the bikes used in these
systems. The new bikes do not provide the user with
any feeling of protection of an interior. On the contrary,
the experience becomes one of detachment in which
the user feels he or she is using a common or a publicindividual good (AMAR, 2010). What is required is a
new sense of collective property. This sense is, however, constantly challenged by the high rate of vandalism against these public bikes (TIRONI, 2013). This is
where the connection with habitele and the new design of the extensions of our selves through data and
services become critical. Why?
Producing an envelope is not only a question of
producing a physical container (as is the car) and
not only a question of the legal extension of personal
rights to some assets (as are property titles). It relies
much more on the quality of the web created between
urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gesto Urbana (Brazilian Journal of Urban Management), v. 6, n. 1, p. 47-56, jan./abr. 2014
49
50
urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gesto Urbana (Brazilian Journal of Urban Management), v. 6, n. 1, p. 47-56, jan./abr. 2014
for each segment of trip (the basic fee limits the use
to 30 minutes) and accepting it. We shall come back
to the issues of privacy that arise immediately, but at
this point, the technical part of the process of coordination is our main focus. Providing a system with
this kind of data is not optional, it is the prerequisite for the use of the bikes because no one can unlock a bike without interacting with the terminal,
through various interfaces, depending on the kind
of subscription that was adopted. Access to the service means giving access to information about your
behavior to the service information system; there is
no other way to gain the power of biking whenever
you want. Is it any different in the case of other transportation systems? Yes, but it is a rather small difference, because many non-usual commuters can use
tickets that are anonymous while, for the bike rental
systems, they must use their credit card and obtain
a ticket which delivers a personal status (including
a personal code). Is there any difference with cars?
Yes, and a huge one, because car drivers do not give
any information to any authority about their destinations and nobody can track them (a freedom which
is not guaranteed by NSA anymore). Is there any difference with the web of data surrounding the use of
a private bike? Yes, because the data commonly used
are maps and GPS services to locate areas of interest
but not specifically related to the bike. To a certain
point, it would be easy to argue that private bikes are
the less traceable devices (no plates, no license, no
fuel, no tax and no electronic system of any kind). In
that sense, private bikes contribute to the extension
of the personal data ecosystem. They do not create a
new digital envelope of their own, and for some users, it can be considered as good news. So, this is our
first point: creating this extension of resources for
citizens requires that they agree to have their data
incorporated in the bike services information system. This is where the bike rental system becomes
not so much a public transportation system as a new
protocol for delivering access services. The two webs
(the one of stations and the one of information) are
connected through the use of terminals located at the
stations. Their management differs but each relies
on the other. Users are involved in both and generate flows of bikes as well as flows of data, although
operators whose job is not exactly equivalent to the
models implemented in the information system rearrange the bikes on the field.
urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gesto Urbana (Brazilian Journal of Urban Management), v. 6, n. 1, p. 47-56, jan./abr. 2014
51
52
urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gesto Urbana (Brazilian Journal of Urban Management), v. 6, n. 1, p. 47-56, jan./abr. 2014
This is an important aspect for habitele and habitacle, because the shift to a common good status
is still connected to individual use and the absence
of a feeling of property can lead to a failure to take
care of the habitacle. Because one cannot identify
with or appropriate the resource, one may lack the
minimum civic mindedness to feel responsible for
a common good. However, this is something that
could be improved using the digital network capacities. This could be a part of the empowerment
of the users community if a service like see click
fix were created for any user to get connected to
a general trouble report system. It would value the
contribution of average citizen to the common good
and invent a new cycle of maintenance based on
more collective responsibility.
Another aspect of the system design can be critical. The model-user was not created only for the
bikes features but also for stations and connection
features. The interfaces were carefully tested and
seek to accommodate many different styles of uses
and to allow non-expert users to get familiar with
the service. However, the length and the complexity
of the process for those using it for the first time remain an obstacle to the expansion of the community
of users. This is why access becomes fluid only when
one has a Navigo pass (the general transportation
pass in Paris region) or a Vlib card and allows the
user to place its card in contact with a bike rack and
to retrieve the bike immediately. The long-term user
uses these cards equipped with a RFID chip, contactless smart cards using the Calypso standard1.
Through antennas and waves, the connection may
look immediate and create this fluid experience of
being a member of a club or a quasi owner of the
service, using bikes whenever one wants.
This contrasts with the five-minute process required for non-registered users. Habitele is based
precisely on this process of habituation, of naturalization of relationships with the environment. The
comparison is interesting between the frequent and
registered user on the one hand and the newbie or unregistered one on the other hand. These model-users
are quite different and the gap in user-friendliness is
huge. The registered user is so well incorporated in
the information system that he is experiencing the
pleasure of being a member, of being within, of the
quasi disappearance of boundaries between him and
the technical system. It is only when one can observe
urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gesto Urbana (Brazilian Journal of Urban Management), v. 6, n. 1, p. 47-56, jan./abr. 2014
53
54
associations which argue that for low income users using the system every day, the amount of the
deposits can be cumulated to a point where they
exceed the limits specified in the users contract
with his bank. The problem might not seem very
significant but it shows that a technical system like
the bike rental one cannot work without a strong
and permanent flow of information from banks and
at an individual level. In todays urban setting the
main ID that serves as a reference and a guarantee is not the identity card or the passport, but the
credit card. Credit cards are considered much more
reliable especially when money transactions are involved because of all codes and controls involved.
Individuals are now supposed to be equipped with a
credit card, and to know how to maintain their right
to use them.
urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gesto Urbana (Brazilian Journal of Urban Management), v. 6, n. 1, p. 47-56, jan./abr. 2014
These rules are mandatory and limit abusive intrusion into personal activity, which would be possible
given that all permanent personal data can be related
to real activity tracked by the information system.
However, users must trust the service provider while
they know that for commercial purposes it is critical to use CRM techniques (Consumer Relationship
Management) and to follow the behavior of segments
of the population. This follow-up has been possible
since May 2013 when an Open Data policy was settled, provided that these data are only aggregated
and anonymized ones. The value of this information
(requests, uses, itineraries and so on) built on users
traces has become a hot issue among urban services providers and city managers. The trend towards
open data systems is supposed to be inevitable but
it remains a controversial issue for many cities and
service providers. First this information must be
processed as anonymous data. However, no one can
really guarantee this request for privacy, since interconnection of behavioral traces may produce new
opportunities for identifying people. And second,
the ownership of this data is strongly disputed, some
providers considering that this is a gold mine produced by their own service and not supposed to be
shared by any other potential competitor. This is why
only very general datasets are made available offering very few opportunities to invent really new and
useful services for any other company.
The habitele of the user produces various layers
that are still related to his personal engagement in
the world but offering different facets of his status.
As a client, he cannot deny the service provider access to his personal data. As a legal person with
rights, the national authority protects him from
database misuses. As an agent in a collective activity, he is computed as a dot moving from one station to another without any attributes. In this last
Conclusion
We followed the major mediations that make the
system work and comply with the habitele cohesiveness. It appears that although service providers are
mainly guided by technical efficiency and financial
benefits, they cannot avoid looking for a seamless
system that deeply changes the experience of the city.
This is where the habitele model helps us understand
what is at stake: the production of an envelope that
urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gesto Urbana (Brazilian Journal of Urban Management), v. 6, n. 1, p. 47-56, jan./abr. 2014
55
56
References
AMAR, G. Homo mobilis, le nouvel age de la mobilite,
eloge de la reliance. Paris: Editions FYP, 2010.
BOULLIER, D. Habitle virtuelle: une nouvelle enveloppe pour commuter, notre tlphone portable. Revue
Urbanisme, n. 376, p. 42-44, 2011a.
BOULLIER, D. From personal data ecosystem and mobile phones to the general theory of habitele. Invited
talk in UC Irvine, May 18th 2012, Institute for Money,
Technology and Financial Inclusion. Available at: <http://
stream3.es.uci.edu/tltc/Production/IMTFI/20120518_
Boullier.html>. Accessed in: Oct. 24th 2013.
CALLON, M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc
Bay. In: LAW, J. (Ed.). Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul,
1986.
CREPEL, M.Les folksonomies comme support mergent
de navigation sociale et de structuration des donnes du
Web. Rseaux, v. 26, n. 152, p. 169-204, 2008.
urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gesto Urbana (Brazilian Journal of Urban Management), v. 6, n. 1, p. 47-56, jan./abr. 2014
Recebido: 15/09/2013
Received: 09/15/2013
Aprovado: 18/10/2013
Approved: 10/18/2013