Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B: Somik Banerjee, A. Kumar
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B: Somik Banerjee, A. Kumar
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B: Somik Banerjee, A. Kumar
Swift heavy ion irradiation induced modications in the optical band gap
and Urbachs tail in polyaniline nanobers
Somik Banerjee, A. Kumar
Materials Research Laboratory, Department of Physics, Tezpur University, Tezpur 784028, Assam, India
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 17 June 2011
Received in revised form 1 September 2011
Available online 10 September 2011
Keywords:
Polyaniline nanobers
Swift heavy ions
Optical band gap
Urbachs tail
Quantum connement
a b s t r a c t
Optical band gap and Urbach tail width of HCl and CSA doped polyaniline (PAni) nanobers and the ion
beam induced modications in the band gap and Urbachs tail of the samples have been studied employing UVVis absorption spectroscopy. All the major bands appearing in the FTIR spectra exhibit a decrease
in intensity and broadening in their band widths upon interaction with the highly energetic ion beams.
This suggests that SHI irradiation induces chain-scissioning events in the PAni nanobers. An interesting
result that comes out from the FTIR analysis is a transition from the benzenoid to quinoid states in the
PAni chains, which reveals that there is a decrease in the degree of conjugation in the polymer upon irradiation. Optical absorption studies indicate three direct allowed transitions at 2.64, 3.61 and 4.08 eV for
HCl doped PAni nanobers and at 2.62, 3.49 and 4.02 eV for the CSA doped PAni nanobers. The optical
band gap is found to increase with increasing ion uence which may be attributed to the reduction in the
ber diameters upon irradiation, which is corroborated by TEM analysis. Increase in the optical band gap
also points out to a decrease in the conjugation length due to the larger torsion angles between the adjacent phenyl rings of the polymer with respect to the plane of the nitrogen atoms, which is also supported
by FTIR results. The Urbach tail width decreases with increasing ion uence indicating that structural disorders are annealed out of the PAni nanobers which is also observed from the plots of (ahm)2 against
photon energy (hm) for HCl doped PAni nanobers. The quantum connement effect is conrmed by fact
that a band gap exhibits a linear dependence on the inverse of the square of the radius of the PAni nanofibers. Infact, the increase in the optical band gap may be a combined effect of the decrease in the Urbach
band width and the quantum connement effect.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Research in the eld of conducting polymers in recent years have
been focussed on the development of conducting polymer nanostructures, which combine the advantages of organic conductors
with low dimensionality and also show better processibility. Several types of conducting polymer nanostructures such as nanobers, nanotubes, nanoparticles, nanowires and nanoribbons have
been synthesized by several techniques including microemulsion,
soft and hard template methods, interfacial polymerization,
electrospinning, etc. [17]. These nanostructures have applications
in sensors, memory devices, microelectronics, etc. [810] and in
majority of the cases show better efciency than their bulk counterpart. Among the family of p-conjugated polymers, polyaniline
(PAni) has attracted much attention because of its properties such
as special doping mechanism, good thermal and environmental stability and high conductivity. Conductivity of PAni can be modied
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: [email protected] (A. Kumar).
0168-583X/$ - see front matter 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2011.09.004
S. Banerjee, A. Kumar / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 269 (2011) 27982806
2799
2800
S. Banerjee, A. Kumar / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 269 (2011) 27982806
Fig. 1. FTIR spectra of pristine and irradiated (a) HCl doped and (b) CSA doped PAni nanobers.
where A is the absorbance and d is the thickness of the quartz cuvette used for the UVVis experiments.
The optical band gap may be evaluated for the values of the
absorption coefcient using the following relation:
I I0 expax
2:303
I
2:303
log
A;
x
I0
x
a 2:303
A
d
ai
X Ai hm Egi mi
;
hm
i
where the value of Egi and mi correspond to the energy and the nature of the particular optical transition with absorption coefcient ai.
For allowed direct, allowed indirect, forbidden direct and forbidden
indirect transitions, the value of mi corresponds to 1/2, 2, 3/2 and 3,
respectively [34]. In an allowed direct transition the electron is simply transferred vertically from the top of the valence band to the
bottom of the conduction band, without a change in momentum
(wave vector). On the other hand, in materials having an indirect
band gap, the bottom of the conduction band does not correspond
to zero crystal momentum and a transition from the valence to
the conduction band must always be associated with a phonon of
the right magnitude of crystal momentum. In the present work,
since we are dealing with nanostructures viz., PAni nanobers, we
have attempted to determine the value of mi without pre-assuming
the nature of the optical transition in the PAni nanobers.
2801
S. Banerjee, A. Kumar / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 269 (2011) 27982806
Table 1
Position, intensity and FWHMs of the prominent FTIR peaks of pristine and 90 MeV O7+ ion beam irradiated PAni nanobers doped with HCl and CSA.
Peak
(cm1)
600
1122
1400
1460
1670
3350
a
b
Designation
of the peaks
CH out of
plane
deformation
CH in plane
deformation
C@C stretching
vibration of
benzenoid ring
C@C stretching
vibration of
quinoid ring
Due to NH
stretching
vibration of
polyaniline
Samples
Lorentzian deconvolution of the FTIR peaks for pristine and irradiated samples at different uences
Position
Intensity
FWHM
Pristine
3 1010
3 1011
3 1012
Pristine
3 1010
3e1011
1 1012
Pristine
3 1010
3 1011
1 1012
S1
S2b
603.37
603.13
602.93
605.77
603.43
603.05
602.93
601.79
23.8
16.7
13.5
15.0
12.7
12.0
10.2
5.0
30.22
27.13
33.93
30.04
34.54
31.75
36.71
40.68
S1
S2
S1
S2
1122.41
1121.61
1401.03
1400.73
1121.00
1119.20
1401.08
1400.93
1119.80
1118.62
1401.39
1400.95
1122.41
1119.68
1401.93
1401.35
49.4
34.5
19.2
13.1
31.5
31.5
12.1
12.3
29.9
27.5
10.1
9.3
26.3
12.9
9.7
4.2
99.57
89.80
24.51
24.37
102.39
98.72
24.95
24.52
106.59
105.87
25.51
25.40
109.29
108.11
27.20
26.22
S1
S2
1459.90
1459.30
1459.28
1458.83
1460.61
1458.21
1458.92
1457.94
3.9
1.7
4.9
5.2
7.2
5.4
7.8
7.8
67.87
101.13
48.44
64.40
45.03
54.80
44.97
44.42
S1
S2
S1
S2
1669.00
1669.17
3277.90
3287.32
1666.96
1669.00
3296.43
3286.34
1669.60
1668.40
3286.42
3271.83
1668.43
1669.70
3279.89
3273.51
23.9
23.8
55.1
35.1
18.4
15.4
36.7
25.3
15.1
14.9
25.1
24.6
9.3
6.0
22.3
9.0
27.95
24.9
731.15
703.74
28.66
27.2
911.17
714.07
34.93
28.4
940.92
718.21
40.25
29.7
945.98
879.69
Fig. 2. Lorentzian deconvolution of the FTIR spectra within 13601520 cm1 for (a) pristine HCl doped PAni nanobers and those irradiated at a uence of (b) 3 1010,
(c) 3 1011 and (d) 1 1012 ions/cm2.
dln ahm
m
dhm
hm E
for a particular value of mi and Egi (say mi = m and Egi = E). The plot
of d[ln (ahm)]/d(hm) vs. hm will show a discontinuity at a particular
value hm = E where a possible optical transition might have occured
corresponding to a particular band-gap E = Eg1. Fig. 5 shows the plot
2802
S. Banerjee, A. Kumar / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 269 (2011) 27982806
Fig. 3. Comparision of the deconvoluted sub peaks representing the C@C stretching
vibration of the benzenoid and quinoid rings of PAni nanobers.
of d[ln (ahm)]/d(hm) vs. hm for the pristine HCl and CSA doped PAni
nanobers.
It is observed that there are three discontinuities corresponding
to three possible optical transitions (at E = Eg1, E = Eg2 and E = Eg3)
in both the pristine HCl and CSA doped PAni nanobers. In order
to get the m values corresponding to the three optical transitions
at 2.64, 3.61 and 4.08 eV for HCl doped PAni nanobers and 2.62,
3.49 and 4.02 eV for the CSA doped PAni nanobers, we plot ln
(ahm) as a function of ln (hm E), where E = Eg1, Eg2 and Eg3 for
the three types of optical transitions as shown in Fig. 6(ac). The
slopes of the plots have been determined by performing a linear
tting of the experimental data. It has been observed that for all
the three types of optical transitions at E = Eg1, E = Eg2 and E = Eg3
for the HCl and CSA doped PAni nanobers the slope is quite near
to 0.5. This conrms that the three types of optical transitions in
both the HCl and CSA doped PAni nanobers are of allowed direct
nature.
The direct optical band gap of the pristine HCl and CSA doped
PAni nanober samples have also been determined by plotting
(ahm)2 against the photon energy (hm). The relation between the
optical absorption coefcient (a) for a direct transition and the
photon energy (hm) was given by Fahrenbruch and Bube [35]:
Fig. 5. Plots of d[ln (ahm)]/d(hm) vs. hm for the pristine HCl and CSA doped PAni
nanobers.
Fig. 4. UVVisible spectra of pristine and irradiated PAni nanobers doped with (a) HCl and (b) CSA.
S. Banerjee, A. Kumar / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 269 (2011) 27982806
2803
Fig. 6. (a) Linear t of ln (ahm) vs. ln (hm E) where E = Eg1, (b) Linear t of ln (ahm) vs. ln (hm E) where E = Eg2 and (c) Linear t of ln (ahm) vs. ln (hm-E) where E = Eg3 for both
the HCl and CSA doped PAni nanobers.
Fig. 7. (ahv)2 vs. hm plots for the pristine PAni nanobers doped with HCl and CSA.
creases with increasing irradiation uence. This increase in the direct optical band gap values can be attributed to two factors: (a)
the fragmentation of the PAni nanobers upon SHI irradiation
[30], and (b) a decrease in the extent of conjugation which suggests
that the adjacent phenyl rings of the polymer have larger torsion
angles with respect to the plane of the nitrogen atoms [36]. This result is corroborated by the FTIR results, which show that there is a
benzenoid to quinoid transition in the PAni nanobers upon SHI
2804
S. Banerjee, A. Kumar / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 269 (2011) 27982806
Fig. 8. (ahv)2 vs. hm plots for the irradiated PAni nanobers (a) doped with HCl and (b) doped with CSA.
Table 2
Optical band gap (Eopt/Eg3), defect levels (Eg1 and Eg2) and Urbach tail width (eV) of PAni nanobers.
Fluence
Pristine
3 1010
3 1011
1 1012
a
b
#
Eg2 (eV)#
S1
S2
S1
14.7 0.2
9.9 0.1
6.0 0.3
4.7 0.2
25.0 0.1
20.6 0.1
10.0 0.2
5.7 0.3
4.2 0.2
4.5 0.3
5.3 0.2
5.6 0.2
Eg1 (eV)#
S1a
S2b
S1a
S2b
2.3
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.4
3.0 0.2
2.0 0.1
1.8 0.1
1.0 0.1
2.2 0.1
1.8 0.1
1.3 0.1
0.7 0.2
S2
S1
S2
3.8 0.2
4.4 0.2
4.5 0.1
4.8 0.3
3.0
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.3
3.5
3.3
3.3
Fig. 9. Plot of ln a vs. hm for the pristine and irradiated PAni nanobers (a) doped with HCl and (b) doped with CSA.
S. Banerjee, A. Kumar / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 269 (2011) 27982806
2805
am a0 exp
hm
Eu
eT; X
KBh KBh
1
K B hX
2r0
2r0
r0 exph=T 1
Fig. 10. Bandgap vs. the inverse of the square of the radius of the pristine and
irradiated nanobers illustrating the quantum connement effect in PAni
nanobers.
E Eg
hp
2lR2
2806
S. Banerjee, A. Kumar / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 269 (2011) 27982806
[19] A. Saha, V. Chakraborty, S.N. Chintalapudi, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 168 (2000)
245.
[20] J.M. Costantini, J.P. Salvetat, F. Couvreur, S. Bouffard, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B
234 (2005) 458.
[21] A.M.P. Hussain, D. Saikia, F. Singh, D.K. Avasthi, A. Kumar, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.
B 240 (2005) 834.
[22] A.M.P. Hussain, A. Kumar, D. Saikia, F. Singh, D.K. Avasthi, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.
B 240 (2005) 871.
[23] H.S. Virk, P.S. Chandi, A.K. Srivastava, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 183 (2001) 329.
[24] H.S. Virk, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 191 (2002) 739.
[25] R.C. Ramola, S. Chandra, J.M.S. Rana, R.G. Sonkawade, P.K. Kulriya, F. Singh, D.K.
Avasthi, S. Annapoorni, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 41 (2008) 115411.
[26] R.C. Ramola, A. Alqudami, S. Chandra, S. Annapoorni, J.M.S. Rana, R.G.
Sonkawade, F. Singh, D.K. Avasthi, Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 163 (2) (2008)
139.
[27] A. Biswas, S. Lotha, D. Fink, J.P. Singh, D.K. Avasthi, B.K. Yadav, S.K. Bose, D.T.
Khating, A.M. Avasthi, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 159 (1999) 40.
[28] A. Biswas, R. Gupta, N. Kumar, D.K. Avasthi, J.P. Singh, S. Lotha, D. Fink, S.N.
Paul, S.K. Bose, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 (2001) 4136.
[29] M. Mateev, S. Karageorgiev, Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 152 (2000) 109.
[30] A. Kumar, S. Banerjee, J.P. Saikia, B.K. Konwar, Nanotechnology 21 (2010)
175102.
[31] S. Banerjee, A. Kumar, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 268 (2010) 2683.
[32] W.S. Huang, A.G. MacDiarmid, Polymer 34 (1993) 1833.
[33] S. Stafstrm, J.L. Brdas, A.J. Epstein, H.S. Woo, D.B. Tanner, W.S. Huang, A.G.
MacDiarmid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 1464.
[34] D. Bhattacharyya, S. Chaudhuri, A.K. Pal, Vacuum 43 (1992) 313.
[35] A.L. Fahrenbruch, R.H. Bude, Fundamentals of Solar Cells, Academic, New York,
1983. p. 49.
[36] J. Yue, Z.H. Wang, K.R. Cromack, A.J. Epstein, A.G. MacDiarmid, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 113 (1991) 2665.
[37] F. Urbach, Phys. Rev. 92 (1953) 1324.
[38] M.D. Migahed, H.M. Zidan, Curr. Appl. Phys. 6 (2006) 91.
[39] R. Sreekumar, R. Jayakrishnan, C. Sudha Kartha, K.P. Vijayakumar, S.A. Khan,
D.K. Avasthi, J. Appl. Phys. 103 (2008) 023709.
[40] A.I.L. Efros, A.L. Efors, Sov. Phys.-Semicond. 16 (1982) 772.
[41] H. Takagi, H. Ogawa, Y. Yamazaki, A. Ishizaki, T. Nakagiri, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56
(1990) 2379.
[42] H. Scheel, S. Reich, C. Thomsen, Phys. Status Solidi B 242 (2005) 2474.
[43] W. Lu, J. Xiang, B.P. Timko, Y. Wu, C.M. Lieber, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102
(2005) 10046.