Capsule Process Validation
Capsule Process Validation
Capsule Process Validation
FORMULATION
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
PRODUCT NAME :
LINE
Remarks
VALIDATION TEAM
PRODUCTION
QUALITY ASSURANCE
QUALITY CONTROL
REMARKS:
________________________________________________________________________
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT
PRODUCTION
QUALITY ASSUARANCE
QUALITY CONTROL
PRODUCT DEVLOPMENT
ENGINEERING
1.0 GENERAL:
1.1 INTRODUCTION:
The process validation will be performed as prospective validation. The complete
documentation for the validation comprises several independent documents,
references to relevant documents will be given as part of this protocol, (see below).
The results of the validation activities will be summarized in the validation report.
1.2 List of Documents for Validation:
Validation protocol,
Details of sampling for the validation batches, test parameters ( Product
performance characteristics) with reference to test methods & Acceptance criteria.
(acceptable Limit)
Methods for recording / evaluating results including statistical analysis.
Reference to relevant documents.
1.2.2 Batch manufacturing records.
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
protocol
Approval of Validation
protocol
Production of validation
Batches
Testing of validation
RESPONSIBILITY
REMARKS
validation report
Approval of validation
report.
Checked by
Approved by
SR
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
INGREDIENTS/EXCIPIENTS
SPECIFICATION
MG.CAPS.
PER BATCH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
NOTE:
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
PER LOT
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
SHIFTING
1. MIXING TIME
2. SPEED
BLENDING
GRANULATION
(IF REQUIRED)
DRYING
1. MIXING TIME
2. SPEED
COMPECT
(IF REQUIRED)
MILLING
(IF REQUIRED)
MIXING
FILLING
BULK ANALYSIS
QUARANTINE
BLISTER/ STRIP PACKING/
COUNTING
FINAL PACKING
QUARANTINE
F.G.STORE
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
ID. NUMBER
1.
2.
3.
TITLE
VERIFIED
BY
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
DATE
19.
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
Checked by
DETAILS
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
CAPACITY:
MANUACTURER:
TAG.NO.:
M.O.C.
CAPSULE FILLING
MACHINE:
STRIP PACKING
MACHINE:
BLISTER PACKING
MACHINE:
Prepared by
TYPE :
MODEL:
CAPACITY:
MANUACTURER:
TAG.NO.:
M.O.C.
TYPE :
MODEL:
CAPACITY:
MANUACTURER:
TAG.NO.:
M.O.C.
TYPE :
MODEL:
CAPACITY:
MANUACTURER:
TAG.NO.:
M.O.C.
TYPE :
MODEL:
CAPACITY:
MANUACTURER:
TAG.NO.:
Checked by
Approved by
CAPSULE COUNTING
MACHINE
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
M.O.C.
TYPE :
MODEL:
CAPACITY:
MANUACTURER:
TAG.NO.:
REMARKS:
Checked by
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
MIXING
AIR DRYING
POLISHING
LOAD SIZE
ACTIVE
SPEED
MIXER
EXCIPIENT
SPEED
MIXER
WEIGHT
LEAK TEST
BLENDING
Prepared by
GRANULATION
( IF REQUIRED)
Checked by
FILLING
Approved by
STRIPING/
BLISTERING/COUNTING
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
BLENDING
Sequence of excipient
Blend uniformity
addition
Load blending vessel.
3.
4.
5.
D.T.
STRIPING/BLISTERING/COUNTING
Leak test
Leakage
Bottle Sealing
Blending time
FILLING
Weight of capsule
Locking length.
Capsule filling speed
REMARKS
Checked by
No leakage
REMARKS
Approved by
Stripping/ blistering
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
Side view:
Top view:
3
Sampling location in blender
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
5.3 SAMPLING
STAGE/ TEST
PARAMETER
MIXING
SAMPLING
REMARKS
CAPSULE FILLING
( SIZE,LOCATION,TIME)
After 20 min of mixing time
N=3 samples at each
interval
Sample size: 1.0 1.5 g
Draw the sample at interval of
Appearance
ASSAY
Weight of 20 caps.
N=____ sample
Weight variation
Sampling : at start,
Disintegration time
STAGE / TEST
PARAMETER
MIXING
EQUIPMENT
( SIZE , LOCATION
TIME)
Sampling thief:
ASSAY
ACCEPTANCE
CRITERIA
Assay 95 % to 105
%
Rel. std. : < 3.0 %
CAPSULE FILLING
Appearance
Visual inspection,
Weight of 20 caps.
Analytical balance
Weight variation
Analytical balance
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
Disintegration time
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
NMT ____minutes.
___________
Prepared by
:_________________________
:_________________________
Date:___________________
: _________________________
(before): ___________________ (After)__________________
:_______________________
Checked by
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
Identification no
Capacity
DRYING:
Equipment Name
Identification No
:_______________________
Date:____________________
: ______________________lt.
:_______________________
:_______________________
Date:___________________
BATCH NO:
Sample no:
1
2
3
Average std.Dev.
Range
RSD
LCL
UCL
POINTS
Method of analysis adopted
Ref No.:
Anlyst:
Date
Meet acceptance criteria.
YES (
)
NO (
)
CONCLUSIONS:_______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________
CHECKED BY:_________________________
Prepared by
Checked by
DATE____________________
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
:______________________lt.
Sample no:
1
2
3
4( POOL)
Average std.Dev.
Range
RSD
LCL
UCL
Method of analysis adopted
Ref No.:
Anlyst:
Date
Acceptance criteria 95 % TO 105 %
Meet acceptance criteria.
YES (
NO (
CONCLUSIONS:_________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________
CHECKED BY:_________________________
DATE____________________
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
APPEARANCE
WEIGHT OF 20 capsule
WEIGHT VARIATION
DISINTEGRATION TIME
Visual inspection
Analytical balance
Analytical balance
DT apparatus with water at
37 + 20 C , with discs.
ASSAY
TEST
95 % TO 105 %
APPEARANCE
AV.WT.
( MG)
WT. Variation
( MG)
D.T
(sec)
Sample qty.
(Beginning
sample)
Middle sample
End sample
Avg.
X
X
X
S.D.
X
X
X
R.S.D.
X
X
X
complies
*All the values are averages of he number of samples mentioned in the table
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
Assay
( %)
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
REMARKS:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
____________________________
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
Sample no:
Average wt
Polishing
B
M
E
yes/ no
Conclusion:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________
Checked by ;___________________________Date_________________________
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
Leak test
Coding
yes/ no
Conclusion:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________
Checked by ;___________________________Date_________________________
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
NAME OF CRITICAL
EQUIPMENT/UTILITIES
QUALIFICATION/
VALIDATION FILE
REF.NO.
DATE OF
QUALIFICATION /
VALIDATION
1
Master sifter
2
Rapid mixer granulator
3
Double cone blender
4
Empty gelatin capsule feeder
5
Capsule filling machine
6
Empty capsule shorting machine
7
Empty capsule shorting machine
8
Strip packing machine
UTILITIES:
1
AHU SYSTEM
2
WATER SYSTEM
3
COMPRESSED AIR
4
STEAM
5
LIGHTNING
6
DRAIN
DATA RECORDING SHEET # 6
DATE:____________________
NAME OF PRODUCT:
SR Parameters
Type of
sample
Sample
A(known
amount
of
analysis.
Accuracy
% Recovery of
known amount.
Prepared by
Actual
reading
Checked by
Observed
reading
Analysis
performed
by
Analysis
checked
by
Approved by
Ref.
Work
sheet
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
90 % of
A
110 % of
A
Precision
Sample
Repeatability
A1
( under same
( from
condition ) Test one
by same
sample
analyst at same point)
time from same Sample
homogenous
A2
validated mass ( from
but from
second
different
sample
sample plan
point)
( by taking
Sample
sample of
A3
different
( from
quantity)
third
sample
point)
Reproducibility Sample
under different A1
conditions.
On
______
Test by
different
analyst on
different days.
Sample
A2
On
______
Linearity and
range
Sample
A3
On
______
25 % of
A
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
Response
concentration
curve on graph
paper.
Prepared by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
50 % of
A
75 % of
A
100 % of
A
125 % of
A
Checked by
Approved by
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
SR Parameters
Type of
sample
Sample A1
15 min.
degradation
Specificity/
selectivity( by
larger
communication
of analytical
method.) for
identification
of impurities
assay of active
component
etcTemp &
humidity /
degradation
factored to
main
ingredients by
15 min, 30
min,45 min or
known
degraded
products.
Limit of
detection
( LOD) & limit
of quantitative
(LOQ)
Qualitative &
Quantitative
result
Actual
reading
Observed Analysis
Analysis
reading
performed checked
by
by
Sample A2
30 min.
degradation
Sample A3
45 min.
degradation
0.1 % of A
1% of A
5 % of A
10 % of A
20 % of A
Analysis
Method A
method (for
non
Method B
pharmacopoeial
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
Ref.
Work
sheet
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
Method C
to be performed
by other public
REMARKS:
1. Specifically / selectivity analysis(4) and Reproducibility (2B) also given raggedness
and robustness.
2. Limit of Quantitative (5) also gives sensitivity of test procedure.
Above procedure to be repeated over three batches to get minimum nine variables for
each parameter.
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by