Comparacion Center Tap Vs Doubler
Comparacion Center Tap Vs Doubler
Comparacion Center Tap Vs Doubler
2, December 2013
Q1
D1
C1
D3
C3
+
UG3
-
+
UG1
T
Ip
Vin
+
Q2
I.
INTRODUCTION
Figure.1
D2
C2
Q4
D4
C4
+
UG4
-
UG1
t
UG2
dead time t2
t
phase-shifted
UG3
t
phase-shifted
UG4
dead time t1
UAB
t
Ip
t
Figure. 2
+
UG2
-
UAB
48
A. Rectifiers Comparison
T
L
Io
C
SR2
Io
(V sec1 Vo ) d T Vo (1 2d )
Load
T
Vo 2 V sec1 d
2
(V sec Vo ) d T Vo (1 d ) T Vo V sec d
SR1
kr (CT )
k f (CT )
kr ( L1L2 )
IL1
Load Io
L1
L2
SR1
L1
L1
L1
Vo Vsec d
L1
L1
k f (CD ) 2 k f ( L1L2 )
(5)
(6)
V sec (1 2d )
L1
2 V sec d
L1
(7)
(8)
where:
kr(CT) = the rising rate of the current of the inductor in
center trapped rectifier
kf(CT) = the falling rate of the current of the inductor in
center rectifier
kr(L1L2) = the rising rate of the current of the inductors in
current doubler rectifier
kf(L1L2) = the falling rate of the current of the inductors
in current doubler rectifier
kr(CD) = the rising rate of the total current ripple in center
trapped rectifier
kf(CD) = the falling rate of the total current ripple in
center rectifier
(4)
IL1
b) Current doubler rectifier
Figure. 3
Vo 2 Vsec1d
L
L
k f ( L1L2 )
C Io
(2)
L
L
L
T
SR2
(1)
49
Vp
IL
Vp
C. Transformer Comparison
The losses of the transformer relate to the turns and the
configuration of the windings and the current flowing in.
As introduced before, the frenquency, duty and size of the
transformers are consistant in both the current doubler
rectifier and the center trapped rectifier so the magnetism
flux and the core losses are almost equal. As is shown in
Fig. 6, with the same average value but the AC current in
the current doubler rectifier is larger than that of the
certer trapped rectifier which means larger AC losses. On
the other hand, it is more possible to achieve better
interleaving configuration and higher coupling coefficient
in the current doubler rectifier which reduce the current
ringing at each switching time[7].
IL1+IL2
IL2
IL1
t
Io
Io
t
dT
T
VSEC
VPRIM
dT
dT
t
dT
IL
IPRIM
I/t
I/nCT
Io/nCT
t
-Io/nCT
Io
Io
ISEC1
Io/2
t
dT
VSEC
dT
dT
VPRIM
t
t
dT
IL1
IPRIM
I/nCD
Io/2nCD
t
-Io/2nCD
IL2
ISEC
Io/2
IL1+IL2
I/t
-Io/2
50
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
CONCLUSION
[6]
[7]
REFERENCES
[1]
51