cl03 Attribute Types PDF
cl03 Attribute Types PDF
Attribute types
Categorical:
Ordered:
Ordinal:
Quantitative:
Sequential:
Diverging:
Cyclic:
Hierarchical attributes
Combination of different basic attributes can be structured in a
hierarchical way.
There are many examples in the real-world. For example: time series
with the daily prices of stock. Different levels in the hierarchy
correspond to the resolution of the time series: days, weeks, months,
years,
Attribute semantics
Attribute semantics is the true meaning in the real-world.
The attribute type is its structural or mathematical interpretation.
The type of the attribute is not meaningful for its semantics, because
they are crosscutting questions.
Although there are several approaches for classifying attribute
semantics, in our case we will focus on discriminating keys vs. values;
spatial and continuous data vs. non spatial and discrete data;
identifying temporal attributes.
Point Position X
Point Position Y
Point Position Z
Unit
Name
Time
Object
Group
Index
150.
100.
122. Um
1 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
150.
100.
122. um
1 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
150.
99.
123. um
1 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
150.
99.
122. um
1 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
152.
99.
123. um
1 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
152.
99.
123. um
1 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
153.
97.
121. um
1 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
153.
98.
121. um
1 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
153.
97.
120. um
1 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
153.
97.
121. um
1 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
10
154.
96.
121. um
1 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
11
154.
96.
121. um
1 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
12
154.
100.
119. um
2 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
13
154.
100.
120. um
2 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
14
154.
101.
122. um
2 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
15
154.
101.
122. um
3 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
16
155.
100.
120. um
3 Measurement Points 4
Surpass Scene
17
Field semantics
In spatial fields, the spatial position is used as a quantitative key.
The main difference between fields and tables is that in the case of
fields, useful queries for attribute values are posed for locations
throughout the sampled range, not just the exact points where data
were recorded.
Fields can be characterized in terms of the number of keys versus the
number of values: the multivariate structure depends on the number
of value attributes, while the multidimensional structure depends on
the number of keys.
Temporal semantics
A temporal attribute is just any kind of information related with the
concept time.
Temporal data are difficult to handle because the complex hierarchical
structure that we use to think about time and for the potential periodicity
of these data.
The nature of temporal hierarchy is multiscale: from nanoseconds to hours,
decades or centuries.
Analysis tasks involving temporal data require most often to discover or to
verify the data periodicity either at a predetermined scale or at some scale
not known in advance.
Furthermore, the temporal scales of interest maybe dont fit well into a
structured hierarchy: for example, weeks (7 days) and months (28, 30, 31
days).
Time-varying datasets
A dataset is considered as time-varying if one of its key attributes is
the time.
Example: an animal tracking system with a fixed sampling frequency.
A very common case of temporal data are time-series datasets,
namely an ordered sequence of time-value pairs.
These datasets are a particular case of tables, where time is the key.
Usually, sampling intervals are uniform, but not always.
Task analysis of these datasets can be focused to find trends,
correlations or variations at different time scales.
In some contexts, the term dynamic is a synonym of time-varying
semantics. In our case, we will only consider in this way if the dataset
is a stream.
References
Tamara Munzner. Visualization Analysis and Design. A K Peters
Visualization Series. CRC Press. Oct 2014.
Stuart K. Card, Jock Mackinlay and Ben Shneiderman. Readings in
Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann,
1999.