Car Number 046: 2010 Atenuador de Impacto

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

2010 Atenuador de Impacto

The Impact Attenuator design clearly


reaches the minimum conditions that
SAE requires for the 2010 FSAE rules
section B3.20:

Impact
Attenuator
Data
Requirement According to section
3.21.1 The team must submit test data
to show that their Impact Attenuator,
when mounted on the front of a vehicle
with a total mass of 300 kgs (661 lbs)
and run into a solid, non-yielding impact
barrier with a velocity of impact of 7.0
metres/second (23.0 ft/sec), would give
an average deceleration of the vehicle
not to exceed 20 gs, with a peak
deceleration less than or equal to 40
gs. In order to achieve the mentioned
scenario a free throw impact test was
performed by our team. These are the
equations ruling our design scenario:
EQUATIONS USED:
1. Vf= Vo + gt

Figure N 1. 2010 Impact


Attenuator model

2. Vf2= Vo2 +2gh

gt2
h=Vo
t+
3.
2
The Impact Attenuator must be:
a. Installed forward of the Front Bulkhead.

4.

d 2 x (Xn+1)( Xn1)2 Xn
a 2
2
dt
t

b. At least 200 mm (7.8 in) long, with its length


oriented along the fore/aft axis of the frame.
c. At least 100 mm (3.9 in) high and 200 mm
(7.8 in) wide for a minimum distance of 200 mm
(7.8 in) forward of the Front Bulkhead.
d. Such that it cannot penetrate the Front
Bulkhead in the event of an impact.
e. Attached securely and directly to the Front

ESTIMATED COLLISION TIME:


Working with the equation (1)
Vf= Vo +gt

t=

Vf
7 m/ seg
=
=0,7135 se g
g 9,81 m/seg 2

Bulkhead and not by being part of nonstructural


bodywork

REQUIRED IMPACT HEIGHT:


Working with the equating (3)

CAR NUMBER 046

2010 Atenuador de Impacto


h= Vo t +

gt
2

9,81 x ( 0,7135 )
h=( 0 x 0 m7135 )+
2

h=2,498 2,5 m SCHEMATIC OF THE


TEST METHOD:
the test method used was free fall.

Figure N 2. Schematic of the test


method
This is the full structure created to fulfill
the free throw crash test:

Figure N 3. Impact Structure

ESTIMATED DECELERATION:
Working with the equation (1)

(Xn+1)( Xn1)2 Xn
t2

Where:
a: deceleration
Xn: distance between a point of the
piece and the floor at a moment.
Xn+1: distance between a point of the
piece and the floor at a later
moment to n.
Xn-1: distance between a point on the
workpiece and the ground at a
moment prior to n.

CAR NUMBER 046

2010 Atenuador de Impacto


t:

Xn1=0,24415

Time differential between

moments.

Images of the test, taken with a t


equal to 0.02331 based on the
acquisition of data necessary to
calculate the average.

Xn=0,107426 m
Xn+1=0,04883 m
g =9,81 m/ seg

Substituting:

( 0,04883 )( 0,24415 ) 20,107426


0,0233 12
a

( 0,078128 )
=143,7894
0,00054335
m
2
seg
m
9,81
seg 2

m
seg 2

143,7894
G=

= 14,6574 G

This is the 2010 IA before performing


the crash test

Figure N 4. Images of the test


Data:

t=t 1=t 2t 1=0,0233 1 seg

CAR NUMBER 046

Figure N 5. Impact Attenuator before


crash test.

2010 Atenuador de Impacto


Figure N 7. Impact Attenuator
Side View after crash test
We can see how the design
attenuator absorbs the energy of the
impact; generating an average
deceleration of 14,6574 G below top 20
gs of the section 3.21 rules.
Figure N 6. internal structure of the
AI before the crash tests.

The team elaborates a video with all


the physical experiences; this video
contains the details of the physical
simulation of the four pre design
models of the FSAE-UDO team.
We want the judges for review this
video, so if you can sent us an address
to ship this video in order to complete
the experimental data.

Please if you decided to review this


video sent the address to:
[email protected]

CAR NUMBER 046

You might also like