Scribd
Upload
599 views3 pages

Blower Standards and Test Methods

CAGI develops test standards for blowers to provide accurate and uniform performance measurements that allow for reliable comparisons between equipment. Current reporting of blower performance captures only a portion of energy usage, while CAGI standards account for all energy inputs to determine true output. CAGI standards evolve over time to meet modern needs, and many become accepted American and international standards after review by various stakeholders. Positive displacement and dynamic blowers require different test methods due to technological differences, but CAGI standards allow their performance to be compared. Simplified annexes to standards provide extremely accurate results without unnecessary complexity. CAGI standards are becoming global standards and, while not required, market demands will lead manufacturers to report performance using them.

Uploaded by

mishraengg
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
599 views3 pages

Blower Standards and Test Methods

CAGI develops test standards for blowers to provide accurate and uniform performance measurements that allow for reliable comparisons between equipment. Current reporting of blower performance captures only a portion of energy usage, while CAGI standards account for all energy inputs to determine true output. CAGI standards evolve over time to meet modern needs, and many become accepted American and international standards after review by various stakeholders. Positive displacement and dynamic blowers require different test methods due to technological differences, but CAGI standards allow their performance to be compared. Simplified annexes to standards provide extremely accurate results without unnecessary complexity. CAGI standards are becoming global standards and, while not required, market demands will lead manufacturers to report performance using them.

Uploaded by

mishraengg
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Blower Section

CAGI TECHNICAL BULLETIN


Blower Standards and Test Methods: FAQs
1.

Is there a need for test standards? What would be the benefit for customers?
Standards provide a common means of understanding and communicating performance. An
accurate, uniform method of testing to determine performance lays the groundwork for
proper selection of equipment so that it can meet the needs of particular applications. If all
manufacturers test and rate their equipment using the same standard test method, purchasers
can be certain that reliable comparisons can be made among different equipment providers
and that performance information can be used to properly specify equipment.

2. How is performance for blowers reported now?

For many years, manufacturers have reported performance of bare shaft power, capturing
only a portion of the true energy required to provide the output generated by a machine.
While this method does capture the largest component of the overall package, and it was
sufficient to obtain a general understanding of performance, it does not meet todays needs.
Equipment purchasers require, and deserve, a more accurate, comprehensive approach that
takes into account all of the energy inputs that are used to provide useful air output.
3. Why does CAGI develop its own standards, instead of using ones now available?

CAGI has been developing standards since its formation 100 years ago. Over the decades,
standards and the process of developing standards have evolved. The CAGI standards are
evolutionary in nature, using the current methods, which have become obsolete, and
updating them so that they meet the needs of modern times. The result is a more accurate,
complete understanding of true performance coupled with better communication of true
performance information to purchasers.
In fact, while CAGI plays a key role in initiating and guiding development of many industry
standards, most of the standards that eventually become used in the industry are American
National Standards and ISO (international) standards. To achieve this status, a standard is
reviewed and approved by a wide variety of manufacturers, users, test labs, and other
interested parties, both in the US and internationally. As manufacturers have become more
engaged in the global economy, particularly US manufacturers, the existence of
international standards has proved to be an invaluable asset that reduces confusion,
increases efficiency, and increases the competitiveness of honest manufacturers that provide
reliable data as they compete against other manufacturers that do not necessarily hold the
same values

1/14, Page 1 of 3

4. Why are different test methods used for different types of blowers?

CAGI has championed the development of two standards for blowers, ISO 5389 for
dynamic compressors and blowers (centrifugal, turbo, etc.) and ISO 1217 for positive
displacement compressors and blowers (rotary vane, rotary lobe, screws, etc.). Positive
displacement machines and dynamic machines operate under different principles and use
different technologies to provide compressed air. The different operating principles and
technologies require different test methods; however, the results that are obtained through
these different methods can be compared against each other. The CAGI standard provides
a means of comparing performance of dynamic blower against dynamic blower, positive
displacement blower against positive displacement blower, and dynamic blower against
positive displacement blower.
ISO 1217 displaced the obsolete PTC 9 for most of the industry many years ago. The 1217
standard and its annexes provide true wire-to-air performance methods, measuring all
power inputs to a positive displacement blower package and stating a true specific power
performance: y power in = x air out.
Whereas ISO 1217 already contains wire-to-air methods, ISO 5389 does notyet. Much
of the recent effort has been development of a method that will provide a similar means of
measuring specific power for dynamic machines using ISO 5389 as that which has existed
for many years in 1217 for positive displacement blowers.
5. Why base standards off other standards using simplified annexes, instead of using
the full base test standard? Are the simplified tests accurate?

The full base test standards (5389 and 1217) serve a purpose, but they can be complex and
lengthy due to the fact that they address many different types of compressor product
variations. The annexes are written to focus on specific types of compressors or compressor
packages.
The simplified annexes are rigorous methods that provide extremely accurate results. In
fact, the annex to 5389 eliminates many of the negative tolerances that are common in most
performance standards. Simplified annexes in 1217 have been used for decades and have
resulted in more effective development and communication of performance information
and greater customer satisfaction.
Overly complex test methods and lengthy, involved standards do not ensure accuracy.
They do ensure confusion and increase the likelihood of error and misapplication. Some
manufacturers attempt to capitalize on this smoke and mirrors approach which, in the
vast majority of instances, does not provide information that is meaningfully more accurate
or useful.

1/14, Page 2 of 3

6. Will these standards become global ones?

Yes. Other international bodies have already begun reviewing the CAGI standards and
integration of the CAGI standard into the international standards is in the early stages of
implementation.
7.

Do manufacturers have to use these test standards when reporting their machinery
performance?
There are no laws that require manufacturers to use the test standards when reporting
performance; however, the demands of the market will eventually lead to a de facto
requirement. For a specific example, with higher pressure equipment such as rotary screw
compressors, all manufacturers state performance according to the ISO 1217 standard and
have done so for many years. We expect the same with lower pressure equipment (blowers)
because of the clear advantages the standards provide to purchasers, users and
manufacturers.

8. If someone is not a member of CAGI, can they still use the test standard?

Yes. The standards exist to be used by all manufacturers.

1/14, Page 3 of 3

You might also like