Lecture Listening and Note-Taking (Units 1-4)
Lecture Listening and Note-Taking (Units 1-4)
Lecture styles
There are different types of lecture. In a university setting, a lecture is
normally one of a series given by the same speaker as part of an academic
degree course. The lecturer usually talks for about an hour, but longer in
some cultures.
The purpose of a lecture may be the presentation and understanding of
facts and ideas, rather than an exchange between lecturer and students.
(At Edinburgh, a class where the emphasis is on interaction and discussion
of ideas is usually called a seminar or tutorial).
To see what lectures are like at other British universities, click on this link:
http://www.prepareforsuccess.org.uk/listening_to_lectures.html
After you have worked through Activity 1 on the Prepare for Success page,
check your answers against the Feedback given there.
Note-taking in lectures
As you know, in Britain students are expected to make notes on lectures,
even if the lecturer gives out a handout. Normally a handout provides some
but not all of the information the students need to have understood.
For many of us, what makes lecture listening difficult - and tiring - is having
to listen and write notes at the same time, as shown below:
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
how to write it in note form
______________________________________________________
Note-taking techniques
Note-taking is a personal thing and there is no single best system. But there
are three basic rules that can help to make your note-taking quicker and
more efficient:
Rule 1: Be selective - decide whats important
Rule 2: Be brief - use abbreviations and symbols
Rule 3: Be clear - show the relationship between the speakers points
Rule 1: Be selective
Imagine that a Year 1 undergraduate and a postgraduate studying the same
academic subject have attended the same lecture. In what ways do you
think their notes would differ?
Think about that question and then compare you answer with ours by
clicking here.
Rule 2: Be brief
What do these conventional Latin abbreviations mean?
e.g.
N.B.
i.e.
etc.
cf.
What do the initials below stand for? Which others are common in your
academic subject?
ILO
WHO
OPEC
ABC
UNESCO
As well as using official abbreviations, you can of course invent your own.
Which words could you shorten to the abbreviations below?
imp
bt
intl
essl
fut
est
prob
Symbols
Symbols are another very effective tool in note-taking, enabling us to
express complex ideas in a time-efficient way. Decide on a symbol for the
meanings below, and vice versa.
symbol
meaning
_____________________________________________
=
is the same as
____________________________________________
in addition, what is more
_____________________________________________
causes or leads to or results in
_____________________________________________
??
something you
_____________________________________________
>
_____________________________________
falls; goes down; decreases
_____________________________________________
Rule 3: Be clear
The relationships between the ideas in a lecture are important, and notes
need to reflect them. There are two common ways of representing these
relationships: traditional linear notes and the alternative mind map.
Mind maps are also known as spider notes or web notes. To see an
example, click here
Practice in note-taking
You are now going to watch several students talking about their
experiences at the University of Edinburgh. You will need to listen carefully
and decide what they think are the key points about starting a university
course at Edinburgh.
Play the whole video once without stopping. It takes about 6 minutes.
The video is called Coming to Edinburgh?
FIRST VIEWING
Watch and make notes on the main points.
SECOND VIEWING
Watch the students again and add to or correct your notes.
Clare
Diff from school: so much resp for own
learning
Large classes, so nobody notices if you
miss
Clare
Fs Week not representative: new people,
new faces. Coffee crawls. Interesting
tours
Amy
Get to know the lib system (a bit
daunting); some Ss scared of it
Ask Ss and staff for help
Ben
Societies Fair (at
BRILLIANT
Join lots of socs
the
Pleasance)
Clare
Also soc life within your subject
Follow own hobbies/ints
Clare
Diff forms of support:
Tutorials (Ts = lecturers or PGs ): focus
on readings
For more serious problems, ask DoS
Amy
Main advice: get involved, in diff ways:
as class rep
through (Student) Council make
your mark on UoE
Socs to meet new people & learn
new skills
Alyssa
Recommends Advice Place run by Student
Union (= EUSA). Offices in Potterow and
at KB
Clare
Initial shock: managing money in her bank
account
Ben
Be sensible. Take care over spending. Easy
to get part-time job.
Amy
If you want p-t job, do it from beginning
(of your studies) because more free time
then.
Clare
Daunting: how to make friends, how many
socs to join
Study Notes
Here are some answers for you to compare yours with.
#Rule 1: Be selective
The quantity of notes depends partly on individual preference and on the
ability to write (re-code) fast, but mainly on knowledge of the topic. So one
might expect the postgraduate to make fewer notes, assuming they knew
more about the topic and therefore had less need to make full notes.
To return to the page you were on, click here
#Rule 2: Be brief
exempli gratia = for example;
Nota Bene = (note well) its important to bear in mind;
id est = that is;
et cetera = (and the rest) and so on;
confere = compare this with;
vice versa = the other way round.
International Labour Office
World Health Organisation
Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organisation.
Personally, I use those abbreviations to mean important, but, international,
essential, future, estimated, problem or probable, and student.
#Rule 3: Be clear
Personally, I take linear notes when Im listening or reading, but I use mind
maps when Im planning something to write or preparing to give a talk.
But the use of mind maps seems to be spreading. I generally find that at
least one student per class (of 15 students, in my case) uses them when
they are listening to lectures.
Tony Lynch
English Language Teaching Centre
2013
10
The best way to use the material in this unit is to find another student who is also interested in
watching the video lecture and making notes. You could then watch the lecture together or
separately - and then compare your notes with theirs after the second viewing.
insight
nudge
referendum
into
bottleneck
congestion charge
Are you confident you know their meanings? (If you are working with another
student, ask them).
If not, check them in a dictionary such as the Macmillan Online:
http://www.macmillandictionary.com/
Then think about what you predict the lecturer is going to say about each of the
expressions, in the context of urban traffic problems.
FIRST LISTENING
Listening and note-taking
Watch the lecture straight through, without stopping.
Make notes - but dont worry if you dont have time to note down all the
information you need to. You will get another chance.
As you listen, focus on the Predicting macrostrategy:
Keep in mind the six questions you reflected on
Use what you know and what Dr Eliasson has said to guess at what he will
say next
Use his Russian story (about the planner who rang a planner in London) to
predict how the story is going to link to his main point
To watch the video, click here
SECOND LISTENING
Detailed note-taking
As you may have noticed, the lecture webpage provides a transcript in English
and may also offer a translation into your language. You might want to use one of
them as you play the lecture again, or you could wait until the end before
checking your notes against the transcript.
(To think about: Is it better to use the transcript or the translation, if you want to
improve your English listening skills?)
Now play the lecture a second time, again without stopping.
As you listen and/or read, study your notes carefully and add new notes at points
where during the first listening
you didnt catch what Dr Eliasson said
you didnt have time to note all the details
you misunderstood what she said
How did you do with your predictions? On page In session 1 you and
another student predicted the points you thought might be mentioned in
the lecture. Did Jonas Eliasson include any of them? (For example, was his
lecture about success, partial success or failure?)
Have congestion charges been tried in (any part of) your own country?
Critical thinking
What was the connection between the Russian story and the Stockholm case
study?
Dr Eliassons central point is the importance of nudging people into changing their
behavior. What exactly do you think he meant?
Do you think nudging would be effective in your home country? What are the
alternatives to nudging in public policy?
Here is what one viewer, Jen Oh, commented on the TED website:
Dec 17 2012:
As an urban transport specialist, I am of the view that Jonas Eliasson oversimplified how the congestion problems might be addressed and understated
the role (and importance) of planning. It is true that Stockholm is one of the
more successful examples of similar schemes, but its success was possible
because of the "alternative" options that had been made available to the
6
citizens. People could choose to use public transport that is reasonably fast,
reliable and safe, or adjust their departure time flexibly as the system
(employers or other services that they need to travel to) allowed them to do
so. And good planning is essential to provide those good alternatives and
fundamentals of urban development that determine the patterns and
flexibility of trips. In many developing and emerging cities, this is not the
case.
Also the notion that you can "nudge" people with a relatively small incentive,
such as 1 or 2 euros, also depends on how willing the users are to pay. How
much extra cost would it take for a commuter to give up the privacy,
independence and comfort of driving their own car and instead use public
transport? In many other places where public transport is not well
developed, it would take a lot more than a "nudge" to alter behaviors.
Do you think any issues about congestion are left unanswered after the lecture?
If so and if you can - discuss them with another student.
Tony Lynch
English Language Teaching Centre
University of Edinburgh
2013
The best way to use these materials is to find another student who is also interested in
watching the video lecture and making notes. Watch the lecture together or
separately - and then compare your notes with theirs after the second viewing.
The lecturer
Dr Jeff Hancock, from Canada, is an Associate Professor of Cognitive Science
and Communications at Cornell University, USA. His academic research
focuses on how people use deception and lies when communicating
digitally - sending texts, composing emails, writing online profiles, and so
on.
Dr Hancock believes that, although the impersonality of online interaction
can encourage mild fibbing (those white lies), the fact that it leaves a
permanent record of verifiable information keeps us honest.
Monitoring your understanding of the lecture
Professor Hancock has a very informal style. He smiles a lot, uses colloquial
language and, as you will hear, makes the audience laugh throughout his
talk. You will probably understand some of his jokes, but not others. Dont
worry! We will be taking that into account in the Listening tasks.
FIRST VIEWING
Monitoring
For this first viewing, just watch and listen. Dont make any notes. Dont
read the transcript. Play the video without stopping roughly 18 minutes.
Each time you hear the audience laugh, write down a percentage to
indicate how sure you are that you have understood why they are
laughing. For example, if you had absolutely no idea what Professor
Hancock has said, you would put 0%. If you are confident you have
understood perfectly, you would put 100%. If you knew he was making a
joke about Canada, but not more than that, you might put 30%.
In most cases, you can expect your understanding to be somewhere in the
middle, between 0% and 100%.
To watch the video, click here
3
SECOND VIEWING
Note-taking
This time, watch the whole video and make notes on what you think are
the main points. Dont read the transcript yet.
Comparing notes
Now compare your notes with the transcript on the lecture webpage (or, if
possible, with the notes of another student).
Content
Do you agree how many main points there were in the lecture?
If you missed other points, has your partner made notes on them?
If there were points (or words) that you could not understand, check
in a dictionary or ask someone else to help.
Form
(For this you need another student). Look for differences between the ways
in which you have used
abbreviations
symbols
layout (e.g. linear notes or spiders web)
emphasis (e.g. underlining, capital letters)
Monitoring
Compare the confidence scores you gave yourself during your first
listening. Did they vary much from point to point during the lecture? (Are
they similar to the other students?
Underline what you think is Jeff Hancocks main point in that extract. When
you have decided on your answer, have a look at mine on the next page.
Further discussion
Im sure there will be issues arising from the lecture that you would like to
discuss. If so, talk about them with the other student or with someone
else.
My answer
But I think there's actually something much more interesting and fundamental
going on here. The next big thing for me, the next big idea, we can find by going way
back in history to the origins of language. Most linguists agree that we started speaking
somewhere between 50,000 and 100,000 years ago. That's a long time ago. A lot of
humans have lived since then. We've been talking, I guess, about fires and caves and
sabre-toothed tigers. I don't know what they talked about, but they were doing a lot of
talking, and like I said, there's a lot of humans evolving speaking, about 100 billion
people in fact. What's important though is that writing only emerged about 5,000 years
ago. So what that means is that all the people before there was any writing, every
word that they ever said, every utterance disappeared. No trace. Evanescent. Gone.
So we've been evolving to talk in a way in which there is no record. In fact, even the next
big change to writing was only 500 years ago now, with the printing press, which is very
recent in our past, and literacy rates remained incredibly low right up until World War II,
so even the people of the last two millennia, most of the words they ever said -- poof! -disappeared.
Tony Lynch
English Language Teaching Centre
University of Edinburgh
2013
As before, the best way to use this unit is to find another student who is also interested
in watching the video lecture and making notes. You can then watch the lecture
together or separately - and then compare your notes with theirs after the second
viewing.
Macrostrategy: Responding
Being an effective lecture listener involves not simply receiving what the
lecturer says but also responding to it. Responding here means relating the
lecture content to your knowledge and personal experience, and forming
your own opinions. Responding involves asking yourself questions such as
these:
Do I accept that what the lecturer says is true and relevant?
Can I think of other examples that support or dont support what is being said?
Do I think the lecturers opinions are reasonable?
The topic of this unit provides a good opportunity for this sort of responsive
listening. The lecturer is a well-known researcher into the ways in which
very young children learn their own language and how they have the
potential to learn others.
You will able to use your own experience of learning English to respond to
what you hear her say in her talk.
1
The lecturer
Professor Patricia Kuhl is Co-Director of the University of Washington
Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences, and Professor of Speech and
Hearing Sciences. She is internationally recognized for her research on early
language and brain development, and studies that show how young
children learn. Her work has played a major role in demonstrating how
early exposure to language alters the brain. It has implications for critical
periods in development, for bilingual education, and for research on
computer understanding of speech.
FIRST VIEWING
Listening and note-taking
Professor Kuhls talk lasts about 11 minutes.
On this first hearing, try to note down the main points. You will get a
second chance to pick up additional information later.
As you are listening, think about your personal response to her points, by
asking yourself these questions:
2
SECOND VIEWING
Detailed note-taking
Did you notice that Patricia Kuhl used a series of questions in her talk? They
provide a clear structure to the topics she wanted to discuss. When a
speaker asks a question in this way and then goes on to give the answer
herself, it is called a rhetorical question.
As you watch for a second time, listen out for the rhetorical questions,
which should help you identify the topic sections.
Add more details to the notes you took on first listening.
Comparing notes
If you can, work with another student and compare the content of your
notes:
Have you included the same information?
If you missed certain points, has your partner got notes on them?
If there were points (or words, or sections) that neither of you could
understand, see whether the lecture transcript helps you clear up your
doubts.
Now compare the form of your notes. Look for differences between the
ways in which you and the other student have used
abbreviations
symbols
layout
emphasis
Responding
Do you know any strategies that adults can use when learning
another language, to compensate for the effect of age on our ability
to learn other languages?
Patricia Kuhl ended by saying we may be able to help keep our own
minds open to learning for our entire lives. Do you agree?
Reflecting on your listening
Of the three lectures you have now heard on traffic congestion,
lying and language development - which do you think was the
clearest? What made it so, for you?
Which aspects of listening do you need to practise further, to make
your listening and note-taking more effective.
Moving forward
We have come to the end of this short course, so we are going to close by
considering possible ways of continuing to improve your English listening
skills.
Some years ago, I asked international students at Edinburgh to tell us about
any techniques they had devised or adapted to improve their listening.
Here is what five of them said:
Student 1
I noticed that I improved much more when I got a TV, but I didn't take any conscious
steps to practise listening.
Student 2
Listening to a tape and writing down exactly what you hear is very helpful. To listen very
specifically and in detail means you have to pay attention to sounds which you have
some problems with yourself. Seeing what the gaps are in your dictation tells you
what your listening problems are.
Student 3
I listen to the news on television or radio and then try to discuss the topics with friends.
This is very useful for me to know whether the news I have heard is correct and does not
give different perspectives than my understanding.
Student 4
I think it's good practice to listen to other foreign speakers talking about your field. You
have to get used to their accents, in the same way as you have get used to British
people's different accents. In fact, there are bigger differences between British accents
than between foreigners, I think. So it's all good practice.
Student 5
I have been experimenting with 'hearing' (not listening to) novels and stories on cassette,
using a Walkman, just to force my mind to think in English when I am not speaking,
reading or writing.
Which of those five pieces of advice do you think is the least useful? Why?
There we offer advice on all the other main areas of English as a second
language - reading, speaking, writing, grammar, vocabulary and
pronunciation as well as more ideas on listening.
Some listening websites
Resources you can access on Andy Gillett's website at
http://www.uefap.com/links/skills.htm
BBC Radio 4 (Old and new radio programmes from BBC Radio 4)