ATTACK WITH MIKHAIL TAL MIKHAIL TAL & IAKOV DAMSIKY EVERYMAN CHESSContents Mikhail Tal - A Personal Tribute Introduction The Main Indicator — King in the Centre Breakthrough in the Centre The Assault Ratio Invasion Trajectories Lines of Communication Outposts Eliminating Defenders At the Royal Court Destroying the Fortress Walls Co oOI AA WWD Answers to: What Would You Have Played? Postscript Index of Players List of Illustrative Games vi vii 32 42 51 14 89 105 116 128 167 179 180 183Mikhail Tal: A Personal Tribute YOUNG PLAYERS of today may find it difficult to appreciate what the name of Mikhail Tal means to chess devet- ees of my generation. In the late 1950s I became passionately interested in the game and began subscribing to Chess Magazine, where I first read about Tal. In particular I remember his exploits in the 1958 USSR Championship, where he was striving to retain the title he had sensationally won the year before. Going into the last round level with Tigran Petrosian, Tal had Black against Boris Spassky, who himself needed to win at all costs, in order to progress to the next stage of the World Championship cycle. Petrosian pra- dently agreed an early draw, but after five hours' play Spassky and Tal were sti] locked in battle, and their game was adjourned in a position that looked grim for Tal. I can stil! vecall the words of Salo Flohr, as they appeared i : "Tal and all Riga slept badly . As it happens, the reader can follow this game in Chapter 8, and see how Tal defended heroically, before finally breaking out with a de- cisive counterattack to win his second USSR Championship gold medal. The next year, 1959, saw the thril- ling Candidates Toumament in Yugo- slavia, in which Tal and Keres fought out a ding-dong battle, Tal in par- ticular taking huge risks in striving to win in virtually every gare, Even the legendary Botvinnik was unable to resist his fiery play, but, not long after wresting the World Championship in 1960, Tal suffered the first bout of ill- health that was te dog him for the rest of his life. And after losing the Return Match the following year, he was never again to contest the title, al- though he reached the Candidates stage on several oceasions. With the passing years his playing style inevitably mellowed and became more solid, although in almost every event he could be relied on to provide at east one combinational flash re- calling the Tal of old. I vividly recall one occasion in 1970 at the Moscow University Chess Club, when Tal came to give a talk about the Tecent "Match of the Century" in Belgrade, He spoke modestly and wittily to the packed audience, and a wonderful evening was rounded off by a 12-player lightning toumament, into which the grandmaster threw himself wholeheartedly. As one of the leading foreign players at the University Club, I was invited to take part, but in my game with Tal was too over-awed, and after losing dismally in under 20 moves ] felt too ashamed to engage the great man in conversation... The pleasure I have gained from transtating this book, and which { hope. will be shared by its readers, is tinged by the regret, felt throughout the chess world, that the incomparable Mikhail ‘Tal is no longer with us. Ken Neat July 1994Introduction ON THE ONE HAND, this is not a textbook. Because in chess, in the opinion of the authors, this name can be given only to an explanation of the rules — the bishop moves diagonally, the rook vertically or horizontally in any direction — and also, perhaps, to the principles of checkmating the lone king with pieces of different values. These are indisputable — they are axioms. Everything else in chess consists of theorems, and they need to be demon- strated. Sometimes they drag on for many years, and sometimes stretch far into the distant future. Indeed: does the truth lie in a strong pawn centre, or the attack on it? Who will give a definitive answer? And when? On the other hand, this is neverthe- less a textbook. Similar to those that set out the basics of versification, the metres and peculiarities, say, of Alexandrine verse. It is true that, after studying all this, you will not neces- sarily become an Alexander Pushkin, a William Shakespeare, or a Johann Goethe — geniuses themselves make paths in the endless world in the name of creativity, but... Neither Pushkin, nor Shakespeare, nor Goethe would have become who they were, had their knowledge of poetry (feelings and thoughts we introduce into this conver- sation in brackets; they are primary and lay at the very foundation) re- mained at the level of prehistoric, primitive people, who made single-tine vii drawings on their cave walls of the desired objects of their hunting, but nothing more... And so, dear readers, what you have before you is a guide. Since it is fully admitted that this is a field in which there are many more exceptions than rules, this book has the aim merely of suggesting: where and on which paths in the dense forest of variations are concealed those very indicators — imperceptible or altogether invisible — that will allow you to replace quiet forward movement with a much more rapid tempo, or to switch from a posi- tional struggle to an attack. It is not always explosive, sacrificial — on the queenside things very often do not come to this. But if the target of the pursuit becomes the king, the sacrifice becomes both a basic weapon, and the main “performer” of that army which is mounting the offensive. This is why reference points and prompts are so important, in deciding whether or not it is the right time for a sacrifice. The theory of sacrifices has already been studied — true, not especially often, and not very recently — by chess researchers, including grand- masters Rudolf Spielman in the mid- thirties, and Leonid Shamkovich in the late sixties. The classification of sac- rifices compiled by them was correct, although also not altogether complete: life in chess does not stand still. But the aim of this book is different: it is to demonstrate the practical applicationVili Attack with Mikhail Tal of these sacrifices, to give typical attacking procedures, and —- most important — to point out those very "symptoms" of a position, which indicate the existence, at its heart, of a combinational, sacrificial solution to the problem. However — and the reader can see this for himself — the correctness of an attack on the kingside may sometimes depend on whether the white a~pawn is at a2, a3 or a4... So then, let's be off. The authors have endeavoured to differentiate the sections as far as possible, although, of course, in practice attacks only on h6 or exclusively on the light squares do not occur, But the main idea may be suggested by one particular feature of the position — and it is this that gives the name to this or that chapter. Bach chapter is accompanied by illustrative games: at the demand of one author GD.) they are taken from the "personal collection" of the other (M.T.). The basis for this selection was the record number of special prizes, the vast majority for “brilliance in attack", which overcame the feeble resistance of one author against the other, and Attack was victorious. May the readers of this book also be victorious.1 The Main Indicator - King in the Centre “IT IS A PROFOUND MISTAKE to imagine that the art of combination depends only on natural talent, and that it cannot be learned. Every experi- enced player knows that all (or almost ali) combinations arise from a recol- lection of familiar elements." LD. This thought of Richard Réti (with certain doubts regarding the numerical grounds of "all or almost all combinations") can be considered in- disputable. And the king in the centre is a stable "familiar element" of pos- sible combinational attacks. M.T. At any event I can admit: as long as my opponent has not yet cas- tled, on each move I seek a pretext for an offensive. Even when I realise that the king is not in danger. LD. Is such an expenditure of time and effort justified? MT. Well... It is more likely that doubts are unjustified, as shown by the following instructive episode. It oc- curred in the 4th game of my Can- didates Semi-Final Match with Bent Larsen in 1965. After 1 e4 46 2 5 405 3 d4 d6 4 4)f3 dxe5 (to some extent a Larsen patent) 5 4)xe5 there suddenly followed 5...45d7. Had this been a simultaneous dis- play, 1 would have decided that my opponent had simply overlooked 6 &)xf7 &xf7 7 wyh5+, when, against his will, the black king is forced to "go for a walk". But Larsen could not have over- looked this, and I began examining possible variations. My inwition insis- tently kept telling me that the sacrifice had to be correct, but I decided to calculate everything "as far as mate", spent some 50 minutes, but then in one of the innumerable variations I found something resembling a defence, and... rejected the sacrifice. This was a be- trayal of myself, I saved the game only by a miracle after the adjournment, and in general I barely, in a “war of nerves", won the match. Of course, I should have begun the attack without thinking, and only after the forced 7...8e6 8 c4 5/6 9 d5+ Gd6 10 WE7 He5 11 Af4 studied the position. This is no place to give var- jations: in certain of them the black king is mated not even on the central files, but at b2 or al! And so that this should not sound totally unreal, here, cleared of a whole network of bran- ches, is a continuation which, though not of course obligatory, is very pretty — 11...c5 12 4c3 a6 13 Hdl!! g6 14 SAxeS+ Hxe5 15 d6 g5 (defending against 16 f4) 16 Hd2 Qf5 17 He2+ Sd4 18 Hedd!! Axed 19 well, with the threat of 20 Qe2+ @d3 21 wyh3+ Se2 22 vyb3+ Sb! 23 Hc3+ Gal 24 Ad3 Qxd3 25 Gd2+ Abl 26 Axbl mate. And so, the attack on the king. It includes many components. If there is2 Attack with Mikhail Tal a lead in development, if the king's pawn shelter is weakened or files and diagonals have been opened, if a se- cure piece outpost or a striking force has been created — all these are suffi- cient grounds for an offensive, and a discussion of them will follow. But for the moment — the assault on the king that is still in the centre. These are the most natural kingside pawn formations, arising almost in- variably in many semi-open and closed openings. They can be broken up only by a direct blow — by a sacrifice at e6 or f7. The offensive then proceeds either along the opened central files, or else along either the h5-e8 diagonal (if it has been weakened beforehand, this often serves as a “prompt" for the attack) or the a2-g8 diagonal. However, usually the attack is mounted down both central files. Nezhmetdinov-Kamyshov Russian Federation Championship Yarostavl 1957 This can be considered a classic ex- ample: a preceding pawn sacrifice for the initiative, an energetic exploitation of a lead in development, and — an attack with limited forces! 17 &\xf7!! @xi7 17..Hg8 18 WhS Bg6 19 4yh8! is also bad. 18 wyhS+ Se7 19 exdS e5 20 £4 wxd5 21 fxe5 £5 22 e6 df6 23 h4! Preparing mate at f7 or gS. 23...0.05+ 24 Qh wxeb 25 Wh6+ Black resigns. Rudolf Spielmann called such a sac- rifice "preventive" — after it the king does indeed lose the opportunity of ending up in its customary and therefore safest place, and is "invited" to face the full force of the attack. Most often this draught threatens not just a cold, but terminal pneumonia...King in the Centre 3 Kupreichik-Grigorian Leningrad 1974 By a temporary pawn sacrifice Black appears to have gained good counterplay on the g-file, and is intend- ing, at the least, after 17 4)f3 2\xh4 18 Wxh4 b5 (there is no point in hurrying to restore material equality; the threat of ...b4 forces White to waste a tempo) 19 a3 4b7 to complete his develop- ment, and, more important, to create the preconditions for a counterattack, in particular on e4. All this would be right, were it not for the fact that the black king is still in the centre, and that White has the possibility of "inviting" it to face the storm. 17 |xf7! Oxf? The interposition of 17...4\xh4 18 Wxh4 @xf7 changes little: after 19 Wh7+ Bg7 20 QhS+ Bf 21 wh8+ Bg8 22 Axf6+ Black loses immedi- ately, while 19...f8 is insufficient, if only because of 20 4\d5!, renewing the threat of 4h5. 18 xf6 Axf6 19 Bd5! Preventing the black queen from switching to the centre or the kingside, where it could have taken on the role of central defender. 19...b5 Not through choice: if 19..W4d8 White has both 20 Hg5 with the irre- sistible threat of {1h5, and 20 Axd6 We? 21 Hd5 exd5 22 Bdxf6+ wxf6 23 Hxf6+ @xf6 24 ¥d6+, which is also good enough to win. And 19... exd5 20 4)xd5 Wd8 21 Bxf6+ is sim- ilar to this second variation. 20e5 20 Bg5, as given above, would have been more quickly decisive, but on the other hand White now attacks “with checks". 20...dxe5 21 Hxf6+ gxf6 22 Hed+ ET 23 WE2+ He7 24 wyl6+ Ph7 25 Se5+ Hh6 26 Bd3 wel+ 27 Adi Whd 28 8h3 wxh3 29 {7+ Ph7 30 gxh3 Qd7 31 h4 Be7 32 nS Hf4 33 QE Dad 34 whos He8 35 wh8+ Sxf7 36 wyxa8, and White soon real- ised his material advantage. Tal-Sveshnikov 4lst USSR Ch., Moscow 19734 Attack with Mikhail Tal Objectively speaking, White does not need to hurry, since he has ach- jeved all that he could dream of: he has brought his central attacker, the knight at e5, into a striking position, he has his sights set on e6, and his queen's rook and queen are both active. In addition, the advanced h-pawn hinders Black's castling, and therefore 12 0-0 was perfectly possible, in order to begin the assault a move later. But what chess player will defer his enjoy- ment without extreme necessity? 12 &xf7! @xf7 13 Axe6+ G8 The bishop is taboo ~ 13...8xe6 14 Wed+ (a “left hook"), winning imme- diately. 140-0 14 eS Qxhl 15 exf6 is also suffi- cient, when both 15...gxf6 16 Hxd7 and 15...)xf6 16 Bxd8+ Hxd8 17 f3 give White a great advantage. 14..%c8 15 Bxd7 4xd7 16 Hdl Ac6 17 HdS tyb7 18 e5 Ye, and now White had a straightforward win by 19 Qxd7+ ¥yxd7 20 e6 Wxd5 (otherwise 21 4)c7+) 21 HxdS Qxd5 22 WeS5 Sc6 23 wWe7 (but not 23 Wyxe7? BfB 24 Ac7 4 £6) 23....b5 24 c4 Qxc4 25 9.d6, or the more prosaic 25 ¥¥c6+, with mate in three moves. Today the episode, known in its time as the "Argentine tragedy", has been largely forgotten. It cecurred in the 14th round of the Géteborg Interzonal Tournament, 1955, when by the will of the draw an unusual USSR v. Argen- tina match took place: Geller had White against Panno, Keres against Najdorf, and Spassky against Pilnik. Specially for that day, the Argenti grandmasters prepared an innovation in a well known variation of the - Sicilian Defence. Here Black struck the flank blow 9...g5, and after 10 fxg5 he continued 10...4)fd7, planning to regain the pawn and obtain the "eternal" eS square for © his knight. After this his f7 pawn ” would be securely defended, and time © would be gained for the development © of his queenside forces. Black's plan could have been fully justified, had not for an instant the hS- 8 diagonal been weakened and his e6 | insufficiently defended. The first to notice this was Yefim Geller. Abs! Aimed indirectly against the black ~ outpost at e5; to support it with the other knight from c6 will not now be - possible. 13...43e5 This continuation, prepared in ad- vance, loses, as does 13.97, played by the other Argentine grandmasters, The strongest defence was found much © later, after a debate in virtually all the _ 11 2yxe6(!) fxe6 12 whS+ BIB 13 -King in the Centre 5 world's chess magazines. It consists in 13...4hn7!, covering f7 in a different way, when after 14 0-0+ @g8 15 96 Hg7 16 Af? Qxh4 17 wxh6 Axf7 18 exf7+ @xf7? 19 wh7+ Ge8 White either gives perpetual check, or contin- ues the attack with 20 ¥yh5+ @f8 21 Hfl+ Qf6 22 e5, although here too Black nevertheless has a draw. 14 fg31 Essential accuracy. After the move order 14 0-0+ @g8! 15 4.23 the offen- sive could have been parried by 15... hxg5! But now it is all over! 14...2.xg5 Alas, here 14...@g8 is met by 15 GixeS dxeS 16 tyg6+, while 14.7 loses to 15 AxeS+ dxeS 16 0-0 wWe8 17 Hes! 15 0-04 He7 16 AxeS wyb6+ Nothing is changed by 16...9e3+ 17 Bhi dxeS 18 WxeS Ad4 19 dd5+ Wyxd5 20 wc7+. 17 @hi dxeS 18 Wi7+ Bd6 19 Had1+ wyd4 If 19.5 White wins quickly by 20 Wf2+, mating. 20 Bxd4+ exd4 21 e5+ GcS A rare, pure mate in the centre of the board results after 21...@xe5 22 We. 22 tye7+ 06 23 Axc6 Black resigns: 23...bxc6 24 Wa5+ Sc4 25 b3 mate. The other two games concluded in similar fashion. Of course, in the next diagram White has the possibility of further activating his forces - his king's rook, but in this time Black will endeavour to simplify the position, in particular by ...Ad8. Bringing up the knight by 17 most 4e4 is parried by the natural and strong centralisation of the queen — 17..¥¥e5!, and so White resorts to a typical solution: Nezhmetdinov-Suetin Russian Federation Ch., 1947 17 Qxe6! fxe6 18 tyxe6+ fe7 After the alternative defence 18... We? White has a choice between 19 Wb3 Qe7 20 Bgl (but not 20 Hel eS 21 Bxe5 Wyxe5 22 wWxb7 0-0, when the advantage passes to Black) 20...8f8 21 He4, and the more con- vincing 19 wf5S! c8 20 wWf3! Black still cannot castle, 20...Ha7 is met by 21 Se4, and after 20...Wyc7 all the white forces unite with 21 Hel+ 9e7 22 Hgt HfS 23 wWhS+ @d8 24 He? He8 25 4d5! wyaS 26 xe7! (or 26 eyxe8+) 26.,.eyxh5 27 4)xc6 mate! 19 Hed AeS 20 Af6+ HB 21 Hd7! Another typical decision: Black's central defender — his light-square bishop, is removed from the game, We Shall be studying this procedure in detail in a later chapter.6 Attack with Mikhail Tal 21..4xd7 22 Sxd7+ @e8 23 56+ Bas Or 23.8 24 Higl!, and by the threat of mate at g8 White wins both black rooks. But what is he to do now, since Black has prepared 24...47b6 ? 24 Be2t! This decides the game. 24.0986 25 Hdl Wxdl+ 26 Hxd1 Axf6 27 eyxf6+ He7 28 we7+ Hb6 29 c4, and a few moves later Black resigned. Sometimes it is not so easy to ap- proach e6, but any "customs duties” will be recovered on the way. There are many examples, of which one of the most striking is a game from more than half a century ago. Ravinsky-Panov Moscow 1943 The player with a lead in develop- ment is obliged to attack. But there is simply no other target, other than e6, and it appears to be quite securely co- vered by the black knights. Securely? 20 Hxd7!! é)xd7 21 )xe6 fxe6 22 Wre6+ The result is the same, the only dif- 5 ference being that White has had to : pay a higher price. 3 22.4.7 i The king cannot escape from the centre: 22..0)d8 23 Qe5+ Bc7 24. We6+ Bb8 25 Af4+ Bc7 26 AxcI+ ¥yxc7 27 ¥yaB mate. / 23 Hel wWe5 In this way Black coordinates his forces and takes control of the impor- tant g5 square, since it is clear that” White cannot manage without includ- - ing his reserves in the attack. The other defence against the i mediate mate, 23...2)b6, is weaker on account of the overloading of the black queen. White quickly wins by 24 §5 (24 e3 allows Black to defend by giving up his knight — 24... Yyd7; this is where the price, paid by White for the sacrifice on ¢6, tells) 24...c7 25 Ac6+ Hf8 26 He3, and Black has n adequate defence against 27 Bf3+. 24 b4! Destroying Black's coordination. With 24...Wxb4 he loses control over g5, and after 25 @ 25 he does not hav the defence 25...\f6. Nevertheless, ac- cording to analysis by grandmaster Reuben Fine, it was in this line that _ Black should have sought salvation: 25..¥yxel+! (once again reminding — White that in his attack he has not © sacrificed, as usual, a minor piece, but — a whole rook!) 26 Wxel 4\f6 27 Web - Exc2 28 Qcb+ iB 29 Wc8+ Hf7 30 Wyxh8 Axc6 31 Axf6 Qxf6 32 ¥yxh7, and there is still a lot of play to come. After the move in the game Black's king remains for ever under fire. 24.498 25 Wed tyc3 26 Hxe7+! |King in the Centre 7 Leaving the king totally exposed. 26...Qxe7 27 Ae5+ Od6 The alternative was 27.,.@e8 28 Wye2+! @f7 (28...Qd7 29 te7 mate) 29 Qd5+ Bg6 30 wet+ Bxgs 31 Wide PhS 32 {7+ g6 33 wh4 mate. 28 Wdl+! Gc7 29 Alf4+ Hb6 30 Wd6+ Ha7 31 wWe7+ Be? 32 Axc7 Yyal+ 33 Qf Ag6 34 ¥yc5+ Qb7 35 a5, and Black did not in fact succeed in avoiding mate, LD. Misha, the whole world knows of that unusual ease with which you "squander" material in an attack. J rea- lise that this ease is purely superficial, yet is there a limit to your generosity, is there an inner censor, which some- times places a veto on tempting attack- ing ideas? M.T. I hope that we are talking not about those attacks, that are calculated to the end, but about those, in the cor- ': rectness of which one is persuaded by experience, knowledge and intuition? I once discussed this with grandmaster Yefim Geller, and we generally agreed that in intuitive attacks there is a limit to the amount of material that can be sacrificed. LD. That is what the Tal of the early 1990s thinks, But what did, say, the Tal of 1960, the World Champion, think? M.T. Mmmm... If you were to give me that Tal now, I would show him what's what, No, Geller is right: if for an attack on the king you have to give up a piece for one or two pawns, and there is the prospect, even in the ab- sence of a mate, of winning two pieces for a rook, then there is nothing to think about. If you sacrifice a rook for a pawn, it would be good at least to be sure of perpetual check. Of course, this is the most abstract viewpoint, and in concrete terms you could have, for ex- ample, two minor pieces and positional compensation for a queen, LD. In short, if the beauty of a com- bination does not depend, as one of the old writers said, on the “thickness” of the sacrificed piece... M.T. ... then in an attack one still has to make one's demands commensu- rate with one's possibilities. And don't Took at me like that: I have been an ex- World Champion for 30 years! The e6 square may also provide the altar for a "free" offering: a piece in- trudes in here with the same idea - of enticing the black pawn away from f7, thereby opening the h5-e8 diagonal. Tal-Bilek Amsterdam Interzonal 1964 The rejoinder 15 )e6 is logical and quite correct: after 15...fxe6 16 Wyh5+ Qd7 17 ¥yg4 the black king's path to a7 is blocked, and White has numerous threats, including 18 ¥¥xg7 and 19 d6,8 Attack with Mikhail Tal or 18 d6 immediately. 15.496 16 )xg7+ YB 17 Hest Bed Here in the event of 17...fxe6 the black king is completely defenceless. 18 Bhfl 95+ 19 @bi bS 20 whs Af4 21 b3 a5 22 2yc7+! The quickest, although 22 a4 or even 22 g3 is quite sufficient. 22...¥9xe7 23 d6, and Black re- signed, since on 23...W¥d7 there would have followed the obvious 24 Hxf4 exfa 25 wes+. An alternative to the direct blow against a king in the centre is the at- tack on it from the flank. In practice this most often reduces to the attacking pieces breaking through to g7 (usually the queen} or on the a4-e8 diagonal (again, usually the queen). M.T. Of course, we are formulating things somewhat abstractly, rather in the style of Mikhail Moiseyevich (Bot- vinnik - LD.) but, strangely enough, a great variety of attacks reduce to this... LD. In your games too! Ae a Tal-Vooremaa Tallinn 1971 14 We The only possibility of maintaining the initiative, even if at the cost of a piece: after 14 fxeS Qxe5 15 c3 d6 Black has nothing to fear. 14...exd4 15 Yyxg7 HFS 16 e5 Ge7 17 £5 £6 : Otherwise White himself would ad- vance his pawn to this square. 18 4f4 Bf7 19 exf6! Hes The queen is clearly immune — after 19...Axg7 20 fxg7 @f7 21 £6 the threats of 22 4+ and 22 Qh7 are irresistible, and also after 21...xf6 - 22 xhS. 20 eat Diverting the knight both from the e-file, and away from g6 square beside the king, from where in certain var- iations the queen will continue the attack. 20...£)xe4 21 We8+ G8 Or 21...f8 22 We6+ Hf? 23 2yd5 Wyd6 24 fxe7 Wxd5 25 f6. 22 2)xh5 Again threatening a blow from the flank. 22...4)d6 23 Hael+ @d8 24 He! This essentially concludes the game. 24.NYDS 25 Hfel ¥d5 26 |fd — Wxa2 27 Heb+ Wxeb : After 27..dxe6 28 Axf7 2)xf7 29 WxfB+ Bc7 30 Wxi7+ bb 31 fxe6 - in the near future White will obtain as many queens as he wants. 28 fxe6 Hxf6 29 resigns, In the next diagram Black is inten- ding to complete his queenside dev- elopment with gain of tempi, after ” which he will have at least equal — chances. The hopes for White, who up HI7 BlackKing in the Centre 9 till now has been conducting an attack through the centre, involve a flank continuation of it. Tal-Gufeld Gori 1968 20 £)xb5! cxb5 21 @.xb5+ 4)d7 22 Hdl We7 The best defence was 22...Q¢7, af- ter which White appears to have noth- ing better than to go into an equal end- game: 23 Wyh8+ £8 24 Se5 wyxgs 25 Gxd7+ Qxd? 26 Axd7 we4+ 27 @xf2 wad) 28 Wxf8+ Sxd7 29 ¥yxa8, But now the black king is drawn out into the firing line. 23 Hxd7! Qxd7 24 Qxd74+ &xd7 25 Wd5+ Qe7 26 wyxa8 wyc5 27 3, and White's pawn preponderance de- cided the outcome. The same idea is embodied in the illustrative game Tal-Larsen (p.24), but for the moment here is another typical flank operation by White. There is a second theme - the intrusion of the heavy pieces onto the 7th rank, but it is only extremely rarely that any procedures occur in pure form. Botvinnik-Euwe The Hague/Moscow 1948 The position is very sharp. The white rook has occupied the open file, and for the moment — but not for ever — the black king is stuck in the centre. ‘On the other hand, Black has an excel- lent bishop and a phalanx of central pawns. In short, after the retreat of the knight each side will have his chances. But, as it turns out, the retreat is not obligatory, since White has a different way of proceeding. 22 Wye3! fxe5 23 Wyg7 BIB 24 He7 The invasion has taken place, mates at d7 and e7 are threatened, and the bishop is "hanging" — things are bad for Black. He fails to save the game by 24...84d6 25 Bxb7 d3 26 Ha7 tyd8 27 ¥yxh7, with unavoidable mating threats. Therefore he gave up his queen — 24...%yxe7, but was soon forced to resign. In all these cases the path for the attacking queen to land a "right hook” was already open. The same goal may be achieved, if first the way has to be10 Auack with Mikhail Tal cleared by an advance of the pawns. The subsequent invasion of the pieces can then usually be supported by the far-advanced infantry. Nezhmetdinov-Paoli Bucharest 1953 This position also illustrates to an equal degree the next theme of our dis- cussion: how incautious it is to vol- untarily leave the king in the centre. True, kingside castling is not possible here — White is well prepared for an attack on this area of the board, but the "normal" 12...4)e5 (essential now or ‘on the following move to neutralise the queen's X-ray pressure on f7) 13 eye2 0-0-0 would have given the game a “normal” course. But Black, hoping for a counterattack, leaves his king in the centre, and White lands an energetic knock-out blow from the flank. 12...c8? 13 g5 hxgs 14 hxg5 Hes 15 Wg2! Ags (15...Hfg4 16 WF4) 16 f4 2)c4 17 Qxed Wxed 18 £5 bS 19 BHb1 b4 20 g6! eS After 20...bxc3 21 gxf7+ @xf7 White wins most simply by the direct 22 Wyxg7+ Be8 23 wyxh8, although he also has the more elegant 22 b3! ¥¥c7 : 23 Wyg6+ GPS 24 fxe6, mating. Bur now f7 is defended by the queen, and the white knights are attacked... 21 b3t Now, in contrast to 21 4\d5, Black does not have time to block the posi- tion by 21.,.f6. 21...8yxc3 22 gxt7+ Ged8 23 Wyxe7 exd4 24 4 xd4! The quickest, most accurate (weav- ing a mating net) and prettiest solution. © 24..Wyxe2+ 25 gal Bh2 26 Ab6+ | Be7 27 wyxg8+ Black resigns, since he is mated i two moves, White's play was rewarded - by the first brilliancy prize. 2 Uh, Vi, BS RAE Z DG g ROW OT, He Hay 2 7 Ei Larsen-Spassky "Match of the Century" Belgrade 1970 Black has the initiative, but at first ” sight it appears difficult to approach the white king. Of course, it can be forced to remain for ever in the centre, but the price for this (11...Bxd2 12. )xd2 4xe3 13 yyc3 Bd8) is perhaps -King in the Centre 11 | too great. And so Black begins an attack from the flank. 11...h5 12 h3. Practically forced. Firstly, because the knight, which has been "launched into the penalty area" (we will be talk- ing about this attacking procedure later, in Chapter 3) cannot be tolerated tor long, and secondly, because the concrete 12 4c3 is refuted by the equally concrete 12...8xd2!!, when after 13 Wyxd2 Qxe3 14 we2 Gf2+ White has to part with his queen. 12...h4! 13 hxgd The interposition of 13 Qxg4 Gxg4 and now 14 hxg4 would have led to variations, similar to those that oc- curred in the game: 14.,.hxg3 15 Bgl Bht!! 16 Bxhl g2 17 Kgl what 18 We2 Wxged+ 19 Wel we3+ 20 He2 (or 20 dl Wf2 21 Wxed wyrxgl+ 22 c2 wyf2, winning) 20...¥9f3+ 21 Bel {1e7, when the outcome is decided. 13...hxg3 14 Bgl Bhi!! 15 Rxht 2.16 BEL There is no choice: if 16 Rgi Black has the decisive 16...xyh4+ 17 @di Yh1 18 ¥yc3 Wyxgl+ 19 Bc2 w2. 16...Wyh4+ 17 Sdl gxfl=wy+ White resigns. After 18 xfl ALxg4+ mate is inevitable. LD. This confirms what you said in an interview, given after the "Match of the Century” in Belgrade: "Spassky... won a game, that will undoubtedly find its way into the books”... S M.T. In my opinion, only Nostra- damus has made faultless forecasts, decades and centuries beforehand. Besides, the attack from the flank was carried out brilliantly by Boris, but there was no sacrifice on f2, the theme of this section... LD. Well, what of it? All the same, examples cannot be clinically pure, procedures and themes are interwoven and, incidentally, we should now make a slight digression and jump ahead. The sacrifice on f7, drawing out the king, can also be made after it has moved away from the centre into its shelter. The double defence of this point makes it less vulnerable, of course, but even so the pawn linkage “e6 + f7" continues to draw the atten- tion of the attacking side, and nearly always requires additional defence by other pieces. Otherwise disaster can strike here. This eternal truth is sometimes for- gotten by even the most experienced grandmasters. Smirin-Smysloy 55th USSR Ch., Moscow 1988 Of course, Black stands worse, and the powerful piece outpost at e5 simply obliges him to keep an eye not only on his queenside pawn weaknesses, but also on the "e6 + f7" link of his pawn12 Attack with Mikhail Tal chain. Therefore 21...d7 was essen- tial, and if 22 2g5 4fd5, at least blocking the dangerous diagonal. 21....a67 This activity leads to disaster. 22 4)xf7! Bxf7 23 xe6 A\edS 24 &e5 Baa? 25 Bxc6 25 &xc6 wyb6 26 4)xa7 wyxa7 27 g5 would also have won. 25...4)f4 26 Bxa6! Bxa6 27 &xf7+ @h8 28 Wf Black resigns (28... Wyxd4 29 26). Kaplan-Radulescu Hungary 1980 Black is cramped over the entire front. Especially unpleasant is the rook at c7, preventing him from completing his queenside development. It would be good to send it home by 18,..2\d5, but then for an instant the black king re~ mains completely undefended, and 19 Wyh5S leads to a quick mate. Hence his natural desire to first drive away White's “central striker", also remov- ing his h7 pawn from attack. 18..h6 19 2\xf7! It turns out that now this is possible. After 19...xf7 20 .xf6 wyxe7 (20... gxf6 or 20...@xf6 allows a quick - mate) 21 wh5+ @f8 22 Qxg7+! xg] 23 wg6+ HIB 24 wyxho+ G7 25 26+ 6 from the several possi. ble mates White chose 26 Qh5+ @f: 27 Wy g6+ id 28 Wed mate. meee # ot cone ae eae nell Adorjan-Tarjan Riga Interzonal 1979 Not one of White's pieces is. “looking at the kingside. But for th moment Black's main forces too are blocked in on the left corner of the board, and so White can calmly pre- pare an attack on the classic point f7. 17 &e5t An essential prelude, planned lon; beforehand, otherwise the black knig) leaps via d7 toc5. 17...a7 18 G&h3 {a8 19 2)xf7! @xi7 Alas, forced: WB 21 sxb8. 20 Axb8 Yyxb8 21 Yyxe6+ GHe8 22° Hd? Bxd7 23 tyxd7+ @f7 24 Web+ White contents himself with perpet-: ual check. The alternative was 24 19.,.8xf7 20 Qxe6King in the Centre 13 Qe6+ Sf6 25 5 (threatening mate in one move) 25...¥¥c8 26 e5+ &g6 27 Wxe7 .xd5 28 Yyd6+ Qe6 29 Wxb6 h6 30 xa @h7 when, although in the endgame (31 ¥¥c6) Black has nothing to fear, and with the queens on the white king might come under a coun- terattack, even so White's chances look preferable. 2A... He8 25 Yyd7+ Draw agreed. And, finally, another motif may sug- gest the preparation of this typical combination: the deployment on the a2-g8 diagonal of the black rook and king, or in the following instance, of even the queen and king, Keres-Geller Budapest 1952 18 )xf7! Yyxf7 Capturing with the king would have allowed White the same possibilities, plus one more: the inclusion in the attack at the required moment of the queen from h5. 19 Qb3 Hed 20 Axed bxed 21 xed 2d5 22 Qxe7 Yxe7 (or 22... Bxe7 23 WWd2) 23 exdS tyxe2 24 Hxe2 Hxe2 25 Qxe2 Mxd5 26 a4, and in the endgame White was a pawn up. oy iy YQ, ate mits e. a Botvinnik-Vidmar Nottingham 1936 In this example the same motif dom- inates, the only difference being that the black pawn has already gone from e6, and White has acquired an addit- ional factor: along the h3-c8 diagonal his queen has its "sights" set on the took. 20 £)xf7! Eixf7 Things are very simple after 20... Bxf7 21 Axd5+. 21 Axf6 Axf6 (or 21...Hxf6 22 Hxf6 and 23 Yyxc8) 22 Bxd5 tYyc6 23 dé! Avoiding a little trap: 23 eS O.xd4+, when White has to agree to a draw. 23...¥e8 24 Bd7 Whereas now Black resigned. But let us return to the main theme of this chapter - the attack on the king, caught in the centre. In all primers, even those for beginners, this factor is14 Attack with Mikhail Tal mentioned as a sure indicator of a possible attack. There is probably no sense in once again listing all those difficulties that a king, remaining on its initial square, causes its troops. They are weli known. But also known is this paradoxical fact: for centuries, in one toumament after another, their partict- pants forget to concern themselves about their king, and in such instances the response of the opponent can and should be appropriate. In short, it must be said again and again: the king in the centre is the signal for an attack. Because a delay in evacuating the king can cost a player very dearly. RA] Ue YA a) Y), Ay Nezhmetdinov-A.Zaitsev Kazan 1964 Here, for the first time, Black should have castled, maintaining equa- lity: 11...0-0 12 @c4 Bd8 13 0-0 @h8, or 12 c4 4c7, when White's light- square bishop is not too well placed. But Black was tempted by something different. 11...e5 12 0-0 He7 13 Ac4 Now, even after the exchange of queens, it becomes uncomfortable in the centre for the king: 13..uxd2 14 - 4)bxd2, with the threat of e4-d6+. 13...b5 14 Qb3 Ea6 15 wye2 Hed 16 Hdl Yyc6 17 Ae2 He6 Castling would now be bad: 17. 0-0? 18 b4 4)b7 19 Ged ee8 20 a4 bxad 21 Yye4+ BF7 (21..49f7 loses a piece after 22 Wyc7) 22 a3, and there is literally nothing that Black can — move. 18 Hbd2 Bd8? This second voluntary rejection of castling, for the sake of simplification, leaves Black on the verge of disaster. 19 b3 Bxdl+ 20 Wxdl 2yb7? This third rejection of castling leads to a crushing defeat, although for his © previous errors Black would have had to suffer mounting difficulties in the variation 20...0-0 21 AxcS Wxe5 22 © Ae3 We7 23 4b3. 21 a4 a6 22 axbS axbS Black is not afraid of the check at a8: there would appear to be no way of | approaching his king at f7. But... : 23 4ybd4t exd4 24 4)xd4 wWd7 25 Syxe6 Wxe6 26 Ha8+ 4)c8 Alas, the f7 square has become - "mined" on account of the weakening - of the a2-g8 diagonal. : 27 Qb3 wd7 28 We2+ Hds 29 | Le6 Bes Is everything in order? ; 30 Hxc8+! eyxc8 31 Wydl+ We7 32 - Axc8 Hxc8 33 Ye2+ Black resigns. (see diagram next page) After playing the opening without any particular pretensions, White should have concemed himself about his king - 10 Ge2 and 11 0-0.King in the Centre 15 Gromek-Veresov Poland y. Belorussia 1954 But the premature sortie 10 4a5 placed him on the verge of disaster, especially after 10...c8 11 Qe2. Now came a piece sacrifice. 11...2)xd5! 12 exdS S\b4 13 dxeé The game would have lasted longer after 13 c4 @f5 14 Qd4 Qxd4 15 Qxd4 42+, but with the same result. 13..£)xe2+ 14 BZ Hxe3 15 Wxe3 Yyb6+ 16 Hdd Or 16 @d3 Qh6 17 ext?+ Bxf7 18 4\d4 Wab+ 19 Bed d5+! 20 Sxds Wd6+ 21 ed Aras, 16..8xe6 17 td3 Ee2! Not the only continuation, but the most efficient. Now 18...Qxd4+ is threatened, and if 19 tyxd4 Hixe2+. 18 Hhdi Bxb2 19 £4 e5 20 fxeS dxe5 21 wyce4+ @h8 22 263 Hb4 23 WadS Bxd4 24 ¥yxb7 He4+! White resigns. But, as a tule, a king does not re- © main in the centre voluntarily: it has to be forced to do so, and not “for free". The price may vary: from sacrifices to positional concessions, which may be very diverse. zy ea iw tet spcole Nezhmetdinov-Tal 29th USSR Championship, Baku 1961 Here such a concession was 15 4)h6, which seems to place the white knight into an offside position, This was the reaction of one of the authors, who decided at this point to “punish” the opponent for his anti-positional decision. In principle this would have been right, had not the audacious knight covered all these drawbacks with one trump: it blocks the king's path to a secure shelter, 15...2)€6 16 222 e717 Sxf6t To the positional "sacrifice" is added a normal one, but now the inva- sion at dS becomes possible. 17..8xf6 18 dS wyd8 19 wiz sf? White would have encountered greater difficulties had Black first played 19....xd5 (now or on the next move), when there appears to be no clear-cut win. For example: 20 exd516 Attack with Mikhail Tal SD f4 21 Axf4 exf4 22 wWxf4 wb6+ 23 Bhi 0-0-0 24 c3!! (the direct ex- change of blows 24 xf7 #xb2 25 Afl AhfS 26 ¥yb4 {97 27 Dxd8 Axfl+ 28 Qxfl wf2 29 Gh3 leaves Black with the advantage after 29... Wf+ 30 gl wxd5, but not 29... 047 30 g5+ Hxd8 31 wd6+ etc., when White wins) 24...Ahf&8 25 g5 Re7 26 Bh3+ Gb7 27 Axf7 Ba7! 28 $26, and although White has a serious advantage, there is still a struggle in prospect. 20 {xf4 exf4 21 eS! AxeS Alas, Black is obliged to open the central files, along which he comes under attack, 21...Qh4 is very strongly met by 22 Wed4!t, with the threat of e5-e6, and after 22...8f8 23 Hdl xd5 24 Axd5 Ac8 25 wa7 We7 26 #xa6 White must win, since 26...¥9xc2 is bad on account of 27 Qxf7+ Hxf7 28 wye6+ He7 29 wWe8+. If 21...4g5 White has time for 22 \fo+ Sf 23 Axb7 Hbs 24 Of3 Axh6 25 Hdl we7 26 wh4 497 27 Dd7+ BHe8& 28 wW2 HcB 29 wd, when Black cannot parry the numerous threats, the chief of which is 30 1b7 Ac7 31 axa6. And after 21...9xd5 all the same the e-file is opened, and White wins the queen: 22 exf6! xg2 23 Hel+. 22 Hel £6 23 Sxfé+! wxf6 24 Wad! @f8 25 Axe5 wd8 Or 25...d8 26 He8+! Qg7 27 Be7+. 26 Bf5+ gxf5 27 wxh8+ we7 28 We27+ Seb 29 gxf5+ Black resigns. This ability — to prevent the oppo- nent from removing his king to safety — was also possessed by the top play- 2 ers in the earlier era of romantic chess. P.Morphy-E.Morphy USA 1850 12 e5! dxe5 13 Bfel Ad7 14 Babi © The black king has not been allowed : across to the kingside, but on the queenside too it will evidently be un-- comfortable. But there is no alterna- tive. : 14...0-0-0 15 a6! Had 16 Hect Ac6 17 eyxa5 bxa6 18 eyxa6+ Hd7 19 &ixc6 and White won (19...2xc6" 20 Hdl +). 3 LD. However, let us leave in peace the shadows of our great predecessors. « Their opponents played rather naive. chess, and on the whole they defended: weakly (here, for example, more tena- cious was 15...bxa6 16 ¥yb3 Se4 17. ¥yb7+ Bd7 18 Hbdl+ e8 19 Hxd8+ Bxd8! 20 wa8+ Ac8 21 Bdl+ sda, although White still retains an attack -- 22 Yyd5+). More instructive, in my op- inion, are modern games even at the le- vel of masters, to say nothing of grand- masters, candidates and champions.King in the Centre 17 M.T. Alas, I am forced to agree. In my youth I gained enormous pleasure from examining the games of the old masters, but when the so-called “Tal School" opened in Riga, at the very first meeting £ said to my young friends: “For pleasure you can read the games collections of Anderssen and Chigorin, but for benefit you should study Tarrasch, Keres and Bronstein." In modem chess the art of defence has grown greatly, and it is becoming increasingly difficult to win a won pos- ition. But the basic principles of attack are eternal. Moreover, the assault need not necessarily resemble a meteorite, be instantaneous and be calculated from beginning to end: the king in the centre can be the target of a lengthy, multi-stage offensive, with one phase logically developing into another. An example — and a brilliant one! is provided by the following game. Chiburdanidze-Dvoiris Tallinn 1980 White is fully mobilised, and essen- tially cannot even strengthen the placing of her pieces: they are ex- tremely actively placed. Black, by con- trast, has made several “superfluous” pawn moves, his queen has gone to b6 in two moves, and as a result not all his forces are in play. And yet he needs only one tempo for queenside cast- ling... The player with the advantage is obliged to attack! 12 4d5!! exd5 The other knight is taboo: 12... Wyxd4? 13 Q.xf6 exf6 14 2xb5 and 15 xf6+. 13 Het Before opening the c-file, White cuts off the black king's escape to the saving shelter at c7, 13...4xc6 The attacking file cannot be kept closed: 13...d4 14 e5! 14 exdS+ Ge? (14.08 15 dxc6 4c5 16 c7+) 15 dxc6 AcS 16 A xf6 gxf6 17 £51 And once again the black king has nowhere to go. 17..89¢7 Forced, since Black has to defend both his bishop, and his d6 pawn, and also the advanced white pawn has to be blocked. 18 b4 Ae6 19 Wh5 427 20 Ad7+ Erecting a barrier in front of Black's queen, which is obliged to look after his bishop, 20...@f8 21 Wh6 aS The main point is to bring the queen out to d6, but in passing Black sets a little trap. 22 Hxe7! @xe7 23 Hel+! The trap —~ 23 Qyxg7? wyxf4+ 24 bl Hag’, when Black wins — fails to operate.18 Attack with Mikhail Tal 23...Q18 24 wxf6 Gg8 25 He7 BS 26 Aec6! It's all over! 26..89xe7 27 tyxe7 fxe6 Or 27...2)xe6 28 £5 \g7 29 c7. 28 c7 h5 29 ¥yxf8+ Black resigns. This theme received a quite amazing interpretation in the following world- famous game, M.T. I am happy to admit that 1 watched this game with envy, and would have readily exchanged my silver medal of that championship for the right to sign the scoresheet — the white half, of course. LD. And when White's next move was announced in the press centre, we decided that the impregnable Ratmir Kholmoy, the "central defender" as he was then called, had for a moment taken leave of his senses. Kholmov-Keres 26th USSR Championship Thilisi 1959 12 Heé(!!) The following variation is not too complicated: 12..%9xd1?2_ 13 Hixdl G&b7 (or 13....d7) 14 45, when: 14.....xc6 is bad in view of 15 &\c7+. Sf8 16 )xa8 Qxa8 17 Hd8 mate, and | otherwise after 14...0-0 White simply | picks up the e7 pawn with check. But» Black has another possibility. 4 12...%d7()) 4 ‘This is what was played, and how: can White now save his piece? 13 Axe7t! z Once again two exclamation marks, , although this is merely a continuation: of White's brilliant conception. White: forces the black king to remain in the centre, since in the event of 13..%yxe7 14 AdS Wd8 15 |fo+ Oxf (or, 15..e7 16 WE3 Ge6 17 25, and Black loses material) 16 exf6+ 9e6. 17 Axh6 Wxf6 18 Yye4! without sac-. sificing anything White has a powerful: initiative, which is merely strengthened by the opposite-colour bishops. And: totally bad is 13..¥yxd1 14 Bxdl. @xe7 15 Be5+ Beb 16 Hd6+ BS (16..<@xe5 17 Bd5+, mating) 17 £4, with various mating threats. 13..xe7 14 Axho! 3 Again a paradoxical decision. The. bishop, which was predestined for an’ attack along the weakened dark squares, is exchanged for the "off- side" knight. s M.T. But on the other hand, a major: attacking principle is maintained — "a. tempo". The time that we don't have i: more precious than the piece that we do have. . 14... xh6 15 ¥f3 Ag7! 3 The best defence. Now after 16. Wyxa8 Qb7 17 Wyxa7 cb 18 £3 Bad | 19 A\d5+ Wyxd5 20 wyxb6 the outcome is unclear.King in the Centre 19 16 HdS+ Gas Forced, since Black loses quickly after both 16..@e8 17 f6+ Axf6 18 exf6+ and 19 ¥yxa8, and 16...@f8 17 6 Wb7 18 27+ Hes 19 wi! 17 Badl Qb7 To find the strongest continuation 17...4¥b7 at the board would be practi- cally impossible, in view of its para- doxical nature. True, even in this case after 18 e6! White has a very strong attack, e.g. 18...fxe6 19 b4+ @c7 20 Yye3+ e5 21 BxeS! exb4 22 HcS+, mating. 18 ¥yb3 c6 19 4)xb6 axb6 20 Wt? QxeS 21 Hxd7+ Qxd7 22 Zixe5, and White won. More complicated are instances when both sides appear to have the right to play actively, and when it is ore difficult to decide: should one ‘ontinue attacking or now switch to lefence? Here the deciding role is layed by an accurate appraisal of all ne factors "for" and “against”. sanans ae ow aca Karpov-Yusupov S5th USSR Championship Moscow 1988 Both kings have lost the right to castle, and, in addition, the positions of each side have their pluses and mi- nuses. White, for example, is for the moment playing without his king's rook, and at least three tempi are re- quired to bring it into the game. Black, for his part, is clearly weak on the dark squares, but he only needs to bring his king to £6, when he could think of seizing the initiative. This could have happened, for example, after 16 Yya3+ fo 17 Qd3 yd5 18 Wyxa7 Bed!, or 16 Qxe6 fxe6 17 Wa3+ G6 18 ¥yxa7?? Wyb5+ 19 @gl Ba winning, or 16 Sg5 QB! (here 16...@f6 is weaker in view of the concrete 17 &xe6 fxe6 18 Se4+, when White wins the exchange) [7 4)xe6+ fxe6 18 Qxe6 Wyb5+ 19 Sel He7! with coun- terplay; in this last variation 17 gxe6 fxe6 18 Dxe6+ Wc8B 19 wyb3 He7! also favours Black. ‘The correct evaluation of the posi- tion is only established by the typical attacking device carried out by the ex- World Champion. 16 d51 At the cost of the isolated pawn the black queen's path to bS is cut, and more important -- the weak dark squares become glaringly weak! After all, now White can also attack along the long dark-square diagonal frorn c3. And another achievement for White becomes apparent on his next move. 16...cxd5 17 AbS! Revealing another target — the knight at d7, which is insufficiently protected, as best illustrated in the variation 17... @f8 18 ¥yc3 Hg8 19 44, 20 4)xe6+ and 21 @xd7.20 Attack with Mikhail Tal 17...a6 18 Wa3+ @d8 Alas, forced: 18...@f6 19 \xd7 SLxd7 20 Hye3+. 19 WyaS+ Ge7 On the queenside the king would have had altogether no defenders, and no chance of surviving: 19...ec8 20 Hicl+ Gb8 21 We7+ a8 22 Hd4 Wed 23 9 xa6! Bb8 24 wya5! wyxd4 25 $ixb7+ @xb7 26 Hc7 mate. And al- though this variation is not forced (for example, 22...4/f6 is possible), all the same the sacrifice on a6 destroys the king's shelter and wins, 20 Wh4+ BE Exploiting a tactical nuance, Black tries to save his king (21 (Qxd7 ¥d3+), but the al-h8 diagonal is on the point of collapse. 21 Wd4+ Be7 22 Gd3 whs 22..9f6 23 eyb4+ is even worse, but now in this variation the black king can try to slip away to g7 via f6. 23 h4 With the terrible threat of 24 g4. 23.808 24 £25 Renewing the same threat of 25 g4, strengthened by the possibility of 25... Wh6 26 Bxe6 fxe6 27 Af7+. 2A...BnfB 25 {e2! wyh6 26 Af3 White is effectively a queen up! 26..He7 27 tyb4 26 28 wd6+ Hd7 29 wyf4 28 (29...4727 30 Bxe6) 30 Aged HcB (30...dxg4 31 wWb8 mate) 31 §.xe6 fxe6 32 Hel+ 8 33 )xe6+ e7 34 wyxfS+ wyxfB 35 4)xf8, and White had a winning mate- rial advantage. The basic solution to this position was provided by a breakthrough in the centre, about which we will have more to say later, But the theme itself — “the attack on the king in the centre". — is practically inexhaustible, and al of the above examples are merely milestones on the way. However, sooner or later we have t draw the line, and we do this with the. following position, which as though: encapsulates the entire chapter. Ivkov-Kagan Rio Interzonal 1979 The queens are no longer on the board, neither is there any pawn ten- sion, and all the white pieces are based on their own territory, on the first three ranks. Yet with a clear conscience Blac! can resign, He did this, a little later, after 17. QNbS! cxbS 18 A xbS+ SF 19 Ah6+,. forcing mate or crushing gain of. material, 5 Here there was everything about which we talked earlier: a lead in de-~ velopment, open files and diagonals, : but most important — the opponent's king, caught in the centre.King in the Centre 2t Tal-Portisch Candidates Quarter-Final, Bled 1965 Caro-Kann Defence 1 ed 6 Strangely enough, au unexpected reply, since the Hungarian champion adopts this defence very rarely, and we for more precisely, D had somehow not thought up any plans against the Caro~ “Kann. When, during our pre-match preparations, my trainer asked me what I was intending to play against 1.06, simply replied that this de- fence would not occur, It immediately became clear that the Hungarians had carefully studied the records of my matches with Botvinnik, ‘nd therefore, without any prepared ‘mines", it would have been inex- ‘pedient to employ the variations with hQ-h4 (2 d4 dS 3 Syc3 dxed 4 |yxe4 £55 4)p3 96 6 le2 ALG 7 hd, or d4.d5 3 eS Of5 4 hd), After Portisch's first move I began rantically trying to recall which of the variations I had not hitherto employed in my tournament games. Perhaps, 2 ‘@)c3 d5 3 4)f37 It was this plan that 1 Wecided to try, especially since the ‘Hungarian grandmaster had never played against it. 2 Hc3 a5 3 fs dxed ". This reply shows that White's choice was a happy one. [email protected] has long ‘been considered best here, not yielding White an inch in the centre. Who knows, perhaps Portisch did not like the variation 4 83 Qxf3 5 gxf3!?, as I played in the third game of my first thatch with Botvinnik? But now White makes the advance d2-d4 unhindered, obtaining a slight but enduring advan- tage. 4 axed gt 5 3 xfs 6 Wx QdaT 7 a4 Deis 8 Ad3 Axed S wrxed 6 10 0-0 16 ¢3 is perhaps more accurate, in order to retreat the queen to e2 after it is attacked. White, however, has some- thing different in mind... 10... 11 3 eT ate ‘The first critical position. Portisch’s reasoning is clear: Black has a slightly passive position, but one that White will be hard-pushed to crack. He handles such pesitions with great precision. New the follawing natural plan sug- gests itself for White: t¥e2, then @d2 or sf4, when after the obligatory ...c5 and the exchange on c5 he obtains a queenside pawn majority plus the two bishops —- Black faces a gruelling22 Attack with Mikhail Tal defence. And I, of course, realised that 12 We2 was a natural and strong move. But nevertheless J was attracted by another idea. 12 wh4 This provokes Black's reply: WW... ds In a number of variations Black strengthens his defences by the ma- noeuvre ...2)f6-d7-f8, but now from d5 it is difficult for the knight to reach f8. However, this is achieved at the cost of several tempi, and Black has time to stabilise the position. 13° wed Af Not, of course, 13...0-0 14 gh6 S16 15 te4, winning the exchange. 14 Hel Initially 1 had been intending to complete the queen manoeuvre by 14 wed, keeping the black king in the centre, but then I noticed that after 14...2)e7 followed by ...2f5 White's initiative would quickly peter out. Allowing Black to castle is by no means evidence of White's good nature — after 14...0-0 he succeeds in advan- tageously regrouping his pieces: 15 Qh6 Be8 16 Had] ¥yb6 17 fic}, when the bishop returns to what is perhaps its best position, and the rook is actively placed in the centre. So Portisch prevents the development of White's queenside: 14... Wb6 The second critical position. Up till now Portisch had played quickly and confidently. White has clearly not achieved what he could have expected from the opening: the queen is pressing on the b2 pawn, pinning down the bishop at cl. Therefore “correct” (one. can also write it without the inverted commas) was the reserved 15 a3, with the hope, in a protracted struggle, of. exploiting the illustrious bishop pair. All this is true. But for 14 moves the black king has remained with impunity. in the centre of the board, Is there no. way of exploiting this and at the same time abruptly changing the course of. the game? This was how the idea arose of the: rook sacrifice at e6. An amusing variation flashed though my mind — ‘one that was by no means forced, but. highly camouflaged, which afforded a® certain aesthetic pleasure. And I con- cluded that, even if the sacrifice might. lead only to a draw, it was correct, and. in addition the change in the character of the play was bound to be unpleasant for Portisch. 15 cA?! On 15...4e7 [ was intending to play. eyb4 16 d5! cxd5 17 cxd5 2xd5 18 wads, at least preventing Black from castling. 16 Bxe6+ fxe6 17) Wyxe6+Here Black was faced with the problem of how to punish his opponent for his "recklessness". It is clear that this aim is least of all answered by ~ 17...d8: White has 18 ¥yd6+ Bes 19 ¥Ye6+ etc. I did not see anything better during the game, nor do I now. My hopes were mainly associated with the "refutation" 17...¢.e7, when White does indeed lose after 18 125 We7 19 Bel 2xd3! 20 xe? wd7! - Le can, however, obtain a very attract- ve position by interposing 18 G.g6+!, when Black cannot play 18...hxg6 19 $125 We7 20 Bel with the threat of 21 Yxg6+! Therefore he must reply 18... dB 19 FS eYyxd4 (not 19...¥¥c7 20 G4 We8 21 Wed) 20 f4. This position greatly appealed to me, and a ‘ontinuation of the variation (not ex- actly forced, it is true) revealed a most itiractive idea: 20...Ge8 21 Hel g6? 2 ge3 Wd6 23 Qxa7! wyrxed 24 Ab6+ Bc8 (not 24...d7 25 Axe6+ (d6 26 c5 mate) 25 G@xe6+ and 26 ‘Sid7. However, in this variation too lack could have defended. : After the game Portisch admitted hat he had seen the rook sacrifice, but ind not considered it dangerous; and When it in fact took place, he became It at ease. Only this nervousness can xplain why he instantly, without hinking, replied 17... fs was even upset: so much time and fort had been spent on the analysis of lhe most complex and attractive vari- tions, and not one of them was to cur On the board... 18 afa Bas The only good move. Insufficient is King in the Centre 23 18...Be8 19 Qd6+ Ge7 20 Bel wd 21 He3!, or 18..4¥d8 19 Hel gS! 20 £.d6+ $g7 21 Qxb4, when White has a very strong attack with level mate- rial, By parting with his queen, Black can face the future with confidence. 19 5 &)xd3! 20° cxb6 Still out for blood... My first inten- tion here had been at last to force a draw by 20 {1h6, to which Black's only good reply is 20...¥9xb2! (less good is 20..%¥c7 21 wyxf6+ Sg8 22 §ixg7!). But not every c-pawn can reach a7! Therefore White decided on the again rather risky, but not losing capture of the queen, 20... ayxfa 21 wed @d5 22° bxa7 The third critical position. Initially it appeared to me to favour White, but when, awaiting my opponent's reply, I began examining the plan with ...26 and ...g7, I had to change my evaluation: chances were roughly equal. Of course, were Black to suc- ceed in coordinating his forces, his24 Attack with Mikhail Tal position would become clearly prefer- able. But there are two factors that hinder this: the audacious pawn at a7, which at the very least frightens Black, and, although only temporary, the dif- ficulties in developing his king's rook. With his next move Portisch tries simultaneously to solve both of these problems, but the further course of the game shows that the plan chosen is incorrect. 22 see Ber "Suicide?", was my first thought. But then I realised that Black's ma- noeuvre was not without its logic: the king heads for the a7 pawn, and any checks will only act as a "favourable wind”, for example 23 Bel+ @d6 24 We3+ Bd7 25 wed+ Bc7. But Portisch did not see my next move, which, incidentally, would have occurred to a player with an attacking style. Therefore it would have been stronger, without further ado, to play 22...6. How the game would have developed in this case, I honestly do not know. But at the board it seemed to me that to a considerable extent the a7 pawn “insures” White against defeat. Ina number of variations he is able, by giving it up with a8=¥¥, to pick up both of Black's queenside pawns in com- pensation. bat Preparing a "warm reception” for the enemy king. It is bad to take the pawn because of 24 Eb1, but after b4- bS White either exchanges on c6, opening tines, or advances it further, when the lone a7 pawn is transformed into a pawn tandem a7/b6. Here Black could have held the position by 23...4\c7, suggested b: Aronin, But the picture had been unexpectedly transformed, that Por-. tisch succeeded in losing a defensibl position in a matter of moves. 23 Has If not 23...4)c7, then Black shoul at least have chosen 23...d6 24 b: c7, not abandoning, for the moment, the pursuit of the pawn. In any event Black will not have time io take it. 24 Bel+ @d6 25 bs Hixa7 This loses instantly, but by no' Black's defence was very difficul White has at his disposal twe threat: the attacking 26 bxc6 bxc6 27 wye6+: Sc? 28 Hel, and the constricting 263 b6!, after which Black must eith agree to the a7 pawn being a constant threat, or nevertheless go in for the extremely dangerous opening of the file (after 26...2)xb6 27 Hib1). 26 He6+ &ec7 27 Bxf6 Black resign: Tal-Larsen 3 Candidates Semi-Final, Bled 1965 3 Alekhine's Defence a 1 e arte 2 & a d5 3 d4 d6 4 HS dxeS S &xe5 6 So, once again this dubious (there is no other word for it) variation, Directly after the Larsen-Ivkov mate! the Yugoslav grandmaster showed me ™ the final game of that encounter, and “scolded” himself for making the pseudo-active move 6 wh5. At tlsame time, he offered the following opinion: that 6 4)d2 is the quietest reply, and 6 Wf3, although committing, is the strongest, with which, after a cursory analysis, 1 agreed. Of course, in the existing match situation, the committing nature of White's move was by no means a hindrance. we wit 6...€Af6 is perhaps stronger, agree- ing to a slightly passive po: White would have replied 7 4e3, pre- paring queenside castling, After »» Larsen's move the black queen proves to be badly placed, and he has to waste precious time defending it. 7 we3 ho 8 4.25 was threatened. 8 Ac3 White must play energetically, in ‘order to exploit the better placing of his pieces. Since exchanging on c3 would only strengthen White's centre, and his queen's knight is threatening to move with great effect to e4, Black continues manoeuvring with his knight, hoping to divert White from his inten- tions, 8... |b4 9 Qb5+ 6 10 fad a7 . The transference of the bishop to the father inactive post at a4 does not signify that White has given up ideas of an attack. After e4 and c2-c3 the ishop can be advantageously switched {0 the important bl-h7 diagonal, . Here White thought for quite a long time. The advantages of his position are perfectly clear: a lead in devel- opment, Black's difficulty in evac- ating his king, but all this must be King in the Centre 25 effectively exploited. In such a position victory is doubly necessary: if 1 could not win from such a position, the psychological shock would be too great — it would mean that I had altogether forgotten how to win. Here White has several very tempt- ing ways to develop his initiative. The first that suggests itself is the tactical possibility of 11 a3 Qd5 12 &xc6. Then 12...bxc6 loses quickly to 13 Axc6 H5b6 14 DHbS! But the idea proves insufficient after 12...6)xc3 13 bxc3 (13 ¥yxc3 Hb6 14 |b8+ Hd8) 13.,..€)b6 14 @bS Q.d7 15 &xa7 Wd8. The positional 11 .f4 does not give anything decisive after 11...04d5. White gains good attacking chances by 11 Se4 wfS 12 £3, and objectively this was perhaps the strongest con- tinuation, although after 12...4)xe5 13 dxeS d7 14 a3 Sd5 15 c4 Qv6 16 Sic2 Wh it is not so easy to continue the attack. I was intending to continue my analysis of this variation, when suddenly my attention was drawn to the possibility of the piece sacrifice that occurred in the game within a few moves, This idea seemed very tempt- ing. ll 0-0 Exes This knight cannot be tolerated for long. 12) dxe5 13° YB White could have obtained the bet- ter ending by exchanging queens, but this would have been a small achieve- ment. WB vee wis Not altogether successful. Black drives the queen to a more comfortable wee26 Attack with Mikhail Tal position. Stronger was 13...4.d7, defending c6, on which I was intending to play 14 ¥ye2, with the idea of Se4 and ¢2-c3, bringing the light-square bishop into play. Of course, 13...9xc2 14 Axc6+ was out of the question. 14 We2 Qe7 Black appears not to have seen the intended sacrifice. White's intention was that if 14...2)d5 15 4b5!, an idea that it is still possible. However, if 14....d7 (which would have ruled out the knight sacrifice) the manoeuvre Se4, c2-c3 and gc2 would have gained in strength. Now, however, 15 £4 would be met by 15...0-0 16 4e4 bS! 17 Qb3 cS! and if 18 c3 c4, not allowing the bishop onto the bI-h7 diagonal. 1S a3 Had the following move not been available, this would have been a seri- ous mistake, leading to the loss of the initiative. A eo 15...2)a6 can also be answered by 16 4bS, although with the slightly different idea of 16...cxb5? 17 {2.xbS: and 18 4.43, winning the queen. 16 yb5! A move which came as a surprise my opponent. White is intending play his knight to the ideal square After, for example, 16...0-0 17 4d: ¥Wh7 18 c4 46 19 Bc? Black's posi tion is extremely difficult, and so the: acceptance of the sacrifice is forced. 16... exb5 17 WyxbS+ : But here 17 Qxb5+ @f8 18 d3.: fails to 18...4)f4! 4 7 ... Sas ' 18 cd : The critical position. Where should. the knight move to? Larsen follows the: path of least resistance: he gives bac the piece, but the position of his king the centre allows White easily to, mount a decisive attack without an significant material sacrifice. White saw that after 18...4)b6 1 Wa5 he would also regain his piece : since 19...Q.d7 20 S.e3 @c7 2 c5 is: bad for Black. Stronger is the imme-: diate 19..c7 20 c5 @b8 21 cxb6 axb6 22 wb5 Ha5 23 wyb3, although. here too White has very good attacking chances, The main variation of White's coi bination was 18..0f4 19 Bdl+ @c7- 20 Bd7+ Qxd7 21 wyxd7+ bs 22. Wyxe7 Yyxe5 23 Me3 Agé (24 HB was threatened) 24 ¥yxf7? wWf6 Se8! This is the point: 25...uy (25...He5 26 Af4) 26 wyxg6 Hxe8 Qc5! Wd7 28 Gd6+ Sc8 29 c5, and: the bishop at d6 is much stronger than a rook. WW... wyxedKing in the Centre 7 19 cxd5 Ado 20 3 x5 21 we2 It becomes clear that for the pawn White has much more than sufficient compensation. The black king is a long way from any sort of peaceful refuge, and White only needs to develop his queen's bishop, for all his pieces to in in a decisive attack, 21 es He7 22 dt was 23° wed wis . This clever possibility does nothing all to help Black. White considered ere 23...e5, after which neither 24 h44+ £6 nor 24 95+ hxgs 25 xg5+ G8 26 Hxd6 Me6 27 Hadi ! is altogether convincing. But by ntinuing 24 Wxg7 Me6 (or 24... xa4) 25 Qxh6 White gains an resistible attack. 2d hed 24 &yxg72? eS! would have been terrible blunder. ‘The queen manoeuvre emphasises ist how hopeless Black’s position is, ince after 24.,.8.d8 25 (e3 he has no bod move, IA sae wes 25 wd3 wd5 26 Wye3 Jt is for this square that the white wen has been aiming. Now 26...Wye5 {8 not possible on account of 27 Qf4. lack is forced to worsen still further é placing of his pieces. ae fed : 27° Wel 27 we3 wyaS 28 .d2 was also per- tly adequate, but there were already any ways to win. 27... Wes 28 Ad2 Pi6 29 Hacl Now everything is clear. The on- slaught of the white pieces is quite impossible to withstand. DD cows 30 fed 31 wh4 Threatening, incidentally, 32 4S. 3 bs Wb6 Wao 32 Axbs 33° fa 34 Qcé Black resigns, Out of his 33 moves, 13 were made by his queen. ¥¥b7 Abs Tal-Hecht Varna Olympiad 1962 Queen's Indian Defence Although the cascade of sacrifices in this game was linked by the single general aim of attacking the king caught in the centre, at the same time it was, as it were, divided into stages. ‘Thus, when he gave up a pawn, White ‘was not counting on further sacrifices, but was prepared to content himself with the initiative, And since a “primary” sacrifice does not exist — there is only the first, the second, and so on, so as the attack developed the aim also changed, 1 afte 2 e4 26 3 |B b6 4 2:3 Qb4 5 Ae5 ab7 6 3 ho 7 gh Axc3+ 8 bxc3 a628 Attack with Mikhail Tal 9 Hd2 eS 10 £3 we? ll e4 Sbd7 12 43 |p Black stubbornly avoids breaking the pin at the cost of any weakening, Earlier he could have chosen 7...25 8 $g3 e4, and now he could have followed Keres in his game with Botvinnik, 12th USSR Championship, Moscow 1940; 12...g5 13 £2 4yh5 14 g3 4)g7 15 ¥ye2 hS, gaining coun- terplay sufficient for equality. Now, however, by getting his blow in first, White initiates unfathomable complications, However, the move played is not necessarily the strongest continuation in this position. He could have obtained a favourable position by the "Spanish" manoeuvre 13 4f1 fol- lowed by 4)e3 and 4445 (or 4)f5). 13 Wya4+ was also good, and if 13..4d7 14 We2, And yet the move played is the one most in the spirit of the position: White is able to open up the game, for which he happily sacri- fices a pawn. 13. 5 dxeS On 13...bxc5 there could have fol- lowed 14 d5, when White gains control of c4 and b5, as well as the open b-file. 14 dxeS Wyxed Now White has a pawn majority in the centre, i.e. on the part of the board where he is intending to begin active play. But Black's defensive resources are, of course, quite adequate. 15 Wad+ 06? A mistake, after which White also gains the use of the d6 square for his attack, 15...€)6d7 was much — stronger; although here too after 16 ¥c2 White's initiative would have been quite ap-. preciable. 16 0-0 e6 After 16..4xc3 both 17 @a6 and 17 404 b5 18 Qyd6+ Gd7 19 Axb5 exb5 20 xb5+ are unpleasant for Biack. But now White has to hurry, since a position has been reached, where every tempo may be decisive: Black only needs to "hide" his king, and for the pawn White will have no compensation. If 17 (.g3 the strong is 17..¥¥e7, when 18 4)c4 fails to 18...b5. 17 |c4 wee Not 17...b5 18 4)xe5 bxa4 19 2)xg6 fxg6 20 e5, when Black can resign. 18 eS! As already mentioned, White's chief aim is to keep the king at e8. With his 18th move he begins a combination, in anticipation of... a favourable end- game. The position does not promise anything better. 18... bs 18...4)xh4 was interesting. After 19 &d6+ &f8 it is unfavourable for White to take any of the three pieces that are en prise: on 20 eyxh4 or 20 )xb7 there follows 20...8xe5. The eS pawn is more valuable than any of the black minor pieces, and therefore White had decided to play the posi: tional 20 Hael, since with one move the threats to the three pieces cannot be eliminated. (see diagram next page) 19 exf6l!King in the Centre 29 This move brings to mind the well fown game Lilienthal-Capablanca, ‘Hastings 1934/35, in which White, len a young master, quickly forced ¢ ex-World Champion's capitulation. Hecht made his reply without think- . Of course, anyone with the black ieces would be very happy to play 0-0. Then three of White's pieces re en prise, and if he moves his queen, 4)xh4 leads to a position where k is under no threat. But against 19.,.0-0 White has the ry strong rejoinder 20 Kael! If Yd5 there can follow 21 Wc2 xh4 22 Se5 with a powerful attack, While after 20..u¥xel 21 Bxel bxa4 22 Qxg6 fxg6 23 He7 Black cannot jay 23...F7 on account of 24 46. At this point the effusive Miguel jajdorf, who was watching the game, ime up and... kissed me (M.T.). Wo... bxad 20 fxe7 -g8 21 ast! ‘The culmination of the combination! Fter 21,..8/xc4 Black will be a whole een up(!), but he loses: 22 Hfel+ Web 23 Hxe6+ fxe6 24 Axg6+ Od7 25 Bdi+ Sc? 26 Ag3+ bb 27 Hbt+ Bab 28 4d3+ Had 29 Ac7+ mate. Meanwhile, 21...29xf5 leads to a hopeless ending: 22 4d6+ @d7 23 4\xf5 Oxh4 24 Badl+ Bc7 25 Axh4 Hixg7 26 Hifel, and the variation 21..4)xh4 22 Qxe6 fxe6 23 Qd6+ demonstrates the "agility" of the white knight. Black chooses the best defence, having in mind a counterblow on the next move. win ee Y ape | a 6 oe te | i 21 wes ayxhd 22 Axe6 fa6 How is White to save his piece? 23 d6+ = Be? 24 Acd! This concludes the combination, which has brought White a marked advantage in the endgame. 24... xg? 25 3 Bxd6 A mistake, since in positions of this type a bishop is stronger than a knight. Black would have retained some drawing chances after 25...Q.xc4 26 4yxc4 Has.30 Attack with Mikhail Tal 26 Axa6 = |FS 27° Babi £6 28 Hidl+ e7 29 Hel+ dé 30 SP ce Creating a shelter for the king at c5. Nevertheless 30...n5 was more tena- cious, for the moment maintaining the knight at its important post. 31 4 De? 32 Bb? Hags 33° xed = dS 34 Sxd5 — cxd5 35° Bb4 Ac8 Black should at least have ex- changed a pair of kingside pawns by 35.85 36 43 hxg4 37 hxg4 £5, al- though even this would hardly have saved him. After the move played, which leads to a "mutual elimination" of pawns, everything is clear, 36 Bxad— Axe3 37 Ha6+ Oecd 38 = Axf6 nS 39 1B yg 40 hxg4 Bh7 41 5 hs 42 BES Be2+ 43 O38 Bed 44° Blee5 d4 45 96 ahi 46 BcS+ d3 47 Bxe2 Bxc2 48 $f = figt 49 gs Black resigns: 49...&xg5 50 @xg5 d3 51 g7 d2 52 g8=W dl= 53 Wyb3+. WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE PLAYED? No.1 Black is attacking the knight that has crossed the demarcation line, To — where should it retreat? No.2 Here too the white knight has the right to choose...King in the Centre 31 But here there would not appear to White plans to get rid of the enemy be any choice: the knight must be outpost at d4, and then, according to taken and the black king will finally circumstances, either queenside cas- castle... tling with chances of an attack (({h6, h2-hé4 etc.), or else the quieter kingside castling. But it is Black to move.., No.4 No.6 gS 7 iB “Age aa, 4 “ a A A Black has just played 12...c5?, evi- After 15 Wxf3 Wxd4 Black gains a dently expecting the theoretical 13 tempo by attacking the white knight, Axf6r... castles, and then sets about realising his advantage. Correct?2 Breakthrough in the Centre A CERTAIN FRENCH GENERAL went down in history for the following dispatch to his commander: “My centre is broken, my flanks are retreating, I attack"...(I.D.) M.T. Mmm... This might do — in a tournament for beginners. But at our and your level of chess - hardly, True, a "retreating" or even absent queenside does not prevent a desperate assault on the kingside, but the domination of one player in the centre completely rules out activity by the other, Deviations from this rule are more likely to be found in studies, than in practical play. On the other hand, an advantage in the centre almost always allows an attack to be obtained. Whether in the centre itself, or on one of the flanks — this depends on the concrete features of the position. With a mobile pawn centre the strength of the attack grows greatly after a breakthrough in the centre, which usually achieves several aims: — the opening of lines, along which rooks and bishops situated on the queenside can instantly join the attack; often their scope is restricted by their own pawns in the centre; — the vacating of a central square, via which, for example, a slow-moving queen's knight can join the attack, or which, like a spring-board, can be used by a rook for a subsequent switching along the rank; — finally, the disruption, if only for a certain time, of the coordination of the enemy pieces. In short, a breakthrough in the centre is always the start of an attack, which, however, is by no means bound to be swift and explosive, but can grow by degrees, like the seventh wave in the sea. This is why voluntarily conceding the opponent a mobile pawn centre, or perhaps only a single pawn in the centre that is capable of advancing, is equivalent to voluntarily entering the lion's cage. This comparison is perhaps evoked by the following game, in which the player with White was a grandmaster by the name of Lev. {A play on words: dev is the Russian word for dion - Translator's note). Polugayevsky-C.Hansen European Team Ch., Plovdiv 1983 In the opening Black has clearly underestimated the possible pawnBreakthrough in the Centre 33 offensive by his opponent on the king- side, and stands worse. But never- theless, even with the two bishops, he should not have opened the centre and given White a dynamic pawn at d4, The correct 15...4.b7 (15...f6 16 g5, and the king's pawn shelter collapses) 16 exdS exdS would yet have given him hope of gradually neutralising the attack. But... 15...dxe4? 16 {&xe4 (gaining a tempo) 16...4b8 17 g5 h5 18 d5 The central files and the long dark- square diagonal are opened (18...e5 fails to 19 d6) and White's lead in development quickly decides. 18...exd5 19 4)xd5 Ac5 20 We3+ @h7 21 c2 Geb 21...4 is no better, being well met by the quiet 22 4e3. 22 4yf4 Yye8 23 Ayxh5, and without waiting for the completion of the attack after 23...Hg8 24 f6+ Axf6 25 exf6 followed by 26 4g5 and h4-h5, Black resigned. Of course, such gifts of fate do not occur in every round. For a break- through in the centre one usually has to battle — and pay. In the next diagram, the game has hardly passed out of the opening stage, but the pawn formation is already largely determined, and the two sides are considering their strategic plans. If the game were to take a quiet course, Black, after completing his develop- ment, could hope to use the strength of his dark-square bishop, which has no opponent. But.., White makes excellent use of the trumps of his position, including the advanced position of the black queen, to develop a powerful initiative by means of a central breakthrough. 5 mit = Chernin-Miles Tunis Interzonal 1985 12 e5! dxe5 13 2ye4 Wi4 14 Afd2! The white offensive is not "in a hurry", but now two of Black's pieces become targets for attack, and he is forced to lose time. 14.05 15 d3 (xed 16 Axed 407 17 g3 Wed 18 h3 wh5 19 dé The development of Black's kingside is hindered, his queen has been driven to the edge of the board, and his king is still in the centre (as is White's, but Black's is under attack). The pawn sacrificed is a miserly price for all this. 19...¥4g6 20 Hdl! The outpost at d6 is supported, and now 21 4)xc5 is a real threat. Black's tactical attempts to confuse matters are ignored by White. 20...b3 21 We2 Not allowing the black rook to move off a light square with gain of tempo (21 ¥xb3 Hb8).34 Attack with Mikhail Tal 21...f5 22 g4! cd 23 Gobi fxgd 24 ¥yxc4 Wi7 25 Yyc6 Hd8 26 hxgd The immediate 26 2c5 was also possible, since 26...44f3 fails to the bishop check at 26. 26...g6 27 A)c5 Hg8 28 Bed O27 29 &)xa6 Wyf4 30 Dc7+ Hi7 31 wed+ Sf6 32 45+ Black resigns. In this case the breakthrough in the centre was merely strengthened by the fact that the stranded black king was pursued, After a breakthrough, a piece offen- sive against the castled position is more common, as one of the authors experienced in the following game. Polugayevsky-Tal 37th USSR Championship Moscow 1969 This position had already occurred in previous games, and who could have known that, in the quiet of his study, White had worked out a variation giving him a decisive advantage, or... a forced win. 16 a5! exdS 17 eS! By breaking through in the centre, White has imparted a great deal of energy to his e-pawn, but more important — he has opened a way for his pieces to the kingside. 4 17...2)¢4 18 yyf4 Ab2 After 18...h6 White would have won| by 19 Yf5 26 20 Wh3 Se7 21 e6 fxeé - 22 4\d4, while if 18...—c6 he has 19 4)g5 h6 20 Qh7+ Bh8 21 Axh7+ Bixf7 (or 21...Qxh7 22 xd8 Bxf4 23 6!) 22 Wyxf7 @xh7 23 wyxb7. 19 Q.xh7+ @xh7 20 4\g5+ g6 21 hai! With the unequivocal intention of giving mate in the variation 22 h5+! HxhS 23 g4+ He6 24 wFS+ Pho 25. 4xf7+, and 21...f5 fails to save Black on account of 22 Bd4! (with the same. idea of h4-h5) 22..%¥e7 23 hS+ @h6— 24 \f7+ Bh7 25 wWxf5+ Hg8 26 e6 Exf? 27 exf7+ wyxf7 28 vyxf7+ Oxf? - 29 Bi4+ Begs 30 He7. 21..Bc4 22 hS+ Qh6 23 2xf7+ Bh7 24 wiS+ gs 25 e6 iG (there is no other defence against 26 h6) 26 Wyxf6 gxf6 And now, after inaccuracies by both sides, White won easily: 27 Hd2 (27 46 was more energetic) 27...He6 28 Hixb2 He8 (and here 28...9.c8 was more tenacious) 29 Sh6+ @h7 30 4S Hicxe6 31 Exe6 Hxe6 32 Be2 Hc6 33 He2 Qc8 34 Be7+ @h8 35 ah4 £5 36 Dg6+ Hg 37 Bxa7 Black resigns. In the next diagram White has achieved a strategically won position. There is nothing to support Black's counterplay on the queenside, whereas around his king there are many weaknesses, and his pieces (queen and knight) are far from ideally placed.Breakthrough in the Centre 35 Nevertheless, it is only by a break- through that White can capitalise on all the advantages of his position. after 39...c3 40 bxc3 wed 41 Of3 h4 42 wxhd vyxc3 43 Add wed 44 xaé. wey Late en J, iy ol a US Ne 3 is ae ca Junk S ( a Ribli-Gheorghiu Riga Interzonal 1979 27 eS £5 Otherwise absolutely all the lines are opened. 28 )c6 Also good enough to win was 28 e6 Se8 29 AxfS exf5 30 AxfS ws, when 31 4)xe7+ and 31 4xd6 are equally strong. But White prefers, firstly, to clear the e-file, and secondly, to include in the attack the only piece that is not participating — the knight atc3. 28..AxC6 29 dxc6 WS 30 Dd5 Hxc6 The exchange is lost in any case, and that is not all. 31 exd6 Hxel 32 Hxel Yyxd6 33 Del+ Bl 34 Dxch wyxc6 35 wed DIB 36 We7+ eB 37 Bdl Ace6 38 Hd6 we8 39 Gdl The bishop heads for d5, and Black can resign, which he did in fact do Szabo-van Seters Hilversum 1947 Although nominally Black has com- pleted his development, his position gives serious cause for alarm. Ideally aimed against the black king is the bishop at a2, which together with the queen can also operate on the b1-h7 diagonal, and the e-file is open for the white rook, Nevertheless, a rapid suc- cess can be gained only by increasing the number of targets to attack, and this is ideally achieved by a break- through in the centre. 17 d5!! Dxd5 The alternative capture 17...exd5 is refuted by the simple 18 bl g6 19 Hxe7 (this demonstrates the superiority of the 17 d5 breakthrough over the immediate 17 @b1). After 17...2a5 18 4e5 Hdd 19 Qb!I g6 20 Hb5 ¥yb8 21 d6 Black loses material, while the attempt to exploit the pin on the audacious white pawn, 17...Hcd8, is36 Attack with Mikhail Tal refuted by 18 Qxf6! Qxf6 19 we2!, exploiting the weakness of the back rank to create an irresistible threat against e6. 18 Gxd5! Wd8 The same idea, but with 18...Bcd8, is refuted by the thematic 19 Hxe6! But now the second white bishop is also attacked. 19 wea! Renewing the attack on e6 (19... fixg5 20 Qxe6!). 19..exd5 20 Axd5 Axgs 21 x5! Here we can sum up the outcome of the central breakthrough. The white pieces have closed in, and a weakening of the black king's position is in- evitable. In addition its main defenders have been exchanged, and the final assault now commences. 21...g6 22 wh4 h5 23 Df6+ wxt6 24 Bxd7 4d8 25 He8+ Gg7 26 &xf7+, and Black, who is losing his queen, resigned (26...£)xf7 27 £)e6+). LD. Every player has a "game of his life", a victory in which he seemingly moves onto a higher chess plane. You first became champion of your country, and at the same time a grandmaster, by defeating the highly experienced Alexander Tolush in the final round of the 1957 USSR Championship. M.T. Surprisingly, it was also the first time in my serious chess career that I made such an effective break~ through in the centre (see diagram next column), White has of course made more pro- gress in the preceding complications, and for the pawn he has a strong attack, But for 30 {1d2 followed by g4-g5 he has neither the time, nor the right: firstly, Black will establish a piece at e5, and secondly, counterplay on the b-file is already imminent. Be- sides, White must include his reserves — his knight and light-square bishop. All this is achieved with a single thematic move. Tal-Tolush 24th USSR Championship Moscow 1957 30 eS! BxeS j 30...fxg5 also opens the f-file for White, and after 31 (ixg6 hxg6 32 ¥Wyh8+ Sf7 33 Bh7+! he gives mate in afew moves. 31 Axg6 Hb7 For the moment both bishops are immune: the light-square one on ac- count of the same variation, and the dark-square one in view of 31..8xg5 32 (xh7+ @f7 33 ded. 32 Hed! : Another gain from the breakthrough. 32...fxg5 33 Bfl Bxe4 There is no other defence against 34 Dior.Breakthrough in the Centre 37 34 fixed Bg7 35 BE Axed 36 Bhft 4d7 37 Bxd6 we7 38 Axaé Wh 39 Axh7! Abs 40 165+ Hes 41 fe6+ Axe6 42 Axe6 Black resigns, VR fe ty 2a 7 eS ate Be } One 4 Vi, a ee Geller-Spassky 25th USSR Championship Riga 1958 Here too White has gained a clear Positional advantage, with the two bi- shops, the better pawn formation, and - the possibility at the necessary moment of a breakthrough in the centre, 23 Bee3! S\e6 (23...2\fxe4 can be met by 24 Qxe7 Bxe7 25 Ag5!) 24 eS! It is in this way, by ridding Black of his pawn weakness, that White imparts additional dynamic strength to his tooks, which dominate on the e-file, overloaded with black pieces. 24.524 24...dxe5 25 Bxe5 would also have Jed to the loss of a pawn, 25 hxg4 4)xg5 26 exd6 4\xf3+ 27 gxf3 O¢5 28 a4 The ending with two extra pawns is easily won after 28 9.04 Yyd7 29 Bxe8 Bixe8 30 Bxe8+ wWyxe8 31 d7 and 32 £.xa6. But for the moment White decides to stay in the middiegame. 28...%yd7 29 Bxe8 Axe8 30 xe8+ ¥yxe8 31 d7 Wis. If 3t..4¥e7 White has the decisive 32 f4, 32 tyez White is in no hurry to go into the pawn ending after 32 xf? ¥yxf7 33 d8=¥+, but creates the simple threat of 33 Wed. 32...We7 33 Yyd3 h6 34 Ged! Enticing the black a-pawn into an attack and effectively deciding the game, 34...a5 35 Axt7 Qha Or 35..x¥xf7 36 d8=t¥+ Qxd8 37 ¥yxd8+ Bh7 38 wWxa5, and the f3 pawn is immune in view of the exchange of queens. 36 Gg2 A £6 37 Acd wad 38 WAS Ags 39 wWe7 Black resigns. Against the threat of 40 wWe8+ @h7 41 4.d3+ there is no defence. Spassky-O'Kelly San Juan 196938 Attack with Mikhail Tal This game can be considered a mo- del example of this type of operation. 27 AxfS! gxfS The h5 pawn has been weakened, and a path towards the king from g5 has been opened, but... Black's centre has been strengthened, he has gained control of e4, and there is the prospect of his knight reaching there. 28 d5!! This breakthrough is the key to White's plan. At the cost of a pawn he occupies the centre with his pieces, and the next stage of the game commences. 28...Axc3 29 Yyxc3 cxd5 30 Ad4 wa7 The threat of 31 xf5 forces Black first to concede the queenside. 31 cS! 4yh7 32 b4 a6 33 ad! Hc8 Alas, 33...Wyxa4 fails to 34 c6! bxc6 35 Bal, trapping the queen. 34 bS axbS 35 axbS Als The black knight has hopes of occu- pying e4, but at the point when this is achieved disaster is all ready to strike. 36 c6 bxc6 37 bxc6 Wa8 38 Hcl £6 39 c7 Wa7 40 west White has tied down the black forces with his c7 pawn, and now, with his control of the centre, he switches his sights to the kingside, where his attacking queen is unopposed. 40.54 The dream is realised, but a longer resistance could have been offered by 40..4)h7 41 Bec2 @e7 42 Wes+ 28, although after 43 Ac6 White has the irresistible threat of 4)d4-bS- a7(d6); he can also play for a mating attack with 44 £3 followed by g3-p4. 41 £3 e5 42 fxed £4 43 gxf4 exd4 44 Bg2+ Black resigns: 44..@h7 45 ¥f3 Wd6 46 wyxhS+ wh6, and now the — simplest is 47 yxh6+ @xh6 48 exd5. Spassky-Tal Tallinn 1973 Nimzo-Indian Defence 1 a4 are 2 ¢4 06 3 Hc3 I took this to be the first sign of Spassky's aggressive intentions. When in a more peaceable mood he plays 3 £3, which usually leads to the rela- - tively quiet Queen's Indian Defence. 3 see Abs 4 aes Throwing down the gauntlet. This, the Leningrad Variation, which is quite often employed by Spassky, usually leads to a sharp and complicated battle. awe n6 5 aha 5 6 a bS The challenge is accepted. This sharp continuation seems to me quite logical, although Black also has other, quieter moves, such as 6...d6, 6...e5 or 6...xc3+. The move 6...b5 is akin to the Volga (Benko) Gambit, which has recently been played quite frequently. 7 dxe6 Very complicated play results from 7 e4 95 8 Qp3 Axe4 9 Qe5, which occurred in the game Levenfish-Estrin (USSR Championship Semi-Final, 1951). White also suffered a reverse in the game Korchnoi-Durasevic from the USSR-Yugoslavia Match (Belgrade 1956}. It was then that grandmasterBreakthrough in the Centre 39 ‘Tolush suggested for White a different plan, involving the win of a pawn, and subsequently he successfully employed it. This is the course that Spassky chooses. True, to me it seems more correct to say not that White wins 2 pawn, but that Black sacrifices it, 7 fxe6 8 cxbS d5 Now Black has an active pawn centre. 9 3 10 2f3 Better, perhaps, was 10 $4d3 d4 11 exd4 cxd4 12 a3, or the immediate 10 a3. It is on this possibility that the eva- luation of the entire variation depends. 10... wad Lo axf6 This exchange is forced in view of the threatened 11...dye4, Ho... Axf6 12 wd2 12 Ycl is more accurate, so that after a subsequent a2-a3 the black bishop should be immediately attack- ed, since the rook at al is defended, True, Black can reply 12...c4. 12... a6! 13 bxa6 A risky move. 13 b6 or 13 (e2 axbS 14 0-0 was more circumspect. 130... Dc6 Black, of course, does not take on a6, but intensifies the threat of ...d4. 0-0 4 fe2 Here too 14 cl came into consideration, in order to answer 14...d4 with 15 a3 {.xc34 16 bxc3. In this case White would have been in no immediate danger. ao... d4! 15 exd4 i... Eixf3 This combination leads by force to an advantage for Black. 16 Qxf3 17 00 Interesting variations arise after 17 Hcl. In this case I was intending to play 16...s¢xa6 (17...dxc3 18 bxc3 is unpromising) 18 {{xc6 d8, when Black must win, ¢.g. 19 wyc2 dxc3 20 bxc3 WyeS+ 21 fLe4. Here 21...9d3 wins easily, but at the board I worked out another variation that appealed to me: 21...Q.xc3+ 22 Wyxc3 Wyxe4+ 23 We vyxg2 24 ¥yxe6+ (the only move) 24..BHh8 25 web wYxc6 26 Hxc6 {4b7!, and Black wins a rook. More- over, it is amusing that, if White tries to give up his rook as dearly as possible, after 27 Hxh6+ gxh6 he is mated: 28 0-0 Hg8 mate, or 28 Bgl S03 and then ...d1 mate, 17... dxc3 18 bxe3 xed 19 wd6 Exa6é Of course, not 19....xal 20 ¥yxc6. 20° Axcé exd440 Attack with Mikhail Tal If the rook had moved from al, Black would have played 20...2d4. 20... Aba le YY Vy “of The concluding move of the combination. White loses his bishop at c6. 20..fe5 was insufficient on account of 21 ge7. 21) Wyb8 Hxcé 22 Gacl Acs 23° He2 Spassky aims for pressure on the c-file, but in White's position an Achilles’ heel comes to light — at £2. Possibly he should have looked for counter-chances by moving his rook off the c-file, for example to dt. 23... wad 24 wb3 24 fcl was not possible on account of 24... Q.xf2+. 4... wid Here I considered two moves — 24..84e4 and 24.4914. I rejected 24...W¥e4 in view of 25 Bifcl Qb7 26 wxb7 Axt2+ 27 Gl! (not 27 Bhi? Bxc2) 27..eyd3+ 28 x2 Bxc2+ 29 Bxc2 Yxc2+, when it is clear that the resulting queen ending with an extra pawn for Black is an extremely minor achievement. 4 Therefore ] switched my choice to 24..%9f4. Against 25 ¥yb5 I was intending 25...Wyd6, and if 26 fcl | 126, when 27 w¥ya5 is not possible: 27...Axf2+. 25 Wed 25 ¥yf3 was better, and if 25...eyxf3 26 gxf3 e5 27 @hi! b7 28 Bbl Bb6 29 Bxb6 Qxf3+ 30 Bg! 4.xb6 31 a4, when the ending is still unclear. Black, however, would not have exchanged queens, but could have played 25...29d6 or 25...¥c7, retaining the advantage. 25... wis 26 Hifcl Qb7 27° Wf 27 Sb8+ Ph7! (but not 27...2c8 28 wyxc8+ xc8 29 fixc5, when it is White who wins) 28 ¥yxb7 was not. possible on account of 28....¢.xf2+, but 27 h3 was more tenacious, 27 ase Wes 28 wb3 If 28 ¥yg3 the check at f2 is again’) decisive: 28....xf2+ 29 @xf2 (or 29 waxf2 eyxcl+) 29,.Bxc2+ 30 Hxc2. wise. 2B... eT 29 3 On 29 ¥yxe6+ Black would have won by 29..2f7, while if 29 ¥yg3 he again has the decisive 29....xf2+. The only move not to immediately was 29 ¥yh3. 29... Sixf2+ 30 Sxf2 ey f6+ I played this in accordance with my preliminary calculations. 30...4yf5+ 31 eg! we4 wins more quickly. loseBreakthrough in the Centre 41 31 Gel 32 «@fl 32 @dl wWd4+ 33 Wel wWel+ and 32 @f2 Bf7+ 33 Bgl wd4+ were wWes+ equally bad. 32... ab6+ 33° @gl Yydd+ 34 @e2 wed+ 35 el If 35 @h3 Bxc2 and then 36... ffl. 35... Sb7 36 hd wyhi+ 37) @f2 Efy+ 38 Ge2 wWed+ White resigns: after 39 Yye3 06+ 40 Sd2 d7+ he loses his queen. WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE PLAYED? No.7 White stands more actively, but how can he build up his initiative? Although there are signs that the position is double-edged (in particular ‘on account of the g-file), it is neverthe- less clearly in White's favour. Black's king prevents his rooks from uniting, but what particular plan should White aim for? And how should it be carried out? Nod The h5 and g6 pawns are weak, as well as the whole complex of dark squares around the black king. Where should the first blow be struck?3 The Assault Ratio THE PLAYER WITH A LEAD IN development is obliged to attack, or risk losing this advantage. This is a chess truth, formulated back in the last century by Steinitz, repeated by other classic writers, and in the intervening century merely confirmed on thousands of occasions in practice. Here is one single example: Geller-Korchnoi Candidates Quarter-Finat Moscow 1971 White has every justification for taking decisive measures, and indeed 24 QxhS gxh5S 25 Bf6! would have given him a very strong attack, for example: (a) 25..44d8 26 ¥yxh5 £)f8 27 Bh6 {5 28 Bh8+ @g7 29 who+ F7 30 Hh4, or (b) 25...2¥c5 26 Heat hxg4 27 Wxe4+ @f8 28 Bh6 Af 29 exf6 2x6 30 Hxf6 Ye7 31 Hf4! True, a collective analysis later found an improvement here — 27...@h71!!, and there appears to be nothing more thi perpetual check (28 Hed 4xf6 2! exf6 0.8). M.T. But firstly, I am sure that even. here White can strengthen his attack: and should win, and secondly, by dec. lining to attack he altogether concedes * the initiative... Indeed, after 24 h3 QfS 25 Qh? g7 26 He3 4c5 27 Wel Oc6 28 Axcé Yxc6 29 wh4 Hd7 Black ob- tained a counter-attack. White's cautious decision here was’ undoubtedly influenced by the fact that defence has changed fundamentally during this intervening century: the degree of resilience is commensurate. with the previously unknown rein- forced concrete, and defensive and counterattacking procedures have been found and systemised. Therefore a successful attack on the king is guaran- teed only when an especially strong piece grouping can be created in the attack zone, when the power of such an assault exceeds for certain the defen- sive possibilities. (see diagram next page) The pieces of both sides are in a way polarised. But although “phy- sically" White's pieces occupy squares on the kingside, for the moment they are not "looking" directly at the black / king. In short, White cannot manage without strengthening his attacking force.The Assault Ratio 43 Kasparov-Marjanovic Malta Olympiad 1980 17 eds! Axb2 18 4g5! White is already two pawns down, but now the concentration of his pieces clearly exceeds the defensive forces. 18...87c6 Black cannot eliminate the most dangerous attacker: 18...2e6 19 d6, with numerous threats such as 20 4)dxf7+, 20 eyc2 and 20 Yyhs. 19 Sye7 6 20 2)xh7! wd4 21 Wh5 26 22 wh4 There is no way of saving the game, and the players each make an “unnecessary” move: Black, in the sense that he might well have not both- ered to make one, and White, in that he can win "as he pleases". 22....xal 23 Hf6+ Black resigns: 23...@g7 24 eyh6+ @xf6 25 25 mate. In the next diagram, Black's consis- tent pressure on c4 has proved success- ful. In order to defend his pawn, White would have to give up his outpost pawn at eS, by capturing 14 exd6 en passant, but he can also sacrifice it, continuing his plan of concentrating his forces against the black king. i Kotov-Keres Candidates Tournament Budapest 1950 14 Qbl! White chooses the second alterna- tive, the more crucial and only correct one. Besides, in the given instance his strategic idea is supported by concrete calculation, 14.25 Of course, this is not a counterattack in the attack zone, but merely a de- fence, especially since 14...<.xc4 15 We2 26 16 G16! followed by ed2 or W£2-h4 cannot be tolerated. 15 ¥yc2 \g6 Black has eliminated the pin, and the attacking diagonal is blocked... 16 2f4t! Now all White's forces (not includ- ing his rooks) are in the attack, aimed at one point. 16...exh4 The alternative was to try and hold44 Attack with Mikhail Tal the g6 square: 16..%¥e8 17 4hS! Web (or 17...f5 18 exf6 gxh4 19 cxd5! exd5+ 20 $f2, and after regaining his piece — 20...@h7 21 Bei, with the threat of 22 Be7 — White obtains a material advantage with an over- whelming position) 18 cxd5 exdS 19 $1g3, with a decisive strengthening of the attack after the undermining move h2-h4, 17 &)xg6 He8 18 4yh8! While opening the way for the queen, the knight itself also remains in the attack. 18...e7 19 Yyh7+ BFS 20 f4 Axed It is not possible to evacuate the king: 20..e8 21 xf?! Bxf7 22 fig6 We7 23 5. 21 £5 exf5 22 0-0 The f-file is opened for the rooks, and the outcome is settled. 22.4808 23 QxfS Oxf 24 BxfS Be8 25 Axi? Had7 26 w5+ Heb 27 Wy6+ Hd7 28 e6+ Scé Or 28...6d6 29 Bxe7, and 29... ¥8xe7 is bad on account of 30 Af7+. 29 Bxe7 Wyxh8 30 Bxc7+! wb (30...8xc7 31 We7+ Sb8 32 Hfl) 31 We7 a5 32 tyd7+ a6 33 bl Black resigns. The concentration of force before the final phase of the attack is often made by outwardly imperceptible piece movements far from the epicentre of the coming events (see diagram next column). The material balance has been dis- turbed in favour of White. In the end- game this would be of decisive impor- tance, but for the moment, exploiting in the full sense of the word his piece advantage, Black launches an assault on the kingside. In a certain sense he even has two “extra” pieces: after all, the bishops are of opposite colour. Bata at soit oT] 7 ag ay A Y Stein-Geller Kislovodsk 1966 22...$.h4 23 He2 He7! z Black's jast fighting unit, not ready | for the assault, takes up an attacking position. Maximum concentration! 24 g3 Sixg3t 25 fxp3 WES 26 g4 The weakness of the king's pawn screen, the remoteness of the rook at a6, and, as a consequence, Black's decisive superiority in force leave | White without any chances of saving. the game. In the main variation 26 Bg2 Be7 27 Wd4 Bel+ 28 Ph2 wel he | also comes under a mating attack. 26..He7 27 Wd4 wyhd 28 Bal | Hel+ 29 Hxel ¥yxel+ 30 Gh2 we3+ | 31 Bhi Wxh3+ 32 gl (or mate in | three moves: 32 Bh2 Sg3+ 33 Gel Bfl+) 32...2)g3 White resigns. Here the rook was switched to the | decisive part of the battlefield along the 7th rank (or, using the old descrip- tive notation, along the 2nd rank).The Assault Ratio 45 White most often uses the 3rd rank for the same aim, prudently avoiding pawn advances such as h2-h3, but sometimes making use of the move a2-a4. In this case the concentration of force in the altack zone can grow very quickly. Kuzmin-Kondevsky Krasnodar 1970 White has already transferred one of his rooks into a close attacking posi- tion along that 3rd rank. But with only two heavy pieces, the black king's de- fences cannot be smashed, and mean- while his knight, splendidly placed in the centre and suppressing Black's counterplay on the c-file, is attacked. Tf turns out that the knight can be ignored, if the mobilisation is contin- ued! 21 Bdd3!! After thinking for an hour and a half (!), Black... overstepped the time limit. But neither after 21...Rxd4 22 Hdg3 followed by the sacrifice on g7, nor in other variations such as 21...f5 22 Hdg3 Af? 23 eyxh6 OFS 24 eyh8+ Be7 25 xe? Hxg7 26 wxg7+ Sd8 27 &xe6+ is there any way of saving the game. By coincidence, it was on the same move that White's rook made a deci- sive entrance in the following game. Yusupov-Kengis Moscow 1983 24 Ha3! @h8 22 Bg3 An accurate choice of target, al- though White could also have won by 22 Bh3 2.8 23 Bg3 (with the threat of 24 xh6 exh6 25 Wed) 23...2yhd (23...h5 24 SF6 g6 25 ¥yxh5+) 24 Hf and the black queen is trapped. 22...g8 23 2yc4 iming, in passing, at the d6 square, which the same dark-square bishop is obliged to cover. 23....d5 Or 23.....a6 24 Wed. 24 Bh3 1.8 25 b3 Threatening simply 26 exd6. 25....x04 This hastens the end, but what else can be suggested? 26 bxed dxe5 27 Wxe5, and Black resigned, since after 27...f6 (otherwise46 Attack with Mikhail Tal 28 &xh6 mate} his position makes a pitiful impression. LD. There is also another procedure for preparing a decisive assault, which has never previously been considered in chess literature. My co-author has suggested calling it "launching"... M.T. ... and in doing so I have no claims to authorship. This is pure pla- giarism, since in ice-hockey this con- cept has existed since the game was born.” The point of it is that the puck ends up close to the goal, but no one knows what will happen with it next. Who will gain possession of the puck, who they will pass it to, in which di- rection it will fly. At any event, when I “faunch” a piece close to the enemy king, I never aim it only at one point. LD. In your opinion, is such a stra- tagem objectively strong, or is it more a means of psychological pressure? M.T. One cannot, of course, deny the effect of surprise, and often after such an escapade a mistake follows, "It is a popular practice, particularly in Canadian ice-hockey, for a player to pass the puck not to a team member, but simply close to the opponents' goal, in the hope that one of his team will get to it first and will be able to shoot at goal. Similarly in chess, a piece may be moved close to the enemy king, but without any concrete aim, much depending on future developments, including the defence chosen, In the absence of any generally accepted English name for this practice, the term “launching” has een adopted, to convey its speculative nature (Translator's note), But that alse happens in any situation: when there is a sharp turn in the play. But the main thing is that it is "normal" move, and the "launching" is in no way. disproved. After all, this is one version of concentrating force, only without a clear and single aim planned before~ hand. Tal-Vasyukov 32nd USSR Championship Kiev 1964/5 One senses a certain remoteness of the black pieces from the kingside, and White airns to exploit this factor. 15 \hSt Typical “launching”. Approaching the black king at the length of a drawn sword, the Knight is looking both at £6, and at g7 — according to circum- stances. For example, 15...ae8 can be met by 16 c4 Ab4 (16.4516 17 )xf6+ )xf6 allows White to set up a strong piece outpost in the centre with 18 45, when 19 .xf6 and 20 47 is already threatened) 17 §.xh7+ @xh7 18 Bxd7 eyxd7 19 HeS wyd4 20 Hor gxf6 21 wyhS+ with a quick mate. InThe Assault Ratio 47 the game itself the knight goes the other way. M.T. Only one should not harbour any illusions: at the moment of “launching” the knight had already been allotted the role of a condemned man. 15..@h8! A useful move from all points of view. The threat of a possible sacrifice at h7 is not so terrible (without check!), and in the variation 16 04 4576 17 S\xf6 4xf6 Black is ready after a further exchange to play his rook to g8. 16 Ged £6! Again the best, and possibly the only move. If White has time to play 17 4, his advantage over the entire board will become evident. 16...f5 was « weaker in view of 17 Qxd5 Axd5 18 £4, when 18....04 fails to 19 Bxd7! 17 ghd White might have been tempted to win a pawn by 17 Qf4, but after 17...Qyxf4 18 Syxt4 eyxf4t 19 xb7 -Had8 20 Wyxe6 He5! any real advan- - tage would have evaporated instantly — 21 Axd8 Axd8 22 4xe5? is not possible on account of 22...uyxf2+! 17..6.d6 Very interestingly played. Black only needs to follow up with 18...4\c5, sand he will seize the initiative. _ Therefore White's move is forced, but in fact it had already been planned in outline at the moment of “launching”. 18 c4 Qa6 How should White — continue? - Defending the pawn with the rook is = inconsistent: after all, the pin is main- “\ tained. On 19 .d3 Black replies 18... SES 20 xls Qxf4 21 Wreb acd. Drastic measures are required, but 19 &xh7 is insufficient in view of 19...@xh7 20 Wed+ h8! 21 exes &xc4, Only one move remains: 19 &)xg7! xg7 (bad is 19.4 20 ¥d2, or 19...Axc4 20 Axe6) 20 4 d4 HcS 21 wyed+ Gh8 22 Zyxe6 axeG& 23 wyxe6 HaeS 24 wyxdS Axh2+ 25 @hi, and now the lesser evil for Black was 25...%yxc4! 26 Wyxe4 (ixc4 27 Hfel, although the ending favours White, Bot after 25....9f4 26 yh! White retains a winning advantage in the event of 26..4xe4 27 Hd7, and on 26...¢yxe4 (the only move) he could have won immediately by 27 Hdet. M.T. We once talked about “launching" at one of the sessions of the school run by grandmaster Gipslis and myself for young Latvian players, and fairly soon I was gladdened by 17- year-old Alexei Shirov, who by that time was already World Junior Under- 16 Champion. Shirov-Stangl World Junior Ch,, Tunja 198948 Attack with Mikhail Tal White needs to get rid of the one black piece that is preventing him from beginning an offensive on the kingside — the bishop at g4. With this aim, 1! 3 followed by g2-g4 and f4-f5 would have done, but a "launching" is even better, 11 HgS Axe? 12 wxe2 Now the white knight supports the possible breakthrough 13 e6, and it is hard for Black to endure it close to his king. 12...86 13 Syxf7t ‘The goal has arisen of its own ac- cord! 13...@x17 14 £5 gxfS 15 wyh5+ Ses 16 Raf e6 17 g4 wWd8 18 exis exf5 19 Hhel we7 Only White's knight is not partici- pating in the attack, and his advantage in force suggests a solution. 20 Axg7+! @xe7 Had Black given up his queen (20... Wxg7 21 Bgl) he would then have lost, much more. 21 Hgl+ {8 22 Axh6+ Axh6 23 Wxh6+ Ge8 24 Be7 wht Forced: 24..¥9f8 25 Web+ d8 26 Begs. 25 a3! Elegantly removing the defence from f&8 and forcing rnate after 25..%yxd4 26 Beg8+ @f7 27 wWh7+ Heb 28 He’. Black resigns. In the next diagram too, White makes concrete gains by a “launching”. 17 gS! The obvious aim is 18 ge4, but there is also a reserve one that is not yet evident. 17.85 Practically atter forced, since 17...ad8 18 g4! Black altogether has a problem: what to move? 3 Balashov-Stein 39th USSR Championship Leningrad 1971 18 Qh2 £5 19 fel Qes!? ‘The best chance -- to remove his: concerns over the d6 pawn. But... 20 gA! fxg4 21 2)xh7! Goal! Of course, talking in ice- hockey terms, the match is not yet. won, but even after the most fogical. 24...$215 (bad is 21...Qxh7 22 wWe5, and wins) 22 4)g5 White has a clear advantage in view of the weakness of: e6, to where his agile knight will soon: find its way. 5 21...g3?! 22 fxg3 4£5 Here too the capture 22... xh7 23 Wed Qd4+ 24 Bhi DL 25 wxe6+ @h8 26 AFL Axh3 27 Ax Qxf6 23” Wxfo+ Bg8 29 wha d7 (or; 29,..9.08) 30 2e4 would have given: White an irresistible attack, But in the game too, after the correct 23° @eg5! he should have won® “lawfully” -~ 23....4xg3 24 Hxed+The Assault Ratio 49 Hixe8 25 GxfS gxfS 26 Qxg3 Axg3 27 Bh2 HhS 28 Bgl, or 23...Axb1 24 Eixbl Sxg3 25 Qxg3 2xg3 26 Heb with a decisive advantage. In fact, he went wrong with 23 &.xf5? (giving Black counterplay by opening the g-file), and won only after inaccuracies by both sides, during which he was close to defeat. M.T. Which in no way affects the evaluation of the entire idea, begun on the 17th move with the "launching". Tal-Averbakh USSR Team Ch. Semi-Final Riga 1961 Ruy Lopez 1 e4 e5 2 | 4Nc6 3° abs a6 4 Sat |G 5 0-0 Ae? 6 Hel bs 7 Sb3 6 8 3 0-0 9 h3 Had 10 Sc2 cd il a we7 12 Sbd2 Ac6 13 dxe5 dxe5 14 }fl Rds 15 Wed £6 16 Se3 bs Black's 14...8d8 is clearly rather provocative, since his f7 square is ~ deprived of its central defender. But if White develops unhurriedly with @.d2, Bad1 etc., as in many well known games, Black's position will prove quite satisfactory. The knight does not threaten any- thing for the moment, but it clearly intends to sacrifice itself at £7, or — in some cases — at h7. 17... ALS 18 wf3 As though confirming _ his “sacrificial mood" — now there is no way back for the knight. 18... he7 19 4d5! _wWd6 After the capture on d5 the weak- ness of f7 would already have been felt — 20,..4)e7 is not possible. 20 Se3 h6 It was difficult to tolerate the knight any longer since 21 Had! was threat- ened, but now White begins a com- bination that he has calculated right to the end. 21 Dxf6+ = Axf6 Tt would have been better to part with a pawn after 21..4yxf6 22 Wxf6 SLxf6 23 HF3. 22 Hadi = wWe750 Attack with Mikhail Tat 23 QxcS! Axdl 24 Bxdl x5 25 wxf6 hes 26 Qb3! This quiet move is the point of the combination. The black king loses its pawn protection and comes under the fire of ali three remaining white pieces. 26... 8b7 27 tyxg6+ «Of 28 ¥yh6+ And in view of the variation 28...e7 29 Bd5! eyb6 30 vyxg5+ Os 31 who+ Be7 (Gl..Gg8 32 Hd3) 32 wWh4+, Black resigned. WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE PLAYED? No.10 Compared with familiar positions, in the opening Black has lost two tempi — this is too great a handicap. To what does it give White the right? No.1 All five white pieces are aimed at the biack king. Is some further strengthening required, or is it time to seek a combinational blow? .4 Invasion Trajectories INVASION TRAJECTORIES ARE the diagonals, ranks and files that in fact make up the entire black and white arena of the chess battle. But initially they are blocked by pawn barriers, of both sides, and increasing the mobility of his pieces is essentially one of the main problems for each player. For this the pieces need clear trajectories, For such privileges a player has to battle, sacrifice pawns and pieces, or make positional concessions. But let us nevertheless begin with some particular instances: the conclu- sions of attacks along trajectories that have already been cleared. The idea of an attack along a weak- ened long dark-square diagonal is il- _. lustrated in pure form by the following example, froma ladies' competition. Archakova-Andreyeva Kaliningrad 1970 The position of the black king is quite badly compromised. White can choose between a piece attack on h6 and the advance of her h-pawn, which, however, does not completely rule out Black's defensive chances, associated in particular with 28...%b4, But the latter preferred the mercenary 28... &.xc5??, after which the main line of attack became the al-h8 diagonal. 29 Wf6 He8 30 Hd8 tye7 So, has the diversion of the defender not succeeded? Has the attack been parried? 31 Yyh8+! Black resigns, BEE wie ifiie a i ig me £ Kasparov-Korchnoi Candidates Semi-Final, London 1983 In this, the first game of the match, the dark squares in the vicinity of the black king have been weakened, and although White no longer has his dark- square bishop, this weakening could and should have been exploited with the help of his knight, in spite of the$2 Attack with Mikhail Tal piece sacrifice involved. After 21 Sse5! the threat of 22 2)g4 (and, in passing, 22 cA) obliges Black to swim with the tide: 21..Bd8 22 Wh4! Hd5 23 @)g4 BxbS, and now the interposition of 24 Badl!, cutting off the king's escape to the queenside, forces him to find a way of neutralising the oppo- nent's powerful initiative, Thus, for example, 24...4)c6 is bad on account of 25 8d7!, while on 24... 4.d5 White has 25 04 Wxc4 26 Bxd5! exd5 (otherwise the queen is lost) 27 Wd8+ He7 28 wis SFB 29 Hel wes 30 Wh8+ He7 31 Hxed+ dxe4 32 h4, retaining the initiative. Perhaps the only way to save the game is in the variation 24...d5! 25 c4 Hd6! {the open file cannot be con- ceded, since 25...4xd1, in the hope of 26 EXxdl A\c6 27 Ad7 tyxd7! 28 Af6+ @g7 29 4)xd7 Bd8!, is refuted by the interposition of 26 4)f6+!! @f8 — bad is 26.497 27 2)e8+, when Black can resign — 27 Bxdl with excellent at- tacking chances; in addition White has in reserve the drawing mechanism 27 Wh6+ Ge7 28 Ags+) 26 Afo+ SB 27 WF Bc6 28 Wh6+ Be7 29 g8+ Ge8 30 |Hf6+, with a draw, which from the. initial position is not a bad result for White. After all, his queen- side pawns are organically weak, and in the game this factor led to his defeat after 21 )g5 h6 22 Hed Axedt In the next diagram the only open file has been firmly seized by White, and now his problem is to invade "deeper" and “wider”, breaking up the defences around the black king. 34 Hd6 Ded 35 Heb! yb] 36 Ah 46 37 Bdd6 (the first stage) 37... Ql? 38 Wal (the second stage) 38. Hg8. Ragozin-Lisitsin 12th USSR Ch., Moscow 1940 After 38...Afe8 White could have: changed the invasion trajectory with 39 wal. 39 Qxf6 Qxf6 40 wd5, and in view of inevitable loss of material (4G...Bge8 41 Bxe6+ Bxe6 42 Bxe6+) soon Black resigned. But it happens much more often that attacking diagonals and files have first to be opened — and in a very fierce struggle! Perhaps the most daring — and bril- liant! —- attempt to exploit the al-h8 diagonal for attack, after first weak- ening it, was made in the following © game (see diagram next page). At that time this was one of the stan- dard positions in the Sicilian Defence, where it was considered virtually ob- | ligatory for White to repeat moves: 12. Wh6 {97 13 eyh4 Qf6. But here he made a move that initially seemed fantastic, but then quite logical.Invasion Trajectories 53 g as , ERD 8 “o ae A Ree ay ene Nezhmetdinov-Chernikov Rostov-on-Don 1962 12 Wyxf6r?t The idea of the combination imme- diately becomes clear: with .d4, 4)d5 and Ral-d1-d3-f3 to set up powerful pressure on the f6 pawn, and after its fall — an attack along the diagonal. 12...2)e2+! (by diverting the knight, Black gains a tempo) 13 4)xe2 exf6 14 c3 He8 14...d5 seems better, in order after 15 4)xd5 to continue 15...d8 or 15... 46, intending to get rid of the aggres- sive knight. But White too can try and save a tempo by continuing 15 .d4!? 15 Sd5 He6 16 Qd4 g7 17 Had1 dé On 17...xe4 White can interpose 18 {4c3 and then 19 4)xf6, while if 17.,.b5 18 4.3 Yyd8 19 &xf6 Bxf6 20 Bd6. 18 Ad3 Qd7 19 Bf3 Ob5 20 Ac3 Yyd8 21 4)xf6! Ge2 Black loses after 21...Qxfl 22 2gd+ Hg8 23 hor GLB 24 Axi7 ~ We 25 He5+ Be8 26 Hxe6, when the only way to prolong his king's life is by giving up his queen, 22 Exh7+ He8 Or 22..Qxh7 23 Bxf?+ @h6 24 Qd2+ g5 25 GQxe6 Axfl 26 Af5 wh8 27 h4 Qe2 28 Axg5+ BhS 29 3 xf 30 gxf3 wyd4+ 31 Bg? Ah8 32 &f6, and the threat of 33 424 mate forces Black to part with his queen. 23 Gh3 Bes Alas, blocking the fatal diagonal (24 4g5 was threatened) does not prove possible. 244! Qxfl 25 Sxfl Ac8 26 Bd The hasty 26 fxe5 dxe5 27 Gxe5S would have allowed Black a draw by perpetual check: 27...44d1+. But now the knight again moves into a striking position, 26..b5 27 )g5 Be7 Black cannot also plug the neigh- bouring diagonal with 27...8.c4. White first captures both black rooks with his bishops(!), and then carries out the same "little combination" as in the game, And if 27..49f6 he wins by 28 fixf7+ @g7 29 Bh7+ BB 30 Ae6+ Be? 31 Axg6+! HxeG 32 (5+, 28 Qxf7+! Bxf7 29 Bh8+ &xh8 30 &)xf7+ @h7 31 )xd8 Hxed 32 Ac6 xf4+ 33 de2 Black resigns. This is another example from the games of a player, who is not too well known in Europe, international master Rashid Nezhmetdinov... MT. ... Against whom, incidentally, I lost three of our official games, al- though I should have lost all four. And how [ lost thera! LD. Don't worry, we have already given one of them...54 Attack with Mikhail Tal Nezhmetdinov-Kotkov Russian Ch., Krasnodar 1957 The position of Black's king has cer- tainly been weakened by the advance of his pawn to £5, but how can this factor be exploited? 17 €yf4 is met by the simple 17..Qe5, and under the cover of this knight Black gradually completes his development. 17 &xc7!! Wxe7 18 WydS+ hs 19 Bes! Of course, not 19 Qxd6? 4f6!, when the picture changes sharply. 19...4)f6 26 HxfS+ Axf8 21 @b2! White plans — and carries out! — an invasion of the opponent's position along the a2-g8 diagonal, but in this he is helped by pressure and latent threats along the adjacent diagonal. 21.287 After 21..g7 White realises his plan in pure form — 22 04, with the invasion at 28, Black has a seemingly more tena- cious, and certainly more cunning defence in 21...49g7, when if White is tempted by the plausible and showy 22 Be8 Axe8 23 WE7!!, he runs into 22.. Ac6! 23 Axf8+ Hxf8 24 wxeé d3 2. 24 fxg4 26 hxg4 h6 27 f4 95, wher Black gradually frees himself. But instead of this, White had pre- pared in advance the essentially forced variation 22 ¥yd4 4)e4 (22...6)28 is met by 23 He8 wyxd4 24 Qxd4+ Op" 25 c4, while if 22..Qe7 23 wed S118 24 Wye5) 23 £3 dd 24 fxed fixed” 25 WF2!, which Biack can avoid only at the cost of a hopeless ending. Q 22 Seat Qd7 23 Axf6 Axf6 24 WIT ds 24...0.95 is also insufficient: 25 g3 Hc8 26 h4 Qc6 27 He8+ Axed 2: ¥yxc7, and White must merely avoit blundering into the mate after 28. Hel+ 29 @h27? (29 Qfl). The move in the game allows a pretty finish. 25 He8+!! Black resigns. He cannot simulta- neously defend f6 and 8. 8 So that the timely opening of a di- agonal brought the attacking side rich — and pretty, if they can be such dividends. 8 It would be naive to think that a good friend of both authors, five-times= Women's World Champion Nona Gaprindashvili, did not know about. this attacking procedure... ° ID. The point is probably that knowledge comes in different forms. Some, that was once assimilated, is stored somewhere in the depths of the brain, and is soundly asleep... M.T. Of course, no grandmaster, on’ sitting down at the board, repeats in his: mind the entire range of chess knowl: edge, but for me a sign of good form is when it is all "spontaneously", as itInvasion Trajectories 55 were, available, and what is needed surfaces of its own accord at the required moment... LD. But how can this be attained? M.T- Nothing, apart from constant training, has yet been thought up by mankind. Neither in science, nor in art, nor in chess... Gaprindashyili-Vereczi Belgrade 1974 Here White is attacking, Black is counterattacking, and it is not clear which is the more dangerous. It is White's move, and she has a draw in the rook ending (36 w¥f7+), but she has also discovered a mating motif. 36 h3t! Axfl+ 37 @h2 Here there is no point in giving any exclamation marks: White is merely continuing what has been begun. The threat is 38 hxg4+, with mate to fol- low, and 37...gxh3 allows 38 g4+ h4 39 Wyxf6+, mating. 37...g3+ 38 fxg3 We3 Black has taken control of the inva- sion square hG and is herself threaten- ing mate in one move. Therefore White gave perpetual check — 39 wye4+ @h6 40 ¥yg7+, although she could have opened one more diagonal for a decisive attack. After 39 Hxe5+ fxe5S 40 g4+ @h4 the game would have been concluded by 41 ¥e7+, and if 41..¥¥25 42 g3 mate. A finish, worthy of any textbook, in any era! The opening of files is virtually the main motif in the majority of games where the target of one side is the enemy king. Lines can be cleared by exchanges, but more often — by sac- tifices. °y wae DAR cane wa ee al Geller-Vasyukov USSR Spartakiad, Riga 1975 White has an advantage in mobili- sation, and in the placing of his king. In addition Black's position has many weaknesses (the d6 pawn, the d5 and f5 squares, and the kingside pawns), but it is very difficult to approach them. Apart from one way... 16 £4! exf4. 17 Qxf4! gxf4 18 Rxf4 &n7 At the cost of a piece White has opened fines on the kingside, exposed a56 Attack with Mikhail Tal glaring weakness at f7, acquired an outpost at d5, and his attack on the king becomes threatening. 19 AdS Yds 20 b4 Ga7 21 eS Me6 (21...dxe5 is decisively met by 22 Hxf7!) 22 exd6 He6 23 Bed (again aiming at f7) 23..8xd6 24 Qxe6 Bxe6 25 |l6+ Ye? 26 Had+ GiB 27 Radfl Hg5 28 h4 Ad8 29 Bed BeS 30 Hdd 4)e6 (30...2)e4!? came into con- sideration, creating counterplay) 31 Wee wye8 32 Ad3 Axd5 33 Bxd5 Af4 34 Wf He8 35 Bd8, and Black played on for a further ten moves, only because it was a team event. Kupreichik-Belyavsky Chelyabinsk 1974 White has an enormous spatial ad- vantage, and in addition virtually all the black pieces are practically stale- mated. Truc, had it been Black to move, with a pawn sacrifice he could have gained a “gulp of air" — 23...04 24 Axed Qf6 25 Md4 Axd4+ 26 ¥yxd4 (6 27 d3 fe’, and after White's "normal" move — 23 e4, he could have tried to set up some defensive lines with 23...f6, which, however, would hardly be sufficient. But White (and it is in fact him to = move) is not inclined to defer his as- — sault, and he resorts to a typical attack~ ing device, opening the f-file and the bl-h7 diagonal. 23 £6! Qxf6 24 fed Bhs Roughly the same variations would have occurred after the alternative 24,.,.ce8, 25 Axf6! gxf6 26 Gxh7 Ags 27 fl Be7 28 9.e4 £5 29 Q xf5 4 xf5 30 HxfS gs Here Black evidently breathed a sigh of relief... 31 Qh6 Hg6 32 Hes! Exchanging one of the three attack~ ing pieces for the only defender! After this the black king is completely ex- posed, 32..8h7 Or 32...xg5 33 LxgS Hc 34 06 f8 35 Yh7 Bek 36 wese. 33 Hxg6 fxg6 34 wh3 gg8 35 ¥yd7 Black resigns. Kostina-Sammul Tbilisi 1974Invasion Trajectories 57 Every single white piece is ready, either immediately or within a couple of moves, to take part in the attack on the enemy king. But the latter has enough — or nearly enough — de- fenders, there are no serious weak- nesses, and, most important, for the moment the position is a closed one. Hence White's immediate task —- to open lines! 24 4)g6! hxg6 It would have been preferable to decline this Greek gift and to prevent the immediate opening of lines by 24....x26 25 hxg6 h6, although even here after 26 )f7 Hxf? (evidently forced) 27 gxf7+ @xf7 28 Axf6 Axf6 29 £3 exf3+ 30 Wxf3 followed by e3- e4 White stands clearly better. 25 hxg6 (ixg6 26 Hahl 4yh5 27 BxhS Qxh5 28 YxhS Axgs 29 fxg! Not the only solution, but the most consistent: the pawn screen is com- pletely destroyed, Black's king is “un- dressed" and, strictly speaking, she could already have resigned. 29.,.e5 30 ¥yh7+ (other moves were also possible) 30...@f7 31 @xf8+ eS 32 Ac5, and White won. It is usually another gift that is of- fered at g6, when the g-pawn, suppor- ted by its neighbour on the h-file or sometimes even unsupported, moves into a double attack. However, this procedure is exam- ined in detail in one of the illustrative games in this chapter (Tal-Mohrlok). For the moment here is another exam- ple of the opening of lines, and of how the pieces can exploit this. There is nothing to herald a storm, except perhaps that one senses a rather abstract weakness of the a7-g1 diago- nal. And yet... as oH |Z. ae fe Oe emonae vs Oe Fa % & Mititelu-Tal World Student Team Ch, Varna 1958 17...yg4'! This is not a queen sacrifice, since 18 {xd8 af2+ 19 Bgl Axd1+ 20 @hil |Af2+ 21 Hel Hexd8 gives Black both material compensation, and an attack. His idea was a different one, based, incidentally, on White's accu- rate reply. 18 fxgd Wxg5 19 exdS 24 20 d6 Qxe2 21 2xe2 )xd6 22 Hxd6 4b5 23 Wyd2 Wed 24 S\c3 Axd6 25 Wxd6 Hied8 Forcing play has led to Black's de- sired result. The disturbing of the ma- terial balance is nominally not in his favour, but on the other hand all the central files are open, and the black rooks are established on them. Strictly speaking, there is no attack as yet, but with every justification Black can count on one, as soon as his rooks advance, ideally onto the 2nd rank.