McTigue Plea Agreement

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document outlines a Memorandum of Plea Agreement between Jennifer Ann McTigue and the United States regarding criminal charges of wire fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy.

McTigue is pleading guilty to Counts 1, 2, 4, 28j, and 35 of the indictment which charge her with conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud, conspiracy to launder proceeds, wire fraud, mail fraud, and money laundering respectively.

The maximum penalties include imprisonment up to 5 years for Count 1, 10 years for Count 2, 20 years each for Counts 4, 28j, and 35, fines up to $250,000 each, supervised release up to 3 years, and restitution in an amount to be determined by the court.

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 1 of 18

PageID #: 1746

ORlG\~~ l\ L
FLORENCE T. NAKAKUNI
United States Attorney
District of Hawaii

#2286

JOHN A. MICHELICH
Senior Litigation Counsel
Criminal Division, Fraud Section
United States Department of Justice
E-mail: john.michelichusdoj .gov
MARC A. WALLENSTEIN
Assistant United States Attorney
Room 6-100, PJKK Federal Bldg.
300 Ala Moana Boulevard
Honolulu, HI 96850
Telephone: (808) 541-2850
Facsimile: (808) 541-2958
E-mail: marc.wallensteinusdoj .gov

FILED IN THE:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF HAWAII

f JUL 2 2 2015
aj_{_~'clockand ; -rmi ._
SUE

BEITI~ERK

M.

Attorneys for Plaintiff


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

CR. NO. 14-00010 CBM

Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM OF PLEA AGREEMENT
v.

JENNIFER ANN MCTIGUE

( 01)

DATE:
July 21, 2015
TIME:
11:30 a.m .
JUDGE: Consuela B. Marshal

Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OF PLEA AGREEMENT
Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by its attorney, the
United States Attorney for the District of Hawaii, and the
Defendant, JENNIFER ANN MCTIGUE, and her standby counsel, Lynn
Panagakos, have agreed upon the following :

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 2 of 18

1.

PageID #: 1747

Defendant acknowledges that she has been charged

in the Indictment with violating Title 18, United States Code,


Section 371, 1956(h), 1343, 1341 and 1957.
as her own attorney in these proceedings.

Defendant is acting
Stand-by counsel has

been appointed but does not represent Defendant.

Accordingly,

any references to Defendant's "attorney" in this Agreement refer


to Defendant herself, not to her standby counsel.
2.

Defendant has read the charges against her

contained in the Indictment, and those charges have been fully


explained to her by her standby counsel.
3.

Defendant fully understands the nature and

elements of the crimes with which she has been charged.


4.

Defendant will enter a voluntary plea of guilty to

Counts 1 and 2 of the Indictment, which charge her with knowingly


conspiring and agreeing with others to commit federal offenses,
to wit: wire fraud, mail fraud and money laundering.

Defendant

will also enter a voluntary plea of guilty to Counts 4,

28j

and

35, which charge her with wire fraud, mail fraud, and money
laundering, respectively.

In exchange, the United States

Attorney's Office in the District of Hawaii agrees to dismiss the


remaining charges in the Indictment against the Defendant at the
time of sentencing.
5.

Defendant agrees that this Memorandum of Plea

Agreement shall be filed and become part of the record in this

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 3 of 18

PageID #: 1748

case.
6.

Defendant enters these pleas because she is in

fact guilty of conspiring to commit wire and mail fraud and


conspiring to launder proceeds from wire and mail fraud offenses
in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and
1956(h), and committing wire f .raud, mail fraud, and money
laundering in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections
1343, 1341, and 1957, and agrees that this plea is voluntary and
not the result of force or threats.
7.

Defendant understands that the maximum penalties

for the offenses to which she is pleading guilty include:


a.

Count 1: a period of imprisonment of not more than

five (5) years; a fine of up to $250,000; a term of supervised


release of not more than three years; restitution in an amount
that will be determined by the Court at sentencing; and a $100
special assessment.
b.

Count 2:

a period of imprisonment of not more than

ten (10) years; a fine of up to $250,000; a term of supervised


release of not more than three years; restitution in an amount
that will be determined by the Court at sentencing; and a $100
special assessment.
c.

Count 4: a period of imprisonment of not more than

twenty (20) years; a fine of up to $250,000; a term of supervised


release of not more than three years; restitution in an amount

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 4 of 18

PageID #: 1749

that will be determined by the Court at sentencingi and a $100


special assessment
d.

Count 28: a period of imprisonment of not more than

twenty (20) yearsi a fine of up to $250,000i a term of supervised


release of not more than three yearsi restitution in an amount
that will be determined by the Court at sentencingi and a $100
special assessment
e.

Count 35: a period of imprisonment of not more than

ten (10) yearsi a fine of up to $250,000i a term of supervised


release of not more than three yearsi restitution in an amount
that will be determined by the Court at sentencingi and a $100
special assessment
c.

Defendant agrees to pay $500 to the District

Court's Clerk's Office, to be credited to said special


assessment, before the commencement of any portion of sentencing .
Defendant acknowledges that failure to make such full advance
payment in a form and manner acceptable to the prosecution will
allow, though not require, the prosecution to withdraw from this
agreement at its option.
8.

Defendant admits the following facts and agrees

that they are not a detailed recitation, but merely an outline of


what happened in relation to the charge to which Defendant is
pleading guilty:

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 5 of 18

a.

PageID #: 1750

During the period of the charged scheme, McTigue

worked in conjunction with Marc Melton and Sakara Blackwell to


release real estate mortgages encumbering property in Hawaii for
the purpose of marketing and selling the properties as mortgagefree.

In early April, 2011, McTigue secured a "Satisfaction of

Mortgage" form used by mortgage companies to release mortgages at


the Hawaii Bureau of Conveyances.

McTigue's purpose in securing

an authentic, working mortgage release form was to assure the


success of the process McTigue, Melton and Blackwell were
applying to release the mortgages by insuring that the release
forms appeared genuine and. would be accepted by the Hawaii Bureau
of Conveyances.

McTigue, working with Melton and Blackwell,

released mortgages encumbering a total of seven properties in


Hawaii, including three properties that McTigue herself purchased
at foreclosure auction.
b.

Upon gaining title to a property, or identifying a

property with cooperating owners, Mctigue and/or Melton delivered


documents by U.S. mail to the financial institutions holding
mortgage liens against the properties.

The mailed materials set

forth terms in a document identified by McTigue and / or Melton at


various times as a "Note Tender Agreement"

(NTA) , EFT Tender

Agreement, or "Mortgage Satisfaction Agreement"

(MSA).

The EFT

Tender Agreement, NTA and/or MSA represented that a valid


"negotiable instrument" or promissory note had been sent to the

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 6 of 18

PageID #: 1751

lender in the approximate amount of the outstanding mortgage


liens.

The documents contained language stating that in the

event the mortgage company failed to acknowledge and respond to


the conditions in the "agreement" within a short period of time,
usually three (3) days, Melton and/or McTigue, or others, would
become authorized to act as representatives of the financial
institutions holding the mortgages, and the bank would acquiesce
to them performing acts on behalf of the lender, including the
right to "execute and record a satisfaction of Lien for
mortgages."

No lending institution receiving these materials

ever expressly agreed to permit Melton or McTigue to act as its


agent for purposes of releasing a mortgage or mortgages.
c.

Once no response was received from the lending

institution, McTigue and/or Melton created and filed with the


Hawaii Bureau of Conveyances a "Satisfaction of Mortgage" form
purporting to be from the lending institutions holding the
mortgages.

These Satisfactions of Mortgage were signed by Melton

representing himself to be a bank official, such as VicePresident, or the bank's authorized representative.
filed the false satisfaction of mortgage documents
of Conveyances.

McTigue
~t

the Bureau

Melton's signature representing himself to be a

lending institution official or representative was

notarized ~

Once accepted by and filed with the Hawaii Bureau of Conveyances,


the "Satisfaction of Mortgage" reflected that the outstanding

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 7 of 18

PageID #: 1752

mortgage(s) encumbering the property had been satisfied .

Because

the Bureau of Conveyances is the official public record for


recordation of all interests affecting real estate in Hawaii, the
public record then officially reflected the properties to be
mortgage-free.
d.

Following the filing of the false satisfaction of

mortgage forms with the Bureau of Conveyances, Blackwell then


marketed and sold the properties.

McTigue, Melton, and Blackwell

ultimately conveyed title to good faith purchasers with a


warranty deed that represented the properties were free and clear
of encumbrances.

Because the mortgage liens were shown as

"satisfied" on the public record with the Bureau of Conveyances,


escrow officers closing the sale transactions did not pay the
outstanding mortgage balances.

McTigue, Melton, and Blackwell

materially omitted from disclosure to buyers of real estate that


they had applied this process to release existing mortgages on
properties.

As a result, McTigue and Melton were paid half the

net proceeds from the sale of the properties, which were then
divided amongst them through a series of wire transfers.
e.

Material misrepresentations were made with respect

to each of the seven properties, in that Melton was represented


to be a lending institution official or authorized
representative, when in fact that was not true, and McTigue well
knew that no court of law had legitimized the process used by

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 8 of 18

PageID #: 1753

McTigue, Melton and Blackwell to release the unsatisfied mortgage


liens.

Similarly, McTigue, Melton and Blackwell also made

material misrepresentations to buyers of properties by conveying


warranty deeds representing the properties to be free and clear
of encumbrances without disclosing the process utilized by them
to release existing mortgage liens.
f.

Funds wired interstate to fund the transactions

were sent to title companies located in the State of Hawaii for


the purpose of closing real estate transactions.
g.

McTigue, Melton, and Blackwell, in agreement with

each other and in furtherance of their scheme, deposited funds


derived from their activities charged in Counts 3-29 into bank
accounts under their control, in amounts greater than $10,000 per
monetary transaction. The Bank of Hawaii, Pacific Rim Bank, First
Hawaiian Bank and Bank of America are financial institutions
doing business in interstate and foreign commerce.
h.

In furtherance of the scheme outlined above,

McTigue, Melton and Blackwell caused multiple interstate wire


communications to occur.

The wire communications more fully

described in Counts 3 through 23 of the Indictment are herein


acknowledged and admitted by Defendant.
i.

In furtherance of the scheme outlined above,

multiple mailings occurred.

The mailings more fully described in

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 9 of 18

PageID #: 1754

Counts 24 through 29 of the Indictment are herein acknowledged


and admitted by Defendant.
9.

Pursuant to CrimLR32.1(a) of the Local Rules of

the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, the
parties agree that the charges to which Defendant is pleading
guilty adequately reflect the seriousness of the actual offense
behavior and that accepting this Agreement will not undermine the
statutory purposes of sentencing.
10.

Pursuant to CrimLR32.1(b) of the Local Rules of

the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii and
Section 681.4 of the Sentencing Guidelines, the parties stipulate
to the following for the purpose of the sentencing of Defendant
in connection with this matter:
a. Defendant's agreement herein to enter into a guilty
plea is entered less than one week before trial is set to begin,
and therefore is not notice of intent to plead guilty in a timely
manner, because it has not permitted the government to avoid
preparing for trial as to Defendant.

Accordingly, the United

States Attorney will not move in the Government's Sentencing


Statement for a one-level reduction in the sentencing offense
level pursuant to Guideline 3El.l(b).
b.

Restitution:

The Defendant understands that the

Court may Order the Defendant to be jointly and severally liable

for restitution in this case.

~~

~he ~efeft~~nt a~rees ~Rat ~So ~


~
9

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 10 of 18

~itntj on

CillllQJJDt

J;otecl lss s amG<tnt


11.

sha~ l

be $ 3,145, 2 5 9...-G-&, vvh:i:h

at~--'-a

PageID #: 1755

Qt._
k:::::::e~
- - --- .

r~ r'

The parties agree that notwithstanding the

~&f

parties' Agreement herein, the Court is not bound by any


stipulation entered into by the parties but may, with the aid of
the presentence report, determine the facts relevant to
sentencing.
12.

Pursuant to Section 6Bl.4 of the Sentencing

Guidelines, the parties identify the following facts that are in


dispute for the purpose of sentencing of Defendant in connection
with this matter:
a.

The Defendant understands that the government

will contend that the loss amount, pursuant to USSG Section


2B1.1 related to Defendant is $3,145,259.
reserves the right to
b.

obje~t

The Defendant

to this amount.

The following adjustments under USSG 2B1.B

may be in dispute at sentencing:


involved 10 or more victims;
sophisticated means;

(i) whether the offense

(ii) whether the offense involved

(iii) whether the defendant derived more

than $1,000,000 in gross receipts from one or more financial


institutions;

(iv) whether Defendant should receive an upward

adjustment for aggravating role pursuant to USSG 3B1.1; and (v)


whether Defendant should receive an upward adjustment for
obstructing or impeding the administration of justice pursuant to

10

'

''

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 11 of 18

PageID #: 1756

USSG 3Cl. 1.
13.

Defendant is aware that she has the right to

appeal the sentence imposed under Title 18, United States Code,
Section 3742(a).

Defendant knowingly waives the right to appeal,

except as indicated in subparagraph "b" below, any sentence


within the maximum provided in the statute(s) of conviction or
the manner in which that sentence was determined on any of the
grounds set forth in Section 3742, or on any ground whatever, in
exchange for the concessions made by the prosecution in this plea
agreement.
a.

Defendant also waives her right to challenge

her sentence or the manner in which it was determined in any


collateral attack, including, but not limited to, a motion
brought under Title 28, United States Code, Section 2255, except
that Defendant may make such a challenge (1) as indicated in
subparagraph "b" below, or (2) based on a claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel.
b.

If the Court imposes a sentence greater than

specified in the guideline range determined by the Court to be


applicable to Defendant, Defendant retains the right to appeal
the portion of her sentence greater than specified in that
guideline range and the manner in which that portion was
determined under Section 3742 and to challenge that portion of
her sentence in a collateral attack.

11

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 12 of 18

c.

PageID #: 1757

The prosecution retains its right to appeal

the sentence and the manner in which it was determined on any of


the grounds stated in Title 18, United States Code, Section
3742 (b).

14.

The Defendant understands that the District Court

in imposing sentence will consider the provisions of the


Sentencing Guidelines.

The Defendant agrees that there is no

promise or guarantee of the applicability or nonapplicability of


any Guideline or any portion thereof, notwithstanding any
representations or predictions from any source.
15.

The Defendant understands that this Agreement will

not be accepted or rejected by the Court until there has been an


opportunity by the Court to consider a presentence report, unless
the Court decides that a presentence report is unnecessary.

The

Defendant understands that the Court will not accept an agreement


unless the Court determines that the remaining charges adequately
reflect the seriousness of the actual offense behavior
and accepting the agreement will not undermine the statutory
purposes of sentencing.
16.

Defendant understands that by pleading guilty she

surrenders certain rights, including the following:


a.

If Defendant persisted in a plea of not guilty

to the charges against her she would have the right to a public
and speedy trial.

The trial could be either a jury trial or a

12

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 13 of 18

trial by a judge sitting without a jury.


right to a jury trial.

PageID #: 1758

The Defendant has a

However, in order that the trial be

conducted by the judge sitting without a jury, the Defendant, the


prosecution and the judge all must agree that the trial be
conducted by the judge without a jury.
b.

If the trial is a jury trial, the jury would

be composed of twelve laypersons selected at . random.

Defendant

would have a say in who the jurors would be by removing


prospective jurors for cause where actual bias or other
disqualification is shown, or without cause by exercising
peremptory challenges.

The jury would have to agree unanimously

before it could return a verdict of either guilty or not guilty.


The jury would be instructed that the Defendant is presumed
innocent, and that it could not convict her unless, after hearing
all the evidence, it was persuaded of her guilt beyond a
reasonable doubt.
c.

If the trial is held by a judge without a

jury, the judge would find the facts and determine, after hearing
all the evidence, whether or not he or she was persuaded of the
Defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
d.

At a trial, whether by a jury or a judge, the

prosecution would be required to present its witnesses and other


evidence against the Defendant.

Defendant would be able to

confront those prosecution witnesses and she would be able to

13

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 14 of 18

cross-examine them.

PageID #: 1759

In turn, Defendant could present witnesses

and other evidence on her own behalf.

If the witnesses for the

Defendant would not appear voluntarily, she could require their


attendance through the subpoena power of the Court.
e.

At a trial, the Defendant would have a

privilege against self-incrimination so that she could decline to


testify, and no inference of guilt could be drawn from her
refusal to testify.
17.

Defendant understands that by pleading guilty, she

is waiving all of the rights set forth in the preceding


paragraph.

Defendant understands those rights, and the

consequences of the waiver of those rights .


18.

Defendant acknowledges that no threats, promises,

or representations have been made, nor agreement reached, other


than those set forth in this Agreement, to induce Defendant to
plead guilty.
19.

Should the Court refuse to accept this Agreement,

it is null and void and neither party shall be bound thereto.


The parties understand that the Court's rejection of any
stipulation between the parties does not constitute a refusal to
accept this Agreement since the Court is expressly not bound by
stipulations between the parties.
20.

Defendant understands that the prosecution will

apprise the Court and the United States Probation Office of the

14

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 15 of 18

PageID #: 1760

nature, scope and extent of Defendant's conduct regarding the


charges against her, related matters, and any matters in
aggravation or mitigation relevant to the issues involved in
sentencing.
21.

In the event that Defendant does not breach any of

the terms of this Agreement but the Court nonetheless


refuses to accept the Agreement after Defendant has made
statements to law enforcement authorities or representatives of
the United States Attorney's Office pursuant to this Agreement,
the prosecution agrees not to use said statements in its case in
chief in the trial of the Defendant in this matter.

Defendant

understands that this does not bar the use of information and
evidence derived from said statements or prohibit the use of the
statements by the prosecution in cross-examination or rebuttal.
22.

The Defendant understands that the prosecution will

not move the Court Pursuant to Guideline 5Kl . 1 and Rule 35(b),
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to depart from the
Guidelines, because there is no basis for Defendant to provide
substantial assistance to authorities in the investigation or
prosecution of another person who has committed an offense.
23.

Forfeiture:

The Defendant agrees to entry of an

order of forfeiture for any and all funds located in the


following accounts :

15

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 16 of 18

Financial Institution

Account or Policy Number

Mass Mutual

21016084

Northwestern Mutual

1638642

Northwestern Mutual

12953801

Northwestern Mutual

13777171

Northwestern Mutual

20249890

Pacific Rim Bank

1013003031

MTL Insurance

001139725A

MTL Insurance

001141329A

USAA Federal Savings Bank

00256-3939-0

USAA Federal Savings Bank

00256-3938-2

PageID #: 1761

/'tW

received ~ ,-;

McTigue further agrees that such

by Defendant as a result of her participation in the wire and


mail fraud conspiracy charged in Count 1 of the Indictment.

The

United States agrees to make a restoration request to the


Attorney General, or her delegate, so that property forfeited in
this case may be used to compensate victims.

The United States

Attorney's Office makes no representations as to when or whether


such a restoration request may be granted by the Attorney General
or her delegates.

McTigue understands that the decision to grant

or deny such a request is at the discretion of the Attorney


General.
The United States further agrees not to request forfeiture

16

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 17 of 18

of items in her safety deposit box.

17

PageID #: 1762

Case 1:14-cr-00010-CBM Document 192 Filed 07/22/15 Page 18 of 18

DATED:

PageID #: 1763

Honolulu, Hawaii,

AGREED:
FLORENCE T. NAKAKUNI
United States Attorney
District of Hawaii

!d
fyHN MICHELICH
Senior Litigation Counsel
Fraud Section

.r

-~ 11/~ 161k ~Mz;e,

JE
ER ANN MCTIGUE
De endant

MARC A. WALLENSTEIN
Assistant U.S. Attorney

18

You might also like