A Survey/ Development of Passive Optical Access Networks Technologies

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

ISSN 2320-5407

International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 2, 820-828

Journal homepage:http://www.journalijar.com

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
OF ADVANCED RESEARCH

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A survey/ Development of Passive Optical Access Networks Technologies


*Nahla Abdulrahman Hussain
Computer Science Department College of Science / University of Baghdad

Manuscript Info

Abstract

Manuscript History:
Received: 14 December 2013
Final Accepted: 19 January 2014
Published Online: February 2014

Key words:
Passive Optical Network, Time
Division
Multiple
Access,
Wavelength Division Multiplexing
and Orthogonal Frequency Division
Multiplexing.

*Corresponding Author

The bandwidth requirements of the telecommunication network users


increased rapidly during the last decades. Optical access technologies must
provide the bandwidth demand for each user.The passive optical access
networks (PONs) support a maximum data rate of 100 Gbps by using the
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) technique in the
optical access network. In this paper, the optical broadband access networks
with many techniques from Time Division Multiplexing Passive Optical
Networks (TDM PON) to Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex Passive
Optical Networks (OFDM PON) are presented. The architectures,
advantages, disadvantages, and main parameters of these optical access
networks are discussed and reportedwhich have many advantages to become
next-generation broadband access networks.

NahlaAbdulrahmanHussain
Copy Right, IJAR, 2013,. All rights reserv

Introduction
The appearance of new Internet services such as video conference, high performance gaming, video telephony, high
definition television and E-learning have changed the broadband environment. Access technologies have been
evolving from wire based subscribers to optical fiber networks. As the installed digital subscriber line (DSL) has
turned out to be insufficient for providing the bandwidth required for triple-play services (data, voice, video), and it
has become essential to extend the optical networks toward end users. Figure (1) shows forecast of the evolution of
the global consumer internet traffic from 2011 to 2016 [1]. Among the several available technologies, passive
optical network (PON) has been considered as a promising option due to its large throughput and quality of service
(QoS) [2].
In [3] migration from classical PON to new generation PON (NG PON) is discussed. The classical PONs can
offer sufficient bandwidth, but in the long term (five or more years), this bandwidth can be the bottleneck.
NG PON can solve this problem (bottleneck) because NG PON has four times more bandwidth. Ling in [4] have
concentrated on identifying why 10GPON should be standardized and how WDM PON would be able to solve the
ever-increasing bandwidth requirements. In [5], the authors propose a next-generation hybrid WDM/TDM optical
access network architecture called Stanford University a CCESS or SUCCESS.
This architecture provides practical migration steps from current-generation time-division multiplexing (TDM)passive optical network (PONs) to future WDM optical access networks.Biswas et al in [6] mentioned that OFDM
technology that is well-suited for future PON Systems. But it requires advanced Digital Signal Processing (DSP),
providing an analysis of primary cost factors in a practical DSP-based OFDMA-PON implementation and survey the
most recent achievements in this domain. The rest of this paper is organized as follow section 2 will illustrate PON
architecture, section 3 explain TDMA PON technology, section 4 illustrate hybrid TDMA/WDM PON, then WDM
PON discuss in section 5, section 6 will explain OFDM PON and conclusion will be in section 7.

820

ISSN 2320-5407

International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 2, 820-828

PON Architecture
All transmissions in a PON are performed between Optical Line Terminal (OLT) in the Central Office (CO) side
and Optical Network Units (ONU) at the user side through passive optical splitter as shown in Figure (2). In the
downstream direction (transmission from OLT to ONUs), PON is a point-to-multipoint network, and in the upstream
direction (transmission from ONUs to OLT) it is a multipoint-to-point network [7].
In its most general form, an optical network will contain both active and passive optical elements. Active
components can be located at the central office, within termination points at the customers premises, and in the
repeaters, switches, and other equipment located in the transmission path between the central office and the
customer.
They are used for functions such as coupling light from one fiber to another, redirecting the light signal to
another transmission path, splitting the signal into two or more branches, amplifying the optical signal power, and
processing information contained in the signal [5]. If active devices are used in the transmission path, they require
electrical power to perform their functions.Some type of dynamic status monitoring mechanism is needed to verify
that the active devices are working properly.
If the status information indicates a pending or actual malfunction, a network operator needs to take action and
dispatch a maintenance person to the fielded unit to correct the fault. These factors add cost and complexity to the
system operation compared to the case in which no active devices are used between network endpoints. In contrast
to conventional networks, a PON has no active components between the central office and the customers premises.
Instead, only completely passive optical components are placed in the network transmission path to guide the traffic
signals contained within specific optical wavelengths.
Replacing active devices with passive components provides a significant cost savings in maintenance by eliminating
the need to power and manage active components in the outside cable plant [8].
There are several PON protocols and standards defined by the ITU organization with varying levels of maturity. The
three main ones are BPON, EPON and GPON. Table 1 below illustrates their main features.

TDMAPON
Two key network functions of an OLT are to control user traffic and to assign bandwidth dynamically to the
ONT modules. Since up to 32 ONTs use the same wavelength and share a common optical fiber transmission line,
some type of transmission synchronization must be used to avoid collisions between traffic coming from different
ONTs. The simplest method is to use Time-Division Multiple Access (TDMA), wherein each user transmits
information within a specific assigned time slot at a prearranged data rate as shown in Figure (3). The multiplexed
downstream signal is broadcast to all the ONTs. Each ONT discards or accepts the incoming information packets,
depending on the packet header addressing. Sending traffic in the upstream direction is more complicated, since all
users have to time share the same wavelength. To avoid collisions between the transmissions of different users, the
system uses a TDMA protocol.
However, this does not make efficient use of the bandwidth available since many time slots will be empty when
several network users do not have information to be sent back to the central office. A more efficient process is
Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation (DBA), wherein time slots of an idle or low-utilization user are assigned to a more
active customer.
The exact DBA scheme implemented through an OLT in a particular network depends on factors such as user
priorities, the quality of service guaranteed to specific customers, the desired response time for bandwidth
allocation, and the amount of bandwidth requested by a customer [9].
The OLT controls and coordinates the traffic from each ONT by sending permissions to them to transmit during a
specific time slot. The time slots are synchronized so that transmission bursts from different users do not collide.
Since each end terminal is located at different distances from the central office, the OLT uses a ranging technique to
measure the logical distance between the users and the OLT. This enables each ONT to adjust its transmission
timing properly to avoid traffic collisions.

WDM PON
TDM-PONs cannot cope with the requirements of future network evolution with respect to aggregated
bandwidth and the allowable power budget [10]. These problems can be mitigated with WDM-PONs, in which
ONUs are assigned individual wavelengths such that the bandwidth of fiber is utilized more effectively to further
increase the transmission speed.
A major point to keep in mind when implementing a Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) system is that the
wavelengths in WDM must be spaced properly to avoid interference between adjacent channels. A basic PON

821

ISSN 2320-5407

International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 2, 820-828

design accommodates this through the selection of wavelengths at 1310 in upstream direction, 1490 in downstream
direction for data and voice, and 1550 nm for video.
WDM-PON provides the dedicated bandwidth of a P2P network with the fiber sharing inherent in PON access
networks. The straightforward approach to build a WDM-PON is to employ a separate wavelength channel from the
OLT to each ONU, as shown in Figure (4).
In the downstream direction, the wavelength channels are routed to the corresponding ONUs using a passive
Arrayed Waveguide Grating (AWG) as a WDM demultiplexer. The AWG replaces the passive powersplitter used in
a TDM-PON. The AWG is a passive optical device with the special property of periodicity, the cyclic nature by
which multiple wavelength channels are routed to the same output port from an input port. This enables spatial reuse
of the wavelength channels. The insertion loss does not scale with the number of users and is considerably smaller
than a passive splitter and (for example a 1x32 splitter introduces loss of 18 dB while the loss of AWG is typically
in the range of 3-5 dB, independently of the number of routed channels).
For the upstream direction of the WDM-PON, the same AWG performs as a WDM multiplexer to combine all
the upstream wavelength channels together. At the OLT, another AWG is employed along with a receiver array to
detect the upstream signals. In such WDM-PON architecture, each subscriber gets a dedicated Point to Point (P2P)
optical channel to the OLT, although they are sharing a common Point to Multi Point (P2MP) physical architecture
like the TDM-PON.
Because of the virtual P2P architecture of WDM-PON, it has many advantages over the TDM-PON [11]:
Huge bandwidth: each ONU is assigned an individual wavelength (each user can operate at a rate up to the full bit
rate of a wavelength channel).
The usage of the AWG router removes the splitting loss problem increasing the reach and scalability.
Good security and protocol transparency: no sharing information between users.
Less complexity and easier implementation: no need for any sophisticated media access controller algorithms to
manage the timing of the ONU transmissions.
Also there are several issues need to be developed in WDM-PON they are:
AWGs usually require thermal control to keep their wavelength channels locked to the ITU grid. Technology
advances have allowed the recent commercialization of a thermal AWGs.
Each wavelength-specific sources requires thermo-electric coolers to stabilize their wavelengths. Wavelength
stabilized lasers are usually expensive.
The scheme of WDM-PON require a different or colored transceiver for each user, resulting in high costs for
installation, management and maintenance.

Hybrid TDMA/WDM PON


Hybrid WDMTDM PON that applies wavelength-independent or colorless ONU technologies will further reduce
implementation and maintenance expenses.
The wavelength-reuse colorless ONU technology imposes a physical constraint in the hybrid WDMTDM
PON that the same wavelength is used for both upstream and downstream traffic transmission of an ONU.An
integration of WDM and TDM techniques applied in the PON results in a WDMTDM PON, in which a number of
wavelengths are deployed and eachwavelength is shared through TDM among several ONUs rather than being
dedicated to a single ONU. AWDMTDM PON therefore presents an economical upgrade step from TDM PON to
WDM PON by offering both high-bandwidth and resource utilization efficiency [12].
The design and deployment of the hybrid WDMTDM PON face many challenges. Its architecture should allow
wavelengths to be assigned to different ONUs dynamically, and traffic scheduling algorithms should be able to
dynamically allocate not only wavelengths but also timeslots to the ONUs based on traffic conditions and available
resources, that is, perform dynamic wavelength andbandwidth allocation (DWBA).A wavelength-reuse colorless
ONU technology is used to achieve higher cost-effective deployment by using a Reflective Semiconductor Optical
Amplifier (RSOA) instead of a tunable wavelength transmitter in the ONU.
In a hybrid WDMTDM PON architecture that applies colorless/wavelength-reuse ONU technologies, only an
array of transmitters (Txs) is deployed in the CO, and each ONU is equipped with a Tunable Optical Filter (TOF), a
Receiver (Rx), and perhaps a RSOA as shown in Figure (5).
In this architecture, a splitter is deployed to allow all wavelengths to reach every ONU, so that an ONU can join
other ONUs by selecting the same wavelength. The TOF is deployed in the ONU to select the downstream

822

ISSN 2320-5407

International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 2, 820-828

wavelength.More than one ONU can select the same wavelength, and this enables the wavelength and timeslot
resources to be dynamically shared among the ONUs in the network [5].
In hybrid WDM/TDM PONs, the optical laser used for generating optical signals with multiple wavelengths.
Depending on the wavelength generation capability, there are three major classes of lasers: multi wavelength lasers,
wavelength-specified lasers, and wavelength-tunable lasers [13].
Multi wavelength lasers are used at OLT to generate downstream traffic or seed optical network units (ONUs) with
optical signals for their upstream data transmission. Instead of generating multiple wavelengths, a wavelengthspecified laser can only emit one specific wavelength.
Wavelength-tunable lasers are able to generate multiple wavelengths, but only one wavelength at a time.
Comparing with wavelength-fixed lasers, tunable lasers possess advantages in two major aspects. First, from the
perspective of network operators, tunable lasers enable the color-free property of ONUs, which further facilitates the
simplified inventory management, reduced sparing cost, and automated wavelength provisioning. Second, from the
perspective of the MAC layer, the wavelength tunability of tunable lasers facilitates the statistical multiplexing of
traffic from all ONUs, thus potentially yielding better system performance. Owing to these advantages, wavelengthtunable lasers are promising light source generators for hybrid WDM/TDM PONs.

OFDM PON
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) technology utilizes several low bit rate sub-carriers of the
link to carry different QAM symbols simultaneously. When the scheme is employed to allow for Multiple Access
(OFDMA), different users are assigned to different OFDM sub-carriers. Recently OFDM has also been making its
way into the optics world, both in core [14], and access networks.

Basic principles of OFDM


OFDM is a multi-carrier transmission technique, which divides the available spectrum into many carriers, each one
being modulated by a low rate data stream. OFDM is similar to FDMA in that the multiple user access is achieved
by subdividing the available bandwidth into multiple channels that are then allocated to users. However, OFDM
uses the 10 spectrum much more efficiently by spacing the channels much closer together. This is achieved by
making all the carriers orthogonal to one another, preventing interference between the closely spaced carriers
[15].The reason why OFDM boasts a spectral efficiency advantage over conventional FDM is precisely that it
eliminates the spectral guard bands by invoking the principle of orthogonality.

OFDM based PON


In OFDM, a high-speed data stream is converted to aparallel of multiple low-speed data streams. The low-speed
data streams are converted from frequency domain to time domain through inverted fast Fourier transform (IFFT),
and then combined for signal transmission. Because of the nature of Fourier transform, the sub-carriers carrying the
low speed datastreams are orthogonal to each other. At the receiver side, the received signal is converted back from
time domain to frequency domain via fast Fourier transform (FFT). The signal distortions can be compensated
through the signal equalization in the frequency domain.
The practical OFDM-PON implementation uses the orthogonal sub-carriers transmission realized by IFFT and FFT
is shown in Figure (7). Advanced DSP enables practical, cost efficient and multiuser implementation.
OFDM sub-carriers can be dynamically assigned to services in different time slots. By properly designing the
sub-carrier allocations, transparent pipes can be reserved within the overall OFDM signal bandwidth, which can be
used to transmit different services independently.Figure (8) shows an example of OFDM-PON with thetransparent
pipes for multiple services. Sub-carriers are reserved as two transparent pipes for the legacy TOM(Tl /EI) services of
the business area and the RF radio signal from the mobile base station.
The number of sub-carriers of each transparent pipe depends on the bandwidth required by the service. The
remaining sub-carriers are allocated to packet basedIP traffic, shared between the ONU-1 and ONU-3 both
infrequency and time domain. The sub-carriers and time slots allocation are controlled by the optical line terminal
(OLT) and sent to the ONUs over non-reserved sub-carriers in the preconfigured time slots.
To complete downstream transmission, the OFDM frame and any other analog signals are mixed by an electrical
coupler to drive the optical modulator. At the ONU side each ONU selects its own data or signal from its preassigned subcarrier(s) and/or time slots, as communicated by the OLT scheduler. To transmit upstream traffic, each

823

ISSN 2320-5407

International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 2, 820-828

ONU maps its data and/or signal to its assigned OFDM subcarrier(s), nulls all remaining subcarriers, and performs
OFDM modulation to generate a complete frame. For upstream transmission, each ONU maps its data and/or signal
to its assigned OFDM subcarrier(s), nulls all remaining subcarriers, and performs OFDM modulation to generate a
complete frame. In Figure (8), for example, ONU-3 would assign zeros to the subcarriers carrying the traffic of both
ONU-1 and ONU-2, and use its pre-assigned OFDM subcarriers for upstream Ethernet packet transmission. It is also
noted that ONUs with a variety of services and data rates can all be supported in a heterogeneous OFDMA-PON,
which can help achieve a high degree of network flexibility and effectively manage cost.
There are multiple variants of optical OFDMA [16] can be illustrated in Figure (9). The simplest form, shown in
Figure(9-a), consists of assigning different subcarriers from the same OFDM band to different users.
Adaptive bandwidth provisioning is thus performed by changing the number of subcarriers allocated to a given
user/service depending on the real-time traffic demand.
The result is a dynamic bandwidth allocation scheme can be implemented in DSP via MAC layer algorithms
[17]. To achieve higher granularity and flexibility, each OFDM subcarrier bandwidth resource can be further
subdivided in time, by combining one subcarrier OFDMA with classic TDMA, as shown in Figure 9(b). In this
scheme (OFDM+TDMA), multiple users can access the same OFDM subcarrier in different time slots. As in
OFDMA, the OFDM+TDMA approach can be implemented in DSP via MAC layer protocols. Finally, by
implementing the DSP-based OFDMA+TDMA bandwidth scheduling of Figure 9(b) on each of possible WDM
wavelengths, a (WDM+OFDM+TDM) scheme can be achieved as in Figure 9(c). In this case, the first step of
wavelength assignment can be static, as is the case in conventional point-to-point WDM systems, or dynamic, if
tunable optical devices are available at the ONU receivers. In either case, colorless (wavelength agnostic) ONU-side
optics are a key requirement.

Key Benefits of OFDM PON Transmission


OFDM PON regarded as a very promising solution for future PON-based access due to its benefits those can be
summarized as below:
Speed and distance
- Up to 100Gb/s/ downstream transmission.
- Up to 100Gb/s/ upstream transmission.
- Up to 100Km reach for PON, 1000km for metro.
Cost efficiency
- Colorless architecture.
- Stable, accurate DSP- based operation.
- Non-disruptive to legacy ODN.
Flexibility
- Adaptive modulation and FCE on subscriber basis.
- Dynamic band width allocation in time and frequency.
- Transparency to arbitrary services.
- Optically-transparent ONUs.

Conclusion
As an ultimate broadband access solution for future Internet, the passive optical network (PON) brings many
advantages such as cost effectiveness, energy savings, service transparency, and signal security over other last-/firstmile technologies. Over the past several years, we have witnessed significant development and deployment of timedivision multiple access (TDMA) PONs such as IEEE 802.3ah Ethernet PONs (EPONs) and ITUT G.984 Gigabit
PONs (GPONs) to provide high-quality triple-play services for residential users. However, future Internet
applications, apart from triple-play service (e.g., peer-to-peer [P2P] social networking, online video sharing, grid
computing, and mobile Internet), along with their unique traffic characteristics and huge bandwidth requirements,
pose big challenges for current PON design and migration, which in turn are driving legacy TDMA PONs toward
ultra-high-speed flexible next-generation PONs such as wavelength-division multiplexed (WDM) PONs and optical
orthogonal frequency-division multiplexed (OFDM) PONs, and/or a hybrid WDM/OFDM/ TDM PON.

824

ISSN 2320-5407

International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 2, 820-828

References
Cisco visual networking index: Forecast and methodology, 2011-2016," Cisco white papers, May 2012 [Online].
Available:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_paper_c11481360.pdf
K. Kim a, J. Lee b, J. Jeong.(2012). "Transmission performance of all-optical domain orthogonal frequency
division multiplexing signals due to fiber nonlinearities for long-reach PON applications ", Optical Fiber
Technology 18 /140145- Elsevier.
E. Skaljo, M. Hodzic and I. Bektas. (2009)." Migration from G(E)PON to NGPON," 9781-4244-3941- IEEE.
C. Ling, S. Dahlfort, and D. Hood. (2010). "Evolution of PON: 10GPON and WDM PON, Communications and
Photonics Conf., Shanghai, pp. 709.
Fu-Tai An, , K. Soo Kim, D. Gutierrez, S.Yam. (2004)."SUCCESS: A Next-Generation Hybrid DM/TDM Optical
Access Network Architecture", JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 22, NO.11, NOVEMBER.
S. Biswas, S. Adak.(2011)."OFDMA- PON: High Speed PON Access System", International Journal of Soft
Computing and Engineering (IJSCE) ISSN: 2231-2307, Volume-1, Issue-5, November.
X.Bai, A. Shami, and C. Assi .(2005)."Statistical bandwidth multiplexing in Ethernet passive optical networks," in
Proc. of IEEE GLOBECOM, vol. 4, pp. 1920-1924.
N. Antunes, C. Fricker, P. Robert and J. Roberts .(2010)." GATE-driven Dynamic Wavelength and Bandwidth
Allocation for WDM EPONs , 978-1-4244-5637-6, "IEEE Globecom 2010 proceedings.
M. P. McGarry, M. Maier, M. Reisslein. (2004) ," Ethernet PONs: A Survey of Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation
(DBA) Algorithms" , IEEE Communications Magazine Vol.: 42, No.: 8, pp.: S8-S15, Aug.
G. Chang, A. Chowdhury, Z. Jia, H. Chien, M. Huang, J. Yu, and G. Ellinas.(2009).Key technologies of WDMPON for future converged optical broadband access networks, J.Opt. Comm. Net.vol. 1, no. 4, pp. c35c50, Sep.
S.-J. Park, C.-H.Lee, K.-T.Jeong, H.-J.Park, J.-G.Ahn, and K.-H. Song.( 2004). Fiber-to-the-home services based
on wavelength-division-multiplexing passive optical network, IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 22, no. 11, pp.
2582-2591, Nov.
Kazovsky, L.G., Shaw, W., Gutierrez, D., Cheng, N., Wong.(2007)." Next-generation optical access networks", J.
Lightwave Technol. 25(11), 34283442.
C.-H. Lee, S.-M.Lee, K.-M.Choi, J.-H.Moon, S.-G.Mun, K.-T.Jeong, J. H. Kim, and B. Kim .(2007).WDM-PON
experiences in korea, J.Opt.Netw., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 451464.
M. Jinnoet al. (2009). Spectrum-efficient and scalable elastic optical path network: architecture, benefits, and
enabling technologies, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 66-73, Nov.
S. Biswas, S. Adak, (2011)." OFDMA- PON: High Speed PON Access System", International Journal of Soft
Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), ISSN: 2231-2307, Volume-1, Issue-5, November.
N. Cvijetic.(2011)."OFDM for next Generation Optical Access Networks", NEC Laboratories America, OFC,
Tutorial.
N. Cvijetic, D. Qian, and J. Hu.(2010). 100 Gb/s optical access based on orthogonal frequency division
multiplexing, IEEE Commun. Mag,.vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 7077, Jul.

825

ISSN 2320-5407

International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 2, 820-828

Figure 1. Forecast of the global consumer internet traffic (2011-2016)

Figure 2. PON Architecture

Table (1) PON Access Protocols


BPON
ITU-T-.983
1310 nm

EPON
IEEE 802.3ah
1310 nm

GPON
ITU-T G.984
1310 nm

1490 &1550 nm

1550 nm

1490 &1550nm

ATM

Ethernet

ATM, Ethernet, TDM, GEM

Bandwidth

Down 1.24 Gbps


Up 622 Mbps

Down 1.25 Gbps


Up 1.25 Gbps

Down 2.4 Gbps


Up 2.4 Gbps

Max
Distance

20 Km

10 or 20Km

40 or 60 Km

Standard
Upstream

Downstrea
m
Protocol

826

ISSN 2320-5407

International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 2, 820-828

Figure 3. TDM PON Architecture

Figure 4. WDM PON Architecture

Figure 5. Hybrid TDMA/WDM PON Architecture

827

ISSN 2320-5407

International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 2, 820-828

Figure (7) Practical OFDM Implementation

Figure 8.OFDMA PON architecture for delivery of heterogeneous services

Figure (9).a-OFDM b- OFDM+TDMAc-WDM+OFDM+TDM

(a)

(b)

(c)

828

You might also like