The Fibonacci Quarterly: Number
The Fibonacci Quarterly: Number
The Fibonacci Quarterly: Number
NUMBER
CONTENTS
PART IADVANCED
A Fibonacci Circulant.
Combinatorial Problems
for Generalized Fibonacci Numbers .
Application of Recursive Sequences
to Diophantine Equations .
D, A . Lind 449
.
Morris Jack DeLeon 476
the Sequence
/. L. Brown, jr.,
Sequences . . . . and R. L. Duncan 482
*
Edited by Raymond E. Whitney 487
L e t t e r to the E d i t o r
ELEMENTARY
Volume Index
552
DECEMBER
1970
V. E. Hoggatt, J r .
Donald E. Knuth
George Ledin, J r .
D. A. Lind
C. T. Long
M. N. S. Swamy
D. E. Thoro
WITH THE COOPERATION OF
T e r r y Brennan
Maxey Brooke
Paul F. Byrd
Calvin D. Crabill
John H. Halton
A. F. Horadam
Dov Jarden
Stephen Jerbic
L. H. Lange
James Maxwell
Sister M.DeSales McNabb
D. W. Robinson
Azriel Rosenfeld
Lloyd Walker
Charles H. Wall
The California Mathematics Council
A FIBONACCI CIRCULANT
D. A. LIND
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
1. Put
1 F
r
F
F
D
n,r
r+n-1
r+n-2
r+2
'r+n-1
r+1
"r+n-2
F
r+n-1
' Fr+1
where F
r+1
F
r
r+2
r+n-3
r+3
n
Yi = Fo = 1.
1
2
*
= F
n+2
+ F
n+1
We show that
(F
(1)
D
n,r
(F
- F
)
1
;
"n+r
n+r-1
r
l
1
1 - L + (-1) "
n
where L
= F - + F , - is the n
Lucas number*
n
n-1
n+1
A circulant is a determinant of the form
a
n-1
(2)
C(a0,"- ' a n - l } =
n-2
l
0
Vi
a
a
2
l
S O S
Vi
see
s a
an-3
0
n-2
e
e
i
449
9 9
o|
450
A FIBONACCI CIRCULANT
Dec.
It is known (see [1, Vol. 3 9 pp. 374-375] and [3, p . 39]) that
n-l/'n-l
. \
(3)
where the
,,
2k?r , .
2k7T
Xt) = cos
+ i sin
k
n
n
th
are the n roots of unity* To establish (3) rapidly s multiply
Ctao,.-..^)
J+r
in which a = (1 + N / 5 ) / 2 , /3 = (1 -y/E)/2.
- fl>+r
a - 0
Thus by (3),
Ji+r +
, r[ar - 1 - ,jc-l
ji+v-1-.Jo,
n-1- a r - /3r - an+r +, (r
/3
-a n+r-1 ,+/S
=
k^0
n X
" k =o
1970
451
A FIBONACCI CIRCULANT
(4)
Ivx-y^-yS(!-"*)-4"
= x
n
- y
Therefore
r-l)C\l
(F
'
r " W
"
and
n-1
n-1
n-1
- ^)
JSW.
1 - L n + (-l)n
n i ic
[ 2] h a s shown that
F _,_ - F
n+p
It follows that if n = 0 (mod 4 ) ,
L F ,
n p
p even
F L ,
n p
odd
,nfTn
-i
2 - L
and if n s 2 (mod 4) s
n r n
D
n9r
T h i s e s t a b l i s h e s (1).
We note that
that t h i s evaluation of D
>
vn
r 1+ in
-i
H M 2 - ~L - 2 J
452
A FIBONACCI CIRCULANT
[Dec.
n+2
* n+1
^ n
= A a + Bb .
Vn = a + b .
Put
D
(W) = C(W , W ^ , ' ' , W ^ J
n,r
r
r+1
n+n-1
Setting a. = W. + r = Aa : i + r + Bb^ +r in (3) gives
Dn
n , r
n-1 / n - 1
.
A
(W) = n ( Aa r (ao). ) j + Bbr(bco ) ] )
K
K
k=0 \ j=0
/
- V /*a r (l - a">
k=0 \
n
n
k=0
r -
aw
Bbr(l - b n ) \
1
bw
n+r " ^ W r - 1 ~ W n + r - l ^ k
(1 - a c k ) d - b a y
(W r - W n + r ) n - q n (W r -l - W ^ ^ ) 1 1
1 - Vn
qn
Put
= L .
1970]
453
A FIBONACCI CIRCULANT
r+1
F
r+n-1
E
r+n-2
nfr
-F
r+n-1
r+1
r+n-2
r+n-3
-F
r+2
r+1
r+n-1
"r+2
F
r+3
We shall prove
(Er + F n+r
^_ f
(5)
n,r
+ (-l) n (F n+r-1
^ i + F r - 1 .)n
1 + L + (-l) n
n
V"'Vi
*n-l
"an-2
"Vl
"al
~a2
n-2
n-3
n-1 / n-1
. \
where the
cos
n-l
~a3
(6)
k =
454
[Dec.
A FIBONACCI CIRCULANT
a r e the n
th
) by
and t r e a t a s in
l e t a. * F . , .
j
j+r
A development s i m i l a r to Section 1
F
shows that
n - 1 / n - 1 aT(a, ) j - /3r(j3, );
a - j8
k=0 \ j =0
(7)
n-1
n+r
+ F
+ TF , - + F
-If.
r
L n+r-1
r-U k
(1 - ark )(l - iSk )
"
k=0
F o r a r b i t r a r y x and y ,
(8)
Iv^'-SO^M
+ 1
n _, n
+ y
F ^ + F
n+p
n-p
F L ,
n p
L F ,
n p
p even
^
p odd
F
_ ^(*Hn
nsr
+ F
2 + L
r-l+|n)
Ruggles [ 2 j h a s
1970]
A FIBONACCI CIRCULANT
455
|nl
r+|n
r-l+|nj
E
2 + L
n
Note that the l a t t e r y i e l d s on c o m p a r i s o n with the d e t e r m i n a n t the identity
5(F 2 , + F 2 ) = L 2
+ L 2 = 5F Q _,_r+1
r
r+1
r
2r+l
4.
and V be a s
n
th
before j with the exception that we r e q u i r e a and b not be n
r o o t s of - 1
r a t h e r than +1 to avoid division by z e r o . P u t
E
n,r
Let W
(W) = S(W , W ^ , , W ^ , ) .
r
r+1
r+n-1
(W)
(W
n+r
) +
n ( W
n+r-l
1+V
n
which r e d u c e s to (5) when q = - q = 1,
r-l)n
11
H-q
^
= F , and V
= L
REFERENCES
1.
COMBINATORIAL PROBLEMS
FOR GENERALIZED FIBONACCI NUMBERS
VERNER E. HOGGATT, JR.
San Jose State College, San Jose, California
a '
(0
where I
subset.
/ n - ka + a\
=\
n k +1
*+1- L ( \
>
tai<
k=0
<x
<x
We select k - 1 ele-
mentsfromthe n - a elements 1, 2, 3, , n - a to make admissible subsets and add n + 1 to each subset. The count is precisely g (n - a, k - 1).
a
456
Dec.
1970
Consider
<a<". = ( n - i r a ) .
457
k > 0
n + l - k a + a\
f a (n + l,k)
[ n - k a + a \ / n - a - (k-l)a + a\
j {
k-i
)
k
; -\
f (n,k) + f ( n - a, k - 1)
d
Thus, fa (n,k) and g a (n,k) satisfy the same recurrence relation. Since the
boundary conditions are
5 a (n,l) = f a (n,l) = n ,
and
g (l,n) = g_(l,n) = 0,
d
n > 1 ,
II
column of
V (n,a)
d
[n-fal
fn+al
a+l'J
La+lJ
I^=A
k=0
lr=A
k=0
'
458
[DecB
[n/(p+D]
u(n;p,l) =
k=o
k=0
so that
Va( n , a ) = u(n + a; n , l )
Clearly, if we select only certain k-part subsets (b > 1)
TiH-al
La+bJ
where
(j = 0, 1, 2, , r - 1 ) ,
1970]
r 1
(1 +x +x + +x - )
459
i n-f , X- 1
=
i=0
We call
n
i,
the r-nomial coefficients, and n designates the row and i designates
the
i
X
) , n = 0,1,2," .
3 ,
f (n>k>r) =
In - ka + a j
Jr
460
[Dec.
Thus, f (n,k,r) and g (n,k,r) both obey the same recurrence relation, and
fa(n,l,r)
= ga(n,l,r) = n
f ( l , n , r ) = g ( l , n , r ) = 0,
d
n > 1
d.
for all n > 0, so that the arrays are identical for all k > 0.
Summing, for fixed n > 0, over all numbers of all k-part subsets
yields
Rn+a)(r-l)1
L l+a(r-irj
T7 /
V*
J n - ka + a [
Va(n,a,r) =
fc
u(n; p,q), of
Tf
Harris and Styles [3] to the generalized Pascal triangles obtained from the
expansions (1 + x + x2 + + x r " 1 ) , n = 0, 1, 2, 3, ,
f n(r-l) 1
[q+p(r-l)J
u(n;p9q,r) =
"qk^
k=0
there are precisely
[A]
1970]
461
n + a + m - kal
kb
|
k=0
i +j
(j = 1, 2, 3, 5 a)
are to be
-1
) ,
n = 0, 1, 25 3S " .
rn(r-l)'
u(n; 1,1, r) =
Jj
| n - kj
k=0
How-
ever, the generalized Fibonacci sequences for the binomial triangle are obtained if r = 2e The other r-nacci number sequences are obtained if the
subsets are simply restricted from containing simultaneously r consecutive
integers from the set {l, 2, 3, * * - , n} but there is no restriction of r > 2
about pairs of consecutive integers 8
r-nacci
sequences
(r > 2), we cannot simply set a = 1. However, the formulas look identical.
Let
then
462
Dec. 1970
(n+l)(r-l)1
r
V(n; 1,1, r) =
^
k=0
n - k + ll
k
found
six i t e r a t i o n a l g o r i t h m s of which he could p r o v e the f i r s t by m e a n s of the gene r a l i z e d P e l l equation and the second by the p e r m a n e n c e of f o r m a l laws*
the r e m a i n i n g four, equivalent to the solution of x 2 - (k2 + l)y 2 = k 2 ?
For
with k
and 3x + 1 = b 2 9
s i m u l t a n e o u s l y ! w a s mentioned in [6, p. 2 1 1 ] :
9 2 = 81
1-10-1 = 9
9-10-1 = 89
89
89-10-9 = 881
= 7921
= 776161
= 765055841
881
( 8 1 - D / 2 = 40 =
Xl
(7921-1)/2 = 3960 = x 2
(776161-1)/2 = 388080 = x 3
(76055841-1)/2 = 38027920 = x 4
From
2x + 1 = a2
and 3x + 1 = b 2 c o m e s 3a 2 - 2b 2 = 1.
b ^ = 6a + 5b
n+1
n
n
F r o m t h e s e , we can obtain i m m e d i a t e l y
+ a ., = 10a ,
n+1
n-1
n
b ,- + b - = 10b ,
n+1
n-1
n
If
464
[Dec.
T h i s formula h a s t h r e e s h o r t c o m i n g s :
(1) it u s e s f r a c t i o n s ,
(2) it employs
them.
S i m i l a r a r g u m e n t s a r e valid for a f o u r - s t e p i t e r a t i o n a l g o r i t h m [4] to
g e n e r a t e x in x 2 + (x + I) 2 = y 2 .
t e r m f o r m u l a m a y be s i m p l e , .as for a2 + b 2 + (ab) 2
S o m e t i m e s , the n
= c2,
(n - l)n
But for
H e r e , we have
= (n2 - n + I) 2 ,
a = 1,
an a l g o r i t h m would be
and by a table of s q u a r e s :
12 +
o2 +
02 =
l2 =
(02 + I ) 2
l2 +
22 +
22 =
32 =
(22 - l ) 2
I 2 + 12 2 + 12 2 = 17 2 =
(42 + l ) 2
+ 70 + 70
= 99
= (102 - l ) 2
say
obtain
Iteration Algorithm I
6-2 - 0
6-12 - 2
6-70 - 12
6-408 - 70
6-2378 - 408
6-13860 - 2378
=
=
=
=
=
=
12
70
408
2378
13860
80782
1970]
TO DIOPHANTINE EQUATIONS
465
408 2 +
408 2 =
577 2 =
(242 + I) 2
l2 +
2378 2 +
2378 2 =
3363 2 =
(58 2 - I) 2
l 2 + 13860 2 + 13860 2 =
19601 2 = (140 2 + I) 2
squares:
22 +
I2 +
22 =
3 2 = (I 2 + 2) 2
22 +
32 +
62 =
72 = (3 2 - 2) 2
22 +
82 + 16 2 = 18 2 = (42 + 2) 2
2 2 + 2 1 2 + 42 2 = 47 2 = (72 - 2) 2
The a l t e r n a t i n g +2 and - 2 in the l a s t column, which shows a constant p a t t e r n , suggest the p o s s i b i l i t y of an a l g o r i t h m . If we can find all b , say from
b 3 = 8 on, we will also have all c After s o m e t r i a l s and e r r o r s we obtain
I t e r a t i o n Algorithm II
3-3 - 1 = 8
3-8 - 3 = 21
3-21 - 8 = 55
3-55 - 21 = 144
3*144 - 55 = 377
3-377 - 144 = 987
55 2 +
HO 2 =
123 2 = ( l l 2 + 2) 2
322 2 = (18 2 - 2) 2
754 2 =
843 2 = (292 + 2) 2
+ 144
2 2 + 377 2 +
288
466
[Dec.
02 +
02 =
32 +
62 =
32 +
22 +
42 +
32 +
18 2 +
542 =
32 +
80 2 +
240 2 =
2
253 2 = (16 - 3)2
3 2 + 1542 + 4622 =
12
(02 + 3)2
32 =
72 =
13
(2 2 + 3)2
(42 - 3)2
57 2
3038 2 +
9114 2 =
9607 2 =
(982 + 3) 2
32 +
5848 2 +
17544 2 =
18493 2 =
(136 2 - 3) 2
32 +
25974 2 +
77922 2 ="
82137 2
32 +
115364 2 +
32 +
222070 2 +
32 +
986S28 2 +
346092 2 =
666210
2958984 2 =
364813 2 =
(6042 - 3) 2
702247 2 =
(838 2 + 3) 2
3119043 2
Now we want to find an algorithm which should generate the sequence 80, 154,
3038, 5848, 115364, 222070, 4380794, .
and b 3 = 4 be given;
32
b2 =
2,
+ (_ 4 )2 + ( 1 2 ) 2
132
( 4 2 3)2
Now
there remains only to find an algorithm which should generate 25974, 986328,
e . Here, we have not far to go, since such an algorithm is already contained in the former one, and we obtain Iteration Algorithm IV on the following
page.
1970]
TO DIOPHANTME EQUATIONS
467
Iteration Algorithm HI
38*2 - (-4)
280 - 2:4 + 2
38-80 - 2
2-3038 - 2*154 + 80
38*3038 - 80
2*115364 - 2t5848 + 3038
38-115364 - 3038
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
80
154
3038
5848
115364
222070
4380794
I t e r a t i o n Algorithm IV
38-684 - 18 = 25974
38*25974 - 684 = 986328
F i n a l l y s one could ask: Does t h e r e exist a g e n e r a l formula for solving x 2 +
y 2 + z 2 = w2 ? The a n s w e r i s yes 0
x = p 2 4- q2 - r 2 ,
then
y = 2pr 3
x 2 + y2 + z 2 = w2
comingss
Let
becomes
z = 2qr 5
0 = 0.
w = p 2 + q2 + r 2 ;
and
short-
the solution
3 2 + 2 2 + 62 = 72
requires
p =\/~2/29
q = 3\/2/2s
and
r =
V2.
Now we shall p r o v e how the i n t e g e r solutions of c e r t a i n Diophantine
equations of the second d e g r e e , equivalent to Iteration A l g o r i t h m s I-IV,
be found by r e c u r s i v e s e q u e n c e s .
can
x 2 - (k2 + l)y 2 = k2
(1)
with k = 1, 2 9 and 3.
Further, x
and y
will denote i n t e g e r s o l u t i o n s of
(1).
If k = 1,
Eq. (1) b e c o m e s x 2 - 2y 2 = 1.
By T h e o r e m 3 of [ 3 ] , the
y
J
n
= 6y ,- - y - ,
J
J
n+1
n-1
n > 2
468
[Dec.
Eq. (1) b e c o m e s
x 2 - 5y 2 = 4 .
(2)
Q(0),
0 = V^s
which h a s
Q(0)
of n o r m 4 a r e a s s o c i a t e s of 2.
T h u s , if x
+ y 0 is an a l g e b r a i c i n t e g e r of
n o r m 4 , we get
x
o 2n
n
+ Jy 0n = 2u0
= n26-t
1
n
9,
w h e r e et = e\ = (3 + 0 ) / 2 .
Remark.
_ o n
Noting that
n-1
we obtain
yJ , i
n+1
3y
- Jy - ,
J
n
n-1
n > 2 ,
= FQ
n
= L? .
(3)
If k = 3 , Eq. (1) b e c o m e s
x2 -
10y 2
= 9 .
and x
6X1
which h a s
(1,0) a s an
2.
1970]
TO DIOPHANTME EQUATIONS
469
Since the discriminant D = 1 (mod 3), the ideal (3) becomes PjPg, where
Pi and P 2 are distinct prime ideals of norm. 3. Thus there are 3 distinct
ideals of norm 9. Since 3, 7 - 26, 7 + 26 are non-associated integers of
norm 9, all the integers of norm 9 are associates of one of these 3 integers.
It follows that
X
(4)
3n
Jan*
3 n
3n+1
(7
3n+2
yan+2 6
( 7 + W)
'
"
26 R
= <7 - 2*>?
(7 +
W)
3n+2
38b
3n-l -
3n-69
3n-5>
3n-4>
= 57,
bj = 2,
b2 = 4 ,
Thus
b 6 = 684,
b 4 = 80,
b 5 = 154
REFERENCES
rence relation,
(1)
v _, 0 = v , 1 + v + kv v , n ;
n+2
n+1
n
n n+1
vi = Vo = 1
\
L
(n > 1) ,
/
w h e r e k i s a positive i n t e g e r .
It m a y be shown by a s i m p l e inductive a r g u m e n t that
F
(2)
vn =
~-
(n ^ 1) ,
where F
denotes the n
Fibonacci n u m b e r .
n
When we wish to e m p h a s i z e the dependence on the p a r a m e t e r ,
shall w r i t e v
k,
we
5 v (k).
n
A MODEL FOR (Lv J} ,
n n=l
Let b denote an i n t e g e r
(b > 2).
follows:
F
(3)
where
n
6Q = 1 1 . . - 1
(b) denotes b a s e b.
6R = E
i=0
(n > 1)
Obviously,
F -1
(4)
(b)
F
1
b = ^ ^ i
D
470
(n> 1)
Dec. 1970
471
v n (k + D = ena>) .
b - 1 has been called the n
n = T^T
(See [1].)
We note that
n
n
If we are willing to abuse the language, we may extend the allowed
values of b. Formally 9 if k ~ o s Eqa (1) becomes the usual Fibonacci r e currence relation. Then b = k + 1 = 1, and if we interpret the l f s in (3) as
tally marks,
F -1
n
en = i d )
+ . . . +i(i)
F
= 11 . . . I
(1) .
+ . . . + KO)0
= 1 1 - . . 1 (0)
Thus 6 = 1. But the solution of (1) in this case is
v n (-l) s i
(n > 1) .
Using similar interpretations for negative bases, we can extend (1) and (3) to
negative integers*
472
[Dec.
DIVISIBILITY PROPERTIES OF { v j ^
It is interesting to note that if
(6 n ,
n+1)
(b)
<Vn+2)
= 1
(n> 1);
(n
^1)-
Proof.
110
i n
for
n > 3,
(mod 4)
and t h e r e -
if and only
J if 2 = F 0 1 F
3
1 = 1 (mod 7) ,
10 = 3 (mod 7) ,
1970]
473
Clearly 7|fl
if and only if 6 | F .
and
But 6 |F
is equivalent to 2 | F
In light of the above, we have the unusual result that 3\6 and l l | e
implies T| 6> and 13|# .
*
' n
' n
We mention some other results which the reader might like to establish.
Assertion Is
18 |F
Assertion 2:
Assertion 3;
41
Assertion 4s
implies 19|0 .
l ^ n ^ anc^ o n ^ y ^ 5 l n
271|0 if and only if 5|n.
73J0 , 10l|6 ,
137J0
(6)
i-i
1 - x - x2
=Z V
i=l
we have
oo i o g [ l + kv.(k)]
(7)
. ,
77777-5 * * *
(2) = 2 TT [1 + 0.(2)] - 1
i=l
Since
F
2
= i + e (2)
(n > 1)
474
[Dec.
and
1=1
i = F n + 2 -1
(n
" X)
i + e 2n (2) = 7 T [i + 0 2 i _i ( 2 ) 1
Proof
< n ^ D-
j F2i-1
= F
1=1
2n
nJ n=l
is a recursively defined positive integer sequence satisfying the linear difference equation
(8)
m
^u ^ = P
i=0 * n + 1
(n > 1)
(order m)
i(0,
1970]
0n
475
(n > 1) ;
then
ni
a.
0 [1 + (b - l)p
] i = b13
n+1
i=0
(9)
Proof,
(n > 1)
Since
u
^n = T A H T
<n * x>
we have
u
k
b ~ = 1 + (b - 1)/^
Denoting the n
- , then
F2 = ( _ D n + 1
so that (-1)
(modp) ,
of
and
a2
I <a
"2
for all n > 0.
n+2
n+1
<A
a
- 2
n
F l o r a l s o c o n s i d e r e d the sequence of n a t u r a l n u m b e r s
< at
and
A<
2 -
n+2
_!*+!<
I2
a
n
-/a
i s simply the n e a r e s t
smaller
{F
L
n
+ kJ fn=n
Kr .
where F
is the n
n=n0
Fibonacci number. In this paper necessary and suf-
{F
+k}
1
J
n
n==n0
Let
1
nJ n=l
The
sequence
(1 F n - l}
J
n=]
n=n0
is a Pisot sequence iff n 0 > 7. The sequence {^n}
is a Pisot sequence of
the first kind (second kind) iff n 0 > 4 (n0 > 3). If |k| > 1 then there exists
no integer n0 such that
(F
1
+ k}
}
n=n0
478
[Dec.
is a Pisot sequence.
We shall need two l e m m a s in o r d e r to p r o v e the t h e o r e m .
L e m m a 1.
F x 0 - 2 F M +F
= F 0 .
n+2
n+1
n
n-2
Proof. F ^ Q - 2F _ + F = (F _ + F ) - 2 F ^ + F
n+2
n+1
n
n+1
n
n+1
n
= - F ^ + 2 F = - ( F + F n ) + 2F
n+1
n
n
n-1
n
= F
L e m m a 2.
= ^
Proof.
( F n + 2 + k)(FR
(F
JQ
n+2
(r
+ k)(F
::
+ kF
n-2 '
+ k) - (F , . + k) 2
n
n+1
r - Fn+1>
+ k(
V2 -
2F
/ ixn+1
F ^ 0 F - F^
= (-1)
n+2 n
n+1
F r o m the definition
n=n 0
2 < F
+ k < F
n0
^ + k
n 0 +l
and
(iia)
(iib)
- ( F n + k)
2 [ ( - l ) n + 1 + kF M
a r e satisfied.
(i) and
] < FM + k
Also (1 F + k )J
i s a P i s o t sequence of the second kind iff
n
n=no
1970]
(iiia)
-(F n + k) < 2 [ ( - l )
+ kF n _ 2 ]
(iiib)
2[ ( - l ) n + 1 + kF n _ 2 ] < F n + k
479
+ 1
2F
+ F
n-2
n-3
+ 1
>
2 F
[ n-2
^ *
2 F
[ n-2
+ 1 = 2F
n-20
+ F
Q
n-3
+ l > 2[F
L
0
n-2
n-20
+ ( - l ) n + 1 J]
+1)
(iia) and (iiia) are satisfied for n > 3 It is clear that (i) is satisfied if n0 >
2 Thus
0
(1F n + l }J 0n=n
0
is a Pisot sequence of the first kind iff n 0 > 6 and it is a Pisot sequence of
the second kind iff n 0 > 4
Next s we consider the case k = - 1 . If n = 6 both (iia) and (iiia) are
not satisfied.
F
- l = 2F
n
n-2
+ F
- 1 > 2[F
n-3
+ 1]
J
n-2
Now
if n > 8
Thus,
-(Fn-1)
< 2[-l-Fn_2]<
2[(-l)n+1-Fn_2]
if n > 8 Therefore, (iia) and (iiia) are satisfied iff n > 7* Since
480
n+1
- F
[Dec,
J < 0 < F
-1
n-2 J
n
if n > 3, both (iib) and (iiib) are satisfied for n > 3, It is clear that (i) is
satisfied for n > 4. Thus,
{F
* n
- i} 0 0
J
n=n0
n > 3. Both (iia) and (iiia) are satisfied for n > 3. Also (iiib) is satisfied
for n > 3, but (iib) is satisfied iff n > 4, Thus
{F
}
n=n0
(F }
n=n0
is a Pisot sequence of the second kind iff n0 > 3.
We shall show that if |k| > 1, then there exists no integer n0 such
that
{F *k}
is a Pisot sequence. This will be accomplished by showing that (iia) or (iiia)
implies that k > -2 and that (iib) or (iiib) implies that 2 < k.
Dividing (iia) by F 0 yields that
ndi
F
F
0/
^vn+1
n-1
n-2
n-2
+ 2k
n-2
for n > n0 After taking the limit of both sides as n oo and remembering
that
1970]
481
limVi=Ll_vi<2 >
n
we have that
-M
-4 < - l i m I * 1 < 2k
Thus
-2 < k .
In a similar manner, one can show that (iib) or (iiib) implies that k <
2.
REFERENCES
1* Charles Pisot, "La Repartition modulo un et les Nombres Algebriques,"
Ann, Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa (2) 7 (1938a)9 pp. 205-248,
2, Peter Flor, "Uber eine Klasse von Folgen Nattirlicher Zahlen," Math.
Ann. 140 (I960), pp. 299-307.
on [ 0,1] so that
F (x) is the number of those terms among /31$ , /3R whichlie in the interval [0,x), divided by n. Then {x.}
00
lim i Y e2nivXj
n oon i
(1)
= 0
> 1.
j=l
V , = a, ,V , , + +a A V
n+k
k-1 n+k-1
On
n > 1,
8 9
D e c . 1970
483
{u } which s a t n J
isfies" the Fibonacci r e c u r r e n c e U , n = U M + U
for n > 1 with U< = k-i
n+2
n+1
n
~
i
i
and U2 = k 2 a r b i t r a r y positive initial t e r m s (not n e c e s s a r i l y i n t e g e r s ) will
have the p r o p e r t y that ( i n U } i s uniformly d i s t r i b u t e d m o d 1. With kA =
1, k 2 = 1, we obtain this conclusion for the c l a s s i c a l Fibonacci sequence
(see [ 2 ] , T h e o r e m 1), while for
k 1 = 1,
k2 = 3 ,
an analogous r e s u l t is
If ( x . )
that
.lim
J i
( x . - y . ) = 0,
Proof.
then \ y . )
i s such
J i
.oo
is uniformly d i s t r i b u t e d mod 1.
(e
1 - e
j) = 0 .
then
n
> y.
lim
n 00
2>i ==
1
rr, , .
27rii/x.
2irii/y.
u
J
Taking y. = e
j - e
] , we have
1 \ ^
t.
lim - >
n - 00 n Z-^
, 2-nivx.
2mvy.,
J
(e
] - e
j)
Since
n
1
\"^
lim 7 e
a-+oo n Zi
1
by Weyl's c r i t e r i o n , we also have
27T1VX.
1 = 0
= 0
484
[Dec.
n
27ri y
Ibn
i
V
n ~* n ^-^ e ^ Jj = 0
and the sufficiency of Weyl's criterion proves the sequence {y.} to be uniformly distributed mod 1.
Lemma 2. If a is a positive algebraic number not equal to one, then
In a is irrational.
Proof. Assume, to the contrary, In a = (p/q), where p and q are
non-zero integers. Then e p / q = a9 so that e p = cfl. But or is algebraic,
since the algebraic numbers are closed under multiplication ([1], p. 84).
Thus e p is algebraic, in turn implying e is algebraic. But e is known to
be transcendental ([1], p. 25) so that a contradiction is obtained.
Theorem. Let \ V } be a sequence generated by the recursion relation,
(2)
V M = a. nV M - + - + a i v _LI
n+k
k-1 n+k-1
1 n+1
+ a
nV
On
(n > 1) ,
Vi = yi9
v2 = y2, ,
v k = yk
are given positive values for the initial terms. Further, we assume that the
k
k-1
polynomial x - ab- i x
- - a^x - a 0 has k distinct roots j3l9 /32, ,
ft satisfying 0 < \pt\ < < j ^ | and such that none of the roots has magnitude equal to 1. Then (in V } is uniformly distributed mod 1.
Proof. The general solution of the recurrence (2) is
k
(4)
Vn=5>j<?
(n>l),
j=l
where the arbitrary constants al9 a2, , a^ are determined by the specification of the initial terms in (3). [it is easily checked that the determinant of
the k x k matrix (/3.) does not vanish, so that determination of the a.f s is
1970]
485
unique. ] Since the initial terms were not all zero, at least one of the a. f s
is non-zero.
so that
p > 1. Then
Z-#
j*]
and
P"1 a.
V
1 -
a B
P P
p-i
p p
a.
1L
But
<1
for j = 1 9 2, , p - l j
and hence 9
lim .
n -*oo|
1 ,
pp
or equivalently,
lim f l n V - lnU j8 | n | =
n -*oo|^
n
I P P| J
(5)
Since p
486
Dec. 1970
{nln|/ p |}^{ln|p p H
is uniformly distributed mod 1 and the same is true for the sequence
MPiK,r>rFrom (5) and Lemma 1, it is then clear that (in V } is uniformly distributed
" i
mod 1 as asserted, q. e. d.
The specialization to sequences satisfying the Fibonacci recurrence,
U
= U
- +U
this case is x - x - 1, and there are two distinct roots of unequal magnitude, namely
1 %/5
2
From the theorem, we conclude (in U }
REFERENCES
1. I. Niven, 'Irrational Numbers," Carus Mathematical Monograph Number
II, The Math. Assn. of America, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , N. Y. , 1956,
2. L. Kuipers, "Remark on a PaperbyR. L. Duncan Concerning the Uniform
Distribution mod 1 of the Sequence of Logarithms of the Fibonacci Numb e r s / ' TheJ[iboji^^
Vol. 7, No. 5, Dec. 1969, pp. 465-466,
473.
3. P. R. Halmos, Measure Theory, D. Van Nostrand Co. , Inc. , N.Y. , 1950.
problems believed to be new or extending old results. Proposers should submit solutions or other information that will assist the editor.
To facilitate
Put
( l + z + i z2\
-n-1
n
a(n,k)zk
=J]
k=0
Show that
/tv
(!)
,
v
2*5*8 . . . (3n - 1)
a(n,n) =
,
S
258 . . . (3n - 1)
nl
(;)(")(-')'
s=0
^ E (n r r )( 2 V ") ^
^^
r=0
where
co = | (-1 + N P 3 ) .
487
2*58 - - (3n - 1)
n!
488
H-l 76
[Dec
Jm
e
-1
4ir
e
6TT
-1
24
Sir
-1
Provide a proof.
H~l 77
+ F
ki
k2
'
+ F
(r
kr
lj
'
where
kj > k2 > > k r > 1 .
Show that
(1)
R(F
2nF2m>
2n+lF2m) =
(n
(2)
R(F
2nF2m+l) =
(3)
R(F
2n+lF2m+l) =
(4)
R(F|n+1) = R(F|n) = F ^
"
(n
m)F
(n
"
"
m)F
2m
+ F
2m-1
2m+l
m)F
2m+l
SOLUTIONS
SUM INVERSION
H-151
a.
Put
(n
m)
(n > m) ,
<n >
m)
(n>l)
'
.
1970]
489
00
2 , - 11
(1 - ax - bxy - c y ) "
V
A
x m y11
J
JLd
m,n
m,n=0
Show that
00
_j
X n9n
xR =
n=0
B.
t "
2bx + (fc>2
4ac x2
> >
Put
(1 - ax - bxy - cy)""1 =
J^
m 9 n=0
V n *m n
y
Show that
j B
x
n,n
n n
n=0
Suppose
F(x,y) = J ]
^f(m,n)xmyn
m=0 n=0
converges for all x and y such that | x | < A, |y| < B, then for all z such
that |z| < AB, we have
490
[Dec.
00
n=Q
-s ds
- (1 - bx)s 2 + ex2
71 _ |
(
__
_J
and
,u
, (
bx + (1 - 2bx + b ^ 2 - 4acx 2 ) 2 V
Thus, the contour C must include 8f and exclude 6%; using the
-sds
a(0|
_ 02}
1970]
491
Let
F(x,y) = ] P f ( m f n ) x m y n
m,n
= (1 - ax k - bxy - cy k )
and let
f(n,n)x n
F(x) = J^
Set co = e
j = 1, . . .
27ri
lift pJJ
as
2k
, , k ^
k
- M(1 - bx}$ + ex
for
k, where
kih
71
1/k
" 1
25
"*
~
2 2
k 2
1_ - bx + (1 ,- 2bx
_ + b_ x - 4acx )
Since 0j_ tends to 0 with x and 62 does not, C includes the singularities
u^fij for j = 1,
8ee
i?( ) = -A277i
i
~s
ds
I 7k
^ T 7 ^ 7&7
(s - 0 4 )(s - 6 2 )a
1
2trik
f
;
k
/ ,,
kk
J (t - flGj) ( t - 0 ) a
a(0^-0k)
492
[Dec.
k
where C? i s a contour In the t-plane which encircles the singularity 0 j , k
k
times but excludes 0 2
Also solved by D. V. Jaiswal and the Proposer.
HIDDEN IDENTITY
H-153 Proposed by J. Ramanna, Government College, Mercara, India.
Show that
G>
<>
16
F3k+1F3k+2(2F2k+1
F 6 k + 3 ) ( 2 F 3 k + 2 +. F ^ )
F ^
* 3n+3
2r
Hence, generalize (i) and (ii) for F + o Solution by the Proposer.
We note that (i) and (ii) a r e easily verified for k = 0 and k = 1 and
assume the results for k = r and prove them for k = r + 1. Thus we need
show, on subtracting (i) and (ii) for n = r from (i) and (ii) for n = r + 1,
respectively, that
(i)
4F
3(r+l)+l F 3(r+l)+2
= F6
(2)
(ii)
16
(2F
- F6
3(rH)+l
+ F
*3(r+l)+3
*3r+3
F 3 ( r + 1 K 1 F 3 ( r + 1 ) + 2 F 6 ( r + 1 ) + 3 ( 2 F | ( r + 1 ) + 3 - F23(r+1)F23(r+1)+3)
- F8
- F&
~ *3(r+l)+3
*3r+3
4F
(F
3(r+l)+2
+ F
+ F
3(r+1)+1 )6 "
(F
1970]
(ii)
6F
+ F
= F
16F
493
3(r+1)+2F3(r+lHl
3(r+1)+1 )
3(r+l) J J 3(r+l)+3 ;
TRIPLE THREAT
H-154
/ m + l \ / n + l \ / p + l \
\i + k + l / \ i + k + l / \ i + 3 + 1 /
E
i,j,k>0
m
= EEE( m -r b )( a "c + c )( p -a + a )
a*t> b=0 c=0
and generalize.
Solution by the Proposer.
Put
S
m
l m + 1 \ / n + l \/ p + 1 \
\ j + k + \)\i + k + l / \ i + 3 + 1 /
'
i,j,k>0
Tm,n9p
Then
m
n
p
B \ T ^ V ^ \ ^ / n i - a + b \ f n - cb + c V p - c + a\
L L H
494
[Dec.
00
xmynZP
d>i
m,n,p=0
m,n,p
X^
j+k i+k
i+j x ^
/m + j + k + l\
L h
i,j,k=0
k+1 j
m=0
m Y"* / n + i
k + 1\ n
L, \ i + k 4-1 ft
n=0
00
#
y^ /p + i + j + i\ P
z
Z^r l
i+ j + i I
p=0
00
i,j,k=0
- x - z)
( l - x - y) * .
In the next p l a c e ,
00
m,n,p=0 T
m
m,n,p
p
zr
a,b,c=0
m=0
n=0
p=0
CO
c,v-b-1/v-c-1/vz (1 - x)
(1 - y)
(1 - z)
a,b,c=0
(l - y - z )
(x - ^ " ' ( i -
1970]
495
GENERALIZED VERSION
Let k > 2
and n l 5 n 2 s
1 +
^\\+
ees
n2
i + vW
(^
n k non-negative i n t e g e r s .
+a
2+ V
+ a A /a3 + a4\
"M
nk
\\-i+
/ a ^
3 /
Show that
+ a2]\
2k-l
/
e
, a k while in the
second s u m
2k
+ a
= n
l'
Solution.
+ a
3 = V
+ a
L e t S(n l 9 * , 1%)
= n
+ a
2k-l
C o n s i d e r the expansion of
-1
</) = </)(xl5 , x k ) = (1 - xj - x 2 )
-1
(1 - x 2 - x 3 )
-1
(1 - x k - x 1 )
Since
- _x
(1
x)
a
(1
-^
-
y)
we have
x>X!^...>1+k
a ^ - . a ^ O
(1 -
X l
a +a +2
a +a +2
2
) k 1 (1-x,)1
. . . ( l - x
\-l+ak+2
) k l
496
E
l'""'
,a
i+a0
a.
rV
=0
V^
b
i,+a1
*2
(\
a
^
V
l''"'bk=0
'
n +a.
\/ a l
+ a
"'A v i
^,,^=0
n..l
X
n2
X
/ V
/Vi
+ a
+ a
+ b
+ x
k + bk + 1 \
+a
+1
\
/
i ,b2
x
/ !
Tc
X
S(n
2 ' k
l ' V *'
On the o t h e r hand, s i n c e
a,b=0
ra2=V
'
3'a4=V
E
n
l,'"'nk=:()
n .l
xx
+ a
T(ni,n2,...,nk)
2k-l,a2k~
n2
x2
'
/ a 2k-l
V^
a
k
...x
2k\
2k-l
1970]
497
RECURRING THEME
H-155
W X ) = rfnW
n-l ( x )
. + a z + bz n n + cz ^ - + dz
= 0
r+4 5 s+4
r+3 3 s+3
r+2,s+2
r+l,s+l
r,s
show that
b = -(x 2 + y2 + 2)
a = c = -xy,
and d = 1
r+4,s+4
V4V4
= (xu
yzr+3,s+3
r+3
+ Z
Then,
+
V2
r+2,s+2
) ( y v
+ (xu
s+3
+ V
r+3vs+2
s+2>
+ y
V2Vs+3)
Now,
(xu
r+3VS+2+yUr+2vs+3)
= (x2 + 3 ^ 2 , 8 + 2
+ (x
VlV2
yVlV2
= (X2 + y ) z r + 2 j S + 2 + x U r + 1 ( y v s + 1 + v g ) + y v s + 1 u r + 2
= (x2 + y 2 ) V 2 , s + 2
^Vl.s+l
+ xu
= (x2 + y 2 ) ^ r + 2 ) S + 2
^VllS+l
r+lvs
^ ^ V l " V2 )
= (X2 + y2 + l ) Z r + 2 } S + 2 + x y z r + l i g + 1 + v g (-u r ) =
+ z
r+2)S+2
498
= fr* + y* + D z r + 2 ) S + 2 + x y z
r + l j S + 1
+ zr>g
Dec. 1970
Hence,
z
,/i
, / i
r+49s+4
= x
V
+ (x2 + Jy 2 + 2)z l 0
+ x yJ z ,,
J Z l 0
r + 3 , s +l 30
r + 2 , s +l 20
r + l , s +nl
- z
r,s
Thus,
a = -xy,
b = -(x 2 + y2 + 2),
c = -xy,
d = 1 .
for t = 0, 1, 2, , k = 0, 1, 2 , *
Since 1967 = 8(245) + 7,
1967 f- x 2 + y 2 + z2
A l e s s e r r e s u l t known
8k + 7 i s the s u m of
t h r e e rational squares,,* *
* William H0 Leveque* T o p i c s in N u m b e r T h e o r y , Vol. 1, p. 133 e
* * L e o n a r d E . Dickson, H i s t o r y of the T h e o r y of N u m b e r s , Vol. II, Chap,
VII, p. 259.
gral sides.
a2 + b2 = c 2
where
a,
b,
Pytha-
n o n - r i g h t - a n g l e d Heronian t r i a n g l e s .
L e m m a 1.
Let
a, b , c ,
with s i d e s of n a , n b ,
(1)
and n all be i n t e g e r s .
Then the t r i a n g l e
angle with s i d e s a , b , c
Proof.
We f i r s t give an obvious p r o p e r t y .
i s Heronian.
where
s = - (a + b + c) .
L e t A be the a r e a of t r i a n g l e a , b , c
and l e t Af be the a r e a of
n a , n b , nc e
500
[Dec.
Af = n2A .
(2)
On the other
hand, Eq. (1) implies that A is the square root of an integer, which is well
known to be either integral, or irrational.
shown. Let the length of the altitude so constructed be x and let the base c
be thus divided into segments c1 and c 2 ,
triangle is Heronian, it is clear that
is rational.
Let
so that c = cA + c 2 .
Since the
1970]
501
m
=
n
C0S w
is rational.
a2 + c2 - b2
i =
Wc
If the numbers x, c 1? and c2 are in fact all integers, we are done. Otherwise we look at the triangle having sides na, nb, and nc. From elementary
geometry, this triangle is similar to the original one and thus the new altitude
is equal to nx = m ,
v^
which is 9 as before, either integral or irrational, and thus must be integraL
Likewise nc 2 is integrals and the new enlarged triangle is the adjunction of
two Pythagorean triangles. Thus the original is a reduction of an adjunction
and we are through.
Since the sides of any Pythagorean triangle are given by u2 + v 2 , u2 v 2 , and 2uvs we now have a method for finding all Heronian triangles.
Corollary 1. A triangle is Heronian if and only if its sides are given
by either (3) u2 + v 2 , r 2 + s 2 ,
2
r s = uv;
or
(4) u + v , r + s , and 2(uv + rs); where r - s = u - v ; or (5) a r e duction by any constant factor in either case (3) or (4).
3. Although the preceding theorem and its corollary give formulations
for finding all Heronian triangles, there are many properties of Heronian t r i angles that are not obvious from examination of the special subset of rightangled triangles. Some of these properties will be given here.
Lemma 2. A primitive Heronian triangle is isosceles if and only if it
has sides given by (3), (4), or (5) with r = u and s = v.
Proof.
equal sides of the isosceles triangle must be odd? say 2m + 1. Let the even
502
side be 2n.
[Dec.
2m + n + 1 and the a r e a ,
given by Eq e (1) b e c o m e s
^f(2m"+ n + l ) ^ T T ^ T l J ( n j f o )
so that
A = n ) / ( 2 m + I) 2 - n 2 .
If t h i s i s to be an i n t e g e r , t h e r e m u s t be an i n t e g e r Q such that
(2m + I) 2 - n 2 = Q 2 .
T h u s the n u m b e r 2m + 1 i s the hypotenuse of a P y t h a g o r e a n t r i a n g l e , which
m e a n s j of c o u r s e , that
2m + 1 i s a s given in C o r o l l a r y 1.
Conversely,
r = u
and
s = v.
We note in p a r t i c u l a r t h a t any n u m b e r of the form
4n + 2 m a y be used
2n 2 + 2n + 1,
and b,
A - \ s ( s - 2)(s - " a M s ^ T ) ,
where a + b + 2 = 2s,
equation a r e a = b = s - 1.
T h u s the a r e a b e c o m e s
1970]
503
A = Vs(s - 2)(1)(1)
and we m u s t have s(s - 2) = Q 2 for s o m e Q* But t h i s Is impossible* so we
a r e done e
Using the formulae for the s i d e s of a P y t h a g o r e a n t r i a n g l e , It Is e a s y
to show that e v e r y i n t e g e r g r e a t e r than two can be u s e d a s a side In a finite
n u m b e r of P y t h a g o r e a n t r i a n g l e s .
m a r k a b l e generalization,,
T h e o r e m 2a
L e t a be an i n t e g e r g r e a t e r than two e
Then t h e r e e x i s t s
If a i s odd* we m a y u s e s i d e s given by
(6)
a 9 i ( a t - 1),
and
| ( a t + 1)
t 2 - (a2 - l)y 2 = 1 .
Since
| ( a t - 1) + 1 = | ( a t + 1),
the t r i a n g l e i s obviously primitive*
504
[Dec.
where n is odd.
Then
we may use
(8)
a, tn - 2,
and
tn + 2 ,
(9)
a, tn - 1,
and
tn + 1,
(11)
a, ^-a(x - 1) + 1,
and
1970]
505
~ a ( x + 1) - 1,
w h e r e x i s found from
x 2 - (a - l)y 2 - 1 ,
which will have an infinitude of solutions a s long a s
a - 1 i s not a p e r f e c t
square,
4.
A simple
every
Heronian t r i a n g l e h a s a r e a divisible by t h r e e ,
Following i s a l i s t of the " f i r s t " few p r i m i t i v e (non-right-angled) H e r o n ian t r i a n g l e s :
a = 3
b = 25
c = 26
13
15
29
30
25
29
7.
15
20
29
35
506
_10
= 17
65
70
10
13
13
10
17
21
11
13
20
12
17
25
13
13
24
13
14
15
13
20
21
13
37
40
14
25
25
15
28
41
15
37
44
15
41
52
16
17
17
17
17
30
17
25
28
18
41
41
19
20
37
20
37
51
21
85
104
22
61
61
23
212
225
24
37
37
25
25
48
25
29
36
25
39
40
25
51
74
26
85
85
27
676
701
28
85
111
29
29
40
29
29
42
17
[Dec.
5-8-13.
Since a pineapple with more fruitlets for a given size would likely have
a finer texture and would be better for eatings the author was interested in
finding a pineapple with 13 - 21 - 34 rows.
found5 however.
Giving evidence to the fact that numbers of spiral rows on pineapples
were studied even earlier, the Experiment Station of the Association of
Hawaiian Pineapple Canners published an article on such a study as early as
1933e The article by M. B. Linford was published in the Pineapple Quarterly,
Vol. HI, No. 49 December 1933, pp. 185-195. It was entitled "Fruit Quality
Studies n , Eye Number and Eye Weighty and mentioned the number of rows.
of fruitlets on pineapples as basically 8 - 1 3 spirals, ranging from 5 - 8 - 1 3
- 21 for the several types of spirals. The article did not s however, draw any
connection between these numbers and the Fibonacci Numbers.
Following is a quotation from a section of this article which had the
headings
508
Dec. 1970
Any number may be expressed in powers of three by addition or subtraction of the numbers those powers represent.
13 = 3 2 + 3 1 + 3
14 = 3 3 - 32 - 3 1 - 3 .
The powers used in such expressions are whole integers* no fractional powers
being involved.
The number of terms required to express a number approximates twice
the number of digits in the number; the greater the number of digits required
the more closely this limit is approached.
Any such expression of a number need contain no repetition of any given
power.
Such expressions are easily handled in arithmetic processes by observation of algebraic rules regarding exponents.
Discussion of this digital system follows.
It will be noted from Table 1 that the powers of three follow a routine
sequence in the expressions for the numbers, appearing first behind the
positive sigh, then changing to the negative sign, and then disappearing from
the statement.
The appearance of powers in the statements follows a fixed sequence:
1. The power appears for the first time at a number equal to one-half of the
value of that power with 1 added.
2. It appears behind the positive sign.
3. It remains in the statement, and behind the positive sign, for a series of
statements equal in number to the value of that power of three.
4. It then becomes negative in the following statement.
5. It remains in the statement, and behind the negative sign, for a series of
statements equal in number to the value of that power of three.
6 It then disappears in the following statement.
509
510
THE POWERS OF
O F THREE
THREE
[Dec.
Table 1
N u m b e r e x p r e s s e d in
P o w e r s of T h r e e
+ 3
1
1
+ 3
+ 3*
- 3
+ 3 1 + 3
4
2
- 3 1 - 3
+ 3
+ 32 - 31
+ 3 2 - 3 1 + 3
+ 32
+ 3
10
+ 32
11
+ 3 2 + 3 1 - 3
12
+ 32 + 31
13
+ 3 2 + 3 1 + 3
14
+ 3 3 - 3 2 - 3 1 - 3
15
+ 33 - 32 - 31
16
+ 3 3 _ 3 2 - 3 1 + 3
17
+ 3 3 .. 3 2
+ 33 _ 3 2
18
- 30
+ 3
- 30
1970]
3e
511
as
below,,
4* Divide again by 3 a s d i r e c t e d in step 2, and continue t h i s p r o c e s s until
the dividend i s 0 with 0 r e m a i n d e r , watching throughout the p r o c e s s
outlined in Step 3 0
5e
The column of r e m a i n d e r s 2 ,
o r 1,
0 remainder,.
three.
60
Given n u m b e r
Divide by 3
6056
- 1
6055
Power
2018 with r e m a i n d e r
1 0
672
"
"
2 1
224
- 1
"
"
0 2
74
"
1 3
24
"
2 4
"
,?
0 5
tt
1 6
"
"
2 7
"
"
0 8
223
8
- 1
7
[Dec.
512
Signs:
Powers:
+
6
Proof of statement:
Positive powers:
6561 + 243 + 9
6813
Negative powers:
- 729 - 27
-757
Given number:
6056
For simplicity, in further discussion, the digit 3 will not be used in power
statements except when the exponent 3 is. required..
only the digits designating the powers.
Con-
sider the ad'dition of the statements for the numbers two and three:
2 equivalent,
+1-0
3 equivalent, +1
Addition of +1 to the statement gives +1 +1 -0..
+2 -1
-9-
The next higher power is given the sign of the duplicated power,
obviously 3 + 3 =
9 - 3.
When a power is triplicated, the next higher power is given the sign of
the triplicated power, which is then dropped from the statement.,
addition of the following statements:
Consider
197
513
2 equivalent, +1 -0
!?
3
+1
?f
4
+1 +0
9
+2
Note that the unlike signs calcelled and removed 0 power from the statement for the sum8
When the number of repetitions exceeds three, they can be eliminated
step-wise by application of the processes outlined above,,
SUBTRACTION OF STATEMENTS
Subtraction is performed by changing the signs on all of the powers in
the statement being subtracted and then performing addition as aboveL
MULTIPLICATION OF STATEMENTS
In performing multiplications the digits representing the powers are
added irrespective of sign, and the signs follow algebraic rule:
Multiplication of like signs yields the positive sign.
Multiplication of unlike signs yields the negative sign,,
Consider multiplication of statements for 13 and 14:
14:
+3 -2 - 1 -0
13
+2 +1 +0
+3 -2 - 1 -0
+4 - 3 -2 - 1
+5 -4 - 3 -2
+5 -4 +3 -2 +1 -0
514
[Dec.
5. The unlike signs for 4 cancel so the -4 carried forward from Step 4 is
brought down unchanged.
6* The +5 is brought down unchanged.
Proof of statements
Positive powers?
243 + 27 + 3 =
Negative powers?
-81
-9
-1
273
-91
13 x 14 =
182
DIVISION OF STATEMENTS
This process brings another rule into play.
consider these two t e r m s , + 4 - 3 and +3, the statements for 54 and 27.
If these terms are added, the cancellation of unlike signs will leave +4, the
statement for 81. If they are subtracted* the sign representing 27 would be
changed. It would then be duplicated.
would cancel the +4 and leave +3, the statement for 27.
The rule in dividing power statements once more involves like and unlike signs, but with an extra specification added? like or unlike signs of
adjacent powers as in the case of the statement for
54.
adjacent powers in the dividend have unlike signs, the two powers must be
considered as a duplication of the lower power, both with the sign of the higher
power. This is a reversal of the rule for the additive process and is not unreasonable since division is a subtractive process.
Demonstration of division will be the reverse of the example given for
multiplication.
+2 +1 +0
Rewritten
Rewritten
+2 +1 +1 - 0
+5 - 4 +3 - 2 +1 - 0
+4 44 +3 - 2 +1 - 0
-4
-3 -2
+4 - 3 +2 +1 - 0
+3 +3 +2 +1 - 0
-3 _
-2 -1
-0
-3 -2 -1
2 -1 -0
+2 +1 +0
See Note 1
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
197
515
Notes:
1. In this case, ail the powers are both adjacent and unlike. The rule will
be applied only to the leading pair,
2. Rewritten giving the duplicated lower power the sign of the higher power.
3. The +2 in the divisor, when subtracted from the +4 in the dividend,
yields +2 for the quotient When the sign is changed for subtraction,
cancellation will result.
4. The duplicated -2 became -3 +2 and the +2 came down. Unlike signs
for 3 cancelled and the -3 brought forward came down. The unaffected +4 came down, making this another case of unlike signs for adjacent powers.
5. Rewritten as in Note 2.
6. The +2 in the divisor, when subtracted from the +3 in the remainder,
yields +1 for the quotient. When the sign is changed for subtraction,
cancellation will result.
7. Unlike signs cancel and +3 comes down with - 0 .
8. The +2 in the divisor, when subtracted from the +3 in the remainder,
yields +1 for the quotient. When the sign is changed for subtraction,
cancellation will result. The duplication of +1 in the quotient can be
cared for after completion of the division.
9. Unlike signs cancel, and unaffected terms come down.
10. The +2 in the divisor now encounters -2 in the remainder. Disregarding signs, the 2 from 2 yields 0 for the quotient. Adding -0 to
+2 will yield -2; when the sign is changed for subtraction, cancellation
will result.
The quotient reads +2 +1 +1 =0. There is duplication of +1. This is
changed to +2 - 1 . This change duplicates +2.
This is changed to +3 - 2 .
Now the corrected statement reads +3 -2 - 1 - 0 , the power statement for 14.
This is as far as I have investigated this curiosity with any success.
Perhaps someone else can find a way to extract roots and raise to higher
powers without simple multiplication. Decimal fractions can, of course, be
handled by appropriate multiplication by powers of 10, as can uneven divisions that result in significant remainders.
I apologize for using the expression "negative powers" when values involved are not reciprocals.
explanation.
is proposed herein.
We shall obtain aganeral Fibonacci sequence by taking any two integers,
a and b, and employing the relationship a + b c.
integers for indexing, with a = T
T
+-,
and b = T
<
+ T
n
n+1
T
n+2
(n = 0, 1, 2, 3, ) .
Thus, while any two successive terms of a general Fibonacci sequence are
sufficient to define the entire sequence, we should like to employ T 0 and Tj.
Hence, we have a unique representation of each general Fibonacci sequence,
i. e. ,
( T 0 , T i ) = T 0 , T l f T 2 , T 3 , T 4 ,
Attention is called to the fact that we do not require any two successive terms
to be relatively prime and employ the single restriction that T 0 be the s m a l lest non-negative term of the sequence.
Since we now have a unique representation of each general Fibonacci
sequence, one of the next logical steps would be to devise a method of ordering
516
Dec. 1970
517
T 2 j - T j T o - T20 = D .
From these few properties we should like to accomplish the desired ordering
of all general Fibonacci Sequences.
Utilizing the property that each sequence has a unique characteristic
number, D,
Where several
sequences have the same D, the size of T 0 becomes the second criterion.
With the restriction that successive terms of the sequence be relatively prime,
no doubt to eliminate multiples of a sequence, he suggests the following
convention:
(To.Tj)
D
1
5
11
19
29
31
41
55
(0,1)
(1,3)
(1,4),
(1,5),
(1,6),
(2,7),
(1,7),
(1,8),
(2,5)
(3,7)
(4,9)
(3,8)
(5,11)
(6,13)
and we have
S[ = ( 0 , 1 ) ,
SJ = (1,3),
SJ = (1,4),
SJ = ( 2 , 5 ) ,
SJ = (1,5),
S^ = (3,7),
S\ = (1,6),
SJ = (4,9),
SJ = (2,7),
S'u = (3,8), .
518
[Dec.
(To.
(0,1)
(0,2).
(1,3)
(0,3)
(1,4),
(0,4)
(1,5),
(2,6)
(0,5)
(1,6),
(2,7),
(0,6)
(1,7),
(2,8),
(3,9)
Tj)
(2,5)
(3,7)
(4,9)
(3,8)
(5,11)
(4,10)
1, 2, 3, 4, ) denoting the n
se-
Si' = (0,1),
Sjf = (0,2),
S^! = (1,3),
S'i = (0,3),
ST5 = (1,4),
S'6f = (2,5),
Si1 = (0,4),
Si1' = (1,5),
Sg = (3,7),
Si?0 = (2,6), .
= Si3 = (4,9)
D = 29
D = 41
1970]
519
eliminating one of the most desirable results we should like to have from a
system of ordering* For example? Given S23 and S ^
S23 smaller than the k
is the k
term of
term of sj 5 ?
or
(237,475) = Sff .
region,,
Hence, an ordering,
using D as an index, becomes unwieldy with larger values of D, the characteristic number of the sequence*
With the above limitation in mind, an alternate proposal for ordering is
presented herein* There is no noteworthy advantage claimed, other than the
convenience of obtaining S
(0,2)
(1,4)
(2,6)
(0,3)
(1,5)
.(2,7)
(0,4)
(1,6)
(2,8)
(0,5)
(1,7)
(2,9)
(3,23 + 1)
(3,23+2)
(j,2].+ 3)
(3,23+4)
(3,23 + 5)
9,
(3 = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, )
*See [5] and [6].
520
[Dec
2
5
9
14
20
27
4
8
13
19
26
7
12
18
25
11
17
24
16
23
22
There are several methods of associating the proper row and column of any
given integer in the above display of positive integers, thus each reader is
free to choose his own favorite scheme. Using the diagonal method of ordering, with S
denoting the n
sequence, we obtain
(237,475) = S 0
~" ^28411
2
4
8
14
22
32
44
5
6
9
15
23
33
45
10
11
12
16
24
34
46
17
18
19
20
25
35
47
26
27
28
29
30
36
48
37
38
39
40
41
42
49
1970]
521
Again, the reader is free to use any one of several well-known methods of
obtaining the row and column of a given integer, and we observe, with S
n
th
denoting the n
sequence of the ordering (n = 1, 2, 3, 4, )
Si070 = (??) = (32,78)
(237,475) = S ? = S5640T
Characteristic
The educational value in mathematics is higher to the perceptive individual than the manufacture of things and the mere solving of problems*
I would like to offer a different approach to the significance of the
Golden Ratio, It is for the purpose of making clear to the layman that beyond
the useful pursuit of mathematics for its own sake (which is not an end in itself) lies the deep philosophic content, and a content that constitutes a very
important ingredient of philosophy,,
Plato 1 s Divided Line and Euclid 1 s Golden Section bear identical ratios.
From Plato 1 s exposition, we derive much of the philosophic content,,
Let me begin by noting that the Creative Right Triangle of Pythagoras
(3, 4, 5) is itself created by the encompassing environment of three Right
Triangles whose perpendiculars bear the relation of 2 to 1. This type of right
triangle will be termed,
f!
Dec. 1970
523
S
Fig. 1 The Celestial Right Triangle
When the areas of the creative triangles reach our squared numbers,
the encompassing square is ten-thirds of them; that i s , if the area of the c r e ative triangle is 36, that square is 120. This indicates a series of Cosmic
squares in the progression of
10
120
403-1/3,
20
30
53-1/3,
163-1/3,
213-1/3,
270
480
563-1/3,
653-1/3,
83-1/3,
333-1/3,
750, etc.
45 , 80 , 125,
180 , 245,
etc,
The areas of the creative triangle are three-tenths of them, or, in the series
of 6, 24, 54, 96* 150, 216, etc., and therefore in the increasing progression
of 4, 9, 16, 25, etc.
524
[Dec.
volumes.
E
Line Lengths
DC = 1
DA = 0.5
AC = \ / 5 / 2
*AE
= ^ 1 . 1X
2
- V5-2
I ._
g-
__I
__,_
~ -^*s^--
2\/5 + 4
1
AE
D1
1
2
1
X]
_ _
__j
2\/5+4
XY
2
**DE
- *
1
2v^* + 4
9<*
2
1 +V5
-1
= a
=
DX = YC =
V^+3
DY = XC
-1
V5 + 1
XY
1_
- -3
V^ + 2
1970]
EH
and
525
GF,
which he
c a l l e d , "the I n t e l l i g i b l e , "
Line
Lengths
AC =
fi
2\/5 + 4
1?
(EG)
GH
EG
| X
GH
\/5 + 2
(EG)
AB = 1
G
EC = 0.5
G
(GH)
EG X GH
EG X GH
CF =
V5
H
EG
X
GH
(EG)
EG
(EG)
\fE + 3
2
EH =
f
\/5 + 1
E'
The Golden
Ratio
(EG) 2 =
ABFE
3^+ 7
GEG f G =
GHH ! G f
EEGG 1
\/5 + 2
3V5 + 7
GHHG
5V5 + 11
V5 + 1
\/5 + 3
EEHH 1 =
^5 + 3
%/5+ 1
\EH) 3 =
Cube of Intelligence;
V5 + 1
Cube of M a t h e m a t i c s
(GH)2
(GH)3
17V5 + 38
4V5+9
(EG) 3 =
4\/5 + 9
526
[Dec.
It may be observed in Fig. 3 that the cube of the "intelligible" is composed of eight p r i s m s , four only with variant volumes.
-1
4V5 + 9
2
(EG)2 X GH =
12V5 + 29
2
(GH)2 X EG =
21V5 + 47
(EG)3
One
Three
Three
1
=
17V5 + 38
Plato termed the line GH, "Mathematics. ff
(GH)3
One
This cube of the "intelligible" has eight positions upon the cube, with
one important feature that they all share in their construction the center
cube, the cube of "mathematics. "
These denominators each share numbers appearing in both the Fibonacci
and Lucas series.
The sum of these eight p r i s m s , that i s , the volume of the cube of the
"intelligible," is
-3
= 2V5 + 4 = V5 + 2
then
thus,
L
=
+ F V5
n
s
1970]
8V5 + 18
13V5 + 29
527
2lV5 + 47
(GH)3 = ~ A _
= a-*
+ 76
_____
___
_._?_^
V. E. H.
Glancing again at Fig 1, an illustration of the "birth" of the creative
triangle, youmayhave noted that the number 1234 is not divisible by "eleven."
See Fig* 4 and accompanying text.
But? suppose we observe these distances in order of rotation
they run as follows:
1243, . 1342,
2134,
2431, 4213,
We find
3421,
These quaternaries are divisible by 11, and the same holds good for
the remaining possible forty*
144 combinations*
The relative proportional areas in Fig* 5 are: - 1 , 4, 4, 6, 5,
or 1,
4, 4, 11. By rotating the triangle into its eight possible positions within the
square, we obtain 24 points which coincide exactly with the points of intersection of perpendicular and horizontal lines within the square of 60 x 60.
By plotting these points, we are provided with the center of the inscribed circle, at x = 0, y = 0; and by bisecting the triangle, we have the
point, x = 0, y = 15 shown in Fig. 5.
Upon making a plotted graph for each of the other triangular positions,
the plotted values of the triangle are merely a matter of sign and number
interchange. The inscribed circle will roll around the circumference of the
circumscribed circle 5 x 0.5 times.
contains the area of the smaller circle 2.5 x 2.5 times,, Area of triangle BDP
is 90. The area of triangle EOF is 20 and 5 / l l t h s .
11 to clear denominator, we have a total area of xx c 1080 = 11,880. Therefore, the 3,600 square units each enjoy an area of eleven.
Such circumferences increase in the arithmetical progression
3.6X/5 x IT.
Coefficients of\/5
11.30976
22.61952
33.92928
45.23904
56.5488
67.85856
Times Increased
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2*5
3,0
of
528
[Dec.
This illustration gives the numerical evidence at a glance. Any four numbers taken in their rotary position of sequence within the same circle are
divisible by eleven. These 48 numbers, out of a total of 144 possible combinations are unique in their divisibility by eleven. The remaining 96 are
not exactly divisible by eleven.
This chart is not intended to bear any idea of magic, but it does reveal analogies to known Law. The causation of this law is shown in the previous
pages. Philosophic research is just as rewarding as scientific research.
"Ominia numeris sita sunt. " (All things lie veiled in numbers.)
1970]
THE
529
A \ x = 30
= 30
x =0
y:
O
^X
'B
~x = 6
y = -18
AREAS
Quadrilaterals
APEF
4725
BDCE
765
Total of the six a r e a s i
Triangles
2475
POE
2475
FEE
PCO
COD
11,800
Inscribed Circumference
12 X \/5~ X TT
Increase
56.5488
18 X yjt)
X TT
Circumscribed Circumference
94.248
Factorsj
30 X y/5
4 x 6 x 11 x 17 x 21 x 0.001
= 94.248
X IT
225
1215
530
D e c . 1970
symmetry
4 and
5 and
11
13 and
29
17 and
38
21 and
47
34 and
76
55 and 123
89 and 199
89 and 398
233 and 521
1597 and 3571
ERRATA
P l e a s e m a k e the following c o r r e c t i o n s in "Sums Involving Fibonacci
N u m b e r s , " Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 92-98:
The f i r s t half of Eq. (3), line 3 , page 9 5 , should r e a d a s follows:
pT
- 2qT
n-1
1
p
+
q
r=0
P l e a s e m a k e the following c o r r e c t i o n s in "Identities Involving G e n e r a l i z e d Fibonacci N u m b e r s / 1 Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 66-72:
Jv,q)
= 2+
P a g e 67 P l e a s e c o r r e c t line 5 to r e a d :
,,
It i s a l s o e a s y to see that H = p F + q F 1 w h e r e F is the n
Fibonacci
n
n
nx
n
P a g e 69 P l e a s e change the l a s t p a r t of the l a s t sentence of page to read:. .
for the Fibonacci n u m b e r s we get in the g e n e r a l i z e d Fibonacci n u m b e r s the
identity: . . .
P a g e 71 P l e a s e c o r r e c t Eq. (26) to r e a d a s follows:
n
3
H
q>]
[<H!n - q ) + 3e(H2n
x; L-i
r=l
Define
= 4 u ( a u - 1)
A
u
B = 4 u < a u
and
&
= A,k ,
= A,k
and
BuBv
= B.k ,
In particular,
we shall, for the first time, finally settle the question, and prove that if one
solution of
^u(au l ) | v ( v 1) = - | M k 1)
exists for integral u, v, k, then an infinite number of other such solutions
also exist.
Theorem 1. If a. is an odd integer, then the suffixes are integers in
(2)
-f (a2q2+(2a-l)q+2)
aq+1
+ A
-l(a2q2+2aq-q) '
and
B
-(a2q2+(2a+l)q+2)
where q = 0 , 1 , 2 ,
Proofc
-f (a2q2+2aq+q)
aq+1 '
identities.
Theorem 2. If
(3)
m = a2q + 1,
532
[Dec.
and
w = (a(n2 + 1) - (n - 1) )/2a ,
then
A =A - + A = A -A
..,
n
n-1
m
w
w-1
(with Hq = 0, 1, 2, ) ,
then
B = B 1 + B
= B -B
-,
n
n-1
m
w
w-1
(with q = 0, 1, 2, ) ,
found solutions for the special case when a = 3 in (2), for the A sum, and
in (3).
We now discuss the paired products in the following:
A A = A.
u v
k
and
B B = B, ,
u v
k
1970]
533
K 2 = 8ap 2 + 8a + 1
(4)
= A. , the suffixes
then
k = (2p2 + l)(2p 3 + 2p 2 + 2p + l ) / a ,
u = (2p 2 + l)(2p 2 + 2p + l ) / a ,
(4.1)
and
i
v = (K + l ) / 2 a = (1 + (8ap 2 + 8a + l ) T ) / 2 a .
Proof.
= A. .
c o n g r u e n c e s a r e self-evident in (4.1).
T h e o r e m 4.
(5)
i s solvable in rational i n t e g e r s ,
in B B
= B. , the suffixes
then
k = (4p2 + 3)(4p 5 + 4p 4 + 5p 3 + 3p 2 + p ) / a ,
u = (4p2 + 3)(4p 4 + 4p 3 + 3p 2 + p ) / a ,
(5.1)
and
v = (K - l ) / 2 a = (1 + (8ap 2 + 8a + I) 2 ) / 2 a .
Proof.
evident.
E u l e r [ 2 ] p r o v e d that if
534
CERTAIN ARITHMETICAL P R O P E R T I E S O F | k ( a k 1)
[Dec.
y 2 - Ax 2 = B
(6)
x = (r - s ) / ( 2 ( A F ) ,
where
r
- An
= 1.
and
m,n
being
T h i s i s E u l e r s t h e o r e m in
changed notation.
T h e o r e m 5.
If a i s an odd p r i m e ,
(7)
Kt, P t
(t = 1, 2 , 3 , - . . )
'
u = (2P? + 1)(2P 2 + 2 P . + l ) / a ,
(7.1)
and
v = OK. + l ) / 2 a = (1 + (8aP 2 + 8a + l ) 2 ) / 2 a
1970]
w h e r e i = j + w(a - l ) a
ProoL
535
(w = 0S l g 2 , - e ) .
u, v, k
in
R[
w=0sl
= K
= K
2,
, -v^. + P
. ^.(Sa)2" ,
wa(a-l)+]
wa(a-l)+jx
, 1U. - P
, -.^-(Sa) 2 ,
wa(a~l)+j
wa(a-l)+jx
a 8 O
= 1 (mod a) ,
(mod a)
and
P. = P
, 1U. ,
j
wa(a~l)+j
In (7), it i s a l m o s t i m m e d i a t e that
1 < j < a(a - 1)
it i s evident that
K
/ - v ,. = K / 1 W , \ , ,
wa(a-l)+j
a(a-l)(w+s)+d
= K,
d
(mod a ) ,
and
P
, -v,. = P / 1W , \ , J =
wa(a-l)+j
a(a-l)(w+s)+d
PJ
N(mod
a)
536
[Dec.
0 (mod a)
and
4P 2 + 3 = 0 (mod a) ,
= B,
(w = 0, 1, 2, ) ,
and
1 < j < a(a - 1) .
We shall give one application in pentagonal numbers for infinite paired
products in (7-7.1).
In (7-7.1), let a - 3, then
K2
= 24P 2 + 25
and
m 2 = 24n2 + 1,
Pj = 1,
and
m = 5,
n = 1.
1970]
CERTAIN ARITHMETICAL P R O P E R T I E S O F | k ( a k + 1)
537
and
( 7 - (24)*)(5- ( 2 4 ) * ) 6 w + 3 = (K4 - P 4 ( 2 4 ) * ) ( 5 - (24)*) 6 w = K g w + 4 - P 6 w + 4 ( 2 4 ) * = s ,
so that
find
(r + s ) / 2 = K fi
(r + s ) / 2 = K fi
fi
+4
and
(r - s ) / 2 = P g
and (r - s ) / 2 = P
g.
+4,
In the s a m e way, we
Then combining t h e s e
re-
2.
4).
3,
H e n c e , if odd p r i m e p divides F 2 -
1?
stein**
proof.
* D m i t r i T h o r o , "Two Fibonacci C o n j e c t u r e s , " Fibonacci Q u a r t e r l y ,
1965, pp. 184-186.
** L e o n a r d Weinstein,
1966, p . 88.
Oct.
Feb.
ERRATA
P l e a s e m a k e the following c o r r e c t i o n s in ? Some R e s u l t s on Fibonacci
Q u a t e r n i o n s , " Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 201-210.
P a g e 201 The f i r s t displayed equation on the page should r e a d :
j2 = j2 = k 2 = _ 1 ? y = _ji = k ; j k = _ k j = i ; k i = _ i k = ^
P a g e 205 Change the b r a c k e t e d p a r t of Eq. (27) to r e a d :
[FrT0 + F2r(Q0 " 3k)l
P a g e 208 Change the f i r s t t e r m s of Eq. (74) to r e a d :
T
F
n+t n+r
FIBONACCI NUMBERS
AS PATHS OF A ROOK ON A CHESSBOARD
EDWARD T. FRANKEL
Schenectady, New York
10
15
21
28
36
10
20
35
56
84 120
15
35
21
28
(k) = WkMh-k)! = ( h h _ k )
Dec. 1970
539
(?)
(?)
G)|
CO CO
Fig. 2.
(?)
(?)
(?)
(?)
(?)
13
21
21
13
34
55
34
89
144 144
89
233 377
55
233 610
F i g . 3 Rook P a t h s L i m i t e d by R e s t r i c t i v e F e n c e s
The a r r a y begins with n u m b e r one in the top left corner*
Inasmuch a s the
[Dec.
540
F _L1 + F .
n+1
n
1 F
Fi
Fi
F0
F2
F3
F3
F2
F4
F5
F5
F4
F6
F7
F7
F6
F8
F9
F9
F8
10
Fn F
10
12
i2
FU
13 J
rook paths is F 2 , and the number of paths that are eliminated by the pattern of horizontal and vertical fences is
(?)
2n
* . (
\ -
+ F 2n-6 4
( s)
+F
Jt)
' . ( " % -
+
+F
2n-5
(S)
19701
OF A ROOK ON A CHESSBOARD
541
Number of unrestricted
rook paths from fence
to lower right corner
Ax B
Number of paths
eliminated by
fences
F2
F4
Fe
= 13
F8
= 34
F 1 0 = 89
ra
G)
ra
(t)
= 792
792
= 210
420
56
280
15
195
136
89
it)
to to
Fo
Subtotal
1912
(?) -
330
Fi =
F3 =
F5 =
(I)
168
F 7 = 21
(a
105
F 9 = 55
( ! ) -
262
( ! )
"
55
*
Subtotal
liminated paths
Ibonacci paths, F ^
910
2822
ft
610
3432
Solutions should
stamped
postcards.
B-196
n = (S)an
(l) a n-l
B-197
V2
s88
(n)a0
n = 0, 1, 2,
in terms of b , 8 , b A .
n
n5
' 0
n+2k
P 4 = 1,
such that
'
and P
Dec. 1970
B-198
543
Let c
in the expansion of
(-Xj + X 2 + X3 + . - + X n ) ( x 1 - X2 + X3 + + X n ) ( x 1 + X 2 - X 8 + + X n ) o e .
(x1 + x 2 +x 3 + + x n i - x n ) .
For example s ct = - 1 , c 2 = 2, c 3 = - 2 , c 4 = 8, and c 5 = 8B
c
l0
n+2
= nc ,- + 2(n + l)c ,
n+1
n
Show that
c = nc . + (-2) s,
n
n-1
and
lim (c /nl) = e
n *- oo n /
B-199
-2
B-200
n>1 ;
n> 1.
for k > 1.
B-201
llk <
6k+1
f 0 r k
in the Fib-
544
[Dec.
SOLUTIONS
DOUBLING NEED NOT BE TROUBLING
B-l 78
+ z
2n+2 - E ^ " V i
"
i=l
and
n
F
2n+3
2n
"F2i+
2n+1
i=l
Generalize.
Solution by Herta T. Freitag, Hollins, Virginia.
Our generalization states that for all positive integers n and for all
positive integers a
<
2 lF
" 2i + (a-3)
+ 2
= F
2n + a
i=l
The proof is by mathematical induction on n.
Relationship (1), for n = 1, claims that
F
- + 2F = F ^ ,
a-1
a
a+2
1970]
545
< 2)
Z ^S^a-S)
+2
\ = *2k+a
1=1
To see if
k+1
i=l
we recognizeon the basis of our assumption (2)that the left side of (3)
equals
2F
2k+a
2k+a-l
F ,
+ F~,
- and, hence,
2k+a+2
This completes our proof by the principle of mathematical induetione
The relationships stated in the problem now become special
ases of
Let Z
Z
to Z
4.
eso
b(2k) = b(k),
and b(2k + 1) =
a value of b(n) and that b(n + 1) > b(n) for all positive integers n.
Solution
Put
546
[Dec.
b(k)x]k-1
B(x) = J^
k=l
Then
00
2k-2
2k 1
k=l
00
00
b(k)
x2k_1 + 1 +
k=l
[b(k) * b(k + 1 ) ] x 2 k
k=l
B(x) = J ! (1 +
n=0
x2n
+ *2
?f
lated to the Stirling N u m b e r s / ' Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , Vol. 70 (1964), pp.
275-278; also: D. A. Lind, ffAn Extension of Stern 1 s Diatomic S e r i e s / ' Duke
Math. Journal, Vol. 36 (1969), pp. 53-60.
1970]
547
Outline
Every positive integer m is a value of b(n) since
m = b ( 2 m _ 1 + 1) .
This is easily established by mathematical induction using the definition of
b(n) and the fact that b(2 n ) = 1.
BUNNY PATHS?
B-180
Proposed by Reuben C. Drake, North Carolina A & T University, Greensboro, North Carolina.
Enumerate the paths in the Cartesian plane from (0,0) to (n,0) that
consist of directed line segments of the four following types:
|j
Type
Initial Point
T e r m i n a l Point
|1
II
III
IV
(k,0)
(k,0)
(k,l)
(k,l)
(k.l)
(k + 1,0)
(k + 1,1)
(k + 1,0)
Let
f0(n) denote the number of paths ending with segment of Type II, and fj(n)
the number ending with a segment of Type IV. Then we have
f0(n + 1) = f0(n) + fi(n) = f(n)
fi(n + 1) = f (0) + f(1) + + f(n) .
It follows that
n
f(n + 1) = f(n) + ^2 f(k) .
k=0
Put
548
F(x) = J2 f(n)xn .
n=0
Then
oo I
k=0
= 1 + xF(x) + jXFix)
so that
F(x) =
* ~ X
1 - 3x + x2
Since
CO
1 - 3x + x2
= I>2nX
n=0
F ^
and
f!(n) = F 1
F8 + + F 2 n _ 1 = F 2 n
[Dec.
1970]
549
AN INFINITE MATRIX
B-181
L e t m be a fixed i n t e g e r and l e t G - = 0,
&
-1
for n > 1.
, G2
, G.
Gi = 1,
*
G = G
n
- +G
n_i
n_2
i s the sequence of u p p e r
m-2
G 0 + G
m-2
m
(-Dm
m-2
(-Dm
G
m--2
>
(-D
= (G, 0 + G, )G , - (-1) G of
k-2
k n-k
n-2k
np
= F F N(mod Fp)
n p
and
L
np
= L L
n p
s L N(mod p)
n
^
550
[Dec.
Therefore,
- = 0 (mod p) and F
- = 0 (mod p)
and
= 1 (mod
s - 1 (mod p)
if
the c a s e
p = 5 being c l e a r .
F r o m I. D. R u g g l e s ,
s.
Let
s = p,
r-s
a p r i m e , and let
r = np
for an
Then
F , ^-v
= L F
+ x( - 1 ) P + 1 F / -v
(n+l)p
p np
(n-l)p
so t h a t
F>(n+l)p
^-n =
np
/ (n-l)p
t\
(Nm o d p^)
the c a s e p = 2 being c l e a r .
Similar-
l y , we obtain
L, , - v
(n+l)p
E L
np
+ L / - v v (mod p)
(n-l)p
^
Suppose F
F
= F F
/ (k+l)p
i^i\v,=
Suppose F
ikp
= F F
= F
- +F
., for all i n t e -
/ i(k-l)p
i\
= F .kF p
Then
F. k --1F p ( m o d p ^) .
Then
F/, t\
= F / f , - , - F.
s F , _ , - F - F. F
= F. - F N( m o dFp ) .
(k-l)p
(k+l)p
kp
k+1 p
k p
k-1 p
1970]
551
Therefore 5 the Fibonacci congruence relation is true for any prime p and
any integer n8 The Lucas congruence relation can be proved by an argument similar to that given above.
PALINDROME CUBES
B-183
b =
35
113
c =
48
113
31
97
120
32
65
65
33
34
65
34
145
145
35
73
102
36
61
65
37
37
70
38
181
181
39
41
50
40
101
101
VOLUME INDEX
ANDERSON, CHRISTINE.
ANDERSON, JEAN H. " S p i r a l s , C h e c k e r b o a r d s , P o l y o m i n o e s , and the F i b onacci S e q u e n c e , " Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 90-95.
ANDREWS, GEORGE E.
P = 3
D e c . 1970
BURNS, DANIEL W.
BUSCHMAN, R. G.
pp. 372-374.
VOLUME INDEX
Problem Proposed:
553
B-168,
Vol. 8,
No. 3 , p. 328;
VOLUME INDEX
554
[Dec.
Problem Proposed:
Arbitrary
1970]
VOLUME INDEX
555
F R I E T A G , HERTA T.
P r o b l e m s Solved: B - 1 6 0 , Vol. 8, No. 1, p. 107;
B - 1 6 1 , Vol. 8, No. 1, p. 108; B - 1 6 3 , Vol. 8, No. 1, p. 110; B - 1 6 4 ,
Vol. 8, No. 1, p. I l l ; B - 1 6 5 , Vol. 8 S No. 1, p. 112; B - 1 6 8 , Vol. 8,
No. 3, p. 328; B - 1 7 2 , Vol. 8, No. 4, p. 445; B - 1 7 3 , Vol. 8, No. 4,
p. 445; B - 1 7 4 , Vol. 8, No. 4 , p. 446; B - 1 7 5 , Vol. 8, No. 4 , p. 447;
B - 1 7 6 , Vol. 8, No. 4 , p. 448; B - 1 7 7 , Vol. 8, No. 4 , p. 448; B - 1 7 8 ,
Vol. 8, No. 5, p. 544.
GABAI, HYMAN.
31-38.
GIACCAI, G. J.
Straight-
Prob-
GRONEMEIJER, CARL.
G U I L L O T T E E , GUY A.
GUPTA, A. K. P r o b l e m s Solved:
Vol. 8, No. 3 , p. 333.
B-171,
HANSEN, RODNEY T.
pp. 83-87.
Problem
556
[Dec.
VOLUME INDEX
H-142;
Vol. 8,
No. 5,
p. 498;
Numbers,"
1970]
VOLUME INDEX
557
Prob-
Distinct
MADACHY, JOSEPH.
pp. 393-396.
MAIER, EUGENE A.
and
of
pp.
558
[Dec.
VOLUME INDEX
P E C K , C. B. A. P r o b l e m s Solved:
Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 328; B - 1 6 8 ,
No. 3 , p. 332; B - 1 7 1 , Vol. 8,
p. 392; B - 1 7 2 , Vol. 8, No. 4 ,
B - 1 7 4 , Vol. 8, No. 4 , p. 446;
Vol. 8, No. 4, p. 448; B - 1 7 7 ,
B-167,
Vol. 8,
No. 4 ,
p. 445;
B-176,
4-5
Problem
1970]
VOLUME INDEX
559
B-167,
Linear
STOLARSKY, KENNETH B. "Infinitely Many G e n e r a l i z a t i o n s of A b e l ' s P a r tial Summation I d e n t i t y , " Vol. 8, No. 4 , pp. 375-379.
SURYANARAYANA, D.
"A T h e o r e m Concerning Odd P e r f e c t N u m b e r s , "
Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 337-346 ( c o - a u t h o r , P e t e r H a g i s , J r . ) .
SWAMY, M. N. S. P r o b l e m s P r o p o s e d : H - 1 5 0 , Vol. 8, No. 4 , p. 391;
H - 1 5 5 , Vol. 8, No. 5 , p. 497. P r o b l e m s Solved: H - 1 5 0 , Vol. 8, No.
4 , p. 391; H - 1 5 5 , Vol. 8, No. 5, p. 497.
TRIGG, CHARLES W. P r o b l e m s Solved: B - 1 7 2 , Vol. 8, No. 4, p. 445;
B - 1 7 3 , Vol. 8, No. 4 , p. 445; B - 1 7 4 , Vol. 8, No. 4 , p. 446; B - 1 7 6 ,
Vol. 8, No. 4, p. 448; B - 1 7 7 , Vol. 8, No. 4 , p. 448.
UMANSKY, HARLAN L. " L e t t e r s to the E d i t o r , " Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 88-89
( c o - a u t h o r , David E. F e r g u s o n ) .
WALL, CHARLES R. P r o b l e m s P r o p o s e d : H - 1 4 3 , Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 277;
H - 1 4 9 , Vol. 8, No. 4 , p 0 390. P r o b l e m s Solved: H - 1 4 3 , Vol. 8, No.
3 , p. 279; H - 1 4 9 , Vol. 8, No. 3 , p. 390.
m
WEINSHENK, R. J. "On Solving C _ ) _ = C , 1 + C
+n
b y E x p a n s i o n s and
O p e r a t o r s , " Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 39-48 (co-author, V. E. Hoggatt, J r . ) .
WESSNER, JOHN. P r o b l e m s Solved: B - 1 6 7 , Vol. 8, No. 3 , p . 328; B - 1 7 0 ,
Vol. 8, No. 3 9 p. 332; B - 1 7 1 , Vol. 8, No. 3 , p . 334; B - 1 7 2 , Vol. 8,
No. 4 , p. 445; B - 1 7 4 , Vol. 8, No. 4 , p 9 446.
560
Dec. 1970
VOLUME INDEX
No. 1,
p. I l l ;
B-175,
Vol. 8,
p. 107;
B-172,
VoL 8,
No. 4 ,
Groups,"
H-140,
Vol. 8,
No. 1,
p . 112;
H-145,
Vol. 8,
No. 4 ,
p. 446;
B-177,
SUSTAINING MEMBERS
*H, L. A l d e r
V. V. A l d e r m a n
G. L. A l e x a n d e r s o n
R. H. Anglin
* Joseph Arkin
L. L. Badii
Don B a k e r
Col. R. S. B e a r d
B. C. B e l l a m y
Murray Berg
Leon B e r n s t e i n
* M a r j o r i e Bicknell
J . H. Biggs
J. J. Bohnert
M. B. B o i s e n , J r .
T. A. B r e n n a n
C A. B r i d g e r
Maxey Brooke
* B r o . A. B r o u s s e a u
* J . L. B r o w n , J r .
C. R. Burton
P. F. Byrd
N. S. C a m e r o n
L. C a r l i t z
P . B. C h a r l a n d
P. J. Cocussa
L e e Corbin
Nannette Cox
A. B. C u m m i n g s
D. E. Daykin
J . W. D e c e l i s
F r a n c i s DeKoven
J . E . Desmond
A. W. Dickinson
M. H. Diem
N. A. D r a i m
* Charter Members
D. C. Duncan
M. H. E a s t m a n
Merritt Elmore
Re S. E r l i e n
H. W. E v e s
R. A. F a i r b a i r n
A. J. F a u l c o n b r i d g e
H. H. F e r n s
D. C. F i e l d e r
E. T. F r a n k e l
C. L. G a r d n e r
G. H. Glabe
*H. W. Gould
Nicholas Grant
G. B. G r e e n e
G. A. Guillotte
B. H. Gundlach
V. C. H a r r i s
W. R. H a r r i s , J r .
*A. P . Hillman
M r . and M r s . B. H. H o e l t e r
*V. E. Hoggatt, J r .
*A. F . H o r a d a m
J . A . H . Hunter
D. F . Howells
F . R. J a c h i m
A. S. J a c k s o n
*Dov J a r d e n
J . H. J o r d a n
R. P . K e l i s k y
* Kenneth K l o s s
D. E. Knuth
* Sidney K r a v i t z
George Ledin, J r .
P . F. Lehman
Eugene Levine
* D . A. Lind
* C . T. Long
A. F . Lopez
F . W. Ludecke
J . S. Madachy
* J . A. Maxwell
* S i s t e r M a r y deSales McNabb
W. A. Morin
L u c i l e Morton
Stephen Nytch
R. Do 0 ? C o n n e l l
P . B. Onderdonk
F . J. O s s i a n d e r
Ann P a p e
R. J. P e g i s
J . W. P h i l l i p s
Alwin P o r t n e y
Mo M. Risueno
* D . W. Robinson
F . G. Rothwell
A. M. Routh
B. B. Sharpe
L. R. Shenton
J . A. Shumaker
D. C. Stone
M. N. S. Swamy
A. Sylwester
* D . E. T h o r o
H. L. Umansky
M. E. Waddill
* L . A. Walker
R. J . Weinshenk
R. A. White
R. E. Whitney
P . A. Willis
C h a r l e s Ziegenfus
NORWICH UNIVERSITY
Northfield, V e r m o n t