Speckman v. Pinnacle Financial Group, Incorporated Et Al - Document No. 10

Speckman v. Pinnacle Financial Group, Incorporated et al Doc.
10
Case 3:06-cv-01772-H-RBB Document 10 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 DAVID SPECKMAN, ) Civil No. 06cv1772 H(RBB)
)
12 Plaintiff, ) NOTICE AND ORDER FOR EARLY
) NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE
13 v. )
)
14 PINNACLE FINANCIAL GROUP )
INCORPORATED, a Minnesota )
15 corporation; T-MOBILE USA, )
INC., a Delaware corporation; )
16 DOES 1-50, inclusive, )
)
17 Defendants. )
)
18
19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an early neutral evaluation of your
20 case will be held on October 3, 2006, at 2:00 p.m. in the chambers
21 of United States Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks, United States
22 Courthouse, 940 Front Street, Room 1185, San Diego, California.
23 Pursuant to Rule 16.1(c) of the Local Rules of the United
24 States District Court for the Southern District of California, all
25 parties, claims adjusters for insured Defendants and non-lawyer
26 representatives with full and unlimited authority1 to enter into a
27
1
"Full authority to settle" means that the individuals at
28 the settlement conference be authorized to fully explore settlement
options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms
1 06cv1772 H(RBB)
Dockets.Justia.com
1 binding settlement, as well as the principal attorneys responsible

2 for the litigation, must be present and legally and factually
3 prepared to discuss and resolve the case. Corporate counsel shall
4 not appear on behalf of a corporation as the party representative
5 who has the authority to negotiate and enter into a settlement.
6 Failure to attend or obtain a proper excusal will be considered
7 grounds for sanctions. (Where the suit involves the United States
8 or one of its agencies, only counsel for the United States with
9 full settlement authority need appear.) (If Plaintiff is
10 incarcerated in a penal institution or other facility, the
11 Plaintiff's presence is not required and Plaintiff may participate
12 by telephone. In that case, defense counsel is to coordinate the
13 Plaintiff's appearance by telephone.)
14 Plaintiff's(s') counsel shall give notice of the early neutral
15 evaluation conference to all defendants filing an answer after the
16 date of this notice.
17 All conference discussions will be informal, off the record,
18 privileged and confidential. Absent good cause shown, if any
19 party, counsel or representative fails to promptly appear at the
20 settlement conference, fails to comply with the terms of this
21 Order, including the failure to timely provide the settlement
22 conference memoranda, is substantially unprepared to meaningfully
23
24 acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph
Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have
25 "unfettered discretion and authority" to change the settlement
position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int'l, Inc., 216 F.R.D.
26 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose of requiring a person
with unlimited settlement authority to attend the conference
27 includes that the person's view of the case may be altered during
the face-to-face conference. Pitman at 486. A limited or a sum
28 certain of authority is not adequate. Nick v. Morgan's Foods,
Inc., 270 F.3d 590 (8th Cir. 2001).
2 06cv1772 H(RBB)
1 participate in the settlement conference, or fails to participate

2 in good faith in the settlement conference, the settlement
3 conference may be vacated and sanctions may be imposed pursuant to
4 Rules 16(f) and 37(b)(2)(B), (C), and (D), Federal Rules of Civil
5 Procedure.
6 In the event the case does not settle at the early neutral
7 evaluation conference, the parties shall also be prepared to
8 discuss the following matters at the conclusion of the conference:
9 1. Any anticipated objections under Federal Rules of Civil
10 Procedure 26(a)(1)(E) to the initial disclosure provisions of
11 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A-D);
12 2. The scheduling of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26
13 (f) conference;
14 3. The date of initial disclosure and the date for lodging
15 the discovery plan following the Rule 26(f) conference; and
16 4. The scheduling of a case management conference pursuant to
17 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b).
18 The Court will issue an order following the early neutral
19 evaluation conference addressing these issues and setting dates as
20 appropriate.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3 06cv1772 H(RBB)
1 Questions regarding this case may be directed to the

2 magistrate judge's research attorney at (619) 557-3404.
3
4 Dated: September 11, 2006
5 RUBEN B. BROOKS
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7 cc: All Parties of Record
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
A Notice of Right to Consent to Trial Before a United States
27 Magistrate Judge is attached for your information.
28
K:\COMMON\BROOKS\CASES\SPECKMAN1772\ENENOT.WPD
revised 9/03 4 06cv1772 H(RBB)

1 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO TRIAL BY UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
3 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), you
are hereby notified that a United States Magistrate Judge of this
4 district may, upon the consent of all parties, conduct any or all
proceedings, including a jury or non-jury trial, and order the
5 entry of a final judgment. Consent forms are available in the
Clerk's office. Counsel for the Plaintiff shall be responsible for
6 obtaining the consent of all parties, should they desire to
consent.
7
You should be aware that your decision to consent or not to
8 consent is entirely voluntary and should be communicated solely to
the Clerk of the Court. Only if all parties consent will the
9 district judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been
assigned be informed of your decision.
10
Judgments of the United States Magistrate Judges are
11 appealable to the United States Court of Appeals in accordance with
this statute and the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure unless
12 the parties at the time of their consent to trial before a
magistrate judge agree upon review by the United States District
13 Court.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
K:\COMMON\BROOKS\CASES\SPECKMAN1772\ENENOT.WPD
revised 9/03 5 06cv1772 H(RBB)

Speckman v. Pinnacle Financial Group, Incorporated Et Al - Document No. 10

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Speckman v. Pinnacle Financial Group, Incorporated Et Al - Document No. 10

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Speckman v. Pinnacle Financial Group, Incorporated Et Al - Document No. 10

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Speckman v. Pinnacle Financial Group, Incorporated et al Doc.

1 binding settlement, as well as the principal attorneys responsible

1 participate in the settlement conference, or fails to participate

1 Questions regarding this case may be directed to the

revised 9/03 4 06cv1772 H(RBB)

1 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO TRIAL BY UNITED STATES

revised 9/03 5 06cv1772 H(RBB)

You might also like