Laporte District 315 E Boyd Boulevard, P.O. Box 429 Laporte, in 46350, 46352 Phone: (219) 362-6125 Fax: (219) 325-7516

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

LaPorte District

315 E Boyd Boulevard, P.O. Box 429


LaPorte, IN 46350, 46352

PHONE: (219) 362-6125


FAX: (219) 325-7516

Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., Governor


Michael B. Cline, Commissioner

January 18, 2012


INDOT LaPorte District would like to share some information concerning traffic signals - When they were first invented and how they play a part in
our world today.
ADVANTAGES OF SIGNALS
Signals offer the maximum degree of control at intersections - they relay messages of both what to do and what not to do. The primary function of
any traffic signal is to assign right-of-way by permitting conflicting streams of traffic to share the same intersection by means of time separation.
When properly timed, the traffic signal increases the traffic handling capacity of an intersection, and when installed under conditions which justify
its use, it is a valuable device for improving the safety and efficiency of both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. In particular, signals may reduce
certain types of accidents, most notably the angle (broadside) collision.
DISADVANTAGES OF SIGNALS
While many people realize that traffic signals can reduce the number of angle collisions at an intersection, few realize that signals can also cause an
increase in other types of accidents (it has been well documented that other types of accidents, notably rear-end collisions, usually increase when a
signal is installed).
Normally, traffic engineers are willing to trade off an increase in rear-end collisions for a decrease in the more severe angle accidents; however,
when there is no angle accident problem at an intersection, there is nothing to trade off and the installation of traffic signals can actually cause a
deterioration in the overall safety at the intersection. This situation sometimes prompts the remark, "You mean you won't do anything until
somebody gets killed!" What is not fully understood is that traffic signals are not a "cure-all" and that the primary goal of all traffic engineers is to
attain the safest and most efficient traffic flow feasible.
In addition to an increase in accident frequency, unjustified traffic signals can also cause excessive delay, disobedience of signals, and diversion of
traffic to inadequate alternate routes.
Traffic signals are much more costly than is commonly realized, even though they represent a sound public investment when justified. A modern
signal can cost taxpayers between $80,000 and $100,000 to install - depending on the complexity of the intersection and the characteristics of the
traffic using it. On top of this, there is a perpetual cost which is almost never considered - the cost of the electrical power consumed in operating a
signalized intersection 24 hours a day. This now averages about $1,400 per year.
UNJUSTIFIED SIGNALS
Because of the widespread belief that traffic signals offer the solution to all intersection traffic control and accident problems, a number of signals
have been installed nationwide where no legitimate operational warrant exists. Traffic records clearly show the attitudes and misunderstandings
which sometimes lead to unjustified installations should be resisted. It is important that the selection and use of this traffic control device be
preceded by a thorough study of traffic and roadway conditions and that the determination of the type of control and method of operation be
based on the study data.
Traffic signals should be used only where lesser forms of control have proven ineffective, since signals almost always create more "overall
intersection delay." In fact, minor movements may experience excessive delay, particularly if the signal is improperly timed. As a result, many
drivers switch to less desirable alternate routes or to residential streets to avoid the added delay.

CREDITS
This document is based on a booklet called "Are Traffic Signals Really a Cure-All?", published by the Arizona Department of Transportation.

www.in.gov/dot/
An Equal Opportunity Employer

AT A GLANCE:
Police Officer William L. Potts of Detroit, Michigan, decided to do something about the problem caused by
the ever increasing number of automobiles on the streets. What he had in mind was figuring out a way to
adapt railroad signals for street use. Potts used red, amber, and green railroad lights and about thirtyseven dollars worth of wire and electrical controls to make the worlds first 4-way three color traffic light.
It was installed in 1920 on the corner of Woodward and Michigan Avenues in Detroit. Within a year,
Detroit had installed a total of fifteen of the new automatic lights.

THE STORY
RELATED INFO
BOOKS
WEB SITES
DID YOU KNOW?

Invention: Traffic Light


Function: noun / traffic signal / stoplight
Definition: A road signal for directing vehicular traffic by means of colored lights, typically red for
stop, green for go, and yellow for proceed with caution.
Patent:

As a government employee Potts could not patent his invention.

Inventor: William L. Potts


Criteria: First practical. Modern prototype.
Birth: Unknown
Death: Unknown
Nationality: Unknown
Milestones:
1918 U.S.Patent # 1,251,666 issued January 1, to J.B. Hoge of Cleveland, OH
1919 U.S.Patent # 1,307,544 issued June 24, to Oscar A. Erdmann of Detroit, MI
1920 William Potts invents and installs a three color, four direction traffic light in Detroit, MI
1923 U.S.Patent # 1,475,024 issued November 20, 1923 to Garrett Morgan for traffic signal
ARYs: traffic light, traffic signal, stop light, William Potts, Garrett Morgan, J Hoge, Oscar Erdmann, history, invention, story, facts,
biography, inventor.

Story:
Even during the horse and buggy days, traffic in big cities was often heavy. Police officers had to be stationed full time directing traffic
at busy intersections.
The worlds first traffic light came into being before the automobile was in use, and traffic consisted only of pedestrians, buggies, and
wagons. Installed at an intersection in London in 1868, it was a revolving lantern with red and green signals. Red meant "stop" and
green meant "caution." The lantern, illuminated by gas, was turned by means of a lever at its base so that the appropriate light faced
traffic. On January 2, 1869, this crude traffic light exploded, injuring the policeman who was operating it.
With the coming of automobiles, the situation got even worse. Police Officer William L. Potts of Detroit, Michigan, decided to do
something about the problem. What he had in mind was figuring out a way to adapt railroad signals for street use. The railroads were
already utilizing automatic controls. But railroad traffic traveled along parallel lines. Street traffic traveled at right angles. Potts used
red, amber, and green railroad lights and about thirty-seven dollars worth of wire and electrical controls to make the worlds first 4-way
three color traffic light. It was installed in 1920 on the corner of Woodward and Michigan Avenues in Detroit. Within a year, Detroit had
installed a total of fifteen of the new automatic lights.
At about the same time, Garrett Morgan of Cleveland, Ohio realized the need to control the flow of traffic. A gifted inventor and
reportedly the first African American to own an automobile in Cleveland, Ohio, he invented the electric automatic traffic light. Though it
looked more like the semaphore signals you see at train crossings today.
Many others had obtained US Patents for Traffic Signals, some as early as 1918. But Morgan's Patent was purchased by General Electric
Corporation and provided the protection they needed to begin building a monopoly on traffic light manufacture.

Information from www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions.trafficlight.htm

We hope youll share this information with your co-workers and families.

Jim Pinkerton
On Behalf of the Staff of LaPorte District - INDOT

You might also like