Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 35 views

    WP Evaluation Questonaire

    Uploaded by

    Daniela Uţă
    This document contains an evaluation questionnaire for Work Package 1 of a project called LIMO. The questionnaire contains 9 sections evaluating the transnational meetings, efficiency of the coordinating team, partnership development, respect of the work plan, impact on the target group, obstacles encountered, learning satisfaction, transferability, and general impressions. Respondents are asked to rate various aspects on a scale of 1 to 5 and provide explanations to help evaluate the project's progress in the initial work package.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    WP Evaluation Questonaire

    Uploaded by

    Daniela Uţă
    35 views4 pages
    This document contains an evaluation questionnaire for Work Package 1 of a project called LIMO. The questionnaire contains 9 sections evaluating the transnational meetings, efficiency of the coordinating team, partnership development, respect of the work plan, impact on the target group, obstacles encountered, learning satisfaction, transferability, and general impressions. Respondents are asked to rate various aspects on a scale of 1 to 5 and provide explanations to help evaluate the project's progress in the initial work package.

    Original Description:

    Chestionar de evaluare proiect antreprenoriat

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains an evaluation questionnaire for Work Package 1 of a project called LIMO. The questionnaire contains 9 sections evaluating the transnational meetings, efficiency of the coordinating team, partnership development, respect of the work plan, impact on the target group, obstacles encountered, learning satisfaction, transferability, and general impressions. Respondents are asked to rate various aspects on a scale of 1 to 5 and provide explanations to help evaluate the project's progress in the initial work package.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    35 views4 pages

    WP Evaluation Questonaire

    Uploaded by

    Daniela Uţă
    This document contains an evaluation questionnaire for Work Package 1 of a project called LIMO. The questionnaire contains 9 sections evaluating the transnational meetings, efficiency of the coordinating team, partnership development, respect of the work plan, impact on the target group, obstacles encountered, learning satisfaction, transferability, and general impressions. Respondents are asked to rate various aspects on a scale of 1 to 5 and provide explanations to help evaluate the project's progress in the initial work package.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    ANNEX 7: Work Package Evaluation Questionnaire

    LIMO

    Evaluation Questionnaire-WP 1 :Project Preparation


    IMPORTANT: 1 is NO or absolutely disagree. 5 is YES or I completely agree
    1. TRANSNATIONAL MEETINGS
    Do you think that the collective working meetings have
    been frequent enough?

    YES

    NO

    Are you satisfied with the meetings?

    YES

    NO

    Please explain your answers, minimum 3 lines each.

    2. EFFICIENCY OF COORDINATING TEAM


    What do you think about the efficiency of the coordinating team and their
    administrative and technical skills?
    1
    2
    3

    Availability
    Attitude
    Time of reply
    Quality of reply
    Please explain your answers, minimum 4 lines.

    3. PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT
    3.1 Are you satisfied with the collaboration between the partners? Please write any
    remarks.
    1

    Please explain your answers, minimum 3 lines.

    3.2 Evaluation of the partnership organisation

    Quality of exchanges
    Time of reply
    Comprehension of mutual suggestions
    Please explain your answers, minimum 3 lines.

    4. RESPECT OF THE WORK PACKAGES AND WORK PLAN


    Has the work plan been respected?

    Please explain why.

    Have changes to the work-packages work plan been


    discussed and agreed by the partnership?
    Please explain why.

    Are the work-packages being effectively managed by the


    lead partners of each work-package?
    Please explain why.

    Are the skills and expertise of the project partnership


    being properly utilised to meet the objectives of the work
    package?

    Please explain why.

    5. IMPACT ON TARGET GROUP


    Do you believe that the needs of the target group were
    taken into account?
    Please explain why.

    Do you believe that the dissemination activities and


    exploitation plans were suitable to the needs of the target
    groups
    Please explain why.

    6. OBSTACLES - DIFFICULTIES
    Have you encountered any difficulties till now in this WP with the project? If yes, which were
    they and how have you worked them out?

    7. LEARNING SATISFACTION
    Did you find working in this project and sharing
    information with transnational partners an enjoyable and
    value added learning experience?
    Please explain why.

    Do you think that it could be improved? If yes, how?

    8. TRANSFERABILITY
    Do you feel that by using skills and knowledge acquired within this project you can extend to
    other learning objects and target groups? If yes, please explain.

    9. GENERAL IMPRESSIONS
    What do you think are the main strong points, weak points, opportunities and threats of the
    project?

    How do you think the development of this WP is helping to the success of the project?

    Any other suggestion for the improvement of the project?

    You might also like