The respondents filed a complaint against multiple parties including the petitioners and an insurance company. The complaint involved several causes of action relating to the inheritance of Antonio's estate by Ramon. Specifically, the respondents alleged that:
1) Ramon should be legally disinherited from Antonio's estate due to being accused of Antonio's death.
2) Ramon illegally transferred titles of Antonio's properties to his own name.
3) Ramon fraudulently misrepresented and used undue influence over the respondents to gain control of Antonio's assets.
4) Ramon illegally transferred Antonio's stock ownership in a company to his own name through forged documents.
5) Ramon executed an affidavit solely adjudicating Antonio
The respondents filed a complaint against multiple parties including the petitioners and an insurance company. The complaint involved several causes of action relating to the inheritance of Antonio's estate by Ramon. Specifically, the respondents alleged that:
1) Ramon should be legally disinherited from Antonio's estate due to being accused of Antonio's death.
2) Ramon illegally transferred titles of Antonio's properties to his own name.
3) Ramon fraudulently misrepresented and used undue influence over the respondents to gain control of Antonio's assets.
4) Ramon illegally transferred Antonio's stock ownership in a company to his own name through forged documents.
5) Ramon executed an affidavit solely adjudicating Antonio
The respondents filed a complaint against multiple parties including the petitioners and an insurance company. The complaint involved several causes of action relating to the inheritance of Antonio's estate by Ramon. Specifically, the respondents alleged that:
1) Ramon should be legally disinherited from Antonio's estate due to being accused of Antonio's death.
2) Ramon illegally transferred titles of Antonio's properties to his own name.
3) Ramon fraudulently misrepresented and used undue influence over the respondents to gain control of Antonio's assets.
4) Ramon illegally transferred Antonio's stock ownership in a company to his own name through forged documents.
5) Ramon executed an affidavit solely adjudicating Antonio
The respondents filed a complaint against multiple parties including the petitioners and an insurance company. The complaint involved several causes of action relating to the inheritance of Antonio's estate by Ramon. Specifically, the respondents alleged that:
1) Ramon should be legally disinherited from Antonio's estate due to being accused of Antonio's death.
2) Ramon illegally transferred titles of Antonio's properties to his own name.
3) Ramon fraudulently misrepresented and used undue influence over the respondents to gain control of Antonio's assets.
4) Ramon illegally transferred Antonio's stock ownership in a company to his own name through forged documents.
5) Ramon executed an affidavit solely adjudicating Antonio
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2
Facts:
the respondents filed a Complaint against the petitioners and Stronghold
Insurance Company, Global Business Bank, Inc. (formerly PhilBank), Elena Tiu Del Pilar, Asia Atlantic Resources Ventures, Inc., Registers of Deeds of Manila and Malabon, and all persons claiming rights or titles from Ramon Ching (Ramon) and his successors-in-interest. The Complaint, captioned as one for "Disinheritance, Declaration of Nullity of Agreement and Waiver, Affidavit of Extra-Judicial Settlement, Deed of Absolute Sale, Transfer Certificates of Title with Prayer for the Issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order and a Writ of Preliminary Injunction," which was raffled Branch 08 of the Regional Trial Court of Manila. Respondents causes of action stated in their complaint are as follows, to wit: As to the first cause of action, Respondent alleged that Ramon shall be legally disinherited and cannot claim any share from the inheritance considering that he is the accused in the criminal case filed against him for the death of his father Antonio; As to the second Cause of Action, Respondents alleged that Ramon had illegally transferred to his name the titles to the said properties. Further, there are two other parcels of land, cash and jewelries, plus properties in Hongkong, which were in Ramon's possession. As to the third Cause of Action, Ramon persuaded Mercedes which resulted to the surrendering of Global Business Bank, Inc. (Global Bank) Certificate of Time Deposit in the name of Antonio, and the certificates of title covering two condominium units in Binondo which were purchased by Antonio using his own money but which were registered in Ramon's name. Ramon also fraudulently misrepresented to Joseph, Jaime and Mercedes that they will promptly receive their complete shares, exclusive of the stocks in Po Wing Properties, Inc. (Po Wing), from the estate of Antonio. Exerting undue influence, Ramon had convinced them to execute an Agreement and a Waiver on August 20, 1996. As to the fourth Cause of Action, Antonios total capital stock, were illegally transferred by Ramon to his own name through a forged document of sale executed after Antonio died. Po Wing owns a ten-storey building in Binondo. As to the fifth Cause of Action, Ramon executed an Affidavit of Extra-Judicial Settlement of Estate adjudicating solely to himself Antonio's entire estate to the prejudice of the respondents.
As to the sixth Cause of Action, Ramon sold Antonio's two parcels of land in Navotas to co-defendant Asia Atlantic Business Ventures, Inc. Another parcel of land, which was part of Antonio's estate, was sold by Ramon to co-defendant Elena Tiu Del Pilar at an unreasonably low price. By reason of Ramon's lack of authority to dispose of any part of Antonio's estate, the conveyances are null and void ab initio.
