BIL

PUBLISHER

JOURNAL TITLE

YEAR
SUMMARY
ITERATIVE METHOD
-iterative methods provide wide choices of updating parameters, structural connectivity can be easily maintained and corrections suggested in the selected parameters
can be physically interpreted.
-Iterative methods either use eigendata or FRF data.
-Iterative methods are based on minimizing an objective function that is generally a nonlinear function of selected updating parameters.
- Quite often eigenvalues,eigenvectors or response data are used to construct the objective function
1
(Collins et al., 1974)
Statistical Identification of
1974
Objective:
Structures
-used the eigendata sensitivity for analytical model updating in an iterative
framework.
2
(Lin & Ewins, 1994)
Analytical
model
1994
Objective:
improvement using frequency
-used measured FRF data to update an analytical model
response functions
3
(Modak et al., 2002)
Comparative study of model
2002
Objective
updating
methods
using
-Comparison of response function method (RFM) and inverse
simulated experimental data
eigensensitivity method neglecting damping was done with an objective to
study the accuracy with which they predicted the corrections required in an
FE model
4
(Modak et al., 2000)
Model
updating
using
Objectiveconstrained optimization
proposed an updating method in which updating of undamped FE model was
done by imposing constraint on natural frequencies and mode shapes
Noted:
Most of the updating methods neglect the damping. So these methods can be
used up to the point of predicting the natural frequencies and real modes. But
these cannot be used for complex frequency response functions (FRFs) and
complex modes.
5

(Arora et al., 2009)

Finite
element
updating
with
identification

model
damping

2009

Objective:
-to propose a new procedure for damped model updating(considered on
damping) for better FRF matching based on application on damping
identification procedure with 2 steps : Mass and stiffness updated using Response Function Method
Damping matrix identified using updated mass and matrices method
-Result the damped FE model updating procedure predict accurately the
measured FRFs

(Mehrpouya et al., 2013)

FRF based joint dynamics

2013

Objective:

modeling and identification

(Mares et al., 2006)

Model Updating Using

2006

(Baaa et al., 2011)

A model updating approach

2011

-using two methods for joint identification which are inverse receptance
coupling (IRC) method & the point-mass model.
Results both model yielded close results in simulation & experiment
-But, IRC method have several advantages over point mass model
Its explicit closed-form solution (eliminates the necessity of
numerical solution in the point-mass model, which suffers from
repeatability.)
only requires two sets of measurements(pint mass model 3)
time taken (faster only take in seconds than hours)
Objective:
-to discuss about Markov-Chain Monte Carlo theory (MCMC) and
implementing it into model updating in the case of multiple sets of
experimental results by using frequency responses functions.
-using simulated 3 DOF to illustrate some aspect of the method
- assessment of the consequences of wrongly chosen updating
parameters, model structure errors, noise effects, observability of the
model errors through measurements locations and optimal frequency
measurement points for the minimisation of model errors is carried out.
Objective:
-addressed an updating algorithm to modify the numerical models by
using design points for unknown structural properties
-to minimize the error by updating uncertain parameters for each
mode and combine them to get an optimum solution
-formulate objective function as the difference between EMA and
analytical frequency and using optimisation method to identify
parameters that minimize the function
-using the algorithm that used by Zhang & Der Kiureghian to calculate
design point and being developed using three steps:
1. applying the calculation of the design point algorithm for each
mode
2. determining the modal participation factors (MPFs)
3. the calculation of the uncertain parameters by using design point
and MPFs
-the reliability analysis program, FERUM is updated for implicit limit
state function using ANSYS finite element program.

-the proposed algorithm gives better solutions for model updating

(Jensen et al., 2014)

Model reduction techniques

2014

Objective
-presented a strategy for integrating a class of model reduction into FE
model updating formulation in order to reduce computational cost involved
in the dynamic re-analyses of large scale linear models including localized
nonlinearities
-the implementation of the transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo method
in the framework of FE model updating using dynamic response data
NON ITERATIVE (DIRECT)
Although these methods are computationally cheaper and reproduce the measured modal data exactly, they violate structural connectivity and updated structural
matrices are difficult to interpret

Arora, V., Singh, S., & Kundra, T. (2009). Finite element model updating with damping identification. Journal of sound and vibration, 324(3), 1111-1123.
Baaa, H. B., Trker, T., & Bayraktar, A. (2011). A model updating approach based on design points for unknown structural parameters. Applied Mathematical Modelling,
35(12), 5872-5883.
Collins, J. D., Hart, G. C., Haselman, T. K., & Kennedy, B. (1974). Statistical Identification of Structures. AIAA Journal, 12(2), 185-190. doi: 10.2514/3.49190
Jensen, H., Millas, E., Kusanovic, D., & Papadimitriou, C. (2014). Model-reduction techniques for Bayesian finite element model updating using dynamic response data.
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 279, 301-324.
Lin, R. M., & Ewins, D. J. (1994). Analytical model improvement using frequency response functions. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 8(4), 437-458. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1994.1032
Mares, C., Dratz, B., Mottershead, J., & Friswell, M. (2006). Model updating using Bayesian estimation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Noise and
Vibration Engineering, ISMA2006, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Mehrpouya, M., Graham, E., & Park, S. S. (2013). FRF based joint dynamics modeling and identification. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 39(1), 265-279.
Modak, S. V., Kundra, T. K., & Nakra, B. C. (2000). Model updating using constrained optimization. Mechanics Research Communications, 27(5), 543-551. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-6413(00)00128-2
Modak, S. V., Kundra, T. K., & Nakra, B. C. (2002). Comparative study of model updating methods using simulated experimental data. Computers & Structures, 80(56),
437-447. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00017-2